I Trusted My Friend to Help With My CV and Application -- But She Was At My Interview When I Walked In


The fluorescent lights in the waiting room hummed with a clinical, predatory energy that made the sweat behind my neck turn cold. I clutched my leather folder, my knuckles white, staring at the woman sitting directly across from me in the plush charcoal armchair. It was Leah.

She was wearing the power suit she'd bought last month, her hair lay in a sharp, professional bob, looking every bit the... corporate conqueror. My heart didn't just throb; it felt like it was trying to exit my chest through my throat.

"Leah?" I whispered, the name catching on the dry roof of my mouth. "What are you doing here?"

She didn't flinch. She didn't look guilty. Instead, she offered a thin, practised smile that didn't reach her eyes and adjusted the identical navy-blue company folder resting on her lap.

"Oh, Naomi! You applied for this, too?" she asked, her voice airy and casual, as if we were bumping into each other at a grocery store rather than at the one job interview that was supposed to save my life. "That's so funny. Small world, isn't it?"

"Funny?" I choked out, the air in the room suddenly feeling too thin to breathe. "You told me the role wasn't really your 'vibe' when I showed you the listing. You spent three days 'fixing' my CV for this exact position."

She leaned forward, the scent of her expensive, musky perfume hitting me like a physical blow -- a sharp contrast to the antiseptic smell of the office. "I just thought I'd throw my hat in the ring at the last minute, babes," she said, her tone hardening just a fraction. "May the best woman win, right?"

We had been inseparable since our first year at university.

Leah was the fire to my water. While I spent my nights in the library perfecting my syntax, she was out networking, building a bridge to the career she wanted. She landed a solid role at a marketing firm straight after graduation.

I, on the other hand, had spent the last eight months staring at the peeling paint on my apartment ceiling. The bills had started to feel like physical weights pressing down on my shoulders.

Every time my mother called from the village to ask how the job hunt was going, I felt a fresh wave of shame. "Don't worry, Naomi," Leah had told me over a plate of steaming tilapia last month.

"I'm going to see you win. Your brilliance just needs the right packaging." She held my hand across the table, her grip firm and reassuring.

"I've got the connections, and I know exactly what these HR managers are looking for," she'd insisted. "Just send me your drafts. I'll polish them until they shine." I felt a surge of genuine gratitude that brought tears to my eyes. "You'd really do that for me?" I asked, my voice trembling.

"Of course," she laughed, waving away my thanks. "What are friends for if not to pull each other up?" I sent her my CV that night, feeling like a massive burden had been lifted.

I told her everything about the mid-sized firm I'd found. I told her about the salary, a figure that was significantly higher than what she was currently earning.

"It's a bit of a jump for you, isn't it?" she'd remarked, her eyes flickering over the job description on my phone. "But hey, if you think you can handle the pressure, go for it."

I trusted her completely because she was the one who already had her foot in the door of the world I was trying to enter. She was my mentor, my sister, and my safety net. Or so I thought.

The first red flag appeared a week before the application deadline. Leah had been "working" on my CV for five days, claiming she was too swamped at her own job to finish the edits.

"I need to submit it by Friday, Leah," I told her over the phone, pacing the narrow hallway of my flat. "The portal closes at midnight."

"Relax, Naomi," she snapped, her voice uncharacteristically sharp. "I'm making sure it's perfect. Do you want the job or not?" I went quiet, swallowed by the fear of offending the only person helping me.

When the document finally landed in my inbox on Thursday evening, I opened it with trembling fingers. As I scrolled through the pages, a cold knot began to form in the pit of my stomach.

She had removed my two-year stint at the regional consultancy -- the very place where I'd managed a team of six. "Why did you take out the consultancy lead role?" I texted her immediately.

"It makes you look overqualified and expensive," she messaged back seconds later. "Trust the process. I've rephrased your skills to make you seem more 'trainable'."

I looked at the laptop screen, bewildered. She had replaced my active, leadership-focused bullet points with passive, administrative language.

"It doesn't sound like me, Leah," I whispered to the empty room. I called her, hoping for clarity, but she didn't pick up.

A few minutes later, a voice note arrived. "Naomi, you're overthinking. I know these recruiters. They want someone who won't clash with the current manager."

I looked at my original draft -- full of achievements and high-level strategy. Then I looked at her version -- muted, simplified, and almost invisible.

The pressure of the deadline felt like a physical hand squeezing my throat. If I didn't submit this now, I'd lose the chance entirely.

If I ignored her advice and failed, I'd have no one to blame but myself. "She knows better," I whispered, trying to convince my pounding heart.

I uploaded her version of my life and hit 'submit'. The confirmation email felt less like a victory and more like a surrender.

Two days later, the invitation for an interview arrived. I was ecstatic, screaming into my pillow before calling Leah to share the news.

"That's great, bestie," she said, though her voice sounded strangely flat. "I told you my edits would work."

"I'm so nervous," I admitted. "Do you think I should brush up on the project management software they mentioned?" "Don't bother," she replied quickly. "They told me -- I mean, I heard -- they're moving away from that system."

I paused, the air suddenly still. "How did you hear that?"

"Just industry chatter, Naomi. Focus on being 'personable'. That's your strength." I sat on my bed after we hung up, the silence of the apartment feeling heavy and suspicious.

The light outside was fading into a bruised purple, casting long, distorted shadows across the floor. I felt like I was walking through a fog, unable to see the cliff edge until my foot was already hovering over the drop.

I decided to do a quick search on the company's recent LinkedIn posts. There, featured in a "Meet the Team" video from that morning, was the exact software she told me to ignore.

My heart gave a sickening thud. Why would she lie about something so small?

I shook it off, telling myself she was just misinformed. Friends don't sabotage friends.

I spent the next forty-eight hours rehearsing the "personable" answers she had coached me on. I wore the modest navy dress she suggested, even though I felt more powerful in my tailored blazer.

"You don't want to intimidate them," she'd warned. I walked into that office building feeling small, prepared to be the "trainable" girl she had created on paper.

Then the elevator doors opened. And there she was.

The receptionist called Leah's name first. She stood up with a grace that felt like a calculated insult, smoothing her skirt without looking back at me.

I sat in that chair for twenty minutes, the silence of the lobby ringing in my ears like a physical siren. Every time the heavy oak door opened, I expected to see her walk out with a look of shame.

Instead, when she finally emerged, she looked radiant. She caught my eye and gave a small, triumphant nod that made my stomach do a slow, sick flip.

