Career development

Anonymous member

2d

Please how do you cope with non-chalant staffs as a senior colleague. Staffs that are so complacent when you give them task to do and are always full of excuses but they are good at their skills, i mean they are very good at what they do.

2

Nafisa Hamed
10h
I suggest that to cope with non-chalant staffs, I would be motivating by some quote and over some training to them that will encourage them.
Renata Fester
15h
First off let me say that non-chalants is very subjective. That said lets deal with the issue as you have suggested it exists. There may be two issues... playing out here. One may be that your staff are unmotivated to do the job. This is a management issue and needs to be resolved at this level. Staff may not feel invested in their work or may feel undervalued. Secondly, if these staff are very good at what they do, they may just be plain bored and unstimulated by their current work. Highly competent people need highly stimulating work, or they will appear disinterested and complacent. If these people are not involved in stimulating work that challenges their skill sets, they will eventually underperform or leave for more exciting roles. It might be time to evaluate the type of work they are being tasked to do and determine if this is meeting their stimulation levels. If it's not, they are bored out of their minds and require significantly more stimulating work. more

Career development

17h

Fridge lockbox guide: How to stop your lunch disappearing at work

You place your lunch in the shared fridge with optimism.

You return a few hours later...

...and it appears to have been rehomed.

No forwarding address provided.

It's a familiar experience -- and, for us, a founding one. The idea for a simple fridge lockbox started after our founder's own lunch went missing at uni.

The lightbulb moment

The idea for the fridge lockbox began with Peter, our... CEO, during his time at university.

Faced with a shared fridge and housemates who took a fairly relaxed view of ownership, his food had a habit of disappearing. It quickly became clear that relying on goodwill alone had its limitations. A more reliable solution was needed, and soon after, the first Lockabox was born.

👉 Learn more about the Lockabox journey

Is your food going missing at work?

You're in good company. CareerBuilder research suggests office fridge theft is more common than most would admit.

Around 1 in 5 workers (18%) say they've helped themselves to someone else's lunch!

The office fridge, it seems, still operates on a rather loose interpretation of ownership. And it's not always as simple as someone taking an entire lunch.

More often, it shows up in a few familiar forms:

* The sampler - never takes the whole thing, just a "small" bite here or a yoghurt there. Technically not theft, apparently. Just... amending your lunch

* The optimistic mistaken - convinced it was theirs, or at least similar enough to proceed without asking too many questions

* The committed repeat offender - approaches the fridge with gusto and leaves with someone else's lunch. Not for the first time!

Do you have a fridge theft problem at your workplace?

We can help. Lockabox offers organisations a simple, secure storage solution that fits easily into existing spaces and routines - bringing structure without unnecessary complexity.

👉 Get in touch with the team and we will help

What is a fridge lockbox?

A fridge lockbox is a secure, lockable container designed specifically for shared environments like office kitchens. In practical terms, it ensures your food remains yours.

A secure lockable fridge box:

* Prevents unauthorised access

* Reduces food theft

* Keeps food hygienic and separate

👉 Ideal for offices, hospitals, warehouses, and shared living spaces

Why food theft happens in workplace fridges

Food theft at work is rarely dramatic. More often that not, it's:

* A misunderstanding

* A lack of labelling

* Or quiet optimism that no one will notice

Shared fridges tend to encourage this because:

* Everything looks similar

* Nothing is clearly defined

* Access is, unfortunately, very easy

Over time, this leads to mild but persistent frustration, and a noticeable decline in trust over leftover pasta.

A fridge lockbox introduces a clear boundary - without requiring anyone to have an awkward conversation.

Why a fridge lockbox works better than other solutions

Workplaces often try to address the issue indirectly:

* Labelling food can be helpful, but in reality it's not preventative

* Policies are well-intentioned, yet frequently ignored

* Reminders are briefly effective, then forgotten

A fridge lockbox works because it circumnavigates all of this. A physical box, physically prevents access, requires no monitoring and leaves very little room for interpretation. No reminders necessary.

Do you have a business enquiry?

For larger orders, organisations can save up to 25%, making Lockabox a practical choice for scaling secure storage across teams and sites.

Request a quote

How to choose the best fridge lockbox

1. Size & fit

A well-designed fridge lockbox should fit standard fridge shelves, stack neatly with others, and hold a complete meal -- rather than just a yoghurt and a compromise

2. Lock type

For workplaces, a combination lock is ideal as there are no keys to keep track of, whereas a key lock can be workable but is more likely to be misplaced.

3. Durability

Shared kitchens are not especially forgiving environments. Look for strong, impact-resistant plastic, BPA-free materials and a lock that withstands daily use.

4. Hygiene & food safety

Shared kitchens are recognised hygiene risk areas in workplaces (NHS guidance). Workplace fridges see a great deal of traffic, so a good fridge lockbox helps prevent cross-contamination, contains spills, and keeps contents enclosed and separate.

