5   
  • You are a true believer!! Go.....produce and fill the world. How I wish the next pregnancy are triplets or quadruplets because it seem you pay more... attention to manufacturing more children than valuing your job more

  • Yes, they can. And you cant just decide to stay home another year. Do you have Drs orders or a documented medical reason to be home during this... current pregnancy?
    Paid or unpaid Maternity leave (ML) is for after you give birth. You have 1 baby and 1 year of ML. Being pregnant does not equal ML. Go back to work until you deliver your next baby. Then you can go back out on ML.
    If you want to be a stay at home mom, quit and stay home. Stop taking up space on the roles and preventing your employers from filling the spot and getting work done.
    As others have stated, you should read your employee manual.
     more

    2

ULV to host Women in Business Summit


Marcella Camberos, MBA '10, EdD '22, founder of the Women in Business Summit, returns to ULV on March 21 to inspire the next generation of leaders. (Courtesy Marcella Camberos)

The Women in Business Summit will bring together leaders, students, and professionals at the University of La Verne for a daylong event focused on leadership, entrepreneurship, and emerging models in commerce. Founded and... led by alumna Marcella Camberos, MBA '10, EdD '22, the summit will feature keynote speakers, panel discussions, and breakout sessions highlighting a variety of career pathways.

Camberos, a first-generation Latina with more than 20 years of experience in human resources and career development, said the University of La Verne was a natural setting for the event. She earned both her master's and doctoral degrees at the university and has remained connected to its academic and community-oriented mission.

"The University of La Verne shaped me in every way," Camberos said. "It was a safe space where I was allowed to ask questions, and the faculty were accessible and invested in our growth."

Speakers and panelists at the March 21 summit at the Campus Center Ballroom represent a variety of industries, including brick-and-mortar businesses, e-commerce, hybrid business models, and technology-driven platforms. Sessions are designed to provide attendees with practical insight into entrepreneurship and career development.

"If you're going to come to this summit, you're going to see a variety of business models," Camberos said. "There's really something for everybody, whether you're a student, an emerging leader, or someone already running a business."

The event also highlights women of color in leadership roles, an intentional focus for Camberos. As a Hispanic-Serving Institution, ULV provides a context that aligns with the summit's emphasis on representation and access to leadership opportunities.

"I would have loved to see a successful Latina keynote speaker when I was a student," Camberos said. "This summit is about showing what's possible and making those pathways visible."

Camberos currently leads Velvet Anchor, a leadership development company focused on supporting women, particularly women of color, in building leadership skills and professional confidence. "Coming back to the University of La Verne feels like coming home," Camberos said. "It's meaningful to bring this event to the place that played such a big role in my journey."

Learn more about the Women in Business Summit.

Faculty, staff, and alumni are also eligible for a discounted ticket with the coupon code provided below.
 
more
3   
  • You’re responsible for finding a quiet location for an online interview. They may have dinged you for requesting to visit the office because it’s... their process, not yours. That’s would depend on the recruiter? As far as not being hired, you may have the latest & greatest opinion of yourself yes, but recruiting as well as interviewing is scientific. Thats why we make the big bucks. Do not be hard on yourself because for every hundred resumes I would receive as a sr headhunter, only 10 to 20 get phone interviews, 5 gets video interview & 2 will get a face to face with department managers.

    You need the same numbers when searching. Get those resume out there, network, and learn some head hunter tricks to improve your odds.

    Everyone is using AI today but it’s personality and problems resolution which teams need.

    Let me know if you have questions!
    You don’t get hired the think NEXT! No time to waste!
     more

    1
  • Kayta, the world is literally on fire. It’s hard enough to quiet the noise inside our heads let alone a neighbor. That you were able to continue your... interview despite the environment shows your commitment. These jobs need to cut the bs.  more

1   
  • Put up a "AT LUNCH" sign so everyone knows your at lunch. When your finished, clean up your desk and take down the sign.

    1
  • You can't do look at hr employee handbook. It could be interpreted your boss or company doesn't give breaks or lunches. Perhaps go to the designated... area to eat. The department of labor can come after the employer.  more

Survey finds Gen Z leaning heavily on parents to navigate challenging job market


ARLINGTON, Va. (7News) -- Driven by anxiety and frustration with a soft job market, Gen Z job seekers are relying on support from a source close to home: their parents.

According to a recent survey from the online platform ResumeTemplates.com, parental involvement in both the job search and early career path of the 18-to-23-year-olds polled is surprisingly high.

"I think they're trying to be... helpful, but unfortunately, it's a little too much in some cases," said Juliet Toothacre, Chief Career Strategist for ResumeTemplates.com.

In January, the company polled 1,000 Gen-Zers who'd searched for jobs within the past two years. Among the findings:

* 75% of Gen-Zers admitted a parent had submitted a job application for them

* 51% said a parent sat in on multiple job interviews.

* 67% said a parent had repeatedly spoken with a manager.

"The interviewing statistics that we got really blew me away, because I felt like it was a high number of parents that were way too involved in the interview process," Toothacre told 7News.

SEE ALSO | Family business ties to Wreaths Across America prompts questions from watchdog group

The survey also found Gen Z men were more likely than women to involve a parent in a career path decision or workplace activity.

A recent report from the National Association of Colleges and Employers found that more than half of employers rate the job market for this year's college seniors as either fair or poor, the highest levels since the pandemic year of 2020-21.