"Good luck, Naomi," she whispered as she passed, her voice dripping with a pity that felt sharper than any blade. "They're looking for someone very... specific today."

When I finally walked into the boardroom, three panellists sat behind a glass table. I sat down, my hands trembling as I laid out my "diluted" CV in front of them.

"So, Naomi," the lead interviewer began, flipping through the pages with a bored expression. "Your profile seems a bit... entry-level for a role with this much responsibility."

I felt the blood drain from my face. "I've actually managed teams before," I said, my voice sounding thin and desperate in the large room.

"It's not listed here," he replied, pointing to the gap where Leah had deleted my consultancy experience. "We're looking for a leader, not someone we have to hand-hold through basic operations."

I looked down at the paper -- the paper Leah had "polished" for me. It was a map leading me directly into a dead end.

"I can explain those gaps," I started, but I could see their interest fading like a dying ember. They began asking technical questions about the very software Leah told me to ignore.

I tried to pivot, to show my personality as she'd coached me, but they weren't looking for a "friend." They were looking for the expert I had been before I let her touch my career.

The air in the room felt heavy, smelling of stale coffee and the ozone of high-end air conditioning. I realised then that I wasn't just fighting for a job; I was fighting the version of myself Leah had invented to ensure I'd fail.

The floor beneath my feet felt as though it had turned to water. I stumbled out of the interview room, the heavy oak door clicking shut behind me like a gavel.

Leah was still there, leaning against the glass windows of the lift lobby. She was silhouetted against the harsh afternoon sun, watching the city traffic crawl below.

"How did it go?" she asked, her back still turned. Her voice was steady, devoid of the nervous energy I was currently drowning in.

"They thought I was a junior, Leah," I said, my voice cracking as the humiliation finally broke through. "They literally laughed when I mentioned strategy. The edits you made -- they erased everything that made me a contender."

She turned around slowly. For the first time in ten years, the mask slipped completely. The warm, supportive sister-friend was gone. In her place stood a woman with eyes as cold and calculating as a high-frequency trader. There was no sympathy there; only a hard, metallic ambition.

"Maybe you just aren't ready for this level yet, Naomi," she said. Her tone was clinical. "I did you a favour, really. I kept you from overpromising and crashing out in the first month. You would have been out of your depth."

"You applied for it yourself," I whispered, the realisation hitting me with the force of a physical blow. I looked at the identical folder in her hand.

"You didn't just 'fix' my CV. You harvested it. You took the leadership highlights you deleted from mine and pasted them into yours, didn't you?"

She didn't even have the grace to flinch. She simply adjusted the strap of her designer handbag and looked at me as if I were a piece of outdated software.

"I saw the salary range on that listing, Naomi. It is double what I make now," she said flatly. "Why should I let you leapfrog over me? I've spent years networking while you were just... waiting. You haven't paid your dues."

The betrayal felt like a thick, oily slick in my throat. The soundscape of the office -- the ringing phones, the rhythmic tapping of keyboards -- suddenly muffled, as if I had been plunged underwater.

"You knew I was desperate," I gritted out, my eyes stinging. "You knew my landlord was calling every day. You used my vulnerability to scout a better deal for yourself."

"It's just business, babes," she said, her voice dropping to a low, cold hum as the lift doors chimed and slid open.

"Don't take it so personally. In this city, you're either the one holding the ladder or the one being stepped on." She stepped into the mirrored carriage, the doors closing on her calm, unbothered reflection.

I didn't cry on the bus ride home. The betrayal was too deep for tears; it felt more like a cold, clarifying frost.

I reached my apartment and sat in the dark for a long time, listening to the distant hum of traffic. My phone buzzed with a notification from her on social media.

"So proud of us for putting ourselves out there today! Lunch soon? x" I stared at the screen until the light dimmed and went black.

I didn't reply. I didn't demand an explanation; I already had. Instead, I went to my settings and clicked 'Block' on every platform we shared.

The silence that followed was the first bit of peace I'd felt in months. The next morning, I opened my laptop and pulled up my original, "overqualified" CV.

I restored every achievement, every leadership role, and every technical skill she had tried to bury. I realised that by trying to make myself "palatable" for her, I had made myself invisible to everyone else.

A week later, I saw a LinkedIn update from the company. The role was being re-advertised; neither of us had been "the right fit."

I felt a grim sense of satisfaction knowing her sabotage hadn't even bought her the prize she'd sold her soul for. I hit 'apply' again -- this time with the real version of me.

I haven't heard back yet, and the bills are still piling up on my kitchen counter. But the air in my apartment feels lighter, stripped of the toxic expectations of a "friend" who wanted me to stay small.

I used to think that loyalty was a debt you paid to people just because you'd known them a long time. I thought that a friend's success was my success, and I assumed they felt the same.

But I've learned that some people only want to see you do well as long as you aren't doing better than them. They will offer you a hand to help you up, only to ensure they can control how high you climb.

True friendship doesn't require you to shrink so the other person can feel tall. It doesn't ask you to hide your strengths to protect their fragile ego.

I am still looking for work, and the uncertainty is terrifying. But I would rather be unemployed and standing on my own two feet than successful and leaning on a snake.

I've reclaimed my voice and my history. And I've learned the hardest lesson of all: trust is a gift, but discernment is a survival skill.

If the person closest to you is the one holding the scissors, how can you ever expect to grow?
 
more
2   
  • As long as you feel yourself now, that is what counts.

  • Mistake One: Putting You Career, Your Money, Your Relationship, Your Dreams, Your Sspirations, Or Your Personal Whatevers In Someone Elses Hands....
    Based On The Length Of The Short Novel You Wrote, I Cant Help But Wonder "WHY?"
    So, What You Do From This Point On Will Determine If You Have The Ability To Protect Your Most Valuable Assets? Your Dreams!
     more

Life is lived mostly in ordinary moments, not in major achievements.


We plan for future successes but rarely consider how we'll actually live day to day. Yet, happiness, and a meaningful life, may depend more on how we spend our ordinary days.

When students, or professionals, sit down across from me for what I call a "Flourishing Chat," which is a mix between life, professional, and health, they rarely begin with a crisis. More often they say something like, "I... know what I want to do... I just don't feel that great about it.