5. Visibility

Transparent designs offer a quiet advantage by reducing confusion, improving organisation, and discouraging creative interpretations of ownership.

The best fridge lockbox options for the workplace

Lockabox One

Durable, stackable, combination lock, designed specifically for shared environments

Lockabox Mini

Compact and space-efficient, suitable for smaller fridge spaces

👉 Explore the full Lockabox fridge solutions for workplaces

Consumer alternatives

* SafeDelux → less durable over time

* Sistema → no locking mechanism

* OXO → also not lockable

The above consumer alternatives are perfectly adequate at home, however they are less convincing in a shared fridge with competing interests.

How to implement fridge lockboxes at work

There's no need for a complex rollout;

Provide each employee with a fridge lockbox, place them in the shared fridge, and explain their use. This roll out method has proven sufficient, and best of all, no policy documents are required.

A fridge lockbox is a really straightforward solution to a very common problem. It prevents food theft, improves hygiene and reduces unnecessary workplace friction -- all without requiring anyone to send another carefully worded email about missing lunches. more

Jamie Bowen

Career development

1d

I hired a new team member, he’s about 40. At the interview he seemed polite and easy to talk to, and for the first two weeks he worked well with clients. But lately he’s been getting more and more irritable, and even started snapping at customers. I understand he might be tired from a new job, but I’m not sure, will he settle down soon? Or will it get worse, and should I start looking for someone... who handles people better?
What do you think?

more

1

Tee Mitchell
8h
The conversation should start with your employee and you should do this on your own. Allow the employee to speak freely without consequence for the... purpose of understanding the issue. Listen and fully comprehend. If you have issues with what is stated say why and be clear and consise. Once you two have a better understanding then you will know the next move. Only you two can determine how to move forward but be willing to accept or move past what is said. Either you both will gain a better understanding of the other or you will know if you should look for someone else. more
kosgei philemon
11h
He could have been fed some stories by the staff, with the intention of creating sabotage. check other factors, including the former employees

Career development

5d

I've applied to 1,000 jobs since earning my master's and am still unemployed. I'm frustrated because I thought I did everything right.

I'm frustrated because I thought I did everything right, but I'm now focusing on freelancing.

For most of my life, I believed in a very specific formula: work hard in school, build a strong résumé, study abroad, learn languages, get a master's degree, and be globally aware.

I studied journalism and media, and I leaned into storytelling early on. I spent time abroad multiple times in Rome,... Florence, Kuwait, and Scotland. I learned how to navigate new cultures, new systems, and new expectations. I became fluent in spaces that were not designed for a first-generation student like me.

After graduating, I went on to earn my master's degree in international affairs as part of the inaugural cohort at John Cabot University in Rome (again). I focused on global justice, human rights, and representation. I contributed to research on the gig economy, attended UN conferences both in Italy and Azerbaijan, and built what I thought was a strong, competitive profile.

I completed my MA degree early, believing I had done everything right. But I still can't find a job.

Since graduating, I've applied to over 1,000 jobs.

That includes roles in Rome with UN agencies, NGOs, and humanitarian organizations. It also includes jobs across the US -- in-person, hybrid, and remote roles. I applied to communications positions, research roles, media jobs, and anything that aligned with my background in storytelling and global affairs.

I tailored résumés. I wrote cover letters that took hours. I researched organizations, memorized their missions, reached out to every connection, and prepared for interviews like they were exams.

Out of all those applications, I've gotten 15 interviews. Only two of those moved me to a second round. Less than five of the roles I interviewed for were actually filled.

For the rest, I watched the same job postings reappear weeks or months later. Were those even real positions?

It started to feel like I wasn't competing for jobs. I was competing for the possibility of a job.

Rejection is one thing. Uncertainty is another.

When you don't get a job, you can usually point to something. Maybe someone had more experience. Maybe you didn't interview well. Maybe the role just wasn't the right fit.

But what do you do when there's no outcome at all? When positions stay open indefinitely. When companies repost roles without hiring. When you make it through multiple steps and still hear nothing back.

It creates this constant loop in your mind. You start questioning everything: your degree, your experience, and the choices you made.

I did everything I was told would make me employable. Yet, I've never felt more unsure about where I stand.

At some point, I had to shift my focus from waiting to building.

During undergrad, I spent four years working in publicity and creative marketing. That became the one thing I could return to when the job market kept shutting me out.

Now, I freelance as a creative director and marketing professional. I design campaigns, create visual content, and work with clients to build cohesive brand identities. I've worked on everything from social media strategy to email marketing to photoshoots to editorial visuals.

It's not stable or the full-time role I desire for myself. But it's something I built myself.

Freelancing has taught me how to trust my skills in a different way. It's shown me that I don't need permission to create meaningful work.

Still, there's a difference between surviving and feeling secure. I'm still trying to figure out how to bridge that gap.

For a long time, I was chasing stability as it was defined for me: a full time job, steady paycheck, and clear title. But not having that has pushed me to ask a different question. What kind of work do I actually want to be doing?

