Career development

cyusa shawn

23h

hey guys am new here, i had a questioni would like to become the youngest successfully tech entrepreneur, i would like some advice from you on the 5 big mistakes a startup should avoid as experienced people in the field that would mean alot to me

1

Jeff Bell
4h
Take advice from auto correct. Nobody will take you seriously if you write so poorly. Punctuation matters to most people. You only once to make a... first impression. Good luck. more

Career development

23h

I hid the fact I had children in job interviews - it's the only way to get hired

When author and mother-of-two Davina Quinlivan was interviewing for new roles online five years ago, she would hide all evidence of her two children, moving Mother's Day cards, their artwork and stray Pokemon cards.

Quinlivan, author of recently published Possessions: A Memoir of Transformation in an Era of Precarity, felt she needed to give each interview "the best shot" and couldn't take the... risk of motherhood "impacting me, even a small amount". As an academic who has spent much of her career teaching feminist theory, she found it deeply conflicting.

"It's a difficult feeling, because why would I do that? It's so painful to pretend to vanish [my children] away. Yet I know on some unconscious level that people interviewing are thinking: 'Well, if this child is unwell, our teaching schedule goes down.' Of course, there is support for working carers, but you have to jump through the hoops of getting the job in the first place," she explains. "I wanted to give myself opportunities. I don't think there were vast numbers of mums being interviewed for these jobs, and I knew who would get those jobs in the end - and they weren't mums."

She's one of an increasing number of women who have felt the need to hide motherhood during job interviews. Peanut, the world's largest community app for mums, ran a poll exclusively for The i Paper and found that the majority of mothers - 60 per cent - don't mention caring responsibilities during job interviews, while six per cent actively hide any trace of motherhood until they are offered a role. This compares with 34 per cent of mums who actively mention their children in interviews, the poll of 580 mothers found. "We're seeing more mothers concealing their children from interviewers, which underscores the need for our working culture to catch up. When honesty becomes a hiring risk, the problem isn't with the candidate - it's with the system," Michelle Kennedy, CEO of Peanut, believes.

You might think caring responsibilities should never be discussed in a job interview. But research consistently shows that men can actually experience a "fatherhood premium" - where having children actually increases their chances of getting hired. In one study, professor Stephen Benard at Indiana University sent identical fictionalised CVs to companies from female and male job "candidates", some mentioning their volunteer work for the Parents Teacher Association. Fathers received a slightly higher callback rate than childless men, while employers were 100 per cent less likely to call back mothers than childless women.

Lana Phillips, a marketing assistant from Derby with two children, aged six and four, learnt to hide motherhood after a job interview went wrong. "My children were three and one at the time. The interview was going well and it came up naturally that I had kids. The head of operations asked how old they were. When I told her, she replied, 'They need their mummy at home with them at this stage.' Then explained she stayed at home with her three children until they were school age. I was already back at work. I found it especially shocking that a woman was making this judgment. The interview went sour and ended five minutes later. I received an email saying I hadn't got the job," she remembers.

Since then, she has avoided mentioning her children in interviews. "Then, if I'm turned down, I know it's because of me, not because I have children," she says. She is relieved her employer is supportive and offers flexibility if she wants to watch a school show.

Discrimination against mothers is something that charity Pregnant Then Screwed has been campaigning against for a decade. CEO Rachel Grocott says: "The reality is that many bosses still see motherhood as a burden to business. Women have faced this discrimination for decades - from assumptions they might become parents, to the belief they 'won't come back' from maternity leave, to the stereotype that mothers are less passionate, less talented and less productive. Anyone experiencing it should seek advice on their rights and protections. Mothers are some of the most talented, productive employees and when you discriminate or push them out, you pay the cultural and financial price as parents move to employers who support them. That's the economic truth."

Joeli Brearley, founder of Growth Spurt which gives advice to women returning to work after becoming parents, says: "I spoke to a recruitment consultant who was told by 80 per cent of his clients not to put forward women with children under the age of five. We are seeing pregnancy and maternity discrimination rising year on year. When the economy gets tricky, people feel uncomfortable and revert back to old biases," she explains. "Things are taking a step backwards but we have a government that is making positive changes with the Employment Rights Act last year and the Parental Leave review currently underway."

Many mothers have experienced "ghosting" from recruiters. Florence, who has three children under five, recently started interviewing. "I have multiple childcare options, from nursery to family living closeby," she explains. "I had one recruiter contact me saying I was a perfect fit for a role. They were really positive until I mentioned children, when he asked how I'd manage work and my childcare responsibilities. I never heard from him again."

Brearley says in a job interview it's not illegal to ask a candidate if they are a parent, but it is illegal if an employer acts on that information. "We cannot prove that is the reason for discriminating, though," she says. "More often than not, interviewers ask subtle questions about candidates' personal lives, such as: 'How do you manage your personal life alongside work?' How to react to this depends on where you are in your career; we know that bias exists. For the majority of people, it is better to wait until you are offered a job to ask for flexible working or mention children, then you can prove discrimination. But if you're very senior, have privilege [to choose your role] and power, then ask the questions you want."

She says this is the opposite for men: mentioning children in an interview - as long as there is no request for flexible working - boosts their chance of success as they are seen as "responsible and better employees". Fathers are perceived as five percentage points more committed than childless men at work, according to research by Harvard Kennedy School, while mothers are seen as 12 percentage points less committed than non-mothers.

Sophie Catto, managing director of AllBright everywoman, which supports development of women in leadership roles, and whose children are seven and five, says: "No woman should ever feel she has to hide being a mother in a job interview. There is no lack of ambition in women who are mothers. Motherhood builds skills from prioritisation and decision-making under pressure to resilience, adaptability and problem solving. It strengthens emotional intelligence, empathy and communication, while also sharpening efficiency and the ability to manage competing demands. When businesses recognise and value this, it has a direct impact on confidence, progression and retention, something we have positively experienced in our office.

"I recommend training for line managers who aren't parents and an open calendar policy from business leaders: I have sports days and parents evenings in my diary and this inspires others to do the same. When working flexibly feels normal and doesn't come with a hidden career trade-off, we see stronger retention, deeper engagement and more sustainable long-term progression."

Quinlivan, whose children are now 13 and 10, found the experience of "vanishing" her children so painful that she will never do it again. "It seemed impossible [at that time] to think I had choice. But I did: by giving myself the tools so that I could make my own work," she says. She's built her self-employed creative career over the past four years, while remaining in academia running an online course with the University of Bristol and holding a Research Fellowship.

"Luckily, I've been treated brilliantly - sometimes my children come along and sit at the back in seminars. I now display motherhood in a way that makes it easier [for employers] to understand how my skills are immensely important and translatable to any kind of professional life. Anyone who is a carer knows the amount of creative power, care, love and challenge that goes into raising a human. I bring all those skills to the workplace." more

Munyaradzi David Matimba
3
4h
I think the female boss in the interview was primarily focused on what’s best for the children, rather than assuming that hiring a mother of young... children would negatively affect work throughput or productivity. more

Career development

10h

Geotech Engineering Job Application Aid

I want to fast-track my search for entry-level geotechnical and civil engineering positions in France by having the entire application routine handled for me. My résumé and a base cover letter are ready; what I need now is consistent, targeted outreach so my profile lands on the right hiring desks without me spending hours every evening. Here is what the engagement looks like from my side: *... Identify suitable entry-level vacancies in geotechnical or general civil engineering throughout France on platforms such as LinkedIn, Indeed, Glassdoor and major French job boards. * Tailor my cover letter and, when required, adjust key résumé keywords to mirror each posting. * Complete online application forms and upload the correct documents on my behalf, keeping log-in details secure. * Track every submission in a shared spreadsheet indicating company name, date applied, next action and response status. * Flag any interview requests or follow-up emails to me immediately. All material you need -- CV (Word & PDF), a universal cover letter draft, transcripts, and reference contacts -- will be delivered at kickoff. I simply ask that each Monday, Wednesday and Friday you send a concise progress update listing the new roles applied to and any correspondence received. Acceptance criteria 1. Minimum 30 unique, relevant applications submitted each week. 2. No duplicate applications to the same employer unless a new vacancy is posted. 3. Every application logged with working tracking links or confirmation screenshots. If you are comfortable navigating French recruiting portals and can keep communications in either English or French, this should run smoothly. Let's get started so I can focus on preparing for interviews rather than chasing openings. more

Career development

11h

An Nvidia exec said AI-generated résumés may be favored by AI recruiters because 'AI likes to use AI'

Nvidia's Chief Software Architect said job seekers could benefit from using the same AI model that recruiters use.

Speaking at the Sohn Investment Conference 2026, Jonathan Ross, the AI hardware architect who previously helped invent Google's TPU chip, said that "AI likes to use AI" and pointed to emerging research that AI hiring systems may favor résumés generated by their own underlying... models.

"Someone did a study and showed that résumés generated from one LLM are preferred by that same LLM over the résumés from the other," Ross told John Yetimoglu, the CIO of Infinitum.

"The recruiters are now using LLM to determine who to interview, but you got to figure out which LLM the recruiter's using," he added.

Ross said that applicants may need multiple AI-tailored résumés to maximize their chances of getting through automated screening systems.

"So, you should build one résumé with Claude or Opus 4.7 and one with ChatGPT, and you'll have the highest probability of being selected, basically," he said.

Ross appeared to be referring to a recent academic paper titled "AI Self-preferencing in Algorithmic Hiring," published in a late 2025 edition of "Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society," by researchers Jiannan Xu, Gujie Li, and Jane Yi Jiang.

The researchers tested more than 2,200 résumés across 24 occupations and found that applicants using the same AI model as the evaluator were between 23% and 60% more likely to be shortlisted than candidates submitting human-written résumés with similar qualifications.

The comments come as AI-powered hiring tools are quickly spreading through corporate recruiting departments.

A 2025 Resume.org survey of nearly 1,400 US workers familiar with their companies' hiring practices found that 57% of companies were already using AI in hiring workflows. Among those employers, 79% said they use AI to review résumés, while 74% said AI systems could reject candidates without human review.

The rapid adoption of AI screening tools has also sparked growing concerns about bias and false negatives in hiring.

Business Insider recently reported that an IT worker said he was rejected for a role six minutes after applying, and suspected that AI software had automatically screened him out. more

Career development

17h

The Engineer Who Said No: Dr. Jon Padfield's Global Rise and His War on the Surveillance State - Frank Report

In April 1997, Jon Padfield -- thirty years old, an electrical engineer by training -- received a registered letter from General Motors informing him that his position no longer existed.