Uncertainty and anxiety in a weak job market may be driving the level of parental involvement, Toothacre said.

At last week's University of Maryland job fair, 85 different employers were on hand to meet face-to-face with the more than 3,000 students who'd registered to attend, according to a school spokesperson.

Ethan Fontenot, a senior majoring in economics, told 7News the job market is bleak.

"It's pretty difficult. I mean, that's why everyone's here, I guess," Fontenot said.

Fontenot said he's sent out hundreds of resumes weekly and has yet to find a promising lead.

"I had an interview the other week where I thought it was going be a real person, but it was just an AI chatbot talking to me," Fontenot said.

Alesya Kolosey, a University of Maryland senior majoring in English, said AI-driven algorithms have been scanning her résumés and discounting her experience.

"So, I get a lot of declining emails, a lot of people who don't even bother to reach out again," Kolosey said.

Allynn Powell, Director of the University of Maryland Career Center, said "people are hiring," but added, "what might be the case is they're hiring in smaller numbers."

"We want to equip parents and families holistically with information on how to support their students but really encourage students in their own development to figure out the tools, the steps, and kind of move in the direction of being autonomous as they go about that job search," Powell said with respect to the degree of parental involvement with this generation of job seekers.

Christina Mitchell, a Talent Acquisition Specialist for MedStar Health, said the company is looking to fill 700 jobs.

"I wouldn't necessarily apply for your child or call for your child, give them the independence to be able to do that themselves," Mitchell said, adding that she's personally experienced parents reaching out on behalf of their children.

Not every Gen Z job seeker is overly dependent on support from home.

Kolosey, the daughter of Ukrainian immigrants, said she has several friends whose parents send emails and resumes, parents who "are very involved in job searches."

Kolosey said she's had to navigate her job search on her own.

"I think being more independent, and kind of having a voice and talking to people is better because, when you're working a job, you're the one working there, not your parents," Kolosey said.

Graduate student Emma McNamara agreed. McNamara, a business management major as an undergraduate student, said she's gotten some help from her mom with networking but is otherwise conducting her own job search.

"I think we're hardworking. I think that we are dedicated and that we want to be innovative and really driven. That's how I would describe our generation," McNamara said.

"Gen Z is smart," Toothacre said. "I think they're more scrappy than people give them credit for and we have to allow them to do that. So, I really hope the parents that are listening, they just give their kids a little bit of space to do that."
 
more

Why Some Women Lift Others Up and Some Don't


Research links the Queen Bee dynamic to structural workplace pressures.

In many workplaces and professional communities, women often notice a contrast: Some women actively mentor, advocate for, and amplify other women's work. Others appear distant, competitive, or even dismissive toward female peers. While these experiences can feel personal, psychological research suggests that these patterns... are often shaped less by personality and more by the social and organisational environments in which women work.

Supportive networks among women -- through mentorship, sponsorship, and professional advocacy -- can play an important role in career development. Research shows that informal networking and relationship-building can significantly influence professional opportunities and advancement. However, these networks have historically been easier for men to access, which contributes to persistent gender gaps in promotion and visibility (Cullen & Perez-Truglia, 2023).

When women actively support one another by sharing information, recommending colleagues for opportunities, and amplifying achievements, they help counterbalance these structural disadvantages. These behaviours reflect what psychologists often describe as prosocial leadership -- using one's position or influence to help others succeed.

Supportive networks also benefit organisations. When colleagues mentor and advocate for one another, workplaces tend to experience stronger collaboration, greater trust, and better knowledge sharing.

At the same time, some women report encountering female colleagues who appear less supportive or more competitive toward other women. Researchers have explored this dynamic through what is sometimes called the Queen Bee phenomenon, in which some successful women distance themselves from other women in professional settings.

Research suggests that this behaviour may not reflect hostility toward other women but rather adaptation to competitive environments. In settings where women are underrepresented or where leadership opportunities are limited, individuals may feel pressure to emphasise their uniqueness or align with dominant workplace norms (Faniko, Ellemers, & Derks, 2016).

At the same time, gender bias can persist even in professions where women appear numerically well represented. Studies show that when people believe gender inequality has already been solved, they may overlook ongoing biases that continue to shape workplace dynamics (Begeny et al., 2020).

These contrasting experiences highlight an important psychological principle: Context shapes behaviour. When organisations foster inclusive cultures, mentorship structures, and fair opportunities for advancement, collaboration tends to grow naturally. When environments signal that opportunities are scarce or highly competitive, rivalry can increase.

The difference between women who lift others up and those who do not may therefore say less about individual character and more about the cultures and systems surrounding them. Understanding this shifts the conversation away from blaming individuals and toward examining how workplace structures shape professional relationships.
 
more
3   
  • Try to be patience may be there is reasons for that you just stay calm and positive every day no matter what comes on your way.

  • Try to be patience may be there is reasons for that you just stay calm and positive every day no matter what comes on your way.

Four things you should lie about in a job interview


A recruitment specialist - who has "been conducting interviews for years" - has outlined the four questions you should lie about in a job interview.

Taking to Reddit, the expert revealed that there are certain questions she feels are permissible to answer with a fib because being honest may have a negative effect on the interview process.

She went on to dub a job interview as less of an... "exhaustive exam" and more of a "negotiation", where the product the company is hoping to buy is your skills.