The answer keeps bringing me back to storytelling.

I want to be a creative director who focuses on telling BIPOC stories with care and accuracy. I want to create media that doesn't flatten people into stereotypes or reduce cultures into trends. I want to build projects that feel honest, layered, and intentional.

That's the work I've been drawn to for years. It's also the work I kept putting off because I thought I needed something more "stable" first.

Now, I'm starting to see that maybe the path I was following was never designed to lead me there.

I don't have a clean ending to this story.

I'm still applying for jobs while freelancing, and trying to make sense of a system that feels unpredictable and, at times, impossible to navigate.

But I also know this: the effort I've put in hasn't been wasted. It just didn't lead me where I expected. Maybe that means I have to build something different instead. more

5

R R
22h
What’s your master’s in?
Blessing Ogah
1d
I can relate with what you are going through. I stopped applying for awhile now. Maybe is a sign you should be an employer of labor and not... employee....keep building yours while you volunteer with any firm that may have what you are aspiring..... best of luck to you. more

Career development

23h

10 Best Applicant Tracking System (ATS) 2026 - CoinCodeCap

It's difficult to choose which applicant tracking system (ATS) is best for you when there are so many options accessible. You want tools to help you source, track, and organize candidates, as well as automation to help you recruit faster, but you must first determine which product is ideal for you. In this article, I'll simplify your decision by giving my opinions on the 10 best applicant tracking... system!

What is an Applicant Tracking System?

An Applicant Tracking System (ATS) is a software tool that allows businesses to manage and streamline their recruitment processes. It acts as a consolidated location for managing the entire hiring process, from advertising job positions to managing resumes and communicating with candidates.

Key features of an Applicant Tracking System

* Job Posting: Recruiters can generate and post job vacancies straight from the ATS to multiple job boards, career websites, and social media channels.

* Resume Parsing: Automatically extracts key information from resumes, including contact information, work experience, education, and abilities, making it easier to organize and search candidate data.

* Candidate Management: Offers a database for storing and managing candidate information. Recruiters can follow candidates' progress, take notes, and engage with team members.

* Application Workflow: Defines and automates the recruitment process workflow, ensuring that each candidate completes all required phases, from application submission to final hiring decision.

* Communication: Facilitates communication among recruiters, hiring managers, and candidates. Many ATS platforms feature email templates and communication tool integration to help with interaction efficiency.

List of Applicant Tracking Systems

1. Greenhouse

Greenhouse is a recruiting management program that assists you in identifying, categorizing, and nurturing talent. You can use it to create a strong candidate pipeline and identify the best prospects for each open position.

One noteworthy aspect that truly distinguishes Greenhouse is its organized hiring capabilities. Their systematic hiring workflow is intended to provide a consistent and equitable interviewing experience by identifying the qualifications, experience, and characteristics that a successful candidate must possess for an open position before the job is advertised.

* Easy tracking with the help of candidate scorecards.

* Developing tailored assessment strategies for interviewers to determine the appropriate skill set and capabilities.

* Customization of career pages, job boards, and email templates.

* Simplified report configuration.

* Best for mid-sized organizations growing quickly.

Also, you may read 10 Best Small Business HR Software

2. Jobvite

Jobvite ATS is a cloud-based, candidate-focused software that allows for social recruiting, the creation and management of mobile-optimized career portals, and onboarding functions. They also provide a mobile application for the tool. The software has features designed specifically for interviews, requisitions, and personnel referrals. This solution is best suited to medium and large-sized businesses.

* Easy employee referrals

* Automated screening and interview-based candidate ranking

* Mobile-friendly application methods for candidates.

* The Smart Scheduler tool looks at the schedules of many interviewers and selects the optimal time to arrange a new interview.

* A single record is kept for all talks with a certain candidate across channels.

* Use this powerful search engine to find candidates by name, keywords, workflow, location, or date of application.

3. TalentReef

TalentReef's ATS and recruiting tools are designed exclusively for firms that hire hourly workers. In addition to staffing tools, it provides talent management capabilities such as performance, pay, and job management.

Further, the software allows you to follow applicants throughout the hiring process and manage the candidate experience. As potential new hires apply for your open positions, you'll be able to review their resumes and conduct assessments to improve screening.

Also, you may also create flexible processes to advance candidates through the phases in a way that works best for your company, and you can simply schedule interviews using the platform.

* Recruiting and talent management in one location

* Designed specifically for the needs of hourly employees.

* Customizable workflows and templates

4. MightyRecruiter

MightyRecruiter is a free application tracking system that can assist recruiting managers find both active and passive prospects.

MightRecruiter offers job vacancies to over 29 job boards, including LinkedIn, Glassdoor, and CareerBuilder. It also scans your social media networks for potential prospects, allowing you to maximize your network.

When applications begin to arrive, AI is used to identify the most qualified job seekers and guide them through the recruiting process.

* Source active and passive applicants from various platforms.