At home, there was a three-month-old daughter.

In Indianapolis, Padfield held a seat in the Indiana House of Representatives during his second term. His legislative salary amounted to $11,600 a year -- not... enough to sustain a family without other employment.

Padfield mailed fifty résumés to engineering firms near his district. On each one, he included the same line beneath his name: "State Representative."

No employer responded.

A friend later suggested that the political designation was discouraging companies from hiring him. Padfield removed the reference from the next set of applications. Within two days, he received two interview requests.

A Bank, a Title, and No Banking Duties

Then a senior Republican colleague -- the chairman of the House Banking Committee -- asked Padfield to step aside for a private conversation.

The chairman explained that there was a bank in Padfield's district. The executives liked his voting record. They were prepared to put him on the payroll -- a title, an office, a salary. He could spend his time campaigning. He could keep his seat. He could run for reelection. No actual banking duties would be required.

Padfield considered the proposal for approximately 20 minutes, a long time when temptation has arrived, appearing as relief.

"I knew where this leads," he told an interviewer this year. "They weren't asking me to do anything illegal. They weren't asking me to do anything unethical. But I knew there would be a day they would remind me how much we had helped you out, and now we need this bill passed, and you're crucial."

Padfield declined the offer.

He resigned his seat in the legislature, moved his family two hours south, and accepted a position at Cummins, the diesel-engine manufacturer in Columbus, Indiana.

That happened twenty-eight years ago, but some decisions keep echoing through a man's life. Ever since then, he has gone on saying no in one form or another -- no to the easy favor, no to the comfortable compromise, no to the hand reaching out with invisible strings tied to it.

Human beings usually compromise a little at a time, gradually enough that they barely notice themselves disappearing.

An Engineer Becomes a Constitutionalist

Today, at sixty, Padfield teaches Business Management at Indiana University Columbus.

He earned a Ph.D. in Technology Leadership and Innovation from Purdue University in 2013. For three decades, he worked as an engineer, first designing circuits at General Motors, then troubleshooting operations at Cummins and other major companies.

Over the years, he has trained more than fifty companies across four continents in quality and productivity improvement and, since 2012, has operated his own analytics and innovation consultancy.

Padfield is also the creator of Business Reform, a YouTube channel with more than 250,000 subscribers devoted to what he describes as "the intersection of business, technology, and society."

This is the sort of phrase engineers use before explaining that civilization has quietly built a system that can watch everyone at all times.

His contract with Indiana University Columbus expires in May 2027. He has already informed his department head that he will not renew it. He intends instead to devote himself to advocacy surrounding civil liberties and personal privacy -- subjects that, in Padfield's telling, have become inseparable from modern technology itself.

At the age when many professionals begin planning comfortable retirements, Padfield has decided instead to become a full-time advocate. Human beings occasionally spend decades mastering systems before deciding the systems themselves are the emergency.

Two Million Views and a Sudden Audience

The channel discovered its purpose in the same manner Padfield had approached most of his life: through engineering.

In 2024, he uploaded a video explaining methods for defeating facial-recognition systems. The presentation was technical, methodical, and restrained in tone. Yet the audience arrived suddenly. The video surpassed 2 million views, and within a single month, Padfield's subscriber count climbed from 10,000 to 100,000.

The response reflected a growing public awareness that surveillance technology was no longer confined to governments alone. This is what happens when an engineer calmly explains to the public that the future may already be peeking through their windows.

Maybe people are lonelier for privacy than anyone realized.

Padfield is not, by temperament, a polemicist. There is little theatrical outrage in him, little appetite for ideological performance. What emerged instead was something more unusual: the engineer transformed into a constitutionalist, applying the same analytical discipline he once applied to defective diesel engines to the twin dangers of modern life -- government surveillance and surveillance capitalism.

In his view, the danger lies not merely in abuse, but in the gradual normalization of continuous observation itself.

Padfield does not sound like a man trying to start a revolution. He sounds like an engineer trying to explain why the machine is overheating.

And there is something touching about a man who still believes problems can be solved if people are willing to look carefully enough.

Privacy Is a Dial, Not a Switch

His philosophy is summarized in one line he has been refining for two years:

"Privacy is not a switch that you flip to go from public to private. Privacy is a dial that you can turn up and turn down."

And in another, written in plain English at the end of his opt-out walkthrough video:

"Privacy isn't about having something to hide. It's about respecting people's right to choose what they want to share about themselves, with whom, and when they choose to share it."

Padfield speaks of what he calls the founders' four boxes for preserving liberty: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and, finally, the ammo box.

A small Minute Man figurine rests on his desk in Columbus, Indiana, not displayed with bravado so much as quiet symbolism. Padfield says he hopes and prays the nation never reaches the fourth box. His efforts are concentrated entirely within the first three: speech, elections, and an informed jury.

Padfield refers to jury nullification -- the power of jurors to refuse to convict a defendant when they believe the law itself is unjust.

Padfield argues that in an age of warrantless surveillance, 12 ordinary citizens in a jury room remain one of the last unreviewable checks on a prosecution built on evidence the Constitution was meant to forbid.

Padfield has attempted, carefully and publicly, to align his conduct with the principles he advocates. He has filmed himself donating under his own name to organizations including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Institute for Justice, and the 1776 Law Center. He says he has rejected what he describes as "ridiculous" sponsorship offers from VPN companies eager to market themselves through his channel.

After one of his viral videos, a manufacturer of privacy glasses sent him two complimentary pairs. Before reviewing them, Padfield disclosed the gift on camera to his audience.

Jon Padfield seems to understand that trust is fragile. Once broken, it rarely comes back whole.

He records his videos from a home office in Columbus, Indiana, a room arranged less like a media studio than an engineer's workshop.

He carries four mobile phones. One number is public. He has had the number for 20 years. The other three remain private. Only his wife and immediate family possess the other numbers. When not in use, the phones are stored in a Mission Darkness Faraday bag designed to block wireless signals entirely.

It is the sort of precaution that might once have seemed eccentric. Increasingly, it appears methodical.

Some men buy locks for doors. Some try to lock the invisible doors too.

The Lone No

In November 2021, Padfield cast the only dissenting vote in his university's faculty senate when it approved the university president's COVID vaccine mandate.

Before the vote, he had prepared a letter refusing to comply, citing Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and had shown it to his department head in advance.

"If you have to fire me, no hard feelings," he said.

The vote was conducted by voice. He could have stayed silent. He did not. He raised his hand and said no. Every head in the room turned to look at him.

The following day, the Indiana attorney general sent an open letter to the university president stating that the mandate was unlawful. Padfield never mailed his refusal.

For nearly thirty years, Jon Padfield has developed a habit of refusing the easier answer.

The bank position in 1997. The vaccine mandate in 2021. The sponsorship offers attached to his growing audience now. The circumstances changed. Padfield keeps returning to the same small, stubborn center inside himself.

The dial in his hand has never moved. more

Career development

18h

The Engineer Who Said No: Dr. Jon Padfield's War on the Surveillance State - ARTVOICE

In April 1997, Jon Padfield -- thirty years old, an electrical engineer by training -- received a registered letter from General Motors informing him that his position no longer existed.

At home, there was a three-month-old daughter.

In Indianapolis, Padfield held a seat in the Indiana House of Representatives during his second term. His legislative salary amounted to $11,600 a year -- not... enough to sustain a family without other employment.

Padfield mailed fifty résumés to engineering firms near his district. On each one, he included the same line beneath his name: "State Representative."

No employer responded.

A friend later suggested that the political designation was discouraging companies from hiring him. Padfield removed the reference from the next set of applications. Within two days, he received two interview requests.

Then a senior Republican colleague -- the chairman of the House Banking Committee -- asked Padfield to step aside for a private conversation.

The chairman explained that there was a bank in Padfield's district. The executives liked his voting record. They were prepared to put him on the payroll -- a title, an office, a salary. He could spend his time campaigning. He could keep his seat. He could run for reelection. No actual banking duties would be required.

Padfield considered the proposal for approximately 20 minutes, a long time when temptation has arrived, appearing as relief.

"I knew where this leads," he told an interviewer this year. "They weren't asking me to do anything illegal. They weren't asking me to do anything unethical. But I knew there would be a day they would remind me how much we had helped you out, and now we need this bill passed, and you're crucial."

Padfield declined the offer.

He resigned his seat in the legislature, moved his family two hours south, and accepted a position at Cummins, the diesel-engine manufacturer in Columbus, Indiana.

That happened twenty-eight years ago, but some decisions keep echoing through a man's life. Ever since then, he has gone on saying no in one form or another -- no to the easy favor, no to the comfortable compromise, no to the hand reaching out with invisible strings tied to it.

Human beings usually compromise a little at a time, gradually enough that they barely notice themselves disappearing.

Today, at sixty, Padfield teaches Business Management at Indiana University Columbus.

He earned a Ph.D. in Technology Leadership and Innovation from Purdue University in 2013. For three decades, he worked as an engineer, first designing circuits at General Motors, then troubleshooting operations at Cummins and other major companies.

Over the years, he has trained more than fifty companies across four continents in quality and productivity improvement and, since 2012, has operated his own analytics and innovation consultancy.

Padfield is also the creator of Business Reform, a YouTube channel with more than 250,000 subscribers devoted to what he describes as "the intersection of business, technology, and society."

This is the sort of phrase engineers use before explaining that civilization has quietly built a system that can watch everyone at all times.

His contract with Indiana University Columbus expires in May 2027. He has already informed his department head that he will not renew it. He intends instead to devote himself to advocacy surrounding civil liberties and personal privacy -- subjects that, in Padfield's telling, have become inseparable from modern technology itself.

At the age when many professionals begin planning comfortable retirements, Padfield has decided instead to become a full-time advocate. Human beings occasionally spend decades mastering systems before deciding the systems themselves are the emergency.

The channel discovered its purpose in the same manner Padfield had approached most of his life: through engineering.

In 2024, he uploaded a video explaining methods for defeating facial-recognition systems. The presentation was technical, methodical, and restrained in tone. Yet the audience arrived suddenly. The video surpassed 2 million views, and within a single month, Padfield's subscriber count climbed from 10,000 to 100,000.

The response reflected a growing public awareness that surveillance technology was no longer confined to governments alone. This is what happens when an engineer calmly explains to the public that the future may already be peeking through their windows.