"roles at major companies. The plans are polished. The résumés are strong. From the outside, everything looks ready to go. Then I ask a different question: "What would your ordinary Tuesday look like at this job?" I don't want to know about the title on their business cards or their starting salary. I want them to tell me what time they'll wake up, who they will spend their days with, what kinds of problems they will solve, what their evenings feel like when they come home tired. At this point in the conversation, every time, students, and sometimes even professionals, can't answer my questions. The conversation turns into silence. They have thought about what role they want, but they haven't yet thought about what the role entails - or how it fits with the activities they like to do and the people they care about. We are taught early to think of success as a possession. We accumulate credentials, milestones, promotions, and recognition. We pursue outcomes that can be measured and displayed. Yet even if we mark our life journey with milestones, most of our time travelling will be in the everyday steps we take along our way. How we travel will not only determine which path we take, it will also determine which milestones are worth marking., which is what today we call flourishing or living a good life rooted in activity rather than possession. Flourishing isn't something you own; it's something you do - consistently and as a way that speaks to your gifts and. It is a way of living that aligns one's actions with one's character and in accord with their values. When I talk about this type of flourishing, most people agree that it sounds nice in theory. Yet when it comes to making personal and professional decisions about their lives, they often revert to their old habits of choosing the path that looks most successful from the outside rather than one they can get excited about actually living day to day. I see this tension regularly with students who feel pulled toward careers they are not sure they will enjoy, but I also see it with professionals at almost every stage of their. Ambition is framed as climbing a ladder rather than finding better ways to act on one's values so that you can have greater impact on oneself and others. Success is an external metric rather than an internal measure of alignment.compresses lives into highlight reels: the graduation photo, the new job announcement, the promotion. We see the trophies, not the ordinary weekday mornings that make up a life.I learned this lesson myself early in my career. Like many ambitious young professionals, I believed that hard work meant sacrificing the present so that futurecould eventually arrive. Like the lesson of the famous "marshmallow test," I thought it demonstrated the capacity to achieve success: A noble ability to endure now so I can enjoy later.important to put in the time to become great at what we do - it is equally important to consider what we are enduring for. Is it to achieve for the sake of achievement, or is it to be able to successfully accomplish the things we truly care about doing? Psychologists sometimes talk about the "arrival fallacy," which is the belief that reaching a certain goal will bring lasting fulfillment. The problem is that achieving theseMeanwhile, the real question remains unanswered: Do I actually like how I spend my days? This is why, in these flourishing chats, I push my conversation partners toward the details - towards painting as complete a picture as they can. Not because I want to discourage ambition, but because ambition is healthier when it is grounded in reality and in self-reflection.These questions shift the frame. They ask us to stop seeing success as something you possess and to start seeing it as something you practice. They ask us to payThis perspective doesn't make decisions easier. In fact, it can make them harder, because we now have to think beyond external validation and ask ourselves what actually sustains us. We must be honest about tradeoffs we are willing to make and have the courage to choose paths that may not look impressive from other people's vantage points. Yet, taking this view of success also offers something liberating, because now our everyday isn't a means to a few momentary milestones. Life is embraced through the ordinary days we spend living it., is an associate professor at the Emory University School of Medicine and the executive director of the Emory Purpose Project.Self Tests are all about you. Are you outgoing or introverted? Are you a narcissist? Does perfectionism hold you back? Find out the answers to these questions and more with Psychology Today.

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Jujutsu Kaisen Just Revealed Its Most Broken Power Yet (& Not Even Gojo Can Fight It)Jujutsu Kaisen Season 3 revealed its most broken power yet, and not even Gojo is a good match for it

Read more "

Don't Give Up On Hannibal Season 4 Just YetCathal Gunning has been writing about movies, television, culture, and politics online and in print since 2017. He worked as a Senior Editor in Adbusters Media Foundation from 2018-2019 and wrote for WhatCulture in early 2020. He has been a Senior Features Writer for ScreenRant since 2020.

Read more "

'Gilmore Girls' Alum Anchors Colleen Hoover's Highest-Rated Movie YetAlexis Bledel and Lauren Graham sat together in Gilmore Girls

Read more "

Scrubs Season 10 Officially Avoids Yet Another Reboot TrapAngel Shaw is a TV Lead Writer and Critic with ScreenRant who knows far too much about Harry Potter and The Lord of the Rings.

Read more "

Marvel's New Disney Special Runtime Becomes The Longest Episode Yet After 4 YearsJon Bernthal as the Punisher in Daredevil Born Again

Read more "

Power Rangers Live-Action Disney Series Reportedly Delayed (But Don't Panic Just Yet)The Power Rangers Live-Action Series For Disney Has Reportedly Been Delayed (But Don't Panic Just Yet)

Read more "
 
more
1   
  • Sorry, it was harsh the HR could have a little bit empathetic.

  • As an HR professional myself, I have issues with your explanation of how this interview went. From what you have written and what I have interpreted,... you missed the point of the interview. As a professional, you should leave your feelings with your feelings and lean on facts as well as sharing those facts with a business mindset.
    They did not try to confuse you as you were already confused. By what, I do not know. Maybe attempting to figure out your interviewer instead of focusing on what is being asked of you. Don't worry, many do the same which if not realized quickly, can cause undue anxiety because the process of the interviewer's questioning does not match the visuals you have already, without reason, placed in your minds eye. Now you're stuck in that cycle of confusion. 
    You are not the first candidate to their rodeo, so the interviewer went through the motions, by the numbers and determined the result. My advice to you is learn from it and move forward. Finding work is a full time job in itself, but launching a career is life absorbing. When you fall, fall forward, get up and move out! leave the tears on the ground behind you.
     more

    -4

The Rise of "Resume Botox": Over One in Four Canadian Workers and Job Hunters Admit to Downplaying Their Experience, as Many Don't Want to Appear Overqualified


Botox might be best known for smoothing wrinkles to look younger, but a growing number of Canadians are applying the same philosophy to their resumes. New research from Employment Hero, the global AI-powered employment platform, finds 28% of Canadian workers and job seekers have downplayed their work experience - on their resume, LinkedIn profile or in job interviews - with many wanting to avoid... appearing overqualified.

The behaviour is part of a growing trend dubbed "resume botox," where candidates subtly smooth out their professional history by trimming earlier roles, removing graduation dates or dialing down senior experience that could make them seem older or overqualified.

The data suggests Canadians are being strategic about what signals their resumes send. Only half of Canadian workers and job seekers (50%) say they would include their graduation date on their resume if applying for a job today, and that transparency drops sharply with age. Two-thirds of Canadians aged 18-34 (67%) say they would include their graduation date, compared with 45% of those aged 35-54 and just 33% of workers aged 55 and older.