* Extract information about candidates directly from their social profiles.

* Integrate MightyRecruiter with your existing ATS.

* Send personalized, automated messages to prospects from within the system, keeping everything in one place.

Also, you may read 8 Best HR Software for Startups

5. Bullhorn

Bullhorn prioritizes the applicant experience and cultivates high-touch interactions. This is combined with cutting-edge automated technologies to assist place the appropriate individuals in the right roles.

This application tracking software, designed for staffing organizations, helps recruiters manage the entire recruitment process, from candidate sourcing to client billing. Its purpose is to streamline your operations and help you place more applicants, hence increasing sales.

With a centralized system for managing jobs, candidates, and tasks, you can always see where you stand in the process. You may also create reminders to perform activities at specific times, ensuring that you stay on schedule to meet your recruitment goals.

* The cloud-based technology is secure and available anywhere you are.

* The integrated CRM tool helps you remain on top of your clients' changing needs.

* There is an emphasis on customer assistance and helping clients get the most out of the system.

6. Recruitee

Recruitee begins by assisting you in creating a careers site featuring your company brand utilizing an easy-to-use editor. It then leverages a variety of sourcing tools, such as job sites, shareable social media links, and employee referrals, to find appropriate individuals.

The scheduler eliminates the trouble of interview scheduling, while interview formats and notes in the system maintain consistency and clarity. This also maintains everything in one place for quick access and encourages collaboration among the hiring team.

* Automation and templates simplify your workflow and save you time.

* You may personalize your reports and dashboards to track the process and easily see where optimization may be necessary.

* This applicant tracking software interfaces with a variety of services, including Google, Teams, Indeed, and Zapier.

Also, you may read 10 Best Employee Monitoring Softwares

7. Breezy HR

This applicant tracking system is ideal for small to midsize businesses that hire all year, such as recruiters, brick-and-mortar stores, and franchises.

Breezy creates a careers page for you and promotes your job opportunities on over 50 of the world's top job sites.

Each pricing tier of this ATS software provides additional functionality. While they all provide automated job posting and resume processing, the paid plans include automate candidate prescreening, interview scheduling via video meetings, and other repetitive chores.

The Business plan includes more advanced capabilities such as candidate comparison, job approvals, and offer administration.

* It's simple to use and personalize the system.

* The dashboard and analytics together provide plenty of information.

* The technology supports collaborative hiring, allowing all members of the recruiting team to participate.

8. BambooHR

BambooHR is a comprehensive human resource management solution that incorporates applicant tracking software. It works from a single, secure data source within the system to support hiring and onboarding, as well as employee performance, payroll, and benefits.

Throughout the employment process, this application tracking system manages all candidate data, including contact information. It also keeps track of the role's details, such as job title and description.

Status updates provide information on where the candidate is in the process as well as their current rating for the position. And, as an additional reminder of the status of their application, they can easily refer back to their most recent correspondence with that candidate.

* Automates tracking and managing candidate information to save you time.

* Allows you to communicate with the candidate at each level of the process, resulting in a positive experience for them.

* Allows for bespoke permissions, facilitating collaboration with stakeholders.

Also, you may read Top 15 Team Management Software in 2023

9. Rippling

Rippling enables you to recruit talent from numerous platforms and then set up hiring processes and workflows to manage the entire process effortlessly from start to finish.

This applicant tracking software simplifies every step, from designing interview stages based on seniority to scheduling interviews in calendars such as Outlook, Google, and iCal.

When you're ready to hire, it makes it easier to send offer letters and other necessary documents, such as job titles and descriptions, to your new employee. It also registers the new hire in all relevant systems, such as payroll and health insurance.

* It automatically uploads job posts to platforms like LinkedIn and Indeed.

* You can design reports to offer you the facts you desire, such as the time available to fill a position or feedback from candidates.

* Applicant tracking systems include learning management, allowing you to swiftly get your new hires up to speed.

10. JazzHR

JazzHR, aimed at midsize and enterprise-level enterprises, allows you to source from several job sites with a single click. Then it uses evaluations and interviews to help you rate the prospects based on your specific criteria.

You may also utilize the platform to gather feedback on candidates from everyone on the hiring team, resulting in a genuinely collaborative approach.

A digital offer management function automates and speeds up onboarding, while clear employer branding ensures that candidates have consistent and favorable experiences at all touchpoints.

* All pricing tiers support unlimited users.

* The technology enables you to design bespoke solutions to meet your hiring requirements.

* JazzHR interacts with various other comparable systems, including JobTarget, Criteria, and Recruiting.com.

Also, you may read 10 Best Knowledge Management Systems

Conclusion

When you are constantly recruiting new employees, it makes sense to identify the most efficient and effective method. An applicant tracking system allows you to manage your employment process from beginning to end.

It centralizes all of your candidate information, allowing you to sort through their profiles and collaborate with other stakeholders. An ATS also automates activities, streamlines your workflow, and enables you to make great hiring decisions for your organization. more

Career development

1d

What Do You Actually Know When You Know a Domain?