Maybe people are lonelier for privacy than anyone realized.

Padfield is not, by temperament, a polemicist. There is little theatrical outrage in him, little appetite for ideological performance. What emerged instead was something more unusual: the engineer transformed into a constitutionalist, applying the same analytical discipline he once applied to defective diesel engines to the twin dangers of modern life -- government surveillance and surveillance capitalism.

In his view, the danger lies not merely in abuse, but in the gradual normalization of continuous observation itself.

Padfield does not sound like a man trying to start a revolution. He sounds like an engineer trying to explain why the machine is overheating.

And there is something touching about a man who still believes problems can be solved if people are willing to look carefully enough.

His philosophy is summarized in one line he has been refining for two years:

"Privacy is not a switch that you flip to go from public to private. Privacy is a dial that you can turn up and turn down."

And in another, written in plain English at the end of his opt-out walkthrough video:

"Privacy isn't about having something to hide. It's about respecting people's right to choose what they want to share about themselves, with whom, and when they choose to share it."

Padfield speaks of what he calls the founders' four boxes for preserving liberty: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and, finally, the ammo box.

A small Minute Man figurine rests on his desk in Columbus, Indiana, not displayed with bravado so much as quiet symbolism. Padfield says he hopes and prays the nation never reaches the fourth box. His efforts are concentrated entirely within the first three: speech, elections, and an informed jury.

Padfield refers to jury nullification -- the power of jurors to refuse to convict a defendant when they believe the law itself is unjust.

Padfield argues that in an age of warrantless surveillance, 12 ordinary citizens in a jury room remain one of the last unreviewable checks on a prosecution built on evidence the Constitution was meant to forbid.

Padfield has attempted, carefully and publicly, to align his conduct with the principles he advocates. He has filmed himself donating under his own name to organizations including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Institute for Justice, and the 1776 Law Center. He says he has rejected what he describes as "ridiculous" sponsorship offers from VPN companies eager to market themselves through his channel.

After one of his viral videos, a manufacturer of privacy glasses sent him two complimentary pairs. Before reviewing them, Padfield disclosed the gift on camera to his audience.

Jon Padfield seems to understand that trust is fragile. Once broken, it rarely comes back whole.

He records his videos from a home office in Columbus, Indiana, a room arranged less like a media studio than an engineer's workshop.

He carries four mobile phones. One number is public. He has had the number for 20 years. The other three remain private. Only his wife and immediate family possess the other numbers. When not in use, the phones are stored in a Mission Darkness Faraday bag designed to block wireless signals entirely.

It is the sort of precaution that might once have seemed eccentric. Increasingly, it appears methodical.

Some men buy locks for doors. Some try to lock the invisible doors too.

In November 2021, Padfield cast the only dissenting vote in his university's faculty senate when it approved the university president's COVID vaccine mandate.

Before the vote, he had prepared a letter refusing to comply, citing Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and had shown it to his department head in advance.

"If you have to fire me, no hard feelings," he said.

The vote was conducted by voice. He could have stayed silent. He did not. He raised his hand and said no. Every head in the room turned to look at him.

The following day, the Indiana attorney general sent an open letter to the university president stating that the mandate was unlawful. Padfield never mailed his refusal.

For nearly thirty years, Jon Padfield has developed a habit of refusing the easier answer. more

Career development

19h

Why I Built a Personal Website -- And Why It Changed How Clients See My Work

Why I Built a Personal Website -- And Why It Changed How Clients See My Work

There's a difference between telling someone you can build things and showing them.

For years, I relied on résumés, LinkedIn profiles, and word-of-mouth to communicate what I do. They worked -- to a point. But they couldn't capture the texture of the work: the architectural decisions behind a project, the problems... solved under pressure, the range of what's possible when you bring the right developer into the room.

So I built a personal website. And it changed everything.

A Portfolio Is a Product, Too

As an IT developer, I think about user experience constantly -- how systems behave, how interfaces feel, how technical complexity gets translated into something that just works. It seemed only right to apply that same thinking to how I present myself.

My site isn't a static list of past jobs. It's a curated look at how I approach problems -- the projects I'm most proud of, the technologies I work with, and the kind of collaborator I am. Every section was built with a specific audience in mind: potential clients, technical partners, and teams looking for someone who can both build and communicate.

What You'll Find

- Projects with context -- not just what I built, but why it mattered and how it came together

- Technical depth -- a clear picture of my stack, my process, and my standards

- A direct path to connect -- because the best opportunities start with a conversation

Let's Work Together

Whether you're looking to build something from scratch, bring in a specialist for a complex challenge, or explore what's possible -- I'd love to hear from you.

👉 Visit my website and let's start a conversation. more

Anonymous member

Career development

1d

I want to pursue a certification for accountant but the microfinance I work for doesn't expect it's employees to have anything that distracts them from work.

As a matter of fact, working hours are from 7:30 AM up until 6:30 PM on average days monday to Friday (Saturdays work stops at about 4:20 PM give or take).

I don't know how I'll balance the two because the company has no guidelines... for such and its seen as a potential reason for employee exit which they don't want!

What should I do? more

1

Sandra Tarkenton
23h
Not sure what country you are in but that’s a lot of hours which would make getting additional education difficult. You have to plan study time too... which is typically 2 or 3 additional hours of your time for every hour spent in class. A lot of companies in some countries actually encourage their employees to get more education and offer tuition reimbursement. Maybe it is time to look at other opportunities. more
1
Peter Cooper
1d
Do you have any paid vacation time ? Take that 1 day a week off for classes them take sick time for other finallyget a doctor’s note for medical... reasons off and finally talk to disability dept and claim disability. For reasons agreed by vdoc’s dept; beem there took me 10 years to get my MBA then said goodbye and claimed my vacation due- been there. more

Career development

23h

UE center rebrands to boost education, career development

HENDERSON, Ky. (WEHT) - The University of Evansville (UE) Board of Trustees has approved a new name for the former Center for the Advancement of Learning. Effective immediately, the center will now be known as the Center for Professional and Continuing Education.

UE says the new name more accurately reflects the center's mission, the populations it serves, along with the breadth of its work... supporting adult learners, working professionals, employers and community partners. The updated title also aligns with terminology commonly used at peer institutions and provides greater clarity for prospective students and industry partners seeking professional development and continuing education opportunities. The change is expected to improve search visibility related to continuing education and workforce learning initiatives.

Officials note all existing programs and services currently housed within the center will remain unchanged and continue under the new name. These include adult degree completion programs, the Master of Science in Leadership, certificate programs, dual credit initiatives, industry partnerships, micro-credentials and CLUE programming.

"Our new name better reflects the work we do to expand access to lifelong learning opportunities and to support workforce and community development throughout the region," said Cindy Felts, Senior Director of the Center for Professional and Continuing Education. "As the needs of students, employers, and industries continue to evolve, this new name more clearly communicates our commitment to offering flexible, relevant programs that help individuals advance their careers and strengthen our communities." more

Career development

1d

Q&A with Volen Vulkov, Co-Founder of Enhancv

Volen Vulkov is the co-founder of Enhancv, a career platform used by millions of job seekers worldwide to build resumes, cover letters, and career documents. With a background in Information Systems and software engineering, Volen co-founded Enhancv to make the hiring process more human and help people present themselves more authentically in an increasingly digital job market. Since launching the... company, he has helped grow Enhancv into a globally recognized career-tech platform known for combining design, storytelling, and AI-powered career tools.

Can you tell us more about your background and what inspired you to co‑found Enhancv?

My background is really a combination of technology, entrepreneurship, and a genuine fascination with how people present themselves and grow throughout their careers. I studied Information Systems and spent my early years closer to the engineering side of things, but I was always drawn to bigger questions around communication, confidence, and opportunity.

The inspiration for Enhancv came from something I kept seeing around me: incredibly talented people struggling to stand out because traditional resumes made everyone look the same. Friends of mine had amazing stories, unique experiences, side projects, volunteer work, ambitions, but once everything was squeezed into a rigid black-and-white template, all that personality disappeared.

That realization stayed with me for a long time. I started wondering why professional identity had to feel so impersonal. Why couldn't a resume show more of the human behind it? That curiosity eventually turned into experiments with design, storytelling, and technology, and those experiments became the foundation of Enhancv.

In the beginning, it honestly felt more like a passion project than a company. A few of us were just trying to rethink how people introduce themselves professionally. But once users started telling us things like, 'This finally feels like me', we realized we had tapped into something much deeper than resume formatting.

Today, the mission is still the same: helping people tell their story with clarity and confidence in a hiring world that often feels cold and transactional. That's the part that continues to inspire me every day.

What problem were you trying to solve in the hiring space?

At the core, we were trying to solve a very human problem: talented people struggling to get recognized for who they actually are.

When we looked at the hiring space, we felt there was this huge disconnect between people and the way they were expected to present themselves professionally. Traditional resumes were incredibly rigid. Everyone was using the same formats, the same language, the same structure. And as a result, candidates with very different personalities and experiences all started to look identical.

The one thing that bothered me the most was how hiring turned into a popularity contest, favoring those who knew how to "play the game" rather than those who showed genuine potential. While some candidates naturally have what it takes when it comes to self-marketing, there are many talented people who do not. They underestimate themselves, cannot properly articulate their skills, or simply lack knowledge about how to effectively market themselves.

That's why we decided to develop a tool that would make the whole experience less robotic and more personal for candidates. Our goal was to provide them with an instrument to think about their accomplishments, properly communicate them, and boost confidence in promoting themselves.

Also, we later understood that hiring is becoming more and more automated. ATS software, keyword filters, artificial intelligence. Suddenly, candidates not only have to appeal to people but also have to be algorithmically discoverable. This realization further shaped our approach to development, making us focus on solutions that will allow users to stay true to themselves while still managing to compete in the digital world.

How has the job application process changed over the last few years?

Honestly, the whole job application process feels completely different now compared to even a few years ago. It used to be much simpler - you'd send a resume, maybe a cover letter, and hope someone on the other side actually took the time to read it carefully. Now there are so many layers between the candidate and the employer.

A big shift has been automation. Most people are aware of ATS systems now, which wasn't really the case before. Candidates think about keywords, formatting, and optimisation, sometimes almost as much as their actual experience. In some industries, people feel like they're writing resumes for software first and humans second.