Among those who admit to downplaying their experience, the motivations arelargely tactical: avoiding the perception of being overqualified (41%) and keeping the focus on recent achievements (41%) were the most common reasons cited.

Underlying these choices is a broader concern about age bias in hiring. More than three-quarters of Canadian workers and job seekers aged 55 and older (77%) say their age makes them a less attractive candidate in today's job market, with nearly half (47%) strongly agreeing. Among workers aged 35-54, 41% say their age works against them, compared with 29% of those aged 18-34.

Real-world perspective

After 26 years with a manufacturing company in Mississauga, Ontario, Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CGA) Bayla Greenberg-Consitt learned her employer was moving its operations to the U.S., eliminating her role. Re-entering the job market in her mid-fifties, Bayla hired a recruitment coach who advised her to remove graduation dates from her resume and trim 10 to 15 years of her work history to appear more aligned with the roles she was targeting.

"Re-entering the job market after almost thirty years, I knew my age would work against me," Bayla said. "Despite my experience, I was willing to take on a more junior position that I was overqualified for, but employers seemed to struggle with looking past my age and recognizing the value I could bring with my extensive experience."

While the "resume botox" approach landed her several interviews, it ultimately failed to secure a job offer. In the end, a personal connection led to a new position where the depth of her experience was fully valued.

For KJ Lee, CEO of Employment Hero Canada, the findings highlight a tension many job seekers feel between presenting their full experience and positioning themselves strategically for modern hiring processes.

"When talented people feel the need to 'botox' their resume just to get a fair shot, it tells you something about the system," said Lee. "Experience shouldn't be treated like a liability. The reality is that businesses benefit enormously from people who've seen more cycles, solved tougher problems and know how to get things done."

Lee says the findings should serve as a reminder to employers that experience and adaptability often go hand in hand.

"The best hiring decisions come from looking at what someone can do today and the impact they can have on your business," he said. "If companies filter out candidates simply because their experience looks 'too long' on paper, they risk overlooking some of the most capable people in the workforce."

Notes to editors

About Employment Hero

Employment Hero is the global authority on employment, offering a world-leading Employment Operating System (eOS) that simplifies and optimises every stage of the employment process. Its award-winning platform combines HR, payroll, recruitment, and employee engagement tools with the groundbreaking employment superapp, EH Work, which integrates career management and financial wellbeing. Serving over 350,000 businesses and managing more than 2.5 million employees worldwide, Employment Hero reduces administrative burdens by up to 80%, enabling organizations to focus on their goals and create more productive, engaged teams. By revolutionising the employment marketplace, Employment Hero is making employment easier, more valuable and rewarding for everyone.

Survey Methodology

These findings are from a survey conducted by Employment Hero from March 11th to March 13th, 2026, among a representative sample of 1034 adult Canadians who are working or looking for work who are members of the Angus Reid Forum. The survey was conducted in English and French. For comparison purposes only, a probability sample of this size would carry a margin of error of +/-3.0 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260323952353/en/
 
more
2   
  • Interest scenario. but first thing first, 'you are a team of women', that statement talks volume. Why women alone? are you dealing in women... merchandise that require mostly expertise from that gender? Is his presence offsetting the equation? You noted that he has no work experience, this might be so, since you are a team, pull together. That is what teams do. Help the new employee get his footing. Team leaders inspire, they mentor and build skills and confidence of team members. You haven't indicated any efforts you've made to understand the challenges the new employee might be facing. Explore deeper, perhaps there is something you can do. should there be family connections between the boss and him, i advise that you slow down and play your part intelligently devoid of antagonistic approach. He may turn out to be the missing cog for your organization. more

  • I see he should be the one to start building capacity and make him get know all the areas of their interest

Career Development And Training Market Size, Share and Trends Analysis Report by Product | Weekly Voice


The Business Research Company's Career Development And Training Market Report 2026 - Market Size, Trends, And Global Forecast 2026-2035

LONDON, GREATER LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM, March 23, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ -- The career development and training sector has seen impressive growth lately, reflecting the increasing importance placed on skill enhancement and professional advancement. As more... individuals and organizations seek to improve workforce capabilities, this market continues to evolve, driven by technological advancements and changing educational preferences. Let's explore the current market size, key growth drivers, leading regions, and trends shaping this dynamic field.

Career Development and Training Market Size Showing Strong Expansion

The career development and training market has experienced significant growth over recent years. It is projected to rise from $196.68 billion in 2025 to $210.38 billion in 2026, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.0%. This growth during the historical period is fueled by increased efforts toward workforce upskilling, a surge in demand for professional development programs, wider adoption of classroom-based training, enhanced collaborations with higher education institutions, and a stronger emphasis on employability and job preparedness.

Download a free sample of the career development and training market report:

https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/sample.aspx?id=33428&type=smp&utm_source=EINPresswire&utm_medium=Paid&utm_campaign=Mar_PR

Future Outlook and Continued Growth Trends in Career Development and Training

Looking ahead, the market is expected to maintain robust growth, reaching $277.86 billion by 2030 at an accelerated CAGR of 7.2%. This anticipated expansion is largely driven by the rising use of online learning technologies, growing interest in AI-powered training solutions, greater focus on personalized career development paths, expanded corporate reskilling initiatives, and increased use of gamification and immersive learning tools. Key trends projected to influence the market include the growing popularity of online and blended learning formats, rising demand for career coaching and mentorship, more integration of aptitude and personality assessments, broader internship and apprenticeship programs, and a heightened focus on developing soft skills and leadership abilities.

Understanding Career Development and Training as a Concept

Career development and training encompasses structured programs and initiatives aimed at enhancing individuals' skills, knowledge, and professional abilities. These efforts support continuous learning, career progression, and workforce preparedness. The goal is to improve employability, job performance, leadership capabilities, and adaptability to evolving industry demands through systematic learning and development interventions. Such programs benefit both individuals and organizations by fostering long-term growth, productivity, and professional excellence in a rapidly changing economic and technological landscape.