With that in mind, she encourages applicants to "have a few tricks" up their sleeves and lie about the following questions.

She advises hopefuls to lie about their previous salary, as human resources professionals are trying to find the most qualified person for the lowest cost to the company.

"During negotiations, if they pressure you to reveal your salary (which we will pressure you to do), don't give the real amount if you want a bigger raise," she shared.

She also encouraged applicants to lie about why they're looking for a new job.

"Don't tell us you didn't like your previous work environment," she instructed. "That makes you seem like a difficult person to recruiters and makes us think you might cause problems in this job.

"Instead, say you're looking for new professional challenges."

The recruitment expert added that one should lie about how their previous boss made them feel, otherwise you will be viewed as a "difficult person incapable of leadership".

"Look, I've worked with some real jerks in the office, and everyone knew it. But even though we all know tyrants exist in companies, don't tell anyone at another company that your old boss was one, because we're not from there."

Lastly, she advised applicants to lie about their goals five to ten years in order to seem like a better investment to the company.

"Although I also see myself running a farm with cows, I'm not going to tell people at the company," she hilariously shared.

"The company wants you there for a long time and they're thinking about the future with you.

She then compared the scenario to navigating relationships.

"It's like going on a date and saying you're afraid of commitment," she noted.

Social media users piled into the comments section to give their two cents on the controversial advice.

"Interviews aren't lie detectors, they're sales meetings so stop confessing and start marketing," one person wrote.

Another chimed in: "Literally treat all interviews as acting auditions and do/say whatever you think they'll like best until it gets down to the real details (pay, hours, etc)."

"God interviews are so exhausting. Like you need someone to do the job, I need a job to do, cool let's shake hands and see how it goes," one person penned.

Another added: "I learnt all this the hard way. Nobody told me anything. My honesty screwed me over so much. Companies want the best liars. Not the hard workers. At least in all my cases."
 
more
7   

The Secret Exams Women Conduct (That Men Don't Even Know They're Writing) - Sirimiri exams


Everyone talks about school exams, board exams, entrance exams, and competitive exams.

Adorable.

The real pressure begins when you start dating a woman.

Because, my friend, welcome to the most unpredictable exam of your life.

No syllabus. No timetable. No sample papers. And heavy negative marking.

Men walk around thinking life has only three major tests: school exams, college exams, and job... interviews.

Incorrect.

There is also the emotional exam.

Conducted daily. Without notice. Without mercy.

For example:

You say, "I'm five minutes away."

This is not information. This is an exam.

If you arrive in five minutes, pass. Ten minutes, borderline. Fifteen minutes, you clearly don't value her time, her feelings, or possibly humanity.

Then comes the legendary line:

"Do whatever you want."

This is a trap exam. There is only one correct answer. You will not know what it is. And "Okay, cool" is absolutely wrong.

Failing these leads directly to the oral exam (also known as The Discussion).

Duration: 2-3 business hours.

Next: the birthday exam.

We say, "Don't get me anything."

Sir. Please. This is an advanced-level exam with an internal assessment. We expect thought. Effort. Memory. Emotion. Possibly fairy lights. Maybe cake at midnight. A handwritten note will fetch extra credit.

Showing up empty-handed? Detained.

Then there's the memory exam.

We once mentioned we love lilies. Or hate raisins. Or had a bad day on 14th August 2018.

If you remember three years later, gold medal. If you forget, repeat the exam next semester.

And let's not ignore the scariest one: the mood exam.

We say, "I'm fine."

You must immediately understand we are not fine. This is telepathy-based testing. No calculator allowed.

But here's the plot twist.

These secret exams aren't actually evil. They're not about control. They're tiny quizzes on attention.

Did you listen? Did you notice? Do you care enough to remember the small stuff?

Because love isn't grand gestures every day.

It's passing the little exam, bringing her favourite chocolate, texting "Reached home?", remembering how she takes her chai.

Pass those? Congratulations.

You're not just clearing the exam. You're topping the class.

Everything else is just bonus marks.
 
more

The great job hug: Why South Africans are staying in their jobs, but quietly checking out


ManpowerGroup's new 2026 Global Talent Barometer has identified a powerful shift in worker behaviour: the rise of "job hugging". This global report reveals that employees are increasingly choosing safety over satisfaction, holding tightly to the security of their current job while quietly searching for something better.

According to the Global Talent Barometer, 64% of workers worldwide plan to... stay in their current roles, yet 60% are actively job hunting. Nearly one‑third (31%) expect possible job loss in the near future, creating a climate of caution, stress and silent disengagement.

Manpower South Africa says this behaviour is even more pronounced locally. 'In South Africa, people are clinging to their jobs not out of loyalty, but out of necessity,' says Lyndy Van Den Barselaar, Managing Director of Manpower South Africa. 'With unemployment above 32% and more than 8.4 million people struggling to find work, employees are understandably risk‑averse. They stay because they feel they cannot afford to leave, but that doesn't mean they're fulfilled, committed or engaged.'

Why job hugging is surging in South Africa

South Africa's labour market creates the perfect conditions for job hugging:

- Unemployment sits at 32.2% (Stats SA, Q2 2025)

- More than 8.4 million people are actively looking for work

- Youth unemployment remains above 45%

- Economic volatility and rising living costs make job moves feel risky

- Job creation is slow and competition for skilled roles is intense

In this environment, employees increasingly opt for security over satisfaction. Many remain in roles they have outgrown simply because the risk of unemployment feels greater than the discomfort of stagnation, a hallmark of job hugging behaviour.

