Rita Morton


Career development 1d
Hello! We’re a small travel agency with a close team of women. Recently, a young guy was hired as a sales manager. But he has no basic knowledge, he doesn’t even know where China or South America are. I don’t understand how he’s going to sell tours to clients.
The owner thinks he’ll learn and do fine. But maybe he doesn't realize how little he knows? Should I tell the owner or stay out of it? I’m... worried we could lose customers because of him. Thanks

 more
2   

  • Ziba Clayton

    4h

    I see he should be the one to start building capacity and make him get know all the areas of their interest

  • OCHIENG STOCK

    6h

    Are you the boss or you report to him? remember the staff performance stand to be appraised/evaluated whether he measures the job specs interns of set... goals so do not pretend to look good for yourself and not for the organization.  more

Load more...

Jessica Miller


Career development 3d
I just got back from a job interview and have mixed feelings. They kept trying to confuse me and make me feel bad. At the start, they asked me to tell them about myself. I began talking about my duties at my last job, but they said they didn’t want memorized answers, they wanted real achievements.
Then they asked if I had taken a certain test. I said no (I’d never even heard of it) and they told... me that meant I failed it and got the lowest score. At the end the HR person said they had wasted their time talking to me and that their time is valuable.
Is this how interviews are done now to test how well people handle stress?

 more

  • Steward Tony Pacheco

    15h

    As an HR professional myself, I have issues with your explanation of how this interview went. From what you have written and what I have interpreted,... you missed the point of the interview. As a professional, you should leave your feelings with your feelings and lean on facts as well as sharing those facts with a business mindset.
    They did not try to confuse you as you were already confused. By what, I do not know. Maybe attempting to figure out your interviewer instead of focusing on what is being asked of you. Don't worry, many do the same which if not realized quickly, can cause undue anxiety because the process of the interviewer's questioning does not match the visuals you have already, without reason, placed in your minds eye. Now you're stuck in that cycle of confusion. 
    You are not the first candidate to their rodeo, so the interviewer went through the motions, by the numbers and determined the result. My advice to you is learn from it and move forward. Finding work is a full time job in itself, but launching a career is life absorbing. When you fall, fall forward, get up and move out! leave the tears on the ground behind you.     more

  • Ed Lechner

    1d

    Why do you have mixed feelings? Personally, if it were me, I'd say I had all bad feelings.

Load more...

Anonymous member


Career development 2d
Hi, I need some advice about hygiene at work. In our office WC there is liquid soap, but since many companies share the floor, it keeps disappearing- someone is taking it. I suggested bringing our own soap but that’s not very convenient. I also asked my boss to put a soap dispenser on the wall so no one can take it, but he said no.
This week, about half of our team got a stomach virus and I think... the reason is simple - people aren’t washing their hands.
How can we fix this problem? How is it done at your workplace? Thanks!

 more
1   

  • Steward Tony Pacheco

    15h


    Just bring your own soap. The owner is already being inconvenienced by an employed kleptomaniac.
    Sharing soap dispensers is also a contaminated hub... when used by multiple end users. Even hand sanitisers have been proven to have the opposite effect on body parts washed. Many carcinogens in their formulations​.

    Your boss is not responsible for your hygiene nor is he/she not aware of property being stolen. the price of doing business. Perp will be fired for integrity issues once caught in the act.     more

    1

  • Anthony Lawton Sr

    1d

    I think you should buy a personal small pocket size bottle of sanitizer. Save yourself and perhaps others also.

    1
Load more...

Career development

 18h

I Built 26 AI Career Tools for Claude Code -- Here's What I Learned


Job hunting is a second full-time job. And if you're a developer, it's a particularly strange one -- because you spend your days building tools that make other people's work easier, and then you go home and manually tailor your resume for the fifteenth time this month.

I got tired of it. So I built something.

placed-skills is a collection of 26 AI career tools that live inside Claude Code and... Cursor. Resume builder, ATS checker, interview coach, salary negotiation, job tracker -- all in your terminal, all accessible through natural language.

The existing tools aren't bad. But they all have the same problem: they live in the browser. When you're in the middle of a job search, you're constantly context-switching. Five context switches for one task. Multiply that by every resume tweak, every interview prep session, every application you want to track.

I wanted something that lived where I already was.

Claude Code has a skills system. You put a SKILL.md file in , and Claude activates it automatically when you describe relevant tasks. No slash commands. No configuration. It just works.

The MCP angle came later. By packaging the same tools as an MCP server, I could reach Cursor users, Cline users, Continue.dev users, Zed users, Windsurf users -- anyone with an MCP-compatible client.

26 tools across 5 categories:

Resume Builder (12 tools): Create and edit resumes with AI, 37 professional templates with ATS scores, export as PDF/DOCX/Markdown

ATS Optimizer (7 tools): Real ATS compatibility scoring (not generic tips), keyword gap analysis vs. specific job descriptions, match score with apply/don't-apply recommendation

Interview Coach (8 tools): Company-specific mock interviews, 13 system design cases, behavioral question banks with STAR format guidance, answer bank

Career Tools (12 tools): Cover letter generation, salary data by role + location, LinkedIn profile generation, salary negotiation scripts, offer analysis

Job Tracker (5 tools): Full pipeline (WISHLIST → APPLIED → INTERVIEWING → OFFER → REJECTED), conversion analytics

The skills format is powerful but the ecosystem is small. ClawHub is early. MCP is winning in terms of adoption. I'd probably lead with MCP next time and treat skills as a bonus.

The job tracker was the most requested feature. People want to track applications without opening Notion or a spreadsheet.

System design cases are the most used interview prep feature. 13 cases isn't enough -- I'm adding more.

MIT licensed. PRs welcome. Happy to answer questions in the comments. more

Career development

 1d

Woman refused job at Midland estate agents because car 'too old'


An 18 year old woman was left furious after being denied a job interview at an estate agency - because her CAR was too old.

Alanah Thompson French applied for the position of trainee lettings negotiator but was rejected because she drove a 2014 Citroen C1.

The industrious teenager spent over a year juggling two cafe positions to fund the £2,800 vehicle which she believed would boost her... employment prospects.

However, when she put herself forward for a £20,000 position at haart Estate and Lettings Agents in Nottingham, her aspirations quickly stalled.

She was astonished upon receiving an email from the firm stating she would not be invited for interview.

Alanah was informed: "We regret to inform you that you have not been shortlisted for interview on this occasion as it is a requirement to have access to a vehicle under 10 years old."

The peculiar requirement meant Alanah's cherished Citroen exceeded the age limit by two years despite having clocked merely 33,000 miles, alongside a complete service history and MoT.

Alanah, from Burton Joyce, Notts., said: "I was really shocked when I received the rejection letter saying it was down to my car.

"I worked really hard whilst doing my A-Levels to pay for the car myself and pay the £700 insurance.

"My reason for getting a car was because I wanted to be able to drive for work but now it seems it was the reason I didn't get the job."

Alanah, who resides at home with her mum and dad, submitted her application for the trainee role last December. Despite nailing the application form, it seems she hit a snag when asked "is your car under 10 years old" and she marked "no".

Alanah commented: "If I hadn't got onto the shortlist because I didn't have the skills then fine but to be told it's because of the car I drive is a kick in the teeth.

"It's hardly an old banger and I keep it really clean inside and out.

"I'm only young so an older car was all I could afford. Obviously if I got the job I could save for a newer model but I need the job first.

"I finished my A-Levels and just didn't want to go to university and saddle myself with tens of thousands of pounds of debt.

"I wanted to get out into the world and really want to have a career in property but I've literally crashed at the first turning.

"It's really frustrating."

Danielle Parsons, employment partner at law firm Irwin Mitchell, stated that the car policy highlighted the obstacles young people encounter in the job market.

She expressed: "I'm concerned that this policy may disproportionately exclude younger less affluent applicants from applying for this job, particularly as this is an entry level position and job vacancies are currently few and far between.

"The response from haart doesn't point to any alternatives to this sort of blanket ban."

A spokesperson for haart responded: "It's extremely important that people who work for us use reliable vehicles for their own personal safety particularly where they travel many miles each day and often work alone.

"Evidence from motoring organisations shows that the likelihood of mechanical problems increases as vehicles get older.

"For that reason, and in line with many organisations that require staff to use their own cars for work purposes, our policy is that vehicles should normally be under 10 years old." more

Career development

 1d

Guy Goma Reflects on His Iconic 'Funniest Interview' Blooper at the BBC - Internewscast Journal


In the annals of television blunders, few can rival the unforgettable moment when an unsuspecting job seeker, Guy Goma, was thrust into the limelight at the BBC. Mistaken for a renowned technology expert, Goma found himself unexpectedly ushered into the newsroom for a live interview.

As the cameras rolled, Goma's bewildered demeanor was evident, yet he gamely navigated a two-minute segment... discussing Apple and a multimillion-dollar lawsuit. This unexpected moment of TV gold spawned a flood of memes and became one of the most viral clips, capturing the imaginations of viewers worldwide.

Marking the 20th anniversary of this remarkable mix-up, the Daily Mail revisited the incident, speaking with both Goma and the producer responsible for the mix-up, to uncover the full story behind that unforgettable incident.

Reflecting on his accidental fame, Goma shared with the Daily Mail, "It's unbelievable. To this day, people still recognize me on the street. They call me a legend and often ask for my autograph."

He added, "I never could have imagined that this one mishap would make me so well-known around the globe."

The intended segment was supposed to focus on a court case involving Apple, scheduled at the High Court in May 2006. Instead, it became a legendary TV moment, forever etched in the collective memory of viewers.