View the full career development and training market report:

https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/career-development-and-training-market-report?utm_source=EINPresswire&utm_medium=Paid&utm_campaign=Mar_PR

Digital and E-Learning Platforms as Key Growth Catalysts in Career Development and Training

One of the strongest drivers behind the market's expansion is the growth of digital and e-learning platforms. These platforms deliver, manage, and support educational content and training via digital technologies, enabling flexible, remote learning experiences. The rise of such platforms is tied to increased internet accessibility, smartphone penetration, and demand for adaptable learning formats. Career development and training leverage this growth by providing structured, scalable frameworks for online and blended professional courses, certifications, and skill-building programs. For example, in January 2024, Eurostat reported that 30% of internet users aged 16 to 74 had utilized online courses or learning materials, up from 28% in 2022, illustrating how digital platforms are fueling market growth.

North America Leading the Career Development and Training Market with Asia-Pacific Growing Rapidly

In 2025, North America held the largest share of the career development and training market. However, the Asia-Pacific region is expected to experience the fastest growth during the forecast period. The market report covers several major regions, including Asia-Pacific, South East Asia, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, North America, South America, the Middle East, and Africa, providing a comprehensive perspective on global market dynamics.

Browse Through More Reports Similar to the Global Career Development And Training Market 2026, By The Business Research Company

Pilot Training And Management Global Market Report 2026

https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/pilot-training-and-management-global-market-report

Corporate Training Global Market Report 2026

https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/corporate-training-global-market-report

Sports Training Global Market Report 2026

https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/sports-training-global-market-report

Speak With Our Expert:

Saumya Sahay

Americas +1 310-496-7795

Asia +44 7882 955267 & +91 8897263534

Europe +44 7882 955267

Email: saumyas@tbrc.info

The Business Research Company - https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/?utm_source=EINPresswire&utm_medium=Paid&utm_campaign=home_page_test

Follow Us On:

* LinkedIn: https://in.linkedin.com/company/the-business-research-company

Oliver Guirdham

The Business Research Company

+44 7882 955267

info@tbrc.info

Visit us on social media:

LinkedIn

Facebook

X

Legal Disclaimer:

EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability

for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this

article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
 
more

Hungarian Job Seekers Finding Work Faster Than a Year Ago, Survey Shows - Budapest Business Journal


The average time from starting a job search to filling a new position has dropped significantly. In the first quarter of 2025, job changes took slightly more than five months on average. That has now fallen to 3 months and 22 days, the survey found.

At the same time, more respondents said job hunting now takes up a substantial part of their daily routine. The share of people who began searching... while unemployed also increased compared with last year.

High Activity Among Job Seekers

The data points to strong activity levels: 40% of active job seekers said they spend several hours a week searching for work, while another 35% dedicate about an hour weekly. The remaining 25% review opportunities only when time allows.

The proportion of people searching for jobs while not employed rose notably. This year, 61% of active job seekers said they were unemployed when they began applying, up from 53% a year earlier.

Companies Focus on Optimizing Recruitment

A separate, recent survey by Profession.hu among employers found that while companies remain optimistic about hiring prospects this year, they are increasingly focused on optimizing recruitment resources.

More employers -- 26%, up from 21% last year -- said they prefer hiring channels that offer tools to help identify the right candidate by the end of the process.

Job portals remain the most popular channel for both employers and employees, followed by referrals, which have become more common over the past year, and social media platforms.

"The average time from the start of a job search to filling a new position has shortened significantly compared to last year," said Nikoletta Szigeti, head of Profession Services. "In recent months, however, job seeker activity -- while still high -- has moderated and become more deliberate. Candidates are applying more selectively, while employers are increasingly narrowing the candidate pool based on role-specific expectations. For higher-level positions, retention remains dominant, while there is more movement in high-volume roles with higher turnover. As a result of this duality, the meeting of supply and demand has become more efficient, which may play a significant role in the shortening of the average job search time."

What Matters Most to Workers

The survey found that 13% of workers are currently actively seeking a new position, while 21% changed jobs in the past year.

A sizable group -- 33% -- are passive job seekers: they do not regularly browse listings but are open to offers and would consider switching for the right opportunity.

When evaluating potential roles, respondents cited salary and benefits as the most important factor (84%), followed by workplace location (68%) and a work schedule that matches their preferences (58%).
 
more

How Firms Can Use Personality Assessments For Financial Advisors


Assessing personality and aptitude through the lens of the workplace is challenging for managers, team members, and interviewees alike. One of the most-Googled questions about job interviews is how to answer the infamous "Tell me about yourself" question (and how to explain strengths and weaknesses!). On the other end, hiring managers are trying to evaluate what the candidate would 'really' be... like to work with. And advisory teams struggle to articulate their own differences and preferences in a uniform and productive way, which can lead to long-term dissatisfaction and even resentment.

The commonly-offered answer to any of these problems is personality assessments: a 2023 Deloitte study found that 80% of Fortune 500 companies used personality assessments in the workplace. These assessments influence hiring, promotions, or refining someone's current job responsibilities - in other words, these results influence very real business decisions.

Personality assessments are common for a reason: a good team member is about more than 'just' competence. Managers and leaders are also searching for people who are pleasant to work with and have an intrinsic inclination towards their work. High job satisfaction in the role is a key determinant in long-term retention - and the easiest way to ensure job satisfaction is to ensure that people like what they do.

Yet while these assessments are prolific, it is less common to use them well. For managers and team members alike, these surveys may feel one-and-done: that is, they are taken, but is anything actually being done with that information?

It is one thing to talk about work preferences on a one-to-one scale - odds are, team members have various ways of working and aspects about their role they would like to change. But it can be challenging to express this consistently in a way that drives change, or to evaluate weaknesses across the organization. Put another way, personality assessments are less concerned with articulating an individual's work style. Instead, they are powerful inasmuch as they create a shared language for advisory teams to discuss individual role fit, from workload to personality. This makes it easier to raise issues - and therefore, enact change in a timely manner.

The latest Kitces Research on What Actually Contributes To Advisor Wellbeing (2025) highlights this well. Advisors with higher levels of well-being were more likely to want to stay at their job. Perceptions of work - that is, how advisors felt in their day-to-day roles - were key to higher well-being. Advisors with high well-being were more likely to feel like they could be themselves at work, effective at their job, and that what they did in life is worthwhile.

Some of these traits are rooted in firm culture. However, many of them are rooted in the specific activities an advisor performs within their specific firm. Some advisors enjoy the face time of working with clients; others may prefer to focus on spreadsheets; still others may prefer prospecting and growth-focused work. No one preference is inherently better than another - but overall, spending time on work that is engaging and enjoyable leads to higher well-being and decreases the odds of burnout.

Personality assessments can be powerful tools for discussing team strengths and weaknesses - but there are many solutions out there, and they're not all created equal.