Van Den Barselaar warns that this creates a dangerous illusion of stability. 'Employers may see low turnover and assume people are happy. But job hugging is not loyalty, its survival. And survival mode is not where innovation, creativity or leadership growth happens.'

How job hugging affects organisations

Job hugging has a measurable impact on organisational performance:

1. Innovation slows down - Employees who feel stuck rarely take risks or propose new ideas.

2. Leadership pipelines stall - High‑potential employees avoid internal moves because they fear instability, leaving succession plans underdeveloped.

3. Productivity quietly erodes - Job huggers stay physically but disengage mentally, a form of "silent stagnation".

4. Culture becomes risk‑averse - When people feel unsafe, they prioritise self‑preservation over collaboration and growth.

5. Future turnover spikes - Once economic conditions improve, job huggers often leave in waves, creating sudden talent gaps.

How to spot job hugging in your workforce

Manpower South Africa highlights several early indicators:

- Long tenure without progression

- Declining participation in development programmes

- Reduced willingness to take on stretch assignments

- A rise in "minimum effort" performance

- Employees expressing fear of change rather than ambition for growth

- Quiet job‑searching behaviour (e.g., browsing online recruitment platforms during breaks)

What executive and leadership teams can do to reduce job hugging

Van Den Barselaar says the solution is not to push people to move, but to create the psychological safety that makes movement feel possible.

1. Build a culture of internal mobility - Employees need to see clear, transparent pathways for growth inside the organisation.

2. Invest in skills development - When people feel capable, they feel confident enough to take on new roles.

3. Strengthen manager‑employee trust - Regular career conversations reduce fear and increase engagement.

4. Address burnout and workload pressure - A workforce in survival mode cannot innovate.

5. Communicate openly about organisational stability - Uncertainty fuels job hugging; clarity reduces it.

6. Reward contribution, not just tenure - This shifts the culture from "stay safe" to "grow boldly".

'Skills confidence is now the new currency of retention,' says Van Den Barselaar. 'When employees feel supported, developed and safe to take risks, job hugging disappears and genuine engagement returns.'

A workforce on pause and a warning for employers

Manpower South Africa says job hugging will remain a defining workforce trend into 2026. The real challenge for employers is not turnover. It's stagnation, as workers remain in their roles but disengage emotionally. To stay competitive, organisations will need to create the conditions that give employees the confidence to grow, move and contribute fully, rather than simply holding on out of fear.
 
more
1   
  • I was rejected many times for being overqualified for the job I was applying for.. my motivation was to work in a no brainer position and to enjoy... life. Their position was I might get bored more quickly as I can imagine and would quit the job.. I heard this argument at least five times. It’s annoying.  more

  • Having a skill set far beyond what is needed for the position. Not including internships. For ex: an employer may think the code writer that accepts... a data entry job, is a risk. Because they don't expect them to stay in the position long. Which translates to another vacancy and $$s needed for another hiring event.
    No, you shouldn't "dumb down".
    Is how you end up in an overqualified status.
     more

    3

The Résumé Is Not Broken. The Search Is.


Why finding the right job has never been harder -- and why the answer might not be a better filter, but a better imagination

There is a particular kind of despair that sets in around the fourth week of a serious job search. You have updated your LinkedIn headline three times. You have tailored your résumé to the point where it no longer feels like yours. You have applied to roles you were... overqualified for, underqualified for, and perfectly qualified for -- and heard back from almost none of them.

The frustrating part is not the silence. The frustrating part is the sneaking suspicion that the right job exists. You just can't find it.

The Matching Problem Is Older Than the Internet

For decades, the dominant theory of job searching was essentially a logistics problem: get your information in front of the right people. The newspaper classifieds gave way to Monster.com, which gave way to LinkedIn, which gave way to an ecosystem of platforms, aggregators, and ATS systems so complex that entire consultancies now exist to help candidates navigate them.

But more pipework has not solved the underlying problem. If anything, it has obscured it.

The core dysfunction is this: job seekers search within the boundaries of what they already know they are looking for. We type in our last job title. We filter by industry. We scan the first two pages of results and, finding nothing that resonates, conclude that the market is bad. What we have actually done is searched a very small corner of a very large space -- and called it thorough.

Hiring, viewed from the other side of the table, suffers from the mirror image of this problem. Recruiters write job descriptions that describe who they had last time, not who they need next. They filter resumes using keyword systems that reward people who know which words to use, not necessarily the people who can do the work. Both sides are searching for each other using maps drawn from memory.

The Vocabulary Problem No One Talks About

There is a concept in information retrieval called the vocabulary mismatch problem: the words a user uses to describe what they want are often not the words a database uses to describe what it has. In job search, this mismatch is catastrophic -- and deeply personal.

A solutions architect with six years of enterprise field experience might never think to search for "technical customer success" or "value engineering" or "AI solutions consultant" -- roles that would suit them precisely, roles that are actively hiring, roles that simply don't appear in the mental model they carry into a search box.

We are, in other words, limited not by what we are capable of, but by what we can imagine ourselves doing. And imagination -- particularly about one's own professional identity -- turns out to be a surprisingly narrow resource when you're under the pressure of an active search.