Mr Goma, a soft-spoken Congolese-born job seeker, had just arrived at the BBC's then HQ in White City, west London, and was waiting to be interviewed for a data role.

Meanwhile upstairs at Television Centre, producer Elliott Gotkine was rushing around organising the live output of that night's BBC News 24 channel.

The correct guest who had been arranged, tech expert Guy Kewney (who incidentally, unlike Mr Goma, was a white skinned man of slight build), had just arrived downstairs waiting in reception to be taken to the studio.

But when frantic Mr Gotkine burst into reception before he saw Mr Kewney sitting nearby he saw Mr Goma first, who looked up expectantly.

A legend was born.

Now both men have spoken exclusively to the Daily Mail ahead of the 20th anniversary of their bizarre first meeting, that night at the BBC.

Mr Gotkine, who has never spoken publicly about the episode before, recalled: 'It was all a bit of a mad rush that day.

'I had booked Guy Kewney and with a few minutes to go [before he was meant to be on air] there was still no word from him.

'So I ran down to the reception and asked if they had someone called Guy Kewney there - and the receptionist pointed to Guy Goma.

'I was a little taken aback and I asked if she was sure and she said yes.

'I then went over to Guy - who I now know was the wrong Guy - and asked if he was Guy Kewney and he said yes, I thought maybe I had seen the wrong picture [of Mr Kewney], and I grabbed him and then rushed up to the studio.

'We were due on air in less than five minutes, so I just grabbed him and we sprinted up the stairs.'

Mr Goma, then a business studies graduate from Brazzaville living in west London and seeking work as a data cleanser, picked up the story at this point, recalling: 'I first thought something strange was happening when I was sat down in a chair and someone tried to put makeup on me.

'I said to her, "I don't need makeup, I'm here for a job interview," but she didn't seem to hear me.

'Then we moved into the studio and the TV cameras were on me and I started to think, "Something isn't right here - this isn't how a job interview is supposed to go." Because that's what I was there for.'

Seconds later, Mr Goma found himself sitting opposite presenter Karen Bowerman, with beads of nervous sweat beginning to break out on his forehead as he shifted in his seat wondering what was going on.

The now famous footage shows Westminster College business graduate Mr Goma, dressed smartly in an open necked blue shirt and brown jacket, glancing nervously up at the lights and around at the cameras.

Breathing heavily, a terrified grimace crosses his face, before licking his lips and composing himself for the unsuspecting onslaught about to hit him.

Goma recalled: 'I saw my image on a monitor, and I think that's when I realised something was going horribly wrong.

'But I didn't want to make a scene or cause a fuss so I went along with it when the presenter started asking me questions.'

As Ms Bowerman wrongly introduced him as 'Guy Kewney', Mr Goma could be seen gulping.

He then opened his eyes wide in shock as she asked him for his 'reaction to the court verdict' and whether he was 'surprised'.

The footage shows Mr Goma reply: 'I'm very surprised to see this verdict come because I was not expecting that... When I came they told me something else, they said it was an interview so it was a big surprise...'

As the car crash exchange continued it began to dawn on Ms Bowerman and fellow TV executives that a huge cock-up was unfolding in front of their eyes - and they eventually managed to cut to another reporter who was standing outside the High Court.

Mr Goma's live ordeal was over - but his fame was just beginning.

He recalls now: 'Once it finished, I left and walked out of the building into the Underground station opposite.

'I called the job agency and told them that something terrible had happened, I had been interviewed live on TV about something I didn't know about.

'I asked if I had got the job.

'But they said, "No - go back, they are waiting for you."

'So I went back and had the interview, which was about Microsoft Excel which I do know about - but unfortunately I didn't get the job.'

Mr Goma may well not have got that data job, but the clip of his interview was already going viral.

Furious BBC bosses launched an investigation into the cock-up and Mr Gotkine eventually left the BBC. He still works elsewhere within the TV industry.

Mr Goma briefly became a celebrity, invited onto TV shows around the world, even hiring.

'There was even talk of a prominent appearance on that December's BBC Sports Personality of the Year award show - but it never materialised.

A week after the incident, Goma was interviewed by the BBC and other TV networks telling them: 'I never really wanted to be famous. I just wanted to be an accountant - I hope I get a job at the BBC.'

Almost immediately an online petition was started by viewers demanding that the BBC give him a job. Although this never happened, Goma was touched by the reaction: 'It was so very kind of everybody, people were so kind and thoughtful.'

Mr Goma says: 'I later got a call from the BBC asking me what programme I would like to work on, but I was in a hurry to catch a plane to Germany for a TV interview, so I asked them to call me back.

'They never did but like I say to everyone it is the will of God, everything happens for a reason, I never really wanted to be famous but if the clip makes people laugh and makes them happy then I'm happy.'

Mr Gotkine recalls how minutes after Goma had been erroneously interviewed, he received a call to say the real Guy Kewney was in reception - and still waiting to be interviewed.

The producer said: 'Once I realised the mistake had been made, I apologised profusely and we recorded an interview with Guy Kewney but it was never broadcast.'

Mr Kewney died in 2010, although the two did meet up after the infamous interview with the IT specialist posting about it on his blog, adding a photograph of the pair and describing Goma as his 'twin brother'.

Goma - who fled to the UK after civil war ravaged Congo - now works with various charities in east London and also as a car park marshal at his beloved Queens Park Rangers football club.

He reflects now: 'It was just a mix up, I was in the wrong place, I had no idea about the subject, so I just tried to give the right answer in the interview.

'When she started talking, I thought "Oh dear Guy, you are in the wrong place" and you can see [in the footage] my body language expressed everything I was feeling.

'But so many people have seen the video, and I still get messages from people about it.'

Mr Goma - who was not paid for his BBC interview - did initially contemplate legal action against the BBC for a share of the royalties his blooper earned.

But he later changed his mind, explaining: 'I am a very spiritual person and I think God helped me get through it that day - and that everything happens for a reason.

'If the reason was to make people happy and take some stress from them, then I'm happy for what happened.'

Mr Gotkine added: 'Guy Goma really is the loveliest man you could ever meet

'They talk about everyone having 15 minutes of fame but Guy has had twenty years of it and it couldn't have happened to a nicer man.'

What Mr Goma was particularly keen to clear up in our interview was the suggestion, widely repeated at the time, that he was a taxi driver.

Chuckling he said: 'That was all wrong, I was never a cabbie. People said I was but I wasn't.

'In fact I had recently graduated from college and was a student.

'But back in Congo I had had a taxi firm so maybe that's where the confusion came from.'

When asked why he just didn't come clean before he was put on air, Mr Goma says today: 'I just didn't want to cause a scene and I didn't want to create a fuss.

'If I had just got up and walked off that would have been worse, I tried to answer the question as best I could but it wasn't necessarily the right answer.'

Mr Gotkine added: 'I think what got to people was just how extraordinarily lovely he came across as - Guy is such a lovely, lovely man and you can see that in just the few seconds he is on TV...

'Although granted yes, it was a complete cock-up.

'The way he tried to bluff his way through it though was TV gold and it's brought so many laughs to people and goodness knows we need a few laughs, especially at this time with what's going on in the world.'

A new book called The Wrong Guy - The Inside Story Of TV's Greatest Cock-Up - is to be published this spring for the anniversary, telling in fine detail the buildup and the aftermath of what became television history.

Written by Mr Gotkine, the hilarious account also details how the two men have kept in touch ever since and have even visited Mr Goma's hometown of Brazzaville in the Democratic Republic of the Congo together. more

Career development

 1d

Star of 'TV's funniest interview' Guy Goma relives viral BBC blooper


It was one of the most extraordinary TV mishaps of all time - when an African job seeker waiting in BBC reception was mistaken for a global tech expert and invited into the newsroom to be interviewed live on air.

And his evident bemusement as he bluffed his way through a two minute interview about Apple and a multimillion dollar lawsuit gave rise to a legion of memes and became one of the most... viewed viral clips of all time.

Now, on the 20th anniversary of the incredible BBC blooper, the Daily Mail has tracked down both that hapless interviewee, Guy Goma, and the producer who mistakenly put him on air, to find out what really happened that strange night.

Mr Goma told the Daily Mail: 'It's crazy - even now people recognise me in the street. They say I am a legend. I'm still being asked for my autograph.

'I never imagined that night that this one cock-up would go around the world like it did and I would become so famous.'

The TV segment was meant to be a two-way interview discussing an ongoing court case involving Apple at the High Court in May 2006.

Mr Goma, a soft-spoken Congolese-born job seeker, had just arrived at the BBC's then HQ in White City, west London, and was waiting to be interviewed for a data role.

When Guy Goma, a softly spoken Congolese man, arrived at BBC headquarters in White City one afternoon in 2006, he was expecting to have an interview for a job as a data analyst

Instead, Mr Goma got a rather different interview as a flustered TV producer ushered him through the door and into a studio in front of millions of people. Baffled and wide-eyed, Mr Goma was introduced as a 'tech expert' there to opine on a High Court case involving Apple

Meanwhile upstairs at Television Centre, producer Elliott Gotkine was rushing around organising the live output of that night's BBC News 24 channel.

The correct guest who had been arranged, tech expert Guy Kewney (who incidentally, unlike Mr Goma, was a white skinned man of slight build), had just arrived downstairs waiting in reception to be taken to the studio.

But when frantic Mr Gotkine burst into reception before he saw Mr Kewney sitting nearby he saw Mr Goma first, who looked up expectantly.