Good personality assessments are usually psychometric, meaning that the same person will get the same results each time they complete the assessment. They are also proven to more consistently predict performance than non-psychometric assessments. For workplace purposes, assessments also need to be contrastable and discrete. That is, a score can be expressed as a numeric value or an ordinal ranking, such as a point-based scale or a "high versus low" framework. At the same time, these assessments need to be focused: if they aim to capture too many data points, they become unwieldy as both a point of discussion and contrast. Without the ability to intuitively compare results for a few concrete insights, the results are neither actionable, nor do they foster productive discussion.

An effective personality assessment also provides some level of nuance. It is not helpful to grade someone as an 'either/or'. For example, 'extroverts versus introverts' is often used as a point of comparison, but extroversion (or lack thereof) is better discussed as a spectrum, given that people are neither 100% extroverted nor introverted.

Finally, personality assessments need to be resonant. No assessment will capture the full complexity of a human being, but the aggregate results should feel 'mostly right', especially if the end goal is to use them to inform business decisions!

Personality assessments have a number of uses for advisory firms. First, they can be used by hiring managers to assess candidates on their own inclinations and how they may jive with the established team members. Assessments can also be used to evaluate individual role satisfaction and create a shared language between the employee and their manager. Finally, they can be used to evaluate teams and firms on a more holistic level for potential opportunities, strengths, or weaknesses. In short, a personality assessment can solve a lot of jobs. Yet while a single assessment can be used in a number of ways, starting with a single problem and seeking just one insight will keep the firm focused (and will yield more fruitful discussions).

In the same vein, advisory firms do not need to use all of the below assessments - truthfully, using all of them would be impractical. Certain assessments are particularly well suited to specific problems. At most, advisory teams may opt for two assessments: one about communication style and one about aptitude. Pairing two assessments together can lead to complementary insights, but if the advisory firm has to choose just one, aptitude assessments tend to capture insights about work styles that are harder to articulate.

Regardless of the number of assessments intended to ultimately be used, it is best to start with one assessment at a time and space out personality assessments by at least 9 months. (Candidly, while managers and leaders tend to be quite enthusiastic about the assessments, team members only want to discuss these topics so much.) If intercommunication issues have been a consistent pain point, start with the communication styles assessments. If there have been issues with team retention, or if roles have shifted dramatically recently, then start with the aptitude assessments.

Given that effective personality assessments are focused and nuanced, they typically deliver one of two types of information: insights into a respondent's communication style or their aptitudes toward different types of work. The former focuses on conflict avoidance (or lack thereof) and how a person shows up at work; the latter emphasizes which types of work people gravitate toward and how they solve problems.

This list does not include every Communication Style or Aptitude assessment. However, these are the assessments that lend themselves particularly well to the consistency, comparability, and nuance needed for informed decisions. and are formatted in ways that allow for particularly useful comparison, allowing teams to highlight both points of strength and opportunities to improve.

As a part of the research for this article, I took all of these assessments (and many more besides). Sample assessment results will be linked below for those who would like a real example of what these assessments look like.

Best for: Analyzing Intrapersonal Team Dynamics

The Insights Discovery assessment is all about communication styles, which are divided into four primary groups: sunshine yellow, fiery red, cool blue, and earth green. The assessment scores people as 'higher' or 'lower' than a central neutral line in various aptitudes. For example, someone who is very above the line in red will be assertive and to the point, while someone who is below it is more conflict-avoidant.

Insights' strengths primarily lie in highlighting potential points of conflict - for example, sunshine yellows are naturally the 'opposite' of cool blues. This provides a powerful framework for team communication styles - and for potentially resolving some team communication challenges!

Example 1: Insights Discovery gave Dani (sunshine yellow) and Roy (fiery red) a great avenue to discuss their work preferences - Dani felt frustrated that Roy was so 'combative', whereas Roy described his communication styles as 'direct' since he "hates wasting time". They used Insights Discovery discussed their differences and agreed to meet in the middle: they would open the meeting with discussing business (so that Roy could feel that the meeting had been productive), then allocated five minutes at the end specifically to catch up (so that Dani could feel better connected to the team).

CliftonStrengths is the longest assessment in this lineup, coming in at 200 questions. At first glance, the CliftonStrengths results can be dizzying - their design purposefully mimics a DNA sequence, ranking 34 possible traits from highest to lowest. More helpful than any individual result is their four themes: Executing (making things happen), Influence (taking charge), Relationship Building (building strong relationships), and Strategic Thinking (absorbing and analyzing information). Each trait is linked to a corresponding theme, so respondents can quickly review their results and see which theme they 'lead' in.

With CliftonStrengths, it is common to lead in one theme and have a very low score in another - for example, someone may be high in Strategic Thinking and low in Relationship Building. When comparing and contrasting results as a team, it may be less helpful to focus on individual traits and more helpful to focus on the thematic findings. That said, the assessment ultimately strikes a helpful balance between big-picture trends and granular ideas for improvement.

View a sample report (provided by CliftonStrengths) here.

Example 2: When Rebecca reviewed her CliftonStrengths results, she had a moment of clarity. She had been struggling with prospecting calls for months - they felt 'salesy' to her. Her CliftonStrengths revealed that she had very few Relationship Building traits, but she had high Influence and Strategic Thinking traits. She resolved to discuss with her manager whether there was an alternative approach to prospecting that better aligned with her communicative strengths.

The Kolbe Index is unique in its focus on how different people initially approach work problems, sorted into four categories: Fact Finder (how people gather and share information), Follow Thru (how people organize and design), Quick Start (how people deal with risk and uncertainty), and Implementor (how people handle space and tangibles). Surveyors can be 'long' or 'short' in their results, with 'long' representing a higher score. Someone who is long in Fact Finder may be inclined toward finding all the details, whereas someone who is short in Fact Finder may just want the key facts.

Several of the Kolbe A Index results are not immediately intuitive - for example, Follow Thru and Implementor can feel like misnomers compared to their actual, functional definitions. However, the Index's measurement of traits like Quick Start can be phenomenally helpful, especially in conversations about how workloads are allocated across a team.

View a sample report (provided by Kolbe Index) here.

Example 3: When Keeley reviewed her team's results from Kolbe, she realized that she only had one team member with a long Quick Start (someone who enjoys novelty and responds well to change). Suddenly, she realized why her new initiatives had been stressing out the rest of her planning team. She adjusted her workflows: she tested out new initiatives with the long Quick Start team member, then rolled out only the confirmed changes with the shorter Quick Starts in a gradual, planned way.