Domain expertise is not primarily factual knowledge about an industry -- that's the small, acquirable part. The larger part is structural: a map of how a domain tends to fail, which problems that look simple are actually hard, which architectural decisions will cause pain as the business evolves, and which invisible technical micro-domains will produce spectacular failures that nobody else in the... room even knew to worry about. This map is what makes the slow, ambiguous product feedback loop interpretable -- without it, signal arrives but there's nothing for it to attach to, so the developer either ignores it or mistranslates it into the nearest technical problem they can solve. Organizations systematically undervalue this because the knowledge is invisible on a résumé, its absence costs arrive through the slow feedback loop, and generic developers look cheaper on a spreadsheet until the diffuse, delayed damage becomes undeniable. Users are essential but cannot substitute for this expertise, because they describe problems in their world while developers must translate those descriptions into a system -- a translation that requires holding both worlds simultaneously. The failure runs in both directions: a developer without domain expertise can't hear what users are actually saying, while one with too much unexamined confidence stops checking their map against the territory and mistakes accumulated narrative for current truth.

We say developers need domain expertise. Everyone nods. Of course they do. But when I try to pin down what that actually means -- what you have when you have it, how you get it, why it's so hard to transfer -- the obvious answer starts to feel insufficient. So let me try to think through it from the beginning.

Start with a simple question: what is domain knowledge, exactly?

The first answer that comes to mind is factual. You know things about the industry -- the terminology, the regulations, the business processes, the workflows users follow. This is real and it matters. A developer building healthcare software who doesn't know what a care pathway is will write software that models the world incorrectly. But this kind of knowledge you can acquire from books, from documentation, from talking to stakeholders. It's not mysterious. And yet experienced developers will tell you that a developer who has only this kind of knowledge -- who knows the facts but hasn't built systems in the domain -- is still missing something important. So the facts aren't the whole story.

What's the rest?

Let me try a different angle. Think about what changes in how you work after you've spent three years building software in a specific domain versus being new to it.

The new developer asks a lot of questions. This is good. But the questions are often about facts -- what does this term mean, how does this process work, what does the user do next. The experienced developer asks different questions. They ask about edge cases that don't exist yet. They ask what happens when two systems that currently work independently need to talk to each other. They ask about the thing that was built five years ago that nobody maintains but everything depends on. They seem to know where the bodies are buried before they've found any bodies.

How? They've seen the category of problem before, even if not this specific instance. They have a map of how this kind of domain tends to fail.

This is different from factual knowledge in an important way. It's structural. It's knowledge about the shape of the problem space -- where complexity tends to accumulate, which requirements that sound simple are actually hard, which architectural decisions will feel fine for two years and then become painful as the business evolves in predictable ways. You can't get this from documentation because nobody writes it down. It lives in the developer, accumulated from exposure to slow feedback over time.

And now something clicks. This is exactly the slow feedback loop we've been thinking about. Domain expertise, at its core, is what you accumulate when you've been exposed to the product feedback loop long enough, and with enough prior structure, to actually learn from it. The facts are the easy part. The hard part is developing calibrated intuitions about which signals mean what -- and that only happens through repeated exposure to outcomes, which takes time and cannot be compressed.

But I want to examine this more carefully, because there is a more specific claim: that domain expertise isn't one thing but several. The business domain, the domains the business depends on, and a constellation of technical micro-domains the business doesn't even know exist.

Let me think about whether that decomposition actually holds up.

The business domain is the most visible layer. Healthcare, logistics, financial trading -- each has its own logic, its own constraints, its own vocabulary. Developers need this to build software that correctly models what the business actually does. Clear enough.

The dependent domains are less obvious but real. A logistics platform depends on geography, on regulatory frameworks around shipping, on the economics of route optimization, on how warehouses actually operate physically. These aren't the business's core domain but they shape it. Get them wrong and you build something that's technically correct about logistics in the abstract but wrong about logistics as it actually exists in the world. This knowledge is harder to acquire because nobody thinks to teach it -- it's assumed background that domain insiders don't notice they have.

The technical micro-domains are the strangest category and I think the most interesting. These are the invisible domains -- distributed systems behavior, database consistency under concurrent load, security attack surfaces, the failure modes of specific infrastructure components. The business has no visibility into these. Users have no visibility. They don't appear in requirements. They only appear when something goes wrong in a way that's slow to diagnose and expensive to fix.

What makes these genuinely different from the first two categories is the direction of the knowledge dependency. For business domain and dependent domain knowledge, the developer is learning things about a world that exists independently of the software. For technical micro-domain knowledge, the developer is the only one who can see the relevant world at all. It's not that the business hasn't thought carefully enough about distributed transaction consistency. It's that this problem space is entirely invisible from where they stand. Nobody can brief the developer on it. Nobody can tell them which micro-domains are relevant to the system being built. The developer has to bring that recognition themselves.