A legend was born.

Now both men have spoken exclusively to the Daily Mail ahead of the 20th anniversary of their bizarre first meeting, that night at the BBC.

Mr Gotkine, who has never spoken publicly about the episode before, recalled: 'It was all a bit of a mad rush that day.

'I had booked Guy Kewney and with a few minutes to go [before he was meant to be on air] there was still no word from him.

'So I ran down to the reception and asked if they had someone called Guy Kewney there - and the receptionist pointed to Guy Goma.

'I was a little taken aback and I asked if she was sure and she said yes.

'I then went over to Guy - who I now know was the wrong Guy - and asked if he was Guy Kewney and he said yes, I thought maybe I had seen the wrong picture [of Mr Kewney], and I grabbed him and then rushed up to the studio.

'We were due on air in less than five minutes, so I just grabbed him and we sprinted up the stairs.'

Mr Goma, then a business studies graduate from Brazzaville living in west London and seeking work as a data cleanser, picked up the story at this point, recalling: 'I first thought something strange was happening when I was sat down in a chair and someone tried to put makeup on me.

'I said to her, "I don't need makeup, I'm here for a job interview," but she didn't seem to hear me.

'Then we moved into the studio and the TV cameras were on me and I started to think, "Something isn't right here - this isn't how a job interview is supposed to go." Because that's what I was there for.'

Seconds later, Mr Goma found himself sitting opposite presenter Karen Bowerman, with beads of nervous sweat beginning to break out on his forehead as he shifted in his seat wondering what was going on.

The now famous footage shows Westminster College business graduate Mr Goma, dressed smartly in an open necked blue shirt and brown jacket, glancing nervously up at the lights and around at the cameras.

Breathing heavily, a terrified grimace crosses his face, before licking his lips and composing himself for the unsuspecting onslaught about to hit him.

Goma recalled: 'I saw my image on a monitor, and I think that's when I realised something was going horribly wrong.

'But I didn't want to make a scene or cause a fuss so I went along with it when the presenter started asking me questions.'

As Ms Bowerman wrongly introduced him as 'Guy Kewney', Mr Goma could be seen gulping.

He then opened his eyes wide in shock as she asked him for his 'reaction to the court verdict' and whether he was 'surprised'.

The footage shows Mr Goma reply: 'I'm very surprised to see this verdict come because I was not expecting that... When I came they told me something else, they said it was an interview so it was a big surprise...'

As the car crash exchange continued it began to dawn on Ms Bowerman and fellow TV executives that a huge cock-up was unfolding in front of their eyes - and they eventually managed to cut to another reporter who was standing outside the High Court.

Mr Goma's live ordeal was over - but his fame was just beginning.

He recalls now: 'Once it finished, I left and walked out of the building into the Underground station opposite.

'I called the job agency and told them that something terrible had happened, I had been interviewed live on TV about something I didn't know about.

'I asked if I had got the job.

'But they said, "No - go back, they are waiting for you."

'So I went back and had the interview, which was about Microsoft Excel which I do know about - but unfortunately I didn't get the job.'

Mr Goma may well not have got that data job, but the clip of his interview was already going viral.

Furious BBC bosses launched an investigation into the cock-up and Mr Gotkine eventually left the BBC. He still works elsewhere within the TV industry.

Rather than come clean and explain who he really was and the real reason he was there that day, Mr Goma styled it out and bluffed his way through the next few minutes of TV

Mr Goma even spluttered at one point that he was 'surprised by the decision' because, he said, he 'hadn't been expecting it', in the clip that went viral to millions of people all over the world

Mr Goma briefly became a celebrity, invited onto TV shows around the world, even hiring.

'There was even talk of a prominent appearance on that December's BBC Sports Personality of the Year award show - but it never materialised.

A week after the incident, Goma was interviewed by the BBC and other TV networks telling them: 'I never really wanted to be famous. I just wanted to be an accountant - I hope I get a job at the BBC.'

Almost immediately an online petition was started by viewers demanding that the BBC give him a job. Although this never happened, Goma was touched by the reaction: 'It was so very kind of everybody, people were so kind and thoughtful.'

Mr Goma says: 'I later got a call from the BBC asking me what programme I would like to work on, but I was in a hurry to catch a plane to Germany for a TV interview, so I asked them to call me back.

'They never did but like I say to everyone it is the will of God, everything happens for a reason, I never really wanted to be famous but if the clip makes people laugh and makes them happy then I'm happy.'

Mr Gotkine recalls how minutes after Goma had been erroneously interviewed, he received a call to say the real Guy Kewney was in reception - and still waiting to be interviewed.

The producer said: 'Once I realised the mistake had been made, I apologised profusely and we recorded an interview with Guy Kewney but it was never broadcast.'

Mr Kewney died in 2010, although the two did meet up after the infamous interview with the IT specialist posting about it on his blog, adding a photograph of the pair and describing Goma as his 'twin brother'.

Goma - who fled to the UK after civil war ravaged Congo - now works with various charities in east London and also as a car park marshal at his beloved Queens Park Rangers football club.

He reflects now: 'It was just a mix up, I was in the wrong place, I had no idea about the subject, so I just tried to give the right answer in the interview.

'When she started talking, I thought "Oh dear Guy, you are in the wrong place" and you can see [in the footage] my body language expressed everything I was feeling.

'But so many people have seen the video, and I still get messages from people about it.'

Mr Goma - who was not paid for his BBC interview - did initially contemplate legal action against the BBC for a share of the royalties his blooper earned.

But he later changed his mind, explaining: 'I am a very spiritual person and I think God helped me get through it that day - and that everything happens for a reason.

'If the reason was to make people happy and take some stress from them, then I'm happy for what happened.'

Mr Gotkine added: 'Guy Goma really is the loveliest man you could ever meet

'They talk about everyone having 15 minutes of fame but Guy has had twenty years of it and it couldn't have happened to a nicer man.'

What Mr Goma was particularly keen to clear up in our interview was the suggestion, widely repeated at the time, that he was a taxi driver.

Chuckling he said: 'That was all wrong, I was never a cabbie. People said I was but I wasn't.

'In fact I had recently graduated from college and was a student.

'But back in Congo I had had a taxi firm so maybe that's where the confusion came from.'

When asked why he just didn't come clean before he was put on air, Mr Goma says today: 'I just didn't want to cause a scene and I didn't want to create a fuss.

'If I had just got up and walked off that would have been worse, I tried to answer the question as best I could but it wasn't necessarily the right answer.'

Mr Gotkine added: 'I think what got to people was just how extraordinarily lovely he came across as - Guy is such a lovely, lovely man and you can see that in just the few seconds he is on TV...

'Although granted yes, it was a complete cock-up.

Afterwards Mr Goma became, albeit briefly, one of the most recognisable men on television and his newfound fame even earned him a place of the satirical show Have I Got News For You

'The way he tried to bluff his way through it though was TV gold and it's brought so many laughs to people and goodness knows we need a few laughs, especially at this time with what's going on in the world.'

A new book called The Wrong Guy - The Inside Story Of TV's Greatest Cock-Up - is to be published this spring for the anniversary, telling in fine detail the buildup and the aftermath of what became television history.

Written by Mr Gotkine, the hilarious account also details how the two men have kept in touch ever since and have even visited Mr Goma's hometown of Brazzaville in the Democratic Republic of the Congo together. more

Career development

 1d

I Trusted My Friend to Help With My CV and Application -- But She Was At My Interview When I Walked In


The fluorescent lights in the waiting room hummed with a clinical, predatory energy that made the sweat behind my neck turn cold. I clutched my leather folder, my knuckles white, staring at the woman sitting directly across from me in the plush charcoal armchair. It was Leah.

She was wearing the power suit she'd bought last month, her hair lay in a sharp, professional bob, looking every bit the... corporate conqueror. My heart didn't just throb; it felt like it was trying to exit my chest through my throat.

"Leah?" I whispered, the name catching on the dry roof of my mouth. "What are you doing here?"

She didn't flinch. She didn't look guilty. Instead, she offered a thin, practised smile that didn't reach her eyes and adjusted the identical navy-blue company folder resting on her lap.

"Oh, Naomi! You applied for this, too?" she asked, her voice airy and casual, as if we were bumping into each other at a grocery store rather than at the one job interview that was supposed to save my life. "That's so funny. Small world, isn't it?"

"Funny?" I choked out, the air in the room suddenly feeling too thin to breathe. "You told me the role wasn't really your 'vibe' when I showed you the listing. You spent three days 'fixing' my CV for this exact position."

She leaned forward, the scent of her expensive, musky perfume hitting me like a physical blow -- a sharp contrast to the antiseptic smell of the office. "I just thought I'd throw my hat in the ring at the last minute, babes," she said, her tone hardening just a fraction. "May the best woman win, right?"

We had been inseparable since our first year at university.

Leah was the fire to my water. While I spent my nights in the library perfecting my syntax, she was out networking, building a bridge to the career she wanted. She landed a solid role at a marketing firm straight after graduation.

I, on the other hand, had spent the last eight months staring at the peeling paint on my apartment ceiling. The bills had started to feel like physical weights pressing down on my shoulders.

Every time my mother called from the village to ask how the job hunt was going, I felt a fresh wave of shame. "Don't worry, Naomi," Leah had told me over a plate of steaming tilapia last month.

"I'm going to see you win. Your brilliance just needs the right packaging." She held my hand across the table, her grip firm and reassuring.