Working Genius is all about organizing the types of work people do into six categories: Wonder, Ideation, Discernment, Galvanizing, Enablement, and Tenacity. Results are grouped into two Geniuses (the work we do best and find energizing), two Competencies (the work we do well), and two Frustrations (the work we do poorly and find draining).

Working Genius is intuitive and easy to understand - just by reading over the six categories, one can reasonably assume which tasks fit into which categories, such as brainstorming being associated with Wonder and Ideation. However, in its quest for simplicity, its structure can also feel constraining - many people report that they have three areas of Genius or Frustration. That said, Working Genius lends remarkably clarifying language to discussing work tasks!

View a sample report (provided by Working Genius) here.

Example 4: Jamie's results revealed he had a frustration in Tenacity - detail-oriented, manual work. Worse, many of those tenacious tasks were administration and compliance-focused - not planning-focused. He realized he would need to utilize a blend of delegation and automation to take some of that work off his plate - allowing him to focus on Enablement and Galvanizing-focused client work. While some of his 'Tenacity tasks', as he called them, had to remain with him, just having a label for that work helped him stay cognizant of when suboptimal work was being placed on his plate.

Whether a firm is using the assessment as a hiring tool or within an established tool, it's best to start by explaining why the group ought to bother with the assessment at all. This explanation doesn't have to be overly elaborate, but it is important to share some fundamental reasons regarding why team members are being asked to fill out questionnaires about how they approach tasks, conflict, or change. Even an explanation as simple as "We're aiming to understand how communication styles vary by role at work" can go a long way!

If the assessment is used in hiring, then ensure that a deadline is provided with the assessment that fits with the hiring timeline and give the candidates a chance to review their results and speak to them in the next round of the interviews.

On the other hand, if the assessment is used internally, give the team members a few weeks to complete their assessments and ensure that everyone has the time to review their results. Then, gather everyone together for a synchronous debrief.

Ideally, the first time an advisory team takes an assessment, a consultant leads the discussion. Many of these assessments offer certified consultants who can facilitate and lead the discussion! The consultant will be able to explain the results with much more detail while allowing management to join the discussion alongside the rest of the team.

Depending on the size of the team, it can be helpful to start with the entire company together, then divide into smaller teams or departments. If there are only a handful of people, divide into pairs.

The following questions can help get the discussion started:

These questions can get the conversation started, but the best discussions will come from observation and follow-up questions. Aim to keep these discussions open-ended - envision the conversation to be a brainstorming meeting on how to optimize workflows.

During the conversation - and afterwards - be mindful not to box in team members too much. Avoid absolutes (e.g., don't say, "He cannot do that task") - instead, use language like "inclined toward" or "stronger with" to describe strengths and weaknesses. And keep in mind that everyone's strengths and scores will manifest differently. Team members may have similar results, but those results may manifest differently in their work preferences and behaviors. This is why it's important to ask team members how they understand the results as well as their work. To paraphrase the Working Genius language, some work may seem like a detailed, laborious task to one team member, and another may see that work as team-supporting Enablement. The real power to personality assessments, more than individual analytics, is how they create a shared language for work and work preferences.

Below is a sample agenda of an hour-long team discussion - though, if time permits, these conversations can easily go for longer!

A one-off team discussion about personality assessments can be fun and enlightening while helping to set expectations for how assessments will be used going forward - but it is after the conversation that the real work begins.

The first point to focus on is the existing team. Is there any visible tension between team members' responsibilities and their scores? Odds are, managers are already aware of some of the tensions their team members feel - so ideally, these results simply offer a better way to articulate those tensions. For obvious reasons, this discussion is best in a one-to-one conversation, rather than as a part of the team discussion.

The manager can start by noting potential points of tension between the team member's assessment score and their workload - or the team member may decide to bring it up themselves. Regardless, keep the conversation oriented around role adjustments for retention; if the employee feels that their place on the team is at stake, then they will be far less forthcoming about their struggles, which makes it harder to move towards resolution.

This is where a group assessment can be especially helpful - the work that one team member struggles with, another likely enjoys. Managers can take a big picture overview of workloads, aptitudes, and opportunities for growth as they help their team members determine how to redistribute assignments in a way that is both fair and more enjoyable.

If a personality assessment is to be used in the hiring process, before listing the role, review the team's results for any gaps that may need to be filled. Not every team needs to be perfectly balanced, but one or two counterweights can help neutralize the weaknesses and inefficiencies of having too many 'birds of a feather'. For example, in Kolbe, a short Fact Finder can help the long Fact Finders get to the point (and avoid rabbit holes).

Managers can probably guess which assessment results are likely to be effective in a role. When hiring, choose just one 'must have' and one 'cannot have' from a personality assessment; for example, if Working Genius is used, then choose one area of Genius and one Frustration that the ideal candidate would have. Near the end of the hiring process, it can pay to ask applicants to take assessments and see where there is a match - or potential points of tension - that can be addressed further in the final round interview.

Ultimately, the key point is that personality assessments can be a powerful tool for advisory teams in a variety of ways, from hiring to team assessments. Simply taking the assessment is the first step - the longer-term question is how an advisory firm can use the results to 'level up' the entire team.

Perhaps the most important result of an assessment is that they create a shared language to discuss individual strengths and work issues. At the end of the day, when the entire team can productively discuss issues, identify weaknesses, and work together in a way that is synchronized with their inclinations, long-term well-being and retention will likely be impacted in very positive ways!
 
more
1   

BCG Attorney Search Advantage Improves Legal Hiring Success


BCG Attorney Search has announced its "Attorney Search Advantage," a comprehensive, data-driven system designed to help attorneys secure interviews and job offers more efficiently in an increasingly competitive legal market.

Learn more from this report: The BCG Attorney Search Advantage - Candidate Education Report

The system represents a shift away from traditional job-hunting methods, such as... job boards and passive applications, toward a more proactive and strategic placement model. According to BCG Attorney Search, the approach focuses on identifying both publicly available roles and the largely untapped "hidden" job market, where many law firm opportunities are never formally advertised.

One of the defining features of the BCG Advantage is its ability to uncover opportunities beyond standard listings. Industry insights suggest that public job postings represent only a portion of available legal roles, leaving many opportunities inaccessible to attorneys relying solely on conventional search methods.