And then AI changed everything again. Suddenly anyone can generate a polished-looking resume or cover letter in minutes. I think that's both exciting and a little complicated. It definitely helps people who struggle with writing or confidence, which is great. But at the same time, recruiters are seeing more applications that sound very similar. You can almost feel when something has been overly generated.

I also think job searching has become emotionally heavier. There's more pressure now. The market moves fast, layoffs are constantly in the news, and people feel like they always need to be 'optimized' professionally. It can be exhausting.

What's funny is that with all this technology, the human part actually matters more. People still connect with authenticity. They remember clarity, personality, good communication. These are things that don't always come through in mass-produced applications.

That's probably why we've stayed focused on helping people sound more like themselves, not less. I don't think the future is about creating perfect AI-generated candidates. I think it's about helping real people communicate their value more clearly.

How is AI transforming the way candidates build resumes and apply for jobs?

The evolution that AI brings to the job hunting process is happening at lightning speed. Not long ago, crafting a resume was a task that took several days. Today, however, it takes just minutes to put together an excellent first draft, customize it, and even prepare for an interview, thanks to AI. This is a major step forward, particularly for those who lack self-confidence and don't know how to proceed.

This development is also contributing significantly to making the whole process more complicated. As recruiters receive nothing but highly polished resumes, authenticity becomes more important than ever before. The candidates that are winning with AI are not those that use it the most, but those that use it to communicate their authenticity better.

That's how we think about AI at Enhancv too. Not as something that replaces your voice, but something that helps you express it better.

How do you balance AI assistance with authenticity in the application process?

I think this is something the entire hiring industry is still figuring out. AI is already part of how people write, communicate, and apply for jobs, so trying to avoid it completely doesn't really make sense anymore. The bigger question is how to use it without losing the human side of the process.

You can usually tell when a resume has been over-generated. It sounds polished, maybe even impressive at first, but after a while everything starts blending together. The wording feels generic, and you lose the sense of who the person actually is.

That's why we see AI more as a support tool than a replacement for someone's voice. It can help people organize their thoughts, phrase things better, or notice strengths they might overlook themselves. But the substance, like the experiences, the personality, the motivations, still needs to come from the individual.

Honestly, I think being authentic is becoming even more valuable now. When everyone has access to the same AI tools, the people who stand out are usually the ones who still sound real.

What common mistakes do job seekers still make?

One mistake that I see is people putting too much effort into trying to sound 'professional' and losing the essence of being themselves. Today, there are lots of resumes that may look technically perfect, yet seem incredibly generic. People use similar words and phrases, have the same tone, and it gets confusing at some point.

Another misconception is that people try to squeeze their whole career into one resume. A resume is not an autobiography, rather it tells the story around the present situation and future plans. In some cases, it could be even more important what you don't put in there.

I also believe that many candidates apply for dozens of positions with literally the same resume. I get that job search is tiring, but nowadays the personalization of a resume actually matters. A few details may make a huge difference in terms of relevance.

What qualities consistently help candidates stand out?

What sets apart candidates who are truly exceptional is definitely not how they try to portray themselves as impressive. It is rather their ability to convey clarity, confidence, and authenticity.

A great starting point is self-awareness. If a person can articulate his or her strengths, be straightforward when discussing experience, and demonstrate awareness of his or her preferred style of working, it will definitely sound more credible than a litany of clichés and achievements.

What I also value is details. Recruiters read countless resumes that claim the candidate is an excellent communicator or a team player. What really catches attention is when a candidate provides an example or shares a certain result that proves the quality.

Curiosity is also underestimated. It might be a little surprising, but the candidates who ask meaningful questions and approach an interview as a dialogue are being remembered.

What have been the biggest lessons for you as a founder?

One of the most important things I've learned is that building a company is all about people and not necessarily product. Initially, I believed that my company would succeed based on the brilliance of its concept or technology. Gradually, I have come to understand that culture, trust, and alignment are as important, maybe even more.

Another thing I've learned is that growth isn't as glamorous when you're working on it compared to what it looks like when you're observing it. Growth in a startup is about consistency, difficult choices, and solving the same problem repeatedly only at different levels.

Also, I've learned the importance of being grounded and connected to the mission. Trends change very quickly, especially in light of the recent developments in AI that will soon transform all aspects of hiring, but once you know exactly the problem that you need to solve for people, decision-making becomes much easier.

I still think of myself as 'always a junior' in some ways. The moment you think you've figured everything out as a founder is probably the moment you stop learning.

What excites you most about the future of work?

The thing that gets me excited is the way in which work is becoming liberated from the constraints of geographical location and career traditions. Just a few years back, your potential would largely be dependent on your geographical location and what career path you chose at an early age. Nowadays, an individual can learn a new skill online, work remotely, change careers, or join an organization located on the other side of the planet. That's a very big change.

Another thing that gets me excited is the way in which organizations are gradually liberating themselves from the practice of evaluating employees solely based on their credentials or resumes. There is more emphasis nowadays on actual abilities, flexibility, and thinking skills.

And then there's AI, which obviously changes everything again. Personally, I don't see it as replacing people. I think it'll take over more repetitive tasks and free people up to focus on things humans are naturally better at, like creativity, collaboration, empathy, good ideas, storytelling.

Ironically, the more technology advances, the more valuable genuinely human qualities seem to become. That part makes me optimistic.

What's next for Enhancv?

Right now, we are working on taking Enhancv to the next level, beyond resume building. Resume building remains one of the key features of our product, yet we want to provide more support for people in career navigation.

Speaking of our focus at the moment, it should be noted that most of our efforts go towards AI-based products. However, our approach is quite human-centric, as we seek to provide people with means to showcase their personality, speed up applications, and recognize their talents and skills without giving up their voice.

International growth remains our priority, and the thing we find the most rewarding is seeing how people all over the world use Enhancv to get their dream job or internship. This makes us feel that our problem is universal and that our solution really works.

Also, we continue growing intentionally. In other words, we try to remain as thoughtful as possible, stay close to our users, and preserve our unique company culture.

If you could change one thing about hiring today, what would it be?

I would definitely change the filtering process that weeds out applicants too fast, before anyone gets to know them. Modern hiring is extremely optimized, but unfortunately, sometimes in the wrong way. Thanks to ATS, keyword matching, and huge applicant flow, many qualified candidates are screened out before they can talk to any real people.

I understand why companies use such approaches. Mass-scale hiring is challenging. But I think there is a lack of nuance in the process. Sometimes potential is difficult to identify from the resume alone. The most promising candidates may be unconventional, mid-career switchers, self-taught, or just bad at selling themselves.

It would be great if hiring could become a bit more human again. Focusing less on perfect fitting and more on curiosity and adaptability. As well as seeing the person behind the resume. After all, companies do not hire resumes, they hire people.

What advice would you give professionals navigating career uncertainty today?

First of all, please understand that uncertainty does not mean failure. In fact, there are a lot of people who feel uncertain at the moment due to many reasons: rapid changes within industries, impacts of AI on job positions, and non-linear career paths, etc. This doesn't mean that you lag behind. It only means that the business world changes.

In my opinion, you should concentrate less on guessing what will happen in the future and learn how to develop the key skills which can help you survive under any conditions: communication skills, fast learning, teamwork skills, storytelling. These skills are always relevant regardless of the market situation.

Please note that you shouldn't underestimate the power of momentum. Any step taken can help you regain the feeling of control over your life. For example, updating your resume, making a phone call to somebody, or acquiring a new skill can have a huge impact.

Career paths tend to become clear only when looking back. more

Career development

1d

Best AI resume builder tools based on job description: which rewrite at volume

You polish every bullet, hit Submit, and hear nothing.

Ninety-eight percent of Fortune 500 firms use applicant-tracking software that rejects files in milliseconds, and recruiters who open a résumé give it just seven seconds.

That squeeze sparked AI résumé builders that scan job posts, surface the right keywords, and pass the bots.

We tested the leaders, scored them on five criteria, and ranked... them so you can choose fast and get back to interviewing.

Today's builders are focused language engines. Drop in your résumé and a job description; the AI flags keyword gaps and rewrites bullets to surface them. Synonyms get mapped, so "cross-functional collaboration" still counts when the listing says "work across teams."

The model treats you as the source of truth. It reshuffles and restyles your own words rather than inventing credentials, and you review every tweak in real time. Three jobs at once: keyword detective, copywriter, proofreader, all in seconds.

A career coach reads context, tunes voice, and catches overclaims, but charges three figures and needs a week. AI delivers fifty tailored drafts before lunch, with the same keyword discipline every time, but misses nuance and can fill blanks with fiction. The smart play: let AI draft, match, and format; spend fifteen focused minutes editing for voice, nuance, and accuracy. That combo beats a blank page, beats generic AI text, and beats paying $800 for a single static résumé.

Before crowning winners, you deserve the yardstick. We built a five-factor scorecard, assigned weights, and ran every platform through the same grind.

First comes Job-matching accuracy (25 percent). Does the draft mirror the posting's skills and verbs, or just swap a title and call it a day?

Next is ATS compatibility (25 percent). Exported PDFs tested in two major tracking systems for header, font, and table hiccups.

Third, Customization & editability (20 percent). Live line-level edits, instant score updates, no layout explosions when you shuffle sections.

Fourth, Value for money (15 percent). Cost mapped against feature depth: free tiers vs $29/month, cover letters, lifetime licenses, download caps.

Finally, User satisfaction & unique features (15 percent). Star ratings plus fresh standouts like bulk auto-apply, GPT-4.1 fine-tuning, or built-in interview prep.

Clear criteria build trust and give you a template to judge new entrants later.

With the rules on the table, let's meet the tools.

Loved by more than a million users, the AIApply job-search suite, long considered the best AI job automation tool, promises ATS-optimized résumés that stand out from 95 percent of other applicants. It is less a résumé builder and more a full job-search cockpit. Open the dashboard and you see a résumé writer, cover-letter generator, ATS scanner, language translator, interview simulator, and even an auto-apply robot sitting side by side.

That breadth matters. Most builders stop at "download PDF." AIApply keeps working until the application is sent and the interview practice is on your calendar. For power users juggling dozens of openings, that single flow saves hours and cuts the risk of version chaos.

Under the hood the writing engine runs on GPT-4 plus a custom layer that watches for keyword gaps while you type. Tweak a bullet, the ATS score in the corner jumps, and you instantly know whether to keep editing or move on.