"I've got the connections, and I know exactly what these HR managers are looking for," she'd insisted. "Just send me your drafts. I'll polish them until they shine." I felt a surge of genuine gratitude that brought tears to my eyes. "You'd really do that for me?" I asked, my voice trembling.

"Of course," she laughed, waving away my thanks. "What are friends for if not to pull each other up?" I sent her my CV that night, feeling like a massive burden had been lifted.

I told her everything about the mid-sized firm I'd found. I told her about the salary, a figure that was significantly higher than what she was currently earning.

"It's a bit of a jump for you, isn't it?" she'd remarked, her eyes flickering over the job description on my phone. "But hey, if you think you can handle the pressure, go for it."

I trusted her completely because she was the one who already had her foot in the door of the world I was trying to enter. She was my mentor, my sister, and my safety net. Or so I thought.

The first red flag appeared a week before the application deadline. Leah had been "working" on my CV for five days, claiming she was too swamped at her own job to finish the edits.

"I need to submit it by Friday, Leah," I told her over the phone, pacing the narrow hallway of my flat. "The portal closes at midnight."

"Relax, Naomi," she snapped, her voice uncharacteristically sharp. "I'm making sure it's perfect. Do you want the job or not?" I went quiet, swallowed by the fear of offending the only person helping me.

When the document finally landed in my inbox on Thursday evening, I opened it with trembling fingers. As I scrolled through the pages, a cold knot began to form in the pit of my stomach.

She had removed my two-year stint at the regional consultancy -- the very place where I'd managed a team of six. "Why did you take out the consultancy lead role?" I texted her immediately.

"It makes you look overqualified and expensive," she messaged back seconds later. "Trust the process. I've rephrased your skills to make you seem more 'trainable'."

I looked at the laptop screen, bewildered. She had replaced my active, leadership-focused bullet points with passive, administrative language.

"It doesn't sound like me, Leah," I whispered to the empty room. I called her, hoping for clarity, but she didn't pick up.

A few minutes later, a voice note arrived. "Naomi, you're overthinking. I know these recruiters. They want someone who won't clash with the current manager."

I looked at my original draft -- full of achievements and high-level strategy. Then I looked at her version -- muted, simplified, and almost invisible.

The pressure of the deadline felt like a physical hand squeezing my throat. If I didn't submit this now, I'd lose the chance entirely.

If I ignored her advice and failed, I'd have no one to blame but myself. "She knows better," I whispered, trying to convince my pounding heart.

I uploaded her version of my life and hit 'submit'. The confirmation email felt less like a victory and more like a surrender.

Two days later, the invitation for an interview arrived. I was ecstatic, screaming into my pillow before calling Leah to share the news.

"That's great, bestie," she said, though her voice sounded strangely flat. "I told you my edits would work."

"I'm so nervous," I admitted. "Do you think I should brush up on the project management software they mentioned?" "Don't bother," she replied quickly. "They told me -- I mean, I heard -- they're moving away from that system."

I paused, the air suddenly still. "How did you hear that?"

"Just industry chatter, Naomi. Focus on being 'personable'. That's your strength." I sat on my bed after we hung up, the silence of the apartment feeling heavy and suspicious.

The light outside was fading into a bruised purple, casting long, distorted shadows across the floor. I felt like I was walking through a fog, unable to see the cliff edge until my foot was already hovering over the drop.

I decided to do a quick search on the company's recent LinkedIn posts. There, featured in a "Meet the Team" video from that morning, was the exact software she told me to ignore.

My heart gave a sickening thud. Why would she lie about something so small?

I shook it off, telling myself she was just misinformed. Friends don't sabotage friends.

I spent the next forty-eight hours rehearsing the "personable" answers she had coached me on. I wore the modest navy dress she suggested, even though I felt more powerful in my tailored blazer.

"You don't want to intimidate them," she'd warned. I walked into that office building feeling small, prepared to be the "trainable" girl she had created on paper.

Then the elevator doors opened. And there she was.

The receptionist called Leah's name first. She stood up with a grace that felt like a calculated insult, smoothing her skirt without looking back at me.

I sat in that chair for twenty minutes, the silence of the lobby ringing in my ears like a physical siren. Every time the heavy oak door opened, I expected to see her walk out with a look of shame.

Instead, when she finally emerged, she looked radiant. She caught my eye and gave a small, triumphant nod that made my stomach do a slow, sick flip.

"Good luck, Naomi," she whispered as she passed, her voice dripping with a pity that felt sharper than any blade. "They're looking for someone very... specific today."

When I finally walked into the boardroom, three panellists sat behind a glass table. I sat down, my hands trembling as I laid out my "diluted" CV in front of them.

"So, Naomi," the lead interviewer began, flipping through the pages with a bored expression. "Your profile seems a bit... entry-level for a role with this much responsibility."

I felt the blood drain from my face. "I've actually managed teams before," I said, my voice sounding thin and desperate in the large room.

"It's not listed here," he replied, pointing to the gap where Leah had deleted my consultancy experience. "We're looking for a leader, not someone we have to hand-hold through basic operations."

I looked down at the paper -- the paper Leah had "polished" for me. It was a map leading me directly into a dead end.

"I can explain those gaps," I started, but I could see their interest fading like a dying ember. They began asking technical questions about the very software Leah told me to ignore.

I tried to pivot, to show my personality as she'd coached me, but they weren't looking for a "friend." They were looking for the expert I had been before I let her touch my career.

The air in the room felt heavy, smelling of stale coffee and the ozone of high-end air conditioning. I realised then that I wasn't just fighting for a job; I was fighting the version of myself Leah had invented to ensure I'd fail.

The floor beneath my feet felt as though it had turned to water. I stumbled out of the interview room, the heavy oak door clicking shut behind me like a gavel.

Leah was still there, leaning against the glass windows of the lift lobby. She was silhouetted against the harsh afternoon sun, watching the city traffic crawl below.

"How did it go?" she asked, her back still turned. Her voice was steady, devoid of the nervous energy I was currently drowning in.

"They thought I was a junior, Leah," I said, my voice cracking as the humiliation finally broke through. "They literally laughed when I mentioned strategy. The edits you made -- they erased everything that made me a contender."

She turned around slowly. For the first time in ten years, the mask slipped completely. The warm, supportive sister-friend was gone. In her place stood a woman with eyes as cold and calculating as a high-frequency trader. There was no sympathy there; only a hard, metallic ambition.

"Maybe you just aren't ready for this level yet, Naomi," she said. Her tone was clinical. "I did you a favour, really. I kept you from overpromising and crashing out in the first month. You would have been out of your depth."

"You applied for it yourself," I whispered, the realisation hitting me with the force of a physical blow. I looked at the identical folder in her hand.

"You didn't just 'fix' my CV. You harvested it. You took the leadership highlights you deleted from mine and pasted them into yours, didn't you?"

She didn't even have the grace to flinch. She simply adjusted the strap of her designer handbag and looked at me as if I were a piece of outdated software.

"I saw the salary range on that listing, Naomi. It is double what I make now," she said flatly. "Why should I let you leapfrog over me? I've spent years networking while you were just... waiting. You haven't paid your dues."

The betrayal felt like a thick, oily slick in my throat. The soundscape of the office -- the ringing phones, the rhythmic tapping of keyboards -- suddenly muffled, as if I had been plunged underwater.

"You knew I was desperate," I gritted out, my eyes stinging. "You knew my landlord was calling every day. You used my vulnerability to scout a better deal for yourself."

"It's just business, babes," she said, her voice dropping to a low, cold hum as the lift doors chimed and slid open.

"Don't take it so personally. In this city, you're either the one holding the ladder or the one being stepped on." She stepped into the mirrored carriage, the doors closing on her calm, unbothered reflection.

I didn't cry on the bus ride home. The betrayal was too deep for tears; it felt more like a cold, clarifying frost.

I reached my apartment and sat in the dark for a long time, listening to the distant hum of traffic. My phone buzzed with a notification from her on social media.

"So proud of us for putting ourselves out there today! Lunch soon? x" I stared at the screen until the light dimmed and went black.

I didn't reply. I didn't demand an explanation; I already had. Instead, I went to my settings and clicked 'Block' on every platform we shared.

The silence that followed was the first bit of peace I'd felt in months. The next morning, I opened my laptop and pulled up my original, "overqualified" CV.

I restored every achievement, every leadership role, and every technical skill she had tried to bury. I realised that by trying to make myself "palatable" for her, I had made myself invisible to everyone else.

A week later, I saw a LinkedIn update from the company. The role was being re-advertised; neither of us had been "the right fit."

I felt a grim sense of satisfaction knowing her sabotage hadn't even bought her the prize she'd sold her soul for. I hit 'apply' again -- this time with the real version of me.

I haven't heard back yet, and the bills are still piling up on my kitchen counter. But the air in my apartment feels lighter, stripped of the toxic expectations of a "friend" who wanted me to stay small.

I used to think that loyalty was a debt you paid to people just because you'd known them a long time. I thought that a friend's success was my success, and I assumed they felt the same.

But I've learned that some people only want to see you do well as long as you aren't doing better than them. They will offer you a hand to help you up, only to ensure they can control how high you climb.

True friendship doesn't require you to shrink so the other person can feel tall. It doesn't ask you to hide your strengths to protect their fragile ego.

I am still looking for work, and the uncertainty is terrifying. But I would rather be unemployed and standing on my own two feet than successful and leaning on a snake.

I've reclaimed my voice and my history. And I've learned the hardest lesson of all: trust is a gift, but discernment is a survival skill.