This means technical micro-domain expertise isn't just knowledge -- it's the capacity to ask questions that nobody else in the room knows need asking.

Now here's something worth sitting with. These three types of knowledge accumulate at completely different rates and through completely different mechanisms.

Business domain knowledge accumulates moderately fast through deliberate learning -- you can read, interview stakeholders, shadow users. Dependent domain knowledge accumulates more slowly because you often don't know you need it until you've already made a mistake that required it. Technical micro-domain knowledge accumulates slowest of all, because you only encounter the relevant failure modes when a system grows complex enough or scales large enough to produce them -- and by then you're already in trouble.

The different accumulation rates create a specific kind of trap for organizations. The most visible knowledge -- business domain facts -- is also the easiest to acquire and the least differentiating. The least visible knowledge -- calibrated intuition about failure modes across all three layers -- is the most valuable and the hardest to see on a résumé or assess in an interview. So organizations systematically overvalue the visible knowledge and undervalue the invisible, which makes developers look more interchangeable than they are. The costs of this mistake arrive slowly and ambiguously, which means by the time they're legible enough to force a correction, a lot of damage has already been done.

The interchangeability question deserves its own examination because I think there's something more going on than just confusion about how knowledge works.

Suppose you're a manager responsible for staffing a project. You have a developer with deep domain expertise and a developer without. The expert is more expensive, harder to replace, and creates organizational dependency -- if they leave, knowledge walks out with them. The generic developer is cheaper, more available, easier to swap if circumstances change. In the short term, on a spreadsheet, the generalist looks better.

The problem is that the costs of choosing the generic developer are paid through the slow feedback loop, not the fast one. The software ships, it mostly works, the obvious problems get fixed. But the subtle wrongness -- the models that are slightly off, the edge cases that weren't anticipated, the architectural decisions that will create pain as the business evolves -- those costs are diffuse and delayed. They appear as general slowness, as mysterious bugs, as features that keep being harder to build than they should be. They're almost never correctly attributed to the original decision to staff with generalists, because the signal is too far from the cause.

Meanwhile the costs of the expert -- the salary, the dependency -- are immediate and precise. They show up on this quarter's budget. The slow feedback loop gets ignored again, in exactly the pattern we keep finding.

Let me turn to the user question, because I think this is where the argument gets most interesting and most easily misread.

The claim is that users can't substitute for developer domain expertise. This is correct. But I want to understand precisely why, because "developers know better than users" is a conclusion that has historically been reached for very bad reasons and produced very bad software.

Users are not trying to describe a system. They're trying to describe a problem they have in the world. These are different things and the translation between them requires exactly the kind of domain expertise we've been discussing. A user who says "the reporting is too slow" is giving you a real signal about a real problem. But what they cannot tell you is whether the solution is a better query, a different data model, a caching layer, a rethinking of what the report is actually computing, or a fundamental architectural change that's been accumulating technical debt for three years. That translation requires knowing both the user's world and the system's world -- which is precisely the combination of business domain and technical micro-domain knowledge that only the developer can hold.

Where domain expertise is absent, this translation fails in a specific way. The developer takes user descriptions too literally, building exactly what was asked for rather than what would solve the problem. Or they take them too abstractly, disappearing into architectural elegance that doesn't connect to the actual workflow. The feedback from users doesn't improve matters much because the developer isn't equipped to interpret it -- they receive the signal but have no map to locate it in.

So the users aren't wrong to want what they ask for. They're describing their problem as best they can. The expertise is what allows the developer to hear something more specific than what was said -- to translate a complaint about slowness into a diagnosis, and a diagnosis into the right intervention.

But here's the part the original argument leaves out, and it matters. Domain expertise can also go wrong in a specific way: it can harden into a prior so strong that user feedback stops being heard at all. The experienced developer who thinks they know the domain well enough that they no longer need to check their assumptions with users is running the same failure pattern as the business strategist who stops testing hypotheses because experience feels sufficient. The slow feedback loop stops working not because it delivers no signal but because the receiver has stopped listening.

Domain expertise is what allows you to ask the right questions of users. It's not a reason to stop asking.

So what do you actually know when you know a domain?

You know the facts, which is the small part. You know the shape of how the domain tends to fail, which is larger and harder. You know which technical problems are lurking in the architecture that nobody else can see, which is perhaps the most important and the most invisible from outside. And underneath all of it, you have a structured map that makes the slow, ambiguous feedback from the product loop actually interpretable -- you can locate the signal because you have a theory of where things tend to go wrong.

What you don't have, and can't have from domain expertise alone, is certainty. The map is not the territory. The failure modes you've seen are not exhaustive. The intuitions calibrated in one business will transfer partially to another in the same domain and not at all to some edge cases you haven't encountered. Domain expertise is the accumulated output of many cycles of the slow feedback loop -- but it's still a hypothesis about how the domain works, not a fact about it. Keeping that distinction clear is what separates domain expertise that continues to learn from domain expertise that calcifies into dogma.