If You Want One Good Idea, You Need a Hundred

There is an old principle in creative problem-solving, attributed variously to Linus Pauling and Alex Osborn, that the way to have a good idea is to have many ideas. Quantity, counterintuitively, is how you find quality. You cannot edit your way to an insight you never generated in the first place.

Job searching has never had a version of this. There has been no mechanism for systematic idea generation at the top of the funnel -- no way to ask "what else might fit me?" and get a serious, considered answer back.

Large language models are not magic. But they do one thing with unusual power: they hold an enormous, associative map of human work -- its titles, its functions, its adjacencies, its history -- and they can traverse that map in ways that keyword search cannot.

Ask a language model to reason about a person's experience, and it will not return the ten most popular jobs with a matching keyword. It will reason about transferable patterns. It will surface roles the candidate never considered, roles that existed before they started searching, roles in adjacent industries where their particular combination of skills would be genuinely rare and valuable.

This is not personalization in the shallow sense -- showing you more of what you already clicked on. This is expansion. It is the difference between a search engine and a thinking partner

An Experiment Worth Watching

A new platform called kumiin.io is testing exactly this proposition. The premise is deceptively simple: rather than asking candidates to search, it asks them to be understood -- and then surfaces jobs they would not have found on their own.

The design philosophy is rooted in the "hundred ideas" principle. Most of what the platform surfaces won't be right. Some of it will seem strange. But somewhere in the noise is a signal -- a role, an industry, a function -- that the candidate had genuinely never considered, or had considered years ago and filed away. The platform's bet is that surfacing that possibility, even once, is worth the exercise.

It is early. But the underlying insight is sound: the bottleneck in job matching is not information volume. It is conceptual range.

What This Means for Talent Strategy

For HR leaders and talent acquisition professionals, the implications extend beyond the candidate experience. If the best hires are the ones who bring capabilities an organization didn't know it needed, then the hiring processes optimized entirely around job description matching are selecting against exactly those people.

The homogenizing pressure of keyword-based ATS systems, combined with candidates who search within narrow self-defined lanes, creates a market that looks efficient while missing enormous amounts of value on both sides.

Better matching is not just good for candidates. It is a competitive advantage for organizations willing to hire based on potential rather than precedent.

The Search Box Was Never the Answer

The job market does not have a data problem. It has a translation problem -- between what people can do and how work gets described; between who someone has been and who they might become; between the roles that exist and the imagination needed to find them.

The résumé is not broken. The search is. And for the first time, there is a tool capable of searching the way a great career advisor would -- broadly, associatively, and without the constraint of what you already know to ask for.

If you're building something solo, figuring it out as you go, or just want to say hi -- I'd love to hear from you. Find me at humiin.io
 
more

Rapid IT Resume Tailoring via summary adjustment and small tweaks & Submission


I am actively applying for Information Technology positions, specifically Product-management posts that sit at the intersection of AI and core platform work. For every job ad I forward, I need you to re-work the opening summary of my résumé so it mirrors the language, priorities, and KPIs in that listing -- always keeping AI Product Management and Technical Product Management front and center.... Once the résumé is updated and proof-read, you'll handle the actual submission through the employer's portal or the ATS link I provide, ensuring each field is populated correctly and confirming receipt. Your Project workflow will look like this: - Receive URLs for positions Total approximately: 30 URLs * Quick Analyze the new posting, extract must-have skills, metrics, and keywords. * Rewrite /Ok to use LLM to update the résumé summary (about 20-40 words) so it aligns with those requirements while highlighting my background in Agile delivery, data-driven market research, and stakeholder management where relevant. Examples will be provided. * Submit the revised version on my behalf and log the confirmation number, deadline, and any follow-up actions. - Goal is 1 or 2 page resumes based on best fit. - Goal is speed to submit to position with interest and applicable resume. A submission is considered complete when the résumé is uploaded without formatting errors, the tracking sheet is updated, and the system sends a confirmation email or screen-shot. Turnaround per posting is 24 hours or less. more

Benefit leaders face pay demands in restless 2026 market


* Key Insight: Discover how pay, career paths and flexibility jointly drive 2026 employee mobility.

* What's at Stake: Companies risk talent loss and competitive decline if rewards strategies remain static.

* Supporting Data: One in five employees plan to switch jobs; 42% are passively looking.

* Source: Bullets generated by AI with editorial review

Higher pay is the biggest driver pushing... employees to switch jobs in 2026, but employers say applicants' salary expectations are outpacing what they can offer.

A new report from Clarify Capital outlines some of the themes that are expected to dominate an active job market this year. One in five employees are planning to switch jobs, and 42% are passively looking for their next role.

"It's pretty telling that a possible threat of turnover is very real given the circumstances in the market," Michael Baynes, CEO and co-founder of Clarify Capital, said in an email response to questions. "Of course, the flip side of this is that 45% of HR leaders also say they're hiring."

Clarify Capital's report, which surveyed both employees and HR professionals, also highlighted the skills that employers are looking for: Customer support (23%), AI/machine learning (23%), and soft skills (22%).

Beyond pay, employees can still be swayed by competitive benefits, according to the report. When looking for a job, employees said that the top non-negotiable employee benefits are retirement (42%), remote/hybrid work options (39%) and flexible hours (37%).