If the person closest to you is the one holding the scissors, how can you ever expect to grow? more
2   

  • Steward Tony Pacheco

    69
    14h

    Mistake One: Putting You Career, Your Money, Your Relationship, Your Dreams, Your Sspirations, Or Your Personal Whatevers In Someone Elses Hands....
    Based On The Length Of The Short Novel You Wrote, I Cant Help But Wonder "WHY?"
    So, What You Do From This Point On Will Determine If You Have The Ability To Protect Your Most Valuable Assets? Your Dreams!     more

  • Daniel Ankrah

    21h

    Hahahaaa! That's what friends are for!! It's a great lesson for you. Cheers!

Load more...

Career development

 1d

A Woman Was Called 'Inconsiderate' For Trying To Shake A Job Interviewer's Hand


A woman had a strange experience when she tried to shake a job interviewer's hand, but was told she did not have consent to do so. Now, she is trying to make sense of the bizarre experience and if, in fact, shaking hands is an act that requires consent.

Interviewing for a job is incredibly stressful. There's a lot on the line, and you want to put your best foot forward. One woman believed she... was doing just that until the interviewer let her know that her completely normal behavior was apparently unacceptable.

The woman named Lauren, known as @scratchqueenlauren on TikTok, shared her bizarre job interview experience."I just had the craziest thing happen to me in a job interview that's, like, ever happened to me," she said in a video.

She described the job as a "pretty simple full-time office job." She stated that she had already completed one interview over the phone and was asked to come into the office for a second, but things felt off from the beginning.

"It's a lady. When I go to meet her, she's very, like, standoffish," she said. The two then had an awkward conversation in which the interviewer asked Lauren questions about how she handles workplace drama.

At the end of the interview, Lauren prepared to do the customary thing and shake the other woman's hand, but it didn't go well."I go to, like, put my hand out to shake her hand, like, 'Thank you for meeting me,' and she goes, 'Don't touch me' ... She's like, 'I don't give consent for you to touch me,'" Lauren said.

She tried to explain that she didn't actually touch the woman and just wanted to extend a kind gesture. "'I didn't touch you,'" she said. "'I'm just trying to shake your hand to thank you for meeting with me.'" The woman's response shocked Lauren. "She was like, 'That's very inconsiderate of you.'"

Lauren was so upset by the interview that she decided she no longer wanted the job, although she doubted the woman would call her about it anyway.

Lauren made a second video to update viewers and answer some questions she had received. "The position I was applying for was actually for a construction company," she explained.

Lauren stated that many people commented on her first video and recommended that she report what happened to her to the company's human resources department. However, that might have led to an even stickier situation.

"When I researched the company on who I needed to reach out to regarding what happened, the HR director has the same last name as the woman I interviewed with yesterday," Lauren said.

At first, she ignored the strange coincidence and sent the email anyway. Then, she decided to do a bit of sleuthing and discovered the HR director was the daughter of the woman she had interviewed with. "My email is probably going to be laughed at and disregarded completely," she lamented.

Handshakes are a regular part of job interviews, even used by recruiters to gauge candidates. According to Indeed, "When you first meet a professional employer, you often greet them with a handshake ... Your handshake can actually leave a significant impression on a hiring manager."

If handshakes are such a typical part of the interviewing process, it seems exceptionally strange that this woman would not want to shake hands. And, even if she did not wish to, there was probably a kinder way she could have informed Lauren of that.

This interaction was undoubtedly a red flag, and she's probably better off looking for a job elsewhere. more

Career development

 1d

Turning Online Internship Into Job Offer: Step-by-Step Guide


How to Turn Your Internship Into a Full-Time Job Offer: The Essential Step-by-Step Guide

The future of career development is being shaped by a revolution in online internships and digital workplace experiences. Gone are the days when internships were simply a way to pass the summer or pad a résumé. Today, internships are often the golden ticket -- your direct pathway to a full-time job offer and... permanent position within the company. It's not just about learning the ins and outs of the business; it's about demonstrating your value to influence hiring decisions and turning an internship into a full-time role in a competitive job market.

Internship programs have become a transformative bridge between education and employment. In many industries, digital internships and remote work experiences are as valuable as traditional programs -- sometimes even more so, thanks to artificial intelligence and advanced educational technology tools. Whether you're a student, a recent graduate, or an early-career job seeker, your internship experience can help you achieve meaningful career goals, develop a strong skill set, and significantly boost your chances of landing a full-time job. In this actionable guide, you'll learn the academic evidence, insider strategies, and step-by-step process to turn your internship into a job offer -- before, during, and after your assignment ends.

Let's explore how you can go above and beyond to turn the internship into your next big opportunity.

A proactive attitude and planning are critical if you want to turn your internship into a full-time job. Many employers use internship programs not just as on-the-job training, but as an "extended interview" to identify candidates for full-time positions. By starting strong and treating your internship like the first chapter of your career path -- not just a temporary job -- you stand out to your supervisor and the whole team.

Start by treating every day during your internship like it directly influences hiring decisions. Arrive punctual, dress appropriately for the company culture, and display a strong work ethic. Consistent professionalism signals to the hiring manager and colleagues that you would be easy to work with as a full-time employee -- someone who will fit seamlessly into permanent teams.

Interns who actively network within the company frequently land a job. Take the initiative to introduce yourself to coworkers from other departments, attend team meetings, and don't be afraid to ask thoughtful questions about available positions or the team's long-term goals. Networking within the company can lead to critical job referrals or insider information about openings you might not otherwise find. Interns who genuinely connect are remembered long after the internship ends.

Research shows interns who request and act on feedback during performance reviews are more likely to get hired. Use every opportunity, from a one-on-one meeting with your supervisor to group conversations in team meetings, to ask for actionable feedback on your skills and performance. Demonstrate your eagerness to contribute and willingness to learn -- the very qualities that increase your chances of turning the internship into a job offer.

You've proven you can do the work -- now, show that you can add long-term value to the company. Action is what transforms temporary positions into permanent ones. This stage is about more than just completing assignments; it's about becoming indispensable to your organization through proactive learning, visible contributions, and strategic communication.

Don't settle for simply meeting deadlines or checking boxes. Successful interns deliver work that exceeds expectations and positively impacts the team's results. For example, if you see an inefficient process, propose a new technology tool or method drawing on your educational technology knowledge. If you master a project, ask for more responsibility. Companies offer full-time opportunities to interns who demonstrate initiative and problem-solving skills that make them stand out.

Internship can help you build a résumé loaded with measurable accomplishments. Document your contributions, results, and learning outcomes. During performance reviews or in email updates, highlight how your work ethic, attention to detail, and professional experience improved team performance. Visibility, when done respectfully, helps hiring managers remember you when it's time to make hiring decisions.

Before the end of your internship, don't be afraid to ask for endorsements, references, or specific performance feedback for your LinkedIn profile or future résumé. These genuine testimonials increase your chances in the job market and keep you top-of-mind for job referrals or "alumni" hiring. Staying in touch via LinkedIn or occasional email signals your ongoing interest in a full-time position and keeps the relationship alive.

The data is clear: over 70% of companies offer full-time positions to their top interns. But companies can't read your mind -- if you want to turn your internship into a full-time job offer, you need to be clear about your intentions, even if it feels a little uncomfortable.

When the internship nears completion, request a meeting with your supervisor or the hiring manager. Express your enthusiasm for the team and communicate directly that you want to be considered for a full-time role within the company. Share why the company culture, projects, and ongoing mentorship align with your career development goals.

Don't be afraid to ask specific questions about available positions, expectations for full-time employees, and the next steps in the hiring process. Sometimes, the simple act of expressing interest and asking actionable questions at the end of your internship gives you a leg up. Clarify any uncertainties and show your willingness to continue learning in the role.

If offered a job interview, approach it like you already know the ins and outs of the business. Use portfolio examples, data from your internship, and feedback from your supervisor to explain your fit for the role. Your internship experience gives you a unique advantage in the hiring process, since you can demonstrate your value, cultural fit, and growth trajectory better than external job seekers.

Turning an internship into a full-time job doesn't always happen immediately. Sometimes, companies offer roles months after the original program ends, especially as new projects develop or budgets allow. Staying proactive, building relationships, and maintaining ongoing communication can significantly increase your chances of landing a full-time job offer -- even after the internship is over.

Use tools like email, LinkedIn, and company alumni networks to maintain relationships with supervisors and peers. Share occasional updates on your professional development or educational milestones. Interns who stay in touch are top candidates when new full-time roles appear.

If a full-time position isn't available right away, use volunteering, additional online learning, or professional certifications to show continued growth. Advanced digital skills, artificial intelligence knowledge, or project management certifications can significantly boost your chances when new opportunities arise. Leverage industry trends and learning platforms to stay competitive.

Many industries have fluctuating hiring cycles. A single internship can help you build the reputation, résumé, and professional network that give you a leg up well after the official program ends. Stay in the loop, remain willing to learn, and build strong relationships to increase your chances of getting that long-awaited job offer.

Transforming your internship into a full-time job offer is no longer just a hopeful possibility -- it's a proven career pathway in today's education and employment ecosystem. The academic evidence, industry data, and practical experience all agree: internships have become much more than a checkbox on your résumé. They're a springboard to professional achievement, a bridge to permanent positions, and a showcase for your work ethic and eagerness to contribute.

By being proactive, demonstrating value, building relationships, and leveraging every opportunity, you can significantly boost your chances of turning an internship into a job offer. The future of accessible, merit-based career advancement is being shaped by motivated interns like you. Treat your internship as more than a temporary assignment -- it's your launchpad for landing a full-time job and achieving your career goals.