The suite ships with recruiter-vetted templates, but it never locks you in. Every section is point-and-click editable, so if the AI oversells or undersells, you fix it on the spot and watch the match score refresh.

Bottom line: if you want one subscription that handles everything from first draft to final click on "Apply," AIApply is the clear front-runner. In the next subsection we will dig into the features that earn it the top score on our chart.

If AIApply is the multitool, Novorésumé is the scalpel. The platform keeps a single promise: turn a blank page into a recruiter-ready résumé with minimal friction.

You start with a guided wizard that asks bite-size questions (job title here, metric there) and builds a live preview on the right. Each time you add a number or action verb, the AI offers margin hints, nudging you toward impact language and stronger keywords.

Layout intelligence is the difference maker. The engine tracks where every character lands, so swapping a two-line bullet for a five-line achievement never breaks the clean, ATS-safe template. In testing, we pasted a messy project paragraph; the AI trimmed fluff, surfaced numbers, and the formatting never flinched.

The free tier lets you create a single one-page résumé with all AI tips active. Need multiple pages, a cover letter, or the built-in ATS scan? Premium costs about twenty-two dollars a month and unlocks everything. Most users treat that upgrade as a one-month sprint, not a year-long bill.

Choose Novorésumé, what many call the best AI resume builder, if you value speed, visual polish, and live coaching over deep feature sprawl.

Resume.io feels like a friendly performance coach that never sleeps. Paste a job link and the platform dissects the posting in a blink, flags missing keywords, and scores your draft against a 100-point benchmark in the sidebar.

The feedback loop is instant and addictive. Swap "led" for "accelerated," the score ticks up. Add a metric such as "cut onboarding time by 27 percent," and watch it pop into the green zone. This gaming element keeps you iterating until the résumé lands in the 90-plus sweet spot recruiters love.

Beyond scoring, Resume.io accepts voice input. Talk through your achievements and the AI transcribes, edits, and formats the bullets, shaving off blank-page dread. Once your content is tight, the builder lists openings that match your refreshed keywords, shortening the jump from writing to applying.

Pricing follows a freemium model. Build unlimited versions for free; exporting without a watermark costs a few dollars for a one-week pass or a monthly plan if you need more time. Power users often treat it like a sprint: pay once, download every file, cancel, and keep the PDFs forever.

Choose Resume.io if you want real-time scores, enjoy seeing measurable progress, and like job leads delivered inside the same window where you edit. It is the closest option on this list to a built-in personal trainer for your résumé.

Kickresume wears two hats: precision AI writer and cheerleading career mentor. Type a job title, hit Generate, and its fine-tuned GPT-4 model spits out bullet points already filled with the right keywords and action verbs.

But the platform does not stop at words. Pick from forty slick templates (creative, corporate, minimalist) and watch the AI adjust spacing, icons, and color so everything stays ATS-friendly. Want a fresh look? Switch templates and the content reflows automatically. No code, no tears.

Kickresume's secret sauce is guidance. An in-app coach breaks down every section, suggests metrics you missed, and reminds you to quantify results. When nerves kick in, the built-in interview simulator fires common questions and scores your answers for clarity and confidence.

Pricing lands in the middle of the pack. The free tier lets you test the AI a handful of times; serious users jump to Premium for unlimited generations, cover letters, and the interview lab. At roughly twenty dollars for a single month, many candidates treat it like a boot camp before a major search.

Choose Kickresume if you want both strong first drafts and human-style coaching cues. It is the closest option here to a friendly career counselor backed by a large language model.

Rezi does one job obsessively well: align your résumé with the exact keywords an ATS is hunting. Paste a job description and the interface lights up green for matches and red for gaps. Miss "budget forecasting"? The AI surfaces it in a sidebar checklist and offers a rewritten bullet that adds the phrase naturally, without awkward keyword stuffing.

Each tweak refreshes the built-in Rezi Score, a percentile gauge of how parse-ready your file is. Chasing that 90-plus score feels like a mini-game, and users on Reddit credit the tool with opening interview pipelines that froze at the screening stage.

Design takes a back seat to purity. A handful of minimalist templates keep fonts, headings, and margins within ATS safety rails. They will not win design awards, yet they sail through Workday and Greenhouse without garbling.

Cost structure is simple. Three free downloads let you try the full workflow. After that you can choose a monthly Pro pass or a lifetime license for about the price of a nice dinner, ideal if you expect multiple career jumps.

Pick Rezi when your biggest worry is "Will the robots even see me?" It turns keyword anxiety into a solvable checklist and lets you sleep knowing the parsing gods are satisfied.

Some résumés need more than black text on white. If your work shines through visuals such as design, marketing, or product, Enhancv lets you display that flair while still flying under the ATS radar.

Drag a timeline, a skill graph, or a splash of color into place, and the AI checks every change against parsing rules. Two-column layout? Safe. Subtle icons? Safe. Anything that would choke the bots gets a red warning so you can tweak before exporting.

Customizing is now one click. Upload a job ad, press Customize, and Enhancv rearranges bullets, sprinkles the right keywords, and highlights the projects that mirror the posting. It feels like a fast-forward button for personalization.

The built-in content analyzer hunts for weak verbs and missing numbers. Add "grew subscriber list by 18 percent" and the score jumps. Leave a vague line like "handled social media" and the analyzer nudges you for specifics.

Cost sits at the premium end, about twenty dollars for a month of unlimited exports, but many creatives treat it as a quick design sprint: build, download, cancel. For that price you walk away with a résumé that looks like you hired a designer.

Choose Enhancv when standing out visually matters as much as keyword precision. It lets your story breathe through layout, then double-checks that a machine can still read every word.

Teal solves a different pain: staying organized while sending dozens of applications. Its Chrome extension scrapes any LinkedIn or Indeed posting you save, then slides the description into the résumé builder where an AI highlighter shows which skills you cover and which ones you still need to mention.

Because the résumé lives inside the same tracker that logs every company, status, and follow-up date, you never lose sight of which version you sent. Need to refine for a second-round role with the same firm? Open the card, click Adjust, and Teal drafts a fresh variant in seconds.

Templates are functional rather than flashy, yet the price is hard to beat: the résumé tool, keyword matcher, and tracker are all free. A low-cost Teal Plus tier adds unlimited advanced analysis and keyword matching, though most candidates land interviews without paying a dime.

Choose Teal if you thrive on checklists, love seeing progress bars, and want AI-powered edits without opening your wallet. It turns résumé customization from a chore into one more column in your job-search Kanban board.

AI builders get you ninety percent of the way. Jobscan and Resume Worded exist to chase the last ten.

Upload your finished résumé, paste the target job description, and Jobscan spits out a forensic match report. Hard skills, soft skills, keyword frequency, and recruiter-friendly phrasing all appear on one screen, and the tool flags every missing puzzle piece. Treat it like a spell-check for relevance: tweak a line, rerun the scan, watch the match score climb.

Resume Worded adds a human-voice layer. Beyond keyword gaps, its AI pinpoints vague verbs, overused buzzwords, and bullets that lack numbers. It also grades layout, tone, and section order, then offers quick rewrite suggestions you can paste straight into your builder of choice.

Neither tool designs documents or generates full drafts; they refine what you already built. Run one of these scanners as a final pass to catch blind spots even specialty builders miss, and send your résumé with confidence.

AI résumé builders are no longer shiny toys; they give you an edge. Pick the tool that matches your pain point: end-to-end speed (AIApply), elegant polish (Novorésumé), data-driven tweaks (Resume.io), coaching flair (Kickresume), ATS precision (Rezi), visual storytelling (Enhancv), or organised hustle (Teal). Do that and you cut hours from every application.

The playbook is simple:

Follow these steps for each role and you swap shotgun outreach for targeted hits: fewer submissions, more callbacks, faster offers.

Your easiest move now is to open a free account on the platform that caught your eye. Five minutes from now you could have a résumé that passes the bots and persuades the humans.

No. Recruiters care about clarity, relevance, and truth. If the content is accurate and aligned to the role, they will not notice that AI helped you phrase it.

Is using an AI builder considered cheating?

Think of it like Grammarly for career docs. You supply the achievements; the software polishes wording and alignment. Ethics slip only when you let the tool invent credentials.

Will these platforms sell my personal data?

The big names on our list encrypt files and promise not to share them outside their ecosystem. Still, skim each privacy page and avoid uploading numbers such as a Social Security number.

Can't ChatGPT do this for free?

It can draft bullets, but you will spend extra time on prompts, formatting, and ATS testing. Purpose-built builders handle those steps, so you trade tinkering for speed.

How many customised versions do I need?

One per application. With modern builders that takes minutes, not hours, and targeted résumés consistently beat generic sends for interview callbacks.

Still stuck? Each platform above has a live chat or knowledge base; give those a look before diving back into editing. more

Career development

1d

Interviews Aren't About You (Sorry)

Early in my career, I thought interviews were about me. My skills. My achievements. My victories.

Then I sat on the other side of the table. And everything flipped.

Sitting on the decision side, I started seeing patterns -- tiny details that made or broke the deal. More importantly, I saw what interviewers were actually looking for -- very different from what I assumed when I was the one... sweating in the chair.

After doing this a hundred times, I could spot strong candidates quickly. The good ones had their hacks. They demonstrated specific results -- and who recognized them for them. They kept the interview flowing: question, concise answer, next question. I didn't have to wrestle for time.

But most importantly, the winners understood what the interview was really about.

It wasn't about the résumé. It was about the hiring manager's problem.

The Myth: Interviews Are Performance Art

Most candidates show up ready to impress and treat interviews like a stage. They list accomplishments. They describe how great they are to work with. And sure, that's nice.

But behind the table, as the hiring manager, I'm rarely thinking, "Wow." More likely, I'm wondering:

"Can this person solve my problem?"

Because every open role is a symptom. No team hires because everything is perfect.

What Job Ads Don't Tell

So what kinds of problems are hiring managers trying to solve?

It could be anything -- but you won't find it in the job ad. Job ads rarely capture the specific internal pressure driving the hire.

They don't tell you that:

The only engineer who understands the payment system just quit.Production incidents are happening often enough that everyone sleeps lightly.The team's code is solid, but the user experience is suffering.

And as a candidate, you need to know that. Because without understanding the problem, it's impossible to position yourself as the solution.

Interviews Aren't Talent Shows

So instead of performing and impressing, demonstrate curiosity -- be a detective.

Early in the conversation, ask things like:

"What prompted the opening for this role?""What's been hard for the team lately?""What problem are you hoping this role solves?"