Read more: The best HR teams of 2026

Baynes talked about these trends and more in a recent interview with Employee Benefit News. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

What role do training and career development benefits play in retention strategies?

Career development has clearly shifted from being a "nice to have" to being a "must have" in today's job market. When we looked at the data, we saw that 33% of job seekers say that training and career development benefits are non-negotiables. What really speaks volumes to employees eyeing their exit is that 41% say they're calling it quits on their employer mainly because they want better career development opportunities. So clearly it's more than money; it's about professional growth and not hitting your head on the ceiling.

What does your data tell you about the increasing significance of flexibility in total rewards?

Flexibility is no longer a want for workers -- it is a must have. Thirty-four percent of HR leaders say they've lost a top candidate due to a lack of remote work. Whether you're working with a hybrid model, remote opportunities or flexible hours, it all falls back onto the idea of flexibility, and it's a foundational piece of the total rewards package.

What is the role of career development in an employee's decision to stay or leave?

One thing that's imperative for today's workers is career stagnation. For 41% of employees, the grass is greener on the other side, since they're saying they have better opportunities for advancement elsewhere. Whether it involves a defined internal career path or external career paths, it is important for companies to clearly communicate these paths to employees within the organization.

How do small and midsize organizations compete with larger ones on employee benefits?

It can be difficult for small and midsize organizations to realistically compete with the salaries of larger corporations. Flexibility, career development and clearly defined career paths are the solution. It is about positioning themselves well against the larger corporation. The good news is 67% of HR leaders are confident they can find qualified talent.

What can be concluded about job security? Are people feeling more secure in their jobs, or is the fear of layoffs continuing to play a role?

Job security is a fickle thing in 2026. You have 64% of job seekers feeling confident they'll find something better. Meanwhile, more than one in four are actively looking for a new job because their job security feels fleeting. So while optimism is definitely there for their next job, so is that creeping feeling of uncertainty when it comes to job stability. When almost one in 10 HR leaders expect layoffs this year, it's hard to argue with anyone who feels their job security is hanging on by a thread.

What recommendations would you make to HR leaders to ensure their organizations remain competitive through 2026?

It is definitely time to reevaluate pay scales since the pressure doesn't show any signs of slowing down. Next, organizations need to define career paths since employees do not always understand how they are progressing. Then there is the issue of flexibility since organizations are losing talent due to remote work limitations. Finally, organizations need to streamline their recruitment process. Twenty-six percent of HR leaders say there are too many unqualified applicants.

If you had to pick just one defining trend that will shape the 2026 job market, what would it be and why?

If I had to nail it down to one, it would be intentional mobility. The days of casual browsing for a new job are declining, and people are actively considering pay, career paths, flexibility and security simultaneously. Companies that emphasize retention and actual employee growth and well-being just as much as recruitment will be the ones who survive. The companies that can successfully marry competitive pay, career paths and flexibility will be the ones that have the last laugh in 2026's talent war.
 
more

Privacy Policy | Jam Recruitment


JAM Recruitment Limited (JAM) will be what is known as the 'Controller' of the personal data you provide to us. JAM's registration number is 5052190 and our registered address is Cheadle Royal Business Park, Brooks Dr, Cheadle SK8 3TD.

JAM is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. This notice sets out the basis on which any personal data we collect from you, or that you provide us,... will be processed by us.

Who we are and what we do

We are a recruitment agency and recruitment business as defined in the Employment Agencies and Employment Business Regulations 2013. We collect personal data from the following types of people to allow us to undertake our business:

* Prospective and placed candidates for permanent and contract roles

* Prospective and live client contacts

* Supplier contacts to support our services

* Employees, consultants, temporary workers

Types of Data We Collect

In order to provide the best possible employment opportunities that are tailored to our candidates, we need to process certain information. We only ask for details that will genuinely help us to help candidates find a new role, such as name, contact details, education details, employment history and immigration status (and other relevant information you may choose to share).

Where appropriate, and in accordance with local laws and requirements, we may also collect information related to diversity, security clearance status or details of any criminal convictions.

If you are a JAM client, we need to collect and use information about you, or individuals at your organisation, in the course of providing you with our recruitment services. This can include finding candidates to fill your roles, providing you with Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO) services or notifying you of content published by JAM which may be relevant to you.

JAM will also store information relating to previous dealings with us, including job applications, email and telephone communications, job interviews and placements.

We collect a limited amount of data from the users of our website which we use to help us to improve your experience when using our website and to help us manage the services we provide. This includes information such as how you use our website, the most popular referrers and website responsiveness. You can read more about this in our Cookies Policy.

Where we obtain your information

We may obtain candidate information from any number of locations:

* When you register with our website or apply for jobs via our website

* When you correspond with us by phone, email or otherwise

* When you visit our website

* When you register your CV on a job board and it matches the skills we're looking for

* When you apply for one of our jobs via a job board

* When you are referred by a friend / colleague

* Your online profiles

* When we obtain your information from external sources such as LinkedIn, corporate websites and job boards we will inform you, by sending you this privacy notice, within a maximum of 30 days of collecting the data of the fact we hold personal data about you, the source the personal data originates from, and for what purpose we intend to retain and process your personal data.

There are two main ways in which we collect client data:

* Directly from you

* From third parties such as candidates, online job boards, LinkedIn and networking.