Let's keep pushing the boundaries of what online education and internships can deliver. Stay inspired, keep learning, and explore more career development resources to give yourself every advantage in the evolving job market. more

Career development

 4w

Woman lands job after CEO asks why she shouldn't be hired: 'I wasn't ready for that question'


It's surprising how interviewers are finding creative ways to test candidates, sometimes asking questions that seem almost impossible to answer on the spot.

Recently, a woman experienced this firsthand and turned it into an opportunity that landed her a job.

According to the post, during her interview, the CEO asked her to give one good reason why she shouldn't be hired.

Katyayani Shukla... shared the incident on X (formerly Twitter) with the caption, "During my last job interview, the CEO asked me to give her one good reason not to hire me."

"I told her I wasn't ready for that question and needed some time to think," she adds.

Most people might have expected the CEO to forget, but a few hours later, she received a follow-up message requesting her response. After reflecting carefully, Shukla wrote her answer, and the result was a job offer.

She began by apologising if her answer was long, explaining that it came from careful thought.

"A good reason not to hire me is that I have my life together. What that means for me is that I keep my personal and professional life organised," the email reads.

Shukla further explained that she has her time to work, usually around 9 to 5 on weekdays, and she sets boundaries to keep work inside those hours.

"I genuinely believe that when everything is urgent, nothing is urgent," she adds.

She added that setting boundaries is important for people to respect her as a professional. While some may appreciate that, others might see it as a red flag.

"Being organised and mindful of my time, and other people's time, is very important to me," the email further read. more
5   

  • f h

    1d

    That’s an excellent response, it emphasizes strong work ethics, boundaries and expectations up front. If that answer did not result in a job offer... then perhaps it may not be a supportive work culture.  more

  • Rigor Data Analyst

    1
    6d

    A strong answer to this question isn’t about disqualifying yourself, it’s about showing self-awareness, honesty, and growth without raising red flags.... The key is to frame a manageable limitation and show how you actively address it. more

Load more...

Career development

 1d

Is our life just a 'Truman Show Simulation'?


This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at Delhi North chapter and does not reflect the views of Her Campus.

That's the premise of The Truman Show. Truman Burbank lives in the pastel-perfect town of Seahaven. He sells insurance. He chats politely. He plans vacations he never takes. What he doesn't know is that Seahaven is a giant studio set, his friends and wife are... actors, and his entire life has been broadcast live since birth as the most successful reality show in history.

When the film came out in 1998, the idea felt exaggerated. Clever. A sharp satire about media voyeurism. Watching it today, though, it feels less like satire and more like prophecy.

Because Truman isn't the only one being watched anymore.

The perfect world

At first glance, Truman's life looks ideal. The sky is always blue. The houses are identical and charming. His routine is predictable. Even the traffic patterns feel choreographed. Seahaven is safe, contained, and curated.

But that's precisely the point.

Truman's world is designed to keep him comfortable and controlled. Every time he expresses a desire to travel, something intervenes. A traumatic childhood memory of his father "drowning" has made him terrified of water. News reports warn of plane crashes. Strangers conveniently redirect him back home. The system nudges him gently but persistently away from anything that might threaten the illusion.

He believes he has choices. But every choice exists within carefully constructed boundaries.

It's difficult not to see ourselves in that structure. We grow up being told we're free to be anything, but certain paths are rewarded more than others. Certain ambitions are celebrated. Certain lifestyles are validated. College students talk about "following their passion," yet often feel immense pressure to pick stable careers, build impressive résumés, and curate a version of themselves that feels employable.

We think we're choosing freely. But are we choosing from options we genuinely want or from options that are socially acceptable?

The film never screams this question at us. It lets it linger quietly, like a flicker in the corner of your eye.

Watching without guilt

One of the most fascinating elements of The Truman Show isn't just Truman; it's the audience within the film. Around the world, people tune in daily. They cry when he cries. They root for him. They fall asleep watching his life unfold.

They love him. But they never question whether it's ethical to watch a man's entire existence without his consent.

This is where the film becomes uncomfortable in a very modern way. Today, we consume other people's lives constantly. Vlogs. Instagram stories. Reality dating shows. Viral breakdowns. We know intimate details about strangers' relationships, mental health struggles, and daily routines.

And we rarely pause to ask: when does observation become intrusion?

The audience in the film justifies their viewing because Truman seems happy. Because it's entertaining. Because "it's just a show." It mirrors how we rationalise our own digital consumption. It's harmless scrolling. Its content. It's normal.

But the normalisation of watching is what the film critiques so gently. The people who love Truman the most are also the ones enabling his captivity.

Performing ourselves

If Truman is performing unknowingly, we perform consciously.

We choose which photos to post. Which achievements to highlight? Which opinions are safe enough to share? We edit our captions. We crop out the mess. We filter lighting. We construct a coherent, digestible narrative of who we are.

The difference is that Truman never opted in. Yet the similarity is eerie.

In the film, Truman's identity is partly shaped by the expectations of his viewers. Producers script major events in his life. They cast his wife to fit an ideal narrative. They engineer emotional arcs. His personality becomes a product.

In our world, identity often becomes branding. "Networking" is a skill. "Personal brand" is a phrase we use unironically. College students maintain LinkedIn profiles that present a polished, ambitious version of themselves, while privately feeling confused, anxious, or unsure.

There's nothing inherently wrong with presentation. Humans have always performed different versions of themselves in different contexts. But the scale is different now. The audience is larger. The feedback is immediate. The pressure to remain consistent is intense.

Truman's entire existence is a performance he doesn't know he's giving. Ours is one we feel obligated to sustain.

The question becomes: at what point does the performance start shaping the person?

The illusion of safety

What makes Seahaven so effective as a prison is that it doesn't look like one.

It's sunny. Pleasant. Organized. Truman has a job. A spouse. Neighbours who greet him every morning with the same cheerful rhythm. Nothing appears threatening.

The creator of the show, Christof, argues that he has given Truman a better life than reality ever could. No war. No chaos. No unpredictability. Only safety. And yet, safety without truth becomes suffocation.

There's something deeply human about Truman's growing restlessness. He can't articulate what's wrong at first. He just feels it. A falling stage light. A radio frequency that accidentally broadcasts instructions meant for camera operators. Small cracks in the façade.

It's that feeling many people recognise in their early twenties, the sense that something doesn't quite fit. That the life you're living looks fine on paper, but feels strangely misaligned. That may be the script you're following isn't entirely yours.

The brilliance of the film is that Truman's rebellion isn't dramatic at first. It's a subtle curiosity. He asks questions. He tests boundaries. He tries to leave. There's courage in that.

Choosing the door

Without spoiling too much for anyone who hasn't seen it, the film builds toward a single powerful image: a door.

Truman reaches the literal edge of his constructed world. The sky peels back. The illusion collapses. For the first time, he's offered a choice that isn't manipulated.

Stay in comfort, adored by millions. Or step into uncertainty, where no one is directing the script.

It's a simple moment, but emotionally enormous. Because it reflects something universal. There's always a door somewhere in our lives, a decision that requires giving up predictability for authenticity. A career change. A confrontation. A refusal to keep performing a role that no longer fits.

Leaving doesn't guarantee happiness. It guarantees reality. And reality is messy.

The final scene is iconic not because it's loud or explosive, but because it's quiet and deliberate. Truman smiles, bows, and chooses himself.

Why it feels even more relevant now

In 1998, reality television was still a novelty. Social media didn't exist in its current form. Influencer culture was unimaginable.

Today, the premise of The Truman Show feels less like dystopian fiction and more like an exaggerated mirror.

We track our lives in stories and highlights. We measure validation in numbers. We watch strangers for entertainment and allow ourselves to be watched in return. We construct narratives that make us legible to an invisible audience.

The difference is consent, and even that feels blurry sometimes. Are we choosing to share, or are we sharing because the social structure nudges us to?

The film doesn't condemn technology. It doesn't scream about moral collapse. Instead, it asks a quieter, more unsettling question:

Are you living your life or living the version of it that feels most watchable?

So... are we Truman?

Maybe not in the literal sense. There are no hidden cameras embedded in our ceiling (hopefully). No director orchestrating our every interaction.

But the metaphor holds. We curate. We perform. We consume. We remain within socially constructed boundaries that feel like freedom because they're comfortable. And yet, there's something hopeful in the story. Truman's awakening isn't cynical. It's empowering. The film suggests that awareness is possible. Those systems can be questioned. Those scripts can be abandoned.

It doesn't argue that being seen is inherently wrong. It argues that being seen without agency is.

In the end, The Truman Show isn't just about surveillance or media or reality television. It's about the human need for authenticity. The quiet discomfort of living a life that doesn't fully feel like yours. The bravery required to step through a door when the world you've known has been carefully arranged for your comfort.