Those questions surface the real issue.

And once the pain is on the table, the interview changes shape.

Because now, instead of giving a prepackaged speech, you can say:

"In my last role, we faced something similar..."

Instead of random autobiography -- relevance.

From Self-Focus → Problem-Focus

Once you identify the problem, connect your experience directly to it. Specifically. With examples.

If the team is struggling with coordination, talk about glue work. If they're scaling fast, talk about trade-offs you made under pressure. If they're rebuilding trust, show that you understand people -- not just systems.

That's empathy. Not the buzzword. The mindset.

How Do You Figure Out the Problem?

You ask.

After the pleasantries, politely inquire whether there's a specific problem they're trying to solve with this hire. Nine times out of ten, they'll tell you. And if they won't, it will leak out in offhand comments about deadlines, team dynamics, or recent departures: "We've had some coordination challenges..."

Sometimes -- and this sounds strange -- they may not even fully realize what the problem is. That's where you come in. With thoughtful follow-up questions, you can help clarify it.

That's how you set yourself apart.

You, a Solution

When I first started interviewing people, I thought I was evaluating talent. What I was actually doing was looking for a solution.

And as a candidate, if you understand that -- and respond to what the interview is really about -- you stand out.

Not because you're performing better. Because you're solving something.

So stop making it about you. Figure out their problem. Then demonstrate you're the solution.

That's often when interviews turn into offers. more

Career development

1d

Armed Forces Bank Partners with Hire Heroes USA to Support Veterans' Transition "From Service to Stability"

Career development

1d

AI: The Good, the Bad, the Lived Experience

The Good: It's hard to admit, but I'm not the best mom. I'm not the best at patience, or even empathy with my own kids (four young adults). I get mad. Frustrated. Even tired sometimes. I've been known to yell. More than once. And on any given day, there is likely at least one having a hard time and reaching out to mom. That's me, and sometimes I'm just, honestly, tapped out.

So what does this... have to do with artificial intelligence (AI)? AI absolutely helped me be a better parent.

I have a 23-year-old working through what I perhaps not-so-lovingly called "Failure to Launch." They graduated high school in the pandemic and are still finding their way. And they text anything and everything to avoid phone calls (sooo old school!).

A few months ago, we agreed they'd look for work (or, alternatively, apply to community college) to earn an allowance. They texted asking for money with a lengthy rationale about why they hadn't done what they promised. To be honest, it's a small allowance, but it's "earned" by what we contracted: moving forward on the job or work or volunteer front, updating the resumé, meeting with a school advisor, applying to classes, what have you.

I felt... let's say, reactive after reading their why-they-hadn't-done-their-part text. I had the urge -- nay, let's call it a craving -- to fire off a retort about no more excuses, I've heard it all before, blah blah blah. And trust me, I can be an expert at biting retort. Not proud of it, just saying. Again, I'm not perfect, and far from it.

But just as I was about to angrily tap back some sarcastic rejoinder, I picked up my phone, and AI stepped in. "Yes, I understand," it suggested, right up under my texting bubble.

I rarely use AI suggestions for writing because, well, I'm a writer, and that makes me naturally snobbish about fake -- I mean, AI! -- writing. But this was something else. It was perfect, exactly what I needed, and what I might recommend that other parents do in this kind of situation.

"Yes, I understand," helped me breathe, pause, and reflect before reacting. Starting my text with that, I added to it in a much more moderated tone than I might have. It was a humbling maternal moment. I had to grudgingly admit that AI vastly improved my communication with one of the people I love most in the world. And "Yes, I understand," opened us both up to working out a much-needed agreement. Thank you, chatbot; AI FTW!

The Bad: Soon after the "understanding" text, I visited my father. In his 90s, he needed a semi-urgent ultrasound the day after my arrival. He, his wife (my beloved "Bonus Mom"), and I had a lovely opportunity to spend an entire afternoon in the closest emergency department (ED). Just us... and 70 others vying for care.

This emergency department is in a nationally recognized health system in Southern California. If I named it, you would know. It's actually a pretty good system (so rare these days), so I'm not going to call them out by name.

We ambled into the ED, and the receptionist smiled. I filled out a form for "the patient," because Dad didn't have his reading glasses. Then, Bonus Mom and I signed in as "visitors." A screen with facial recognition software validated our identity, like at the airport (except not, as you'll soon see).

I tapped in my name and birthdate, and stood in front of the camera. It flashed, then welcomed me back to the ED. By name. But I'd never stepped foot in this ED. "Welcome back, Miriam N-----!" the screen insisted.

Wait, what?!

Even after keying in my name and birthdate, the software overwrote those to tell me I was someone else. Bonus Mom laughed. "I know Miriam N-----!" she marveled. I love my Bonus Mom so much, and I was not surprised. But I was also not amused. Except maybe in a highly ironic way.

"Let me guess," I said, "Miriam N----- must be a Jewish woman with short, curly hair and glasses." Yes, it turned out. Exactly. I pulled Miriam's name up on my phone, clicked Images, and there she was.

But Miriam N----- is at least a foot taller than I am. Facial recognition missed that. (After all, as the name implies, it's only about the face.) Miriam doesn't look like I do (except for the short, curly hair and glasses). And except for looking Jew-ish. This level of software accuracy could have really helped someone like, well, Hitler, identify all people of a given ethnicity or race.

We Jewish people all look alike, right?

I was irritated and a bit spooked by this not-so-charming AI lesson. I assumed the hospital's software had a relatively small ED visitor sample for comparison, and worked as hard as it could to match folks with an already-recognized face. In other words, their database was too small compared to, say, airport facial recognition. I understood, but it didn't help.

Several hours later, the ultrasound was normal, Dad was gratefully fine, and we were released. We made it home in time for dinner.

The Lived Experience: When I post this, a month or two from writing it (I have a bit of a backlog of Psychology Today posts; feel free to come back and read them all!), AI will be better, more accurate, shrewder, and cleaner. They call it a "learning model" because... it's still learning. Maybe we won't be complaining or arguing or singing praises about it so much, just accepting and using it throughout our days. We can certainly appreciate the help.

For now, I "trust, but verify" when asking AI questions every day. Not an AI hater, not a lover; knowing it absolutely has its place(s), but also that it absolutely hallucinates (visually and otherwise). And like with actual people who hallucinate, we need to use discernment and care. I'm intrigued, perhaps not enthralled, by what will happen next. May it be for the good. more

Career development

1d

After Hollywood's slowdown, "vertical dramas" are putting some crews back to work

The past few years have been bruising for Hollywood. Pandemic shutdowns and labor unrest led studios to scale back production. Now, a fast-growing, unlikely format is helping fill some of that gap.

On the patio of a Hollywood coffee shop, directors Corey Gibbons and Kristen Brancaccio laugh as they scroll through their résumés, with a list of titles that can sound more like clickbait than... conventional entertainment.

"My first one was 'Billionaire's Borrowed Bride,'" Brancaccio said.

"We did that one together," added Gibbons.

Other titles include "The Reluctant Billionaire Protector" and "Mafia Daddy Surprise Sextuplets."

These aren't traditional TV shows. Verticals are bite-sized episodes, typically one to three minutes long, formatted vertically for smartphones, with each installment ending on a cliffhanger, nudging viewers to keep tapping for more.

The format first gained traction in Asia. Now, it's spreading quickly in the U.S., offering steady work to crews who've endured a long dry spell.

"The overall tenor of the industry was so bleak," Brancaccio said. "And once verticals came along, it was like -- I'm busy, and so is everyone I know."

Austin Herring, CEO of Snowy Productions, says his company now produces five vertical series a month, or roughly the output of five feature films.

"When we had the one-two punch of COVID and the writers' strike, there were tumbleweeds rolling through Hollywood," Herring said. "If it hadn't been for verticals, the whole industry would have cleared out in a much more dramatic way."

Part of the appeal is cost. A typical vertical series runs between $100,000 and $200,000, a fraction of traditional TV budgets. Crews are small. Shoots are fast. Productions use multiple cameras or even smartphones.

Inside a Koreatown mansion, director Aiko Lozar raced to wrap before lunch. I ask her how many pages she'll shoot today.

"Thirteen," she replied with a laugh. "Yesterday it was 18 and a half."

For comparison, a traditional TV drama might shoot three to five.

Peter Sullivan, with Vert TV, said the storytelling formula is simple and addictive.

"What we call cognitive dopamine," he said. "You're constantly engaging the viewer ... hitting a cliffhanger every minute and a half to keep them going to the next episode."

The business model leans heavily on microtransactions. Viewers typically watch the first few episodes for free. Then they pay, often around 50 cents per episode, to unlock the rest of a series that can run 80 to 90 installments. If a show catches on, those payments add up quickly. Some verticals generate millions in revenue.

The content itself often leans into melodrama: secret billionaires, werewolf romances, mistaken identities. Many titles are rough translations from Mandarin, resulting in names like "Pregnant with My Infertile Alpha King" or "Ugly Cinderella and Her Hobo Billionaire."

The format has even minted its first breakout stars. Kasey Esser, a former personal trainer, has appeared in more than 50 vertical series after landing a role in the hit, "Fated to My Forbidden Alpha." Some fans now call him the "vertical Brad Pitt."

"I don't think I'd reject that association," Esser said with a smile.

Esser said he had just lost his agent and manager before booking that role. Now, he makes $2,000 a day. He and his partner, fellow actor Vanessa von Schwartz, now plan to produce their own projects.

"No one predicted the introduction of these, but my goal is to always have a foothold in verticals," Esser said.

As the format grows, bigger players are starting to take notice. Producers expect budgets and production values to rise.

Vert TV producer Jeff Schenck sees it as part of a longer evolution in entertainment.

"Cinema started with motion pictures, then TV came along and was seen as lesser," Schenck said. "People realized it was just another form of media. Everything evolves. It doesn't replace."

Still, the recovery for Hollywood workers is far from complete. Vertical productions can be made anywhere -- from Atlanta to Canada to Eastern Europe -- and some already are. And at least one major company has announced plans for an entirely AI-generated slate, with no actors or crew, at costs under $20,000 per series.

That prospect may worry some in the industry, but director Corey Gibbons isn't convinced.