Data Retention

We will delete candidate personal data from our systems if we have not had any meaningful contact with you for seven years (or for such longer period as we believe, in good faith, that the law or relevant regulators require us to preserve your data). After this period, it is likely your data will no longer be relevant for the purposes for which it was collected.

We will consider there to be meaningful contact with you if you submit your updated CV onto our website, apply for jobs with us or we receive an updated CV from a job board. We will also consider it meaningful contact if you communicate with us about potential roles, either by verbal or written communication or engage with any of our marketing communications.

Under new data protection regulations (GDPR), we are required to keep the data we hold accurate and, where necessary, up to date. As such, we will make an effort to regularly communicate with you to ensure your data is up to date and accurate.

Whilst we will endeavour to permanently erase your personal data once it reaches the end of its retention period or where we receive a valid request from you to do so, some of your data may still exist within an archive system. While certain details may still exist on an archive system, this cannot be readily accessed by any of our operational systems, processes or staff.

For a list of all data categories and retention periods, please contact data@jamrecruitment.co.uk

Legal Basis for Processing

Our legal basis for the processing of personal data is our legitimate business interests, described in more detail below, although we will also rely on contract, legal obligation and consent for specific uses of data.

We will rely on contract if we are negotiating or have entered into a placement agreement with you or your organisation or any other contract to provide services to you or receive services from you or your organisation.

We will rely on legal obligation if we are legally required to hold information on to you to fulfil our legal obligations.

We will, in some circumstances, rely on consent for particular uses of your data and you will be asked for your express consent, if legally required. Examples of when consent may be the lawful basis for processing include permission to introduce you to a client (if you are a candidate).

Legitimate Interests

Here at JAM, we take your privacy seriously and will only use your personal information to administer your account and to provide you with our recruitment services.

We think it's reasonable to expect that, if you are looking for employment or have posted your professional CV information on a job board or professional networking site, you are happy for us to collect and otherwise use your personal data to provide our recruitment services to you, share that information with prospective employers (with your consent) and assess your skills against our live vacancies. During the job offer process, your potential employer may also want to confirm your references, qualifications and criminal record, to the extent that this is appropriate and in accordance with the law. We need to do these things so that we can help you find the job you deserve.

We want to provide you with tailored job alerts to help you on your job hunt. We therefore think it's reasonable for us to process your data to make sure that we send you the most appropriate jobs.

We may also need to use your data for our internal administrative activities, like payroll and invoicing where relevant.

Data Storage and Processing

All of the personal data we hold about you will be processed by our staff in the United Kingdom, and accessed by our cloud-based CRM system, Bullhorn (UK data centre). We take all reasonable steps to ensure that your personal data is processed securely and prevent unauthorised access to, and misuse of your personal data. For more information, please see our security policy.

Where we have given you (or where you have chosen) a password which enables you to access certain parts of our site, you are responsible for keeping this password confidential. We ask you not to share a password with anyone.

Who do we share your data with?

As required under GDPR, we will only share your information to prospective employers with your express consent.

Unless you specify otherwise, we may also share your information with associated third parties such as our service providers where we feel this will help us to provide you with the best possible service and we have the appropriate processing agreement in place.

Data Subject Access Requests

You may ask us to confirm what information we hold about you at any time, and request us to modify, update or delete such information. If you wish to access your data at any time, there will be no administration charge (unless the request is excessive) and the request should be fulfilled within 30 days. To make such a request, please email data@jamrecruitment.co.uk

Marketing Consent

From time to time we would like to send you details of reports, promotions, offers, networking and client events and general information about the industry sectors which we think might be of interest to you. If you consent to us contacting you for marketing purposes, please click here to provide your confirmation.

Changes to our privacy notice

Any changes we make to our privacy notice in the future will be posted on this page and, where appropriate, notified to you by email. Please check back frequently to see any updates or changes to our privacy notice.

Contact

Questions, comments or requests regarding this privacy notice are welcomed and should be addressed to data@jamrecruitment.co.uk
 
more

How to Deal with Interview Anxiety


How to Deal with Interview Anxiety: Proven Strategies to Stay Calm and Confident

Interview anxiety is something almost everyone experiences at some point. Whether you're a recent graduate preparing for your first role or a seasoned professional aiming for a promotion, the pressure of performing well can feel overwhelming. The good news? Interview anxiety is manageable, and with the right... strategies, you can turn nervous energy into confidence.

In this guide, you'll learn why interview anxiety happens, how to overcome it, and practical techniques to stay calm before, during, and after a job interview.

Interview anxiety is the stress, fear, or nervousness you feel before or during a job interview. It may show up as:

These reactions are part of your body's natural "fight-or-flight" response. The key isn't eliminating anxiety entirely; it's learning how to manage it effectively.

Understanding the root cause helps you control it. Common reasons include:

Recognising your triggers allows you to address them directly rather than letting them control you.

Preparation builds confidence. Research the company, understand the role, and practice answering common interview questions.

Focus on:

When you know your material, your nerves naturally decrease.

When answering experience-based questions, follow a clear structure:

This prevents rambling and reduces the chance of "blanking out."

If anxiety spikes before or during the interview, try this:

Repeat a few times. This signals your body to calm down and lowers your heart rate quickly.

Instead of thinking:"I'm so nervous."

Tell yourself:"I'm excited about this opportunity."