The interchangeable developer has no map and so can't learn from the signal. The overconfident expert has a map so detailed they've stopped checking it against the territory. The useful configuration is somewhere between: enough accumulated theory to make the signal interpretable, enough honesty about that theory's limits to keep updating it.

That's what domain expertise actually is. Not knowledge as a possession, but knowledge as an ongoing process of structured exposure to feedback -- which means it can never really be finished, only more or less current. more

Career development

1d

Essential Skills to Highlight on Your Resume for Career Success

In today's competitive job market, effectively showcasing essential abilities on your resume can make a significant difference in your career trajectory. When considering the key skills on resume for career development, it's important to reflect on the blend of technical abilities, soft skills, and domain-specific knowledge that make you an attractive candidate.

Key Skills on Resume: What... Employers Want to See

Employers are keenly interested in candidates who not only meet the job qualifications but also bring added value through diverse capabilities. Here's an overview of skill categories you should highlight:

Technical Skills

Technical skills are abilities acquired through practice and education and often pertain to specific tasks. For instance, industries such as technology, engineering, and healthcare highly value proficiency in software, data analysis, or specific machinery. Including certifications and courses related to these skills can bolster your resume. To understand how these skills translate into lucrative opportunities, you might explore the top jobs that pay you to master new skills.

Communication Skills

Effective communication is crucial across all job roles. Highlight both verbal and written communication proficiency, which can encompass skills like active listening, public speaking, and professional writing. Employers look for candidates who can articulate ideas clearly and work collaboratively.

Problem-Solving and Critical Thinking

Showcasing your ability to tackle complex challenges and deliver creative solutions can elevate your resume significantly. Mention specific instances where you have improved processes, resolved conflicts, or implemented innovative ideas in your past roles.

Leadership and Management

For those aspiring to management roles, leadership skills are a must. Highlight any experience in leading projects, managing teams, or decision-making. Employers are impressed by individuals who demonstrate leadership qualities, regardless of their position.

Adaptability and Flexibility

The modern workplace is ever-evolving, and adaptability is key to thriving. Being open to change and capable of adjusting to new environments or responsibilities can set you apart as a resilient and resourceful candidate.

Attention to Detail

Whether ensuring the accuracy of reports or meticulously organizing project elements, detail-oriented professionals are highly sought after. Demonstrating your ability to minimize errors and enhance quality can significantly enhance your resume appeal.

Human Resource Skills

For roles in HR, emphasize skills in recruitment, employee relations, and performance management. Having a strong grasp of labor laws and proficiency with HR software can also be beneficial.

Crafting Your Unique Skills Section

To ensure your resume stands out, take the time to tailor the skills section to the specific job you're applying for. Each role may highlight different key skills that are more relevant than others. Additionally, using bullet points for clarity can make it easier for employers to recognize your qualifications.

Integrating Keywords

Incorporate industry-specific keywords from the job description within your resume. This strategy can improve your chances of passing through Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) that scan resumes for relevant skills.

For more insights on how education impacts your employability and career advancement, you may find this resource helpful: Education.

Highlighting the key skills on your resume not only presents the breadth of your capabilities but also aligns your profile with the expectations of potential employers. Thoughtful consideration and presentation of your skills can greatly enhance your career prospects.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are key skills to include on a resume?

Important skills to feature include technical abilities, communication skills, leadership, problem-solving, adaptability, and attention to detail.

How can I decide which skills are relevant for a job?

Review the job description to identify the skills that are emphasized. Customize your resume by highlighting these skills with your relevant experience.

Should I list my skills at the top or bottom of my resume?

It depends on your unique circumstances. Skills should be prominently featured and can be positioned either at the beginning or after your work experience, depending on which one is the stronger selling point.

How many skills should I list on my resume?

Aim for about 5-10 key skills that are most relevant to the job you're applying for.

What is the best way to demonstrate my skills on my resume?

Use specific examples and achievements in your work history to demonstrate how you've applied your skills successfully in past roles. more

Career development

1d

Rosie DiManno: In sexual assault cases, few women get the justice they seek

Rosie DiManno is a Toronto-based columnist covering sports and current affairs for the Star. Follow her on Twitter: @rdimanno.

A former senior civil servant in France was accused and charged in 2019 with drugging and sadistically humiliating 248 women during fake job interviews over nearly a decade.

Now in his 60s, Christian Negre -- he'd been human resources director in the Ministry of Culture... -- allegedly plied the women with powerful diuretics mixed into coffee and tea, then took them on lengthy strolls as they squirmed in discomfort and pain, ultimately wetting themselves. Sometimes he covertly took photos.

Police have said Negre charted his observations of the victims' descent into humiliation on an Excel spreadsheet entitled "experiments," documenting details that he purportedly relished, even the colour of their underwear and the flow strength of urine streams.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW

Negre is charged with administering a harmful substance, sexual assault by a person abusing their authority and invasion of privacy. The investigation has dragged on for more than six years. And still no trial date has been set. Outraged over the inexplicable delay, seven of the women gave interviews recounting their ordeal and shame to Britain's Daily Telegraph in February. Some allowed their names to be used.