"People want that human connection," Gibbons said. "No one's going to want to watch the prompt creator on Jimmy Fallon." more

Anonymous member

Career development

1w

I don’t get along well with my boss because she always wants people to feel sorry for her - about her divorce or her health. My coworkers say it would be easier if I just went along with it. But I want to respect her, not pity her. What should I do? Thanks

3

Sharon Masibo
1d
You can opt to ignore or some comforting words sometimes
susan mazala
1w
she should leave her personal problems at home. let her focus on work

Haleem Abdulsalam

Career development

1d

Hey everyone. If you're on Linkedln. I don't know whether youre facing a kind of low engagement reach on your account;impressions, reactions and comments. After my research, I realized one bad to be really active before engagement starts resonating with the content. I just want to know if its only me or any other person experiencing this.

#Linkedln

2

Dr Niamo Muid
Pro
1d
Greetings. I find myself responding to others much more than getting the engagement I'd like. Intend to move to YT eventually.

Career development

1d

How to Setup Author SEO in WordPress to Boost Your Google E-E-A-T

If you've been putting effort into creating great content but still struggling to rank higher on Google, the problem might not be what you're writing. It could be who Google thinks is writing it.

That's where Author SEO comes in. It's the practice of optimizing your author profile so that search engines can recognize the real person behind your content, including your qualifications, your... experience, and your credibility.

Google's Human Quality Raters use E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness) to evaluate how well its ranking systems are surfacing trustworthy content. E-E-A-T isn't a direct ranking factor, but giving Google clear author signals helps its systems recognize your content as credible.

In this guide, I'll walk you through how to set up Author SEO in WordPress. Whether you're running a personal blog or a multi-author website, you'll have everything in place to give your content a stronger chance of ranking in Google search results -- no coding needed. 🙌

Author SEO is the practice of optimizing your author profile so that search engines can identify and verify the person behind your content, including their credentials, work history, and external profile links.

Think of it as a digital résumé for search engines. The more clearly your expertise is defined, the more confidently Google can decide whether your content deserves to rank.

Author SEO supports the E-E-A-T criteria, which is the set of quality signals Google uses to evaluate whether a page deserves a top position in search results.

E-E-A-T stands for:

Many site owners focus entirely on keyword research and on-page SEO, but overlook the author signals that Google increasingly relies on. That's a missed opportunity, especially in competitive niches.

Here's why Author SEO is worth your time:

Now, let's see how to set up author SEO in WordPress. Here's everything I'll cover in this article:

To set up Author SEO in WordPress, the first thing you'll need is the right tool.

I recommend using All In One SEO (AIOSEO) because it's the only major WordPress SEO plugin with a dedicated, purpose-built Author SEO (E-E-A-T) module. It gives authors structured fields for expertise, experience, and credentials that flow directly into Person schema, instead of relying on the default WordPress user profile.

At WPBeginner, we use the AIOSEO plugin to optimize our post titles, configure OpenGraph settings, create schema markup, and more. See our complete AIOSEO review to learn more about what it can do.

To follow this tutorial, you'll need an AIOSEO account.

On the AIOSEO website, click 'Get All in One SEO for WordPress,' choose a plan that comes with the Author SEO (E-E-A-T) feature, and complete the checkout.

Upon signup, you'll land in your own AIOSEO dashboard, where you can download your plugin zip file and copy your license key.

Now, you can go ahead and install and activate the All In One SEO plugin. Simply navigate to Plugins " Add Plugin in your WordPress admin area to start.

On the next screen, you can click the 'Upload Plugin' button.

Then, click the 'Choose File' button to upload your AIOSEO zip file from your local computer.

Once uploaded, click 'Install Now,' followed by 'Activate.' If you need help, please refer to our guide on how to install a WordPress plugin.

AIOSEO will then add a new menu to your WordPress dashboard. From here, let's navigate to AIOSEO " General Settings to verify your license key.

In the respective field, enter your AIOSEO license key and hit 'Activate.'

With that done, you can manage all of your SEO settings, including your author profiles, from the All in One SEO menu in your WordPress sidebar.

For a more detailed walkthrough of the setup process, see our guide on how to setup All in One SEO for WordPress correctly.

Before you create or edit a user, you'll need to activate the Author SEO (E-E-A-T) feature. This will allow you to unlock extended author profile fields and structured data settings.

To do this, head to the Feature Manager in AIOSEO and toggle on 'Author SEO (E-E-A-T)' to activate it.

Once that's done, go to 'Search Appearance' and click on the 'Author SEO' tab.

Here you'll find a few settings to configure.

First, you'll want to set 'Display Info' to Gutenberg Blocks.

I recommend selecting the Gutenberg Blocks option because it is the easiest way to display author information without touching any code.

Then, you can hit 'Enable' next to 'Append Author Bio to Posts.' This lets you automatically add your author bio box to the bottom of your articles, saving you the hassle of inserting it manually every time.

For the post type, select 'Posts.' If it's relevant to your WordPress site, you can also select 'Pages' or tick 'Include All Post Types.'

Next, let's scroll down to the 'Author Experience Topics' section.

This is where you'll add all the topics your blog covers. It's worth taking your time here, because these topics will be used later when you assign individual writers their own Author SEO settings.

Think in two layers: start with broad umbrella terms like SEO, AI SEO, or Content Marketing, then get more specific with the tools and products you write about, like WordPress. For each one, fill in the relevant URL and any referencing pages that back it up.

When you're happy with everything, click 'Save Changes' and you're done with this step.

With AIOSEO installed and set up, the next step is to make sure every author on your site has a complete WordPress user profile.

This matters more than most people realize because your user profile is where Google pulls the foundational information it needs to evaluate your credibility as an author.

With that done, go ahead and click the 'Add User' button.

If your site covers topics in the YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) category -- such as health, finance, legal advice, or safety, then adding a reviewer to your posts is a smart extra step.

Google holds this type of content to a higher standard. And showing that an article has been reviewed by a qualified expert can meaningfully strengthen your E-E-A-T signals.

Simply repeat the process to add a new user for your reviewer.

Now that the user profile is set up, it's time to add the deeper author details that AIOSEO uses to generate structured data for search engines. This is where Author SEO really starts to take shape.

To access these settings, go to Users " All Users from your WordPress dashboard. Hover over the author's name and click 'Edit.'

Once you're inside the profile, you can switch to the 'Author SEO' tab added by AIOSEO.

You can find it next to the 'Personal Options' tab, like this:

Here, you'll want to fill in the following core details:

These fields feed directly into the author's JSON-LD schema markup, which is a type of structured data that search engines read behind the scenes.

Next, you can add whatever awards the author has received in the past as well as the languages the author speaks.

Do note that the Awards and Spoken Languages fields won't be visible to readers on your posts, but don't skip them. AIOSEO outputs this information as schema markup in the background, and Google can use it to better understand the author's credibility.

After that, you'll find the:

I recommend writing the bio in the third person and keeping it focused on what makes the author qualified to write on your site's topics.

A bio that earns trust does more than describe the author. It gives Google and your readers specific, checkable evidence that this person should be writing on this topic.

Start with the basics: the author's full name, their role on your site, and the topic area they cover.

Then build the rest of the bio around the four E-E-A-T pillars:

The rule of thumb: numbers, named outlets, and dates beat adjectives every time. "Veteran content strategist" is filler. "Has written for HubSpot and Search Engine Journal since 2016" is a signal.

Here's the difference in practice:

Before: Sarah is a passionate writer who loves helping small businesses succeed online. She has years of experience in digital marketing and is dedicated to creating high-quality content.

After: Sarah Chen is a content strategist who has helped 40+ small businesses set up their WordPress sites since 2019. She's a certified Google Analytics professional, has been quoted in Search Engine Land, and personally tests every plugin she recommends on a staging site before publishing.

The "after" version gives Google three verifiable claims (the certification, the named publication, the testing process) and gives readers a clear reason to trust Sarah on WordPress topics. That is what a bio is supposed to do.

On top of those core details, you'll also want to add external profile URLs. These are links to places outside your website where the author has a verified presence.

For example:

These external links act as additional authorship signals. They help Google cross-reference the author's identity and credentials across the web, which strengthens the overall trustworthiness of their profile.

Every field you fill out in the Author SEO tab doesn't just appear on your website. It also gets translated into Person schema. It's a type of structured data that tells Google who the author is in a format it can read and understand, so it can match the right person to the right content.

Here's how each field maps to a Person schema property:

The property deserves special attention. When you add LinkedIn, a portfolio site, or an industry directory listing to the social profiles section, AIOSEO outputs those URLs as values in the schema. This tells Google: "This author also exists here, here, and here."

But a URL only counts if Google can confirm it's actually the same person. That means the profile you link to needs to match your author bio on the basics: same full name, same (or clearly recognizable) photo, same employer or affiliation, and a byline history that lines up with what your WordPress site says about them.

Some platforms carry far more weight than others. I recommend focusing on profiles that Google already treats as identity sources:

What you're building toward is a Knowledge Panel: once Google has enough consistent cross-references confirming the same person across the web, it starts treating that author as a known entity and can eventually attribute content, expertise, and trust to them directly in search results.

The more of these fields you fill in, the richer your Person schema becomes, and the more evidence Google has to evaluate your author's E-E-A-T signals.

Once you've filled in all the details, scroll down and click 'Update User' to save your changes.

From here, you can repeat this process for all of the authors (and reviewers) you have.

Author SEO covers the individual writer. But Google also wants to identify the organization publishing the content.

That's the other half of the E-E-A-T picture. Without it, Google sees credible authors with no verified entity behind them.

AIOSEO handles this through Organization schema, which it generates from a single Knowledge Graph settings panel. Go to AIOSEO " Search Appearance and open the 'Global Settings' tab.

Under 'Knowledge Graph,' you'll want to confirm that 'Organization' is selected, not 'Person.'

This is the right choice for any site with more than one author, or any site representing a brand rather than a solo individual.

From here, fill in the following fields:

These fields map directly to Organization schema properties that Google reads behind the scenes:

Don't forget to also add your organization's social profile URLs at the bottom of this section, just like you did for individual authors.

These become values in the Organization schema and help Google cross-reference your brand's identity across platforms like LinkedIn, Facebook, and YouTube.

Click 'Save Changes' when you're done.

Now, you need to make sure that Google can actually find and crawl your author's archive page. This is a dedicated page that lists all the posts written by a specific author, and it can usually be found at a URL like .

First, make sure your author archive page is set to index in Google. I'll cover exactly when and why you might choose differently in the Bonus Tip below.