Watching it today doesn't feel nostalgic. It feels personal. Because in a culture that constantly asks us to perform, the most radical thing might be choosing to live unscripted. more

Career development

 1d

No replies, no rejections: What's behind the growing silence in hiring? - The Times of India


A young graduate in Delhi refreshes her inbox for the tenth time that day. She has sent out more than a hundred applications in a matter of weeks, each one carefully edited, each one carrying a measure of hope. Nothing arrives. No rejection, no acknowledgement, only silence that stretches longer with each passing day. Her experience is no longer an exception. It is fast becoming the norm.A recent... report by pre-employment testing firm Criteria, cited by Fortune, confirms what job seekers have been quietly enduring: employers are increasingly failing to respond, and the trend is worsening year after year.The data is stark. More than half of job seekers, 53%, reported being ghosted in the past year, according to Criteria's findings. The rise has been steady and troubling, climbing from 38% in 2024 to 48% in 2025. At what point did acknowledgement itself become too much to ask?At first glance, it is easy to place the blame on unresponsive recruiters or overburdened hiring teams. But the reality runs deeper.The hiring process has been reshaped by technology. With the aid of artificial intelligence, candidates can create their own résumés and apply to jobs on an unprecedented scale. Thousands of candidates can apply to a single job posting in a matter of hours.Efficiency on one side of the equation breeds overload on the other side of the equation. Recruiting teams are left to sort through a mountain of applications, often struggling to find meaningful differentiations between candidates. The more applications they get, the less they can meaningfully engage with each one.And so, responses slow down. In many cases, they stop altogether.The résumé, once a personal and laboriously created document, is becoming less effective as a gauge of potential because the technology is constantly improving the language, structure, and keyword content, and all applicants seem to have the same level of polish.On paper, everyone is a good match. Everyone is a good fit. But what happens when everyone is a good match, and everyone is a good fit? This raises a pressing question:If everyone seems like the right fit, how does anyone get chosen?Silence is only one part of the problem. The other is more unsettling. A 2024 report by MyPerfectResume revealed that 81% of recruiters admitted their organisations post roles that are either already filled or never existed.The reasons vary. Some companies aim to maintain visibility on job platforms. Others test how listings perform or gather insights about competitors and the market.For employers, these may be calculated decisions. For job seekers, they represent wasted time and misplaced hope.Applications are written, forms completed, interviews sometimes even attended -- all for opportunities that were never truly open.What does this do to the credibility of the hiring process?The narrative is often framed as a failure of employers to respond. But the system itself is under strain. Candidates apply in large numbers because they expect silence. Employers respond less frequently because they are overwhelmed by volume.This, in turn, encourages the other side to respond in a similar way, creating a cycle that is difficult to reverse.Somewhere along the way, the purpose of recruitment, which is to link people to meaningful work, has become secondary to the process itself.There is a person behind every statistic. Silence, repeated over time, erodes one's confidence. It fills one's mind with doubt, where before there was clarity.Job candidates start to wonder if they're good enough, if they made the right decisions, if they're worthwhile in the job market. Without feedback, they don't know how to get better, they don't know what they did wrong.As a result, some are going to extreme lengths to get noticed: directly contacting hiring managers, showing up to offices, seeking online fame.But should visibility require this level of persistence?The questions now are difficult but necessary: Should companies be held accountable for failing to respond to applicants? Is it ethical to advertise roles that are not genuinely open? And in an age where AI shapes every application, what will replace the résumé as a measure of merit? Until these questions are addressed, silence will continue to define the job search. And for millions of applicants, the hardest part will not be rejection, it will be not being seen at all. more

Career development

 1d

Working Strategies: Is it really the end of résumés?


Elon Musk doesn't want your résumé, at least for his AI5 chip design team - he only wants three bullet points describing the toughest technical problems you've solved. Jeff Taylor, the founder of Monster.com, doesn't want résumés, either. Having created a platform that manages millions of résumés annually, he now believes they have outlived their usefulness. He favors candidate dossiers instead,... preferably housed on his new platform, BoomBand.

Musk and Taylor are far from unique in their views about the demise of résumés. Indeed, I've seen this prediction come and go plenty of times. Whether the culprit was going to be the internet, video profiles, LinkedIn profiles, online job boards, "universal" online job applications or artificial intelligence, the alert has always been the same: We don't need résumés anymore; they're going to disappear.

In some cases, the opposite happened. When online job postings replaced print ads, the tide turned to ... multiple résumés per person. Now instead of mailing a pre-printed résumé in response to a newspaper ad, applicants began creating new résumés for every online posting. And voila - in lieu of eliminating résumés altogether, typical candidates had (have) dozens of résumés, each telling a slightly different story.

So what's really going to happen with résumés? I don't know, but I'm pretty sure they're not going to disappear. Not because they're such great tools but because we haven't found anything better.

At their best, résumés summarize a candidate's work and education in a concise and compelling format. Of course, at their worst, résumés go on and on about the wrong things or fail to say anything at all. At their worst-worst? They're produced and distributed by artificial intelligence in such abundance that hiring managers suffocate under their weight.

And that, in a nutshell, might be one reason this year's prediction of the résumé's demise could actually come true. Already, online job postings are exclaiming "No résumé needed!" Instead, they welcome the candidate to complete the online application, skipping the cover letter as well.

Hmm. My job is to tell you when something smells fishy, and, well, p-yew.

Here's the problem: Choosing between résumés, applications or even dossiers when applying online is about as much of a choice as deciding which swimsuit to wear on the Titanic. You might look fabulous in one or the other, but the ship's still going down.

The issue isn't the résumé, it's the online system. And before that, the issue was the newspaper advertising system. Why? Because most job openings aren't advertised, regardless of the platform. Which in turn means job seekers solve the wrong problem when they try to improve on their response to advertised jobs.

Which leaves us where, exactly? Back to using résumés, because that's how you tell your story to networking contacts who are going to lead you to those unadvertised jobs.

To make the best of this situation, you need to think from the recipient's perspective. These are people, not AI bots or applicant tracking systems. They're not scanning for keywords; they're reading a story about a person - also not a bot! - who could become their employee, colleague and friend.

So give them a story. Create that profile or summary statement, frontload your strengths and best skills, write those descriptions of your best projects and achievements in jobs past, describe your volunteer and community work, share those hobbies and interests. In short, treat the person reading your résumé like a person. And then send the résumé to people instead of machines.

In the meantime, what about Musk's three bullet points and Taylor's dossiers? You can take the best from these ideas without getting tangled up in someone's "better mousetrap." For example, identifying a key project or achievement and learning to tell it in three short parts (bullets) is the heart of behavioral interviewing; it's a good skill to learn.

Likewise, dossiers are essentially portfolios - multi-modal ways of showing your skills. Instead of trusting your materials to someone else's platform (or in addition), why not create your own short website, replete with your "show and tell"?

Here's the bottom line: Applications - in whatever platform they appear - are the employer's tool, designed to reveal your weak spots while quashing the parts that make you human. Résumés are the candidate's tool, a blank page standing ready to present the whole, best you. You just need to remember that online bots don't care, so skip that delivery system and tell your story to the humans.

There's another job search tool you'll want to know about. Skills-testing is making a comeback, helping employers really understand which candidates can do the job. Come back next week for a closer look at modern versions of this blast from the past. more

Career development

 1d

AI Is Hastening the Résumé's Demise. Good Riddance


Artificial intelligence isn't just being blamed for killing jobs; it's exposing the fundamental flaw in one of hiring's oldest tools: the résumé.

Thanks to AI, any applicant can churn out a polished, professional-looking version with a few basic prompts -- regardless of their qualifications. Frustrated companies have responded in kind by deploying the technology to sort the submissions.

The... methods may have changed, but this is a familiar tug-of-war. For close to a century, the résumé has been the focus of an intense struggle between job seekers hoping to present themselves in the most flattering light and employers eager to find the best candidate. But its usefulness was short-lived at best and should have been replaced with a better way to evaluate job seekers long ago.

Though it's possible to find documents that look vaguely like a résumé prior to the 1920s, the version we know today came into its own that decade. Researchers in what's now known as industrial and organizational psychology grappled with a challenge confronting large corporations: what was the best way to screen the applications of hundreds of job candidates about whom next to nothing was known?

Up until then, many employers placed great reliance on a "Letter of Application," or what we would simply call a cover letter. Then, as now, it invited applicants to explain why they were particularly qualified or well-suited for a particular job, noting their experience, talents, and temperament.

Donald Laird, a professor at Colgate University, thought it was ridiculous that managers would rely on these letters to pick the best candidates. In his popular 1925 book, The Psychology of Selecting Men, he heaped scorn on the cover letter. He pointed to a number of real-world experiments showing that applicants tended to overstate their qualifications and otherwise mislead potential employers.

Nonetheless, managers put great faith in them. To counter this, Lairdpublicized a number of tests that demonstrated how managers could be easily gulled by the inflated self-assessments of job applicants, or simply react in subjective, unpredictable ways. A candidate whom one manager ranked first would be ranked last by another. When shown the same letters a month later, some managers completely reversed their initial judgment.

Laird and other members of the industrial and organizational psychology field advocated for "scientific" methods of assessing job candidates, such as objective tests of skill -- for example, a typing test. They also advanced the heretical idea that the standard "Letter of Application" should come with a sobering chaser: a dull, just-the-facts recitation of the applicant's job history, education, references and other objective data. Initially, researchers called it a "data sheet" or "qualifications brief." Whatever the name, make no mistake: the résumé had arrived.

Applicants quickly realized that the new addition, far from being an obstacle to selling themselves, could be a useful tool in the struggle to stand out from others. In a confession from 1952, one job candidate described how he had typed up his résumé and then brought it to a copy shop, paying extra for a printing process that "makes each piece look as if it is a hand-typed original" -- proof that the résumé in question had been specially prepared for this one position. Then he sent out 100 copies to different organizations.

With that hack, job candidates began submitting résumés regardless of whether a job opening asked for one. In 1958, the Wall Street Journal interviewed an executive from a placement firm, who reported: "We send out about 50,000 resumes a week. Ten years ago, it was closer to 500." An executive with Borg-Warner Corporation likewise declared: "Everybody in middle management keeps a résumé handy these days. It's just part of the businessman's briefcase."