I don't know if those women were emboldened to set aside embarrassment and publicly identify themselves because Gisele Pelicot had shown and led the way. But the Frenchwoman who famously waived her right to anonymity in a ghastly 2024 drugging and rape trial that put her husband of half a century and 50 other men behind bars -- a four-month trial where the term "chemical submission" became prominent -- has hopefully shifted the balance of shame for all women. Her just-published memoir is titled: "A Hymn to Life: Shame Has to Change Sides."

Pelicot was 68 and in what she believed was a happy marriage when police broke to her the horrific news that she'd been drugged and raped by her husband, Dominique, and a multitude of men as she lay unconscious. Rejected what she was told until investigators showed her photographs of Pelicot, like a "ragdoll," being penetrated by a stranger. In a state of shock, she went home and did the laundry.

The betrayal, the cruelty, was beyond comprehension and, as the trial approached, Pelicot wanted it kept beyond the public's eyes, in a closed courtroom, her identity protected. But she had a radical change of heart -- identifying herself, opening up the trial, would also publicly identify all the defendants.

Pelicot writes: "I no longer feared the stares; I wasn't afraid of people finding out." Those words -- the shame must change sides -- "lodged in my mind like a refrain, as if suddenly tiny blades were sharpening my thoughts. Everyone had to see the 51 rapists. They were the ones who had to hang their heads. Not me."

On the stand, Pelicot was dignified and resolute. She emerged from the nightmare whole and magnificent, reclaiming agency, looking forward to a life where she might yet find joy and even love. (She has.)

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW

But Pelicot is an exceptional woman of fortitude. Also, the guilt of her rapists was beyond question.

Such is not the case for a great many woman who report rape, put themselves through the agony of intrusive medical examination, of police investigation, and then are traumatized again by often brutal cross-examination at trial.

A few years back I covered the trial of two medical doctors charged with sexually assaulting (the Criminal Code in Canada no longer uses the term "rape") a 23-year-old colleague. The woman testified during a gruelling week in the witness stand that she'd had drinks with the men at a downtown Toronto bar -- to celebrate completing her medical degree exams; one of the doctors had been mentoring her -- then a nightclub, then returned with them to a hotel room.

At some point, she believed that something had been put in her drink, a substance that incapacitated her. She felt stupefied, unable to control events. That's when, she said, the men raped her.

The cross-examination was merciless, but the witness withstood it. From where I sat, the woman was totally credible. In the judge-alone trial, however, the defendants were acquitted. An absence of consent couldn't be proven. And "honest but mistaken belief in consent" by a defendant is even harder to disprove.

It was one of the worst miscarriages of justice I've ever witnessed.

Three years later, the woman refused to obey a summons to appear at a disciplinary hearing for one of the doctors before the College of Physicians and Surgeons. She was not going to put herself through another battering. No witness, no case.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW

I don't support the mantra that "women should be believed." Presumption of innocence is at the core of our judicial system. But why are so many victims disbelieved?

Honestly, I would not recommend coming forward. Few have the fortitude to withstand the experience; fewer will receive the justice they seek.

In France, prosecutors have suddenly told the alleged victims of Christian Negre that they have one month to provide fresh testimonies before they officially close the investigation phase. Tell us again.

Negre remains free, working in the private sector, while awaiting trial ... if there ever is a trial.

Opinion Headlines Newsletter Take a stand with this regular roundup of the best from our columnists.

Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request.

There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again.

Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up This newsletter is only available for subscribers. If you are already a subscriber, please login now. If you want to become subscriber, please click here Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star.

You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply.

Opinion Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Opinion Headlines in your inbox soon.

Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page. more

Ethan Cole

Career development

3d

I’m finishing college and going to lots of job interviews right now. I want to find a place where I’ll actually enjoy working. But my parents are trying to get me a job through their friends. I don’t want that, because I’ll feel like I owe them and their friends too. I want to achieve things on my own. Some people say I’m just being young and should accept the help. But I don’t feel comfortable... with that.
What would you do in my situation? Thanks

more

6

TriComTechnologies Kimani
1d
If the job is within your career passion, dive in. A career occupation should be one which you would enjoy doing even without a salary. Getting into a... life long career should not be via obligation. Listen to how you FEEL about the JOB, and if not contented, wait.
Getting into a career just because of money causes many problems many years later when you have bills and loans to pay and not able to change your career. You become unhappy and easily depressed. more
Stephen Sarfo
1d
In much as I respect your opinion and views, I will advice you to take the your parents are offering you. You know, life is dynamic. As you grow you... will begin to appreciate how nature works. You seems not a lot experience in life yet. Give yourself some few years you will understand my point. My dear , please listen to the advice of your parents and try to ignore the youthful feelings in you. Thank you. more