For now, go to AIOSEO " Search Appearance, open the 'Archives' tab, and confirm that 'Show in Search Results' under 'Author Archives' is set to 'Yes.'

With that set, it's time to confirm that the schema markup is actually showing up correctly. The best way to do this is with Google's Rich Results Test tool because it's free and takes just a minute to use.

After completing the Author SEO fields, you should see a fully populated result with all the structured data AIOSEO generated from your inputs.

To get started, open a new browser tab and go to Google's Rich Results Test. Paste your author page URL into the search bar and click the 'Test URL' button.

Your author page URL will typically follow this format: . If you're not sure what it is, you can find it by clicking on the author's name on any published post on your WordPress site.

After the test runs, you'll see a summary of the structured data Google detected on the page.

From here, expand the 'Profile page' result to check that the key Person schema properties are populated correctly:

If the tool flags any errors or warnings, don't worry because this is common the first time around.

Click on each issue to see what needs to be fixed, then head back to the Author SEO section in AIOSEO to make the necessary updates. Run the test again to confirm everything is resolved.

With your author schema in place, the next step is to make sure that the author information is visible to readers directly inside your posts.

AIOSEO includes two dedicated author blocks that you can add to any post or page using the WordPress block editor.

To add an author block, open a post in the block editor and click the '+' button to open the block inserter. Search for "author" and you'll see the AIOSEO author blocks available to insert.

The Author Name block is designed to appear near the post title.

It displays the author's name and profile picture, giving readers an immediate sense of who wrote the article before they've even started reading.

It's a simple but effective trust signal, especially for first-time visitors who want to quickly assess whether the content comes from a credible source.

The Author Bio block is designed to appear at the bottom of the post.

It includes the author's full bio, educational background, social media links, and area of expertise. This way, readers get a more complete picture of who the author is after they've finished reading.

You can configure this block in two ways:

Once you've added and configured your author blocks, click 'Update' or 'Publish' to save your changes to the post.

Now, you can visit your posts to see your author box, optimized for SEO and E-E-A-T.

Here's what mine looks like on the front end:

If your site covers YMYL topics like health, finance, or legal advice, then adding a reviewer is the highest-value E-E-A-T move you can make beyond setting up your author profiles.

A reviewer is a qualified expert who has checked the article for accuracy. Showing both the author and the reviewer on a post tells Google the content has been through an extra layer of verification, which matters a lot in niches Google scrutinizes more closely.

Start by adding the reviewer as a WordPress user, the same way you added your authors in Step 3.

Go to Users " Add New User and fill in their name, email, and role. If the reviewer won't be writing posts, then the Contributor role is a safe choice. It gives them a profile without publishing access.

Next, go to Users " All Users, hover over the reviewer's name, and click 'Edit.'

Open the 'Author SEO' tab, the same one you used in Step 4.

Fill out the fields that signal credibility for your niche: job title, employer, institution, awards, knows about, bio, and external profile URLs like LinkedIn.

For example, for a medical reviewer, that might be their MD credential and the hospital they practice at. For a financial reviewer, their CFP designation and firm.

These fields feed into the reviewer's Person schema, just like they do for authors. The stronger the reviewer's documented credentials, the more weight Google gives the review signal.

Adding a reviewer to a post takes two quick actions: inserting the AIOSEO - Reviewer Name block where you want the credit to appear, and then picking the reviewer in the post sidebar.

Open the post you want to attribute and click the '+' button in the block editor. Search for "reviewer" and insert the AIOSEO - Reviewer Name block.

Place it somewhere visible, like near the top of the post or just below the author meta, so readers see the reviewer's name before they commit to the content.

Next, look at the right-hand sidebar of the editor for the 'Reviewer' dropdown. This is where you tell AIOSEO which user actually reviewed the post. The block won't show a name on its own until you set this.

Click the dropdown and pick the user who reviewed this post.

Once the reviewer is set, simply update or publish the post.

The AIOSEO - Reviewer Name block on the page will pull in the reviewer's name and photo automatically, and AIOSEO will output the reviewer's details in the page's structured data alongside the author's. This means Google can read the writer-and-reviewer relationship directly from the schema.

Every WordPress site automatically creates an author archive page for each user.

This page does real work for your SEO. When a search engine crawls one of your posts, it follows the author link to the archive page. That's where AIOSEO outputs the full Person schema markup you configured in Step 4.

But before you focus on making it look good, you need to make a foundational decision first: should your author archive pages be indexed by Google at all?

If you're noindexing your author archive pages, you're done here.

If you've decided to index these pages, it's worth taking a little time to make them look good too. A well-presented author page builds trust with readers who land there after clicking an author link, and reinforces the credibility signals you've already built into your schema markup.

Here are a few ways to improve it:

The goal is to make sure the author archive page looks like a real, trustworthy destination, not an unstyled list of posts.

See our guide on how to customize your WordPress theme for a full walkthrough.

Here are some of the most common questions our readers ask about setting up Author SEO in WordPress:

Why is Author SEO important?

Author SEO is important because it directly supports Google's E-E-A-T guidelines, which the search engine uses to evaluate whether your content deserves a top position in search results. Without clear author signals, even well-written content can struggle to rank, especially in competitive or YMYL niches.

Should I noindex author pages on a single-author blog?

Yes, in most cases. On a single-author blog, your author archive page typically duplicates your homepage or blog index, which creates thin content and potential duplicate content issues. Noindexing it avoids those problems. The exception is if your author page has a significantly different layout or content from your homepage, in which case indexing it may still make sense.

Does Organization schema help individual post rankings?

Not directly. Organization schema lives on your homepage, so it doesn't attach to individual posts. But it works alongside the Person schema on your author pages to give Google a complete, verified picture of your site. Think of it as the foundation that makes your author-level E-E-A-T signals more credible.

Which tool can help me with my author SEO?

All In One SEO (AIOSEO) is one of the best tools for setting up Author SEO in WordPress. It includes a dedicated Author SEO section, generates JSON-LD schema markup automatically, and provides author blocks you can add directly to your posts, all without coding.

Does AIOSEO's Author SEO feature work alongside Yoast SEO or Rank Math?

You should only run one SEO plugin at a time. If you already use Yoast SEO or Rank Math, then you'd need to deactivate it before switching to AIOSEO so that two plugins aren't outputting Person and Article schema for the same post. Yoast and Rank Math both handle author metadata at a basic level, but neither offers a dedicated Author SEO module with the same depth as AIOSEO's author blocks, reviewer fields, and automatic JSON-LD output.

How long does it take for E-E-A-T author signals to show up in Google search results?

Plan on weeks to months. Google needs to recrawl your author pages, re-evaluate the new Person schema, and update how it scores your content. Keep in mind that E-E-A-T is not a direct ranking factor. It's a set of guidelines Google's quality raters use, so stronger author signals support better rankings over time but don't guarantee an immediate lift.

Do I need to add a reviewer to every article for E-E-A-T?

For YMYL topics like health, finance, and legal, then yes. A qualified reviewer with verifiable credentials is one of the strongest trust signals Google looks for on this kind of content. For non-YMYL topics, a reviewer is optional, but adding one to your flagship or cornerstone articles is still a smart way to back up your expertise claims.

I hope this blog post has helped you set up author SEO in WordPress to boost your Google E-E-A-T.

If you found this helpful, you might want to check out our other guides on: more

Alex Flynn

Career development

3d

We have a work chat, but people often use it to talk about movies, bars and weekend plans. Because of all those messages I missed an important message saying we had to come to work one hour earlier today. Now my boss wants to fine me, but I think it’s not my fault because the chat is not only for work. How can I prove I’m right? Thanks

prasad r
1d
The Boss needs to have the maturity to understand how you miss that important message, may be some others also missed it. Boss needs to make sure... such a thing won't happen again because of the fault of the system more
Joe Giandonato
3d
We also have a work chat, but we mainly discuss cropdusting, SBDs, and “blowing it up”.

Career development

1d

The truth about job hunting

In this episode, Katy Murray, Co-Founder of Rewired, shares the honest truth about navigating today's job market and why so many talented people are overlooked.

If you've applied for dozens of roles and heard nothing back, it's easy to assume you're doing something wrong.

We don't buy that. The real problem is that modern job hunting often runs through noisy systems where AI-written resumes,... one-click Easy Apply tools, and ATS filtering can bury talented people before a human ever sees them.

Katy Murray, co-founder of Rewired, joins us to unpack what's broken in the traditional hiring process and why "perfect" CVs can still fail. We talk about how recruiters experience a wave of generic, polished applications, why that leads to longer hiring processes, and how career breaks and nonlinear paths especially for women in tech can be unfairly penalized when companies overfocus on titles and years.

Then we get practical. We share how to shift your job search strategy from volume to relevance: positioning your LinkedIn profile for the role you actually want, doing gentle networking that opens doors, and writing applications that prove impact instead of listing duties. We also dig into a simple habit that makes everything easier over time: keeping a brag book so you can tell your story with clarity when it counts. more

Career development

cyusa shawn

Jeff Bell

Career development

I hid the fact I had children in job interviews - it's the only way to get hired

Munyaradzi David Matimba

Career development

Geotech Engineering Job Application Aid

Career development

An Nvidia exec said AI-generated résumés may be favored by AI recruiters because 'AI likes to use AI'

Career development

The Engineer Who Said No: Dr. Jon Padfield's Global Rise and His War on the Surveillance State - Frank Report

Career development

The Engineer Who Said No: Dr. Jon Padfield's War on the Surveillance State - ARTVOICE

Career development

Why I Built a Personal Website -- And Why It Changed How Clients See My Work

Anonymous member

Sandra Tarkenton

Peter Cooper

Career development

UE center rebrands to boost education, career development

Career development

Q&A with Volen Vulkov, Co-Founder of Enhancv

Career development

Best AI resume builder tools based on job description: which rewrite at volume

Career development

Interviews Aren't About You (Sorry)

Career development

Armed Forces Bank Partners with Hire Heroes USA to Support Veterans' Transition "From Service to Stability"

Career development

AI: The Good, the Bad, the Lived Experience

Career development

After Hollywood's slowdown, "vertical dramas" are putting some crews back to work

Anonymous member

Sharon Masibo

susan mazala

Haleem Abdulsalam

Dr Niamo Muid

Career development

How to Setup Author SEO in WordPress to Boost Your Google E-E-A-T

Alex Flynn

prasad r

Joe Giandonato

Career development

The truth about job hunting