Increasingly, human resources departments noticed that applicants used the résumé to tell white lies, and even bigger fibs, listing fictitious degrees, fake promotions and other embellishments.

By 1968, the Journal found that résumé padding had reached epidemic proportions. "Most firms say they tolerate -- and even expect -- a certain amount of fudging in applicants' resumes," the paper reported. A personnel manager was quoted as saying, "Most of us have a tendency to look the other way when a guy who looks like a real winner is caught in a small lie."

When the '70s and '80s came around, employers confronted an additional challenge: the rise of a new industry dedicated to helping job candidates draft the best possible résumés. There wasn't anything inherently wrong with this, but outsourcing the writing to professionals only underscored the degree to which this humble document, once meant to blunt the puffery of the cover letter, had now become the leading weapon in the job seeker's arsenal.

In 1996, hired-gun résumé writers even got their own professional organization: the National Résumé Writers Association. The advent of the internet around the same time made a growing number of résumé-writing templates and guides available to anyone with a modem.

Sign up for the Bloomberg Opinion bundle

Sign up for the Bloomberg Opinion bundle

Sign up for the Bloomberg Opinion bundle

Get Matt Levine's Money Stuff, John Authers' Points of Return and Jessica Karl's Opinion Today.

Get Matt Levine's Money Stuff, John Authers' Points of Return and Jessica Karl's Opinion Today.

Get Matt Levine's Money Stuff, John Authers' Points of Return and Jessica Karl's Opinion Today.

Bloomberg may send me offers and promotions.

Plus Signed UpPlus Sign UpPlus Sign Up

By submitting my information, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

It's no wonder we've forgotten that sheet of paper's original function. As one workplace expert told the New York Times in 2006: "A good résumé is not simply a rehash of past responsibilities, it's a celebration of successes." To that, I say it's time for more employers to rediscover the virtues of screening applicants by administering skills tests and having prospective employees work for (paid) trial periods before tendering a formal offer.

The résumé may have been created with good intentions, but it has never performed the job it was supposed to do. It's time to let it go.

More from Bloomberg Opinion:

* You Won't Find Salvation in AI: Catherine Thorbecke

* AI Hype Is Proving to Be a Solow's Paradox: Stephen Mihm

* Some AI Gig Workers Make $1,000 an Hour. Can That Last?: Parmy Olson

Want more from Bloomberg Opinion? OPIN . Or subscribe to our daily newsletter. more

William Robinson


Career development 1w
I had a job interview at a small company. The director said he was going to lunch and asked me to go with him. He bought me a coffee, we talked calmly and then he said I got the job and could start on Monday. I still don’t understand what the catch is. Or did I really just get lucky and find a job that easily?

9   

  • Benjamin Wambuyu

    2d

    Bruh just play along...embrace it.....you'll ask him after 1 year why he chose you

  • Renate Fester

    3d

    While there is nothing inherently wrong with this approach, it is nonetheless unconventional. That said, though, it might be worth asking the question... for purposes of context and clarity. Knowing what went right in an interview is as important as knowing what went wrong. Typically, and I'll say this again, interviews are generally used to determine culture fit and are used less to determine expertise. Expertise is usually determined by the CV, so when a candidate gets to the interview stage, the company already knows they have the knowledge and skills to do the job. The interview decides whether you will fit in. So if you really want to know, book a meeting with him and ask. more

Load more...

Anonymous member


Career development 2d
please i need a guide on how to prepare for a live recruitment assessment that would last for 30 minutes, any suggestions please?
1   

Career development

 2d

Part-Time Job Search Support - 21/03/2026 00:18 EDT


I'm ready to move into a reliable part-time position and would like an experienced recruitment or career-coaching professional to guide me from start to finish. That includes sharpening my résumé, optimising my online profiles, scouting roles that fit my background, and preparing me to interview with confidence. I'm open to opportunities across administrative, technical or creative areas, so feel... free to suggest openings where my transferable skills can add value. Here's what I need from you: * A fully polished résumé and brief cover-letter template tailored for part-time applications * A curated list of at least ten suitable part-time vacancies with direct application links * Practical interview prep sessions -- question drills, feedback and confidence-building tips I'll share my current CV and availability as soon as we begin, and I'm happy to collaborate through video calls, chat or shared documents -- whatever keeps us both on track. If you have a proven track record placing candidates in part-time roles, let's connect and get my next opportunity locked in. more

Career development

 2d

Virtual Assistant Needed to Apply for Jobs Daily (Tech Roles)


Each day I need 30-50 targeted applications sent out on my behalf and recorded neatly in a shared Google Sheet. The priority is company career sites rather than public boards, so you will spend most of your time on the internal portals of tech, finance, and healthcare organisations that match my résumé and stated preferences. Your routine will look like this: * Search approved company portals for... fresh openings that align with my background. * Adjust the résumé or cover-letter template just enough to reflect each posting's keywords or unique requirements. * Submit the application, double-checking every field for accuracy and compliance with site rules (no bots or grey-area automation). * Log the role title, link, salary range if listed, date applied, and any follow-up steps in the tracker. I will provide: - Current résumé, multiple cover-letter templates, and a quick-reference sheet of my target roles, skills, and location preferences. - Access to the Google Sheet tracker and a short Loom walkthrough of the exact process I want followed. You should already feel comfortable writing concise, mistake-free English, following granular instructions, and working with LinkedIn-style application forms, but the real key is accuracy: every field completed, every attachment correct, every entry recorded. Prior experience in recruiting or high-volume job searching will help you move quickly without cutting corners. This is long-term, part-time work that repeats daily. Let me know about any similar projects you've handled, the average number of applications you managed per day, and the tools you used to stay organised. Reliable, instruction-driven support is exactly what I'm after; if that sounds like you, I'm ready to get started. more

Career development

 2d

The Benefits of Graduating Magna Cum Laude for Your Career Success


Many students and parents wonder, "Is magna cum laude good for career success?" Achieving magna cum laude honors is traditionally associated with academic excellence, representing a significant accomplishment during one's higher education journey. But how does this accolade translate to career benefits post-graduation? In this article, we explore the advantages of graduating magna cum laude and... how this distinction can impact your professional life.

Is Magna Cum Laude Good for Career Prospects?

Graduating with magna cum laude honors signifies that a student has achieved a high level of academic excellence. Employers often regard such honors as indicative of a candidate's ability to perform at a high intellectual level, demonstrating dedication, discipline, and competence. It's important to understand how this prestige might advantage you in a competitive job market and assist in your career development.

Understanding Academic Honors

In academia, honors such as summa cum laude, magna cum laude, and cum laude are used to distinguish the academic performance of graduates. These Latin honors translate to "with highest honor," "with great honor," and "with honor" respectively. Magna cum laude typically requires a GPA between that of cum laude and summa cum laude, though exact criteria can vary by institution.

Career Advancement Opportunities

Graduating magna cum laude is often seen favorably by prospective employers, especially within highly competitive fields such as law, medicine, or academia. Employers may interpret this achievement as a sign of an applicant's potential, commitment, and perseverance. These traits are highly valued in the professional landscape.

Boosting Your Resume

Your resume is often the first impression you make in the job market. Including magna cum laude in your academic achievements can differentiate your application from others. It's demonstrative of your capability to achieve and maintain high standards, which can be an attractive trait to potential employers.

Networking Benefits

Beyond the immediate advantages of job searching, graduating magna cum laude can also enhance networking opportunities. Alumni networks and industry connections value such distinctions, providing a platform to discuss shared experiences and gain insights from established professionals.

Scholarships and Graduate School

Those considering further education may find that magna cum laude honors make them more competitive for scholarships and graduate school admissions. Academic institutions often favor candidates with outstanding academic records, viewing them as assets to their programs.

If you plan to seek recommendations for graduate studies, consider leveraging tools and tips from our comprehensive guide on letters of recommendation.

Considerations and Limitations

While magna cum laude can be advantageous, it is also crucial to consider the whole profile of job applicants. Employers often prioritize skills, experience, cultural fit, and other professional qualities. It is equally important to develop a well-rounded portfolio that complements your academic achievements.

The Psychological Impact

Graduating with honors can boost confidence, demonstrating to yourself and others that you are capable of achieving set goals. This sense of self-efficacy can propel you toward taking on new challenges and responsibilities in your professional journey.

Final Thoughts: Is Magna Cum Laude Good?

So, is magna cum laude good for career success? While it's not a guaranteed ticket to success, it certainly strengthens your positioning in many ways. Emphasizing academic honors can enhance job prospects and professional growth opportunities, making it a worthwhile pursuit.

* Magna cum laude is a prestigious academic honor.

* It can positively impact your job prospects.

* Honors can enhance your resume and networking opportunities.

* Consider all career aspects, not just academics.

* Your success also depends on a well-rounded skill set.

FAQ

What GPA is typically required for magna cum laude?

The GPA requirement for magna cum laude often varies by institution but generally falls between 3.7 to 3.9 on a 4.0 scale.

Does magna cum laude offer more opportunities in certain fields?

Yes, fields such as law, academia, and certain sectors in finance and technology often place a higher value on academic honors.

How should I note magna cum laude on my resume?

Include magna cum laude under the education section of your resume, often right below your degree and your institution's name.

Are Latin honors the same worldwide?

Latin honors systems are mainly used in the United States and some parts of Europe. Other countries might have different systems to denote academic excellence.

Where can I learn more about academic honors?

Further information on academic honors can be found in educational resources like Wikipedia's page on education. more