Your body responds similarly to both emotions. This mental shift can instantly improve confidence.

Remember, interviews are conversations, not interrogations.

Prepare 2-3 thoughtful questions such as:

This shifts focus from being judged to having a professional discussion.

Even experienced professionals feel nervous before interviews. A small amount of anxiety can actually improve focus and performance.

You don't need to feel perfectly calm, just composed enough to communicate clearly.

Online interviews can add extra stress. To reduce anxiety:

Preparation eliminates avoidable stress.

If you're struggling with how to deal with interview anxiety, remember this:

Interview anxiety doesn't mean you're incapable, it means the opportunity matters to you.
 
more

How much are Americans lying on resumes? Here's what the data says - The Times of India


The modern résumé is no longer a summary of one's working life. It is a performance document, sharpened, optimised and, sometimes, subtly bent. In a hiring market defined by algorithms, applicant tracking systems and vanishing attention spans, the line between "polishing" and misrepresentation is increasingly thin. The question is no longer whether people embellish. It is how often, and why.A new... national survey by hiring platform Monster, titled the Credibility Gap Report, attempts to quantify what many recruiters have long suspected: honesty on résumés is more elastic than we like to admit.Monster surveyed more than 1,000 US job seekers. Thirteen per cent acknowledged that they had recently lied or included misleading information on their résumé. That figure alone is striking. But the deeper story lies in perception.According to the report:The numbers reveal a trust imbalance. Many candidates assume background checks are selective and inconsistent. That belief, Monster suggests, creates what it calls a "credibility gap," a space where job seekers feel emboldened to stretch facts because they expect scrutiny to be partial at best.This is not necessarily a story of grand deception. It is a story of rationalisation. When verification feels sporadic, candidates may inflate a title, smooth over a three-month gap, extend a contract by a few weeks, or elevate a working familiarity with a software tool into "proficiency." The risk, in their minds, appears calculated.Among those who admitted to misleading information, the most commonly adjusted elements were not degrees from imaginary universities or invented employers. They were details that feel, at first glance, negotiable:These are not usually outright fabrications. More often, they are expansions, stretching timelines, broadening scope, or rounding up results. A "team member" becomes a "team lead." A contributor to a project becomes the driver of it. A campaign that improved performance "significantly" gains a precise, and sometimes unverifiable, percentage increase.In an economy that rewards confidence and punishes hesitation, the temptation to self-amplify can feel less like dishonesty and more like survival.One anxiety hovering over recruitment today is artificial intelligence. Are machines writing our résumés for us? The data suggests caution in that assumption.Monster's research shows that 61% of job seekers say they do not use AI tools at all for résumé writing or editing. Among those who do, AI functions largely as a refinement tool:AI, in this context, is less a fabricator and more a copy editor. It smooths language, aligns phrasing with job descriptions and ensures keywords are present. Yet even here lies a subtle tension: when optimisation becomes over-optimisation, authenticity can erode.A résumé that perfectly mirrors a job description may pass an algorithmic filter, but it also risks signalling generic tailoring rather than lived expertise.The same credibility tension appears in professional branding.Monster found that 76% of job seekers believe a polished LinkedIn headshot is important (59% moderately important, 17% extremely important). Yet behaviour lags belief:Presentation matters, at least in theory. But the gap between aspiration and action persists. It suggests that while job seekers value polish, they do not always invest in it. Instead, energy may be diverted to résumé optimisation, where stakes feel higher and more immediate.Behind these statistics lies a structural reality. Many hiring processes are opaque. Candidates submit dozens, sometimes hundreds, of applications into digital voids. Rejections are automated. Feedback is rare. Roles are competitive.In such an environment, small enhancements can feel justified. A title upgrade might secure an interview. A more assertive metric might push an application past an applicant tracking system. When the cost of invisibility is high, the moral calculus shifts.But there is a countervailing force: verification often intensifies later in the hiring process. Employers may conduct selective checks once a candidate reaches advanced stages, particularly for roles involving compliance, seniority, or technical expertise. The assumption that "nobody checks" is, at best, partially true. Selective verification does not mean absent verification.The deeper issue is not simply whether candidates get caught. It is what credibility means in a professional life that can span decades.Inflated skills can unravel quickly during technical interviews. Exaggerated metrics can collapse under probing questions. Misstated dates may surface during background checks. Even when discrepancies go unnoticed initially, they create vulnerability, a weak seam that can split open under stress.Monster's findings point toward a truth: credibility itself is becoming a competitive advantage.In markets saturated with polished narratives, clarity and specificity stand out. Employers increasingly look for candidates who can explain not just what they did, but how they did it, who can walk through results, describe trade-offs and articulate failures as well as wins.That level of detail is difficult to fake.How to stand out without crossing the lineThe data suggests an alternative strategy to embellishment:The Credibility Gap Report ultimately reflects a hiring ecosystem built on selective trust. Candidates assume checks are inconsistent; some respond by stretching the truth. Employers assume exaggeration is common; some respond by increasing scrutiny.In that spiral, the most sustainable differentiator may be believability. The strongest candidates are not always the most embellished. They are the most coherent, their stories align across résumé, interview and reference checks. In a labour market shaped by algorithms and accelerated screening, that coherence may prove more powerful than any inflated bullet point.The résumé, after all, is a promise. And in the long run, promises are harder to maintain than polished lines of text. more