BCG Attorney Search addresses this gap by leveraging a proprietary database of law firms and historical hiring trends. This allows recruiters to identify potential openings even before firms formally announce them. This "total-market" approach enables candidates to be considered for positions that align closely with their experience, practice area, and career goals, often with less competition.

The Advantage system operates through a layered methodology designed to maximize exposure and interview opportunities. These layers include:

* Exclusive roles managed directly by BCG

* Verified active openings across law firms

* Targeted outreach to firms with known hiring patterns

* Analysis of historical hiring data to predict recurring needs

* Strategic submissions to firms without current postings

This structured process allows attorneys to access a broader range of opportunities while maintaining control over which firms are contacted on their behalf.

A key feature of the system is "mass approval," which allows candidates to authorize outreach to multiple firms at once. This streamlined approach significantly accelerates the hiring process, increasing the likelihood of securing interviews within a shorter timeframe.

In addition to its data-driven infrastructure, BCG Attorney Search emphasizes personalized recruiter support. Attorneys are paired with experienced recruiters, many of whom have legal backgrounds, ensuring that each candidate's qualifications and experience are presented effectively.

The firm also provides comprehensive support throughout the hiring process, including résumé refinement, interview preparation, and assistance with offer evaluation and negotiation. This combination of advanced technology and individualized service is designed to improve both the efficiency and success rate of placements.

BCG Attorney Search reports that its system can significantly reduce the time it takes for candidates to secure interviews, with some attorneys seeing results shortly after activating their search.

By focusing on timing, market intelligence, and targeted outreach, the Advantage system aims to position candidates ahead of the competition. Attorneys are introduced to opportunities earlier in the hiring cycle, often before roles become widely known, increasing their chances of securing desirable positions.

With decades of experience and an extensive network of law firms, BCG Attorney Search continues to refine its placement strategies to meet the evolving demands of the legal industry.

The introduction of the Attorney Search Advantage highlights the firm's commitment to helping attorneys navigate the job market with greater precision, confidentiality, and success, setting a new standard for legal recruiting services.
 
more

The 93% mandate: Why skin of colour care demands more than clinical skill


Dermatologists should act as advocates of diversity at the clinic, research, and institutional level, says Dr. Bolu Ogunyemi (Issue #532, 1,600 words, 8 minutes)

Approximately 93% of Canadian dermatologists report providing caring for patients of colour. Physicians also play a role as advocates for patients in systems that can influence those patients' health outcomes. Those same physicians are... in a position to contribute to diversity within the specialty itself. As a result, dermatologists play a pivotal role in ensuring Canadian dermatologic care is equitable and inclusive for citizens with skin of colour.

This message was part of a presentation by Dr. Bolu Ogunyemi [pictured below] at the 2025 Skin Spectrum Summit in Toronto.

Dr. Ogunyemi is a Clinical Associate Professor of Dermatology at Memorial University in St. John's, NL, and president-elect of the Canadian Medical Association.

In the presentation, Dr. Ogunyemi noted that dermatologists are uniquely positioned to be leaders in social accountability and health equity. He noted dermatologists are:

Dermatologists are responsible not only for patient care, but also for engaging with the systems that influence health outcomes, Dr. Ogunyemi said. "We have an obligation to ensure institutions, educational materials such as medical textbooks, and clinical research reflect all patient groups -- particularly those from underserved groups."

There is also a need to support diversity within the medical profession, Dr. Ogunyemi said. "Data shows we don't have a true meritocracy," he noted. "Across recruitment, training, promotion, and compensation -- at every single level, there's well-documented evidence of bias."

This bias can also influence career opportunities. Dr. Ogunyemi noted that applicants with names or experiences perceived as "ethnic-sounding" receive significantly fewer interview callbacks than those with names perceived as White. As a result, some racialized applicants resort to "Résumé Whitening," intentionally concealing or downplaying ethnic cues in their résumés to avoid anticipated discrimination in the hiring process.

Dr. Ogunyemi said that he once felt pressure to do the same. "Early in my career, when I was trying to get my foot in the door, I sometimes went by 'Bo' instead of using my full first name," he said. "I even removed certain undergraduate activities that might reveal too much about my background."

He cited a study that showed that Black applicants who "whitened" their résumés increased their callback rate from 10% to 25%. (Kang SK, et al: Whitened Résumés: Race and Self-Presentation in the Labor Market: Race and Self-Presentation in the Labor Market. Administrative Science Quarterly 2016; 61(3):469-502).

A key resource in combating inequality is good data. However, despite Canada's population becoming increasingly diverse, a tendency to a "colourblind approach" has left significant gaps in systemically collected health data across ethnic groups, said Dr. Ogunyemi.

If race- or ethnicity-specific data isn't being collected, it is impossible to determine what proportion of people from different backgrounds are experiencing different opportunities or different outcomes, he said. "We need disaggregated data."

"Tracking which populations are encountering barriers is essential," he explained. "Data alone won't fix the system, but will provide a clear way to hold systems accountable and move us toward meaningful change."

As a profession, dermatologists should work to make diversity, equity, and inclusion projects more recognized as legitimate efforts to improve patient outcomes, Dr. Ogunyemi said. "Whether it's academic, educational, professional, clinical outreach, training, doing clinics in rural areas, mentorship and sponsorship, community involvement, those are things that have a real and important impact. And institutions, including academic institutions, need to recognize that when we talk about promotion [of diversity]."

Bottom line: Diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts have real impacts on health outcomes. Effectively improving diversity will require disaggregated data and recognition of the importance and legitimacy of these efforts at the institutional level.

This study evaluates response to narrowband ultraviolet-B (NB-UVB) across Fitzpatrick skin type (FST) groups in a multi-institutional mycosis fungoides (MF) cohort.

Investigators retrospectively analyzed data from MF patients treated with NB-UVB monotherapy at Columbia, Emory, and Johns Hopkins Universities between 2010 and 2025. Among 114 patients, 63 had FST I to III, and 51 had FST IV to VI. Primary outcomes were percent change in total body surface area (TBSA) involvement and complete/partial response (CR/PR) rates.

Patients with FST IV to VI were younger and more frequently had hypopigmented MF. FST I to III patients achieved greater TBSA reduction (-73% vs -35% at mid-year; -78% vs -26% at year-end) and higher CR/PR rates, with differences persisting after multivariable adjustment. Rapid response (CR/PR within four months or less) occurred more often in FST I to III (53% vs 34%), while non-response was more frequent in FST IV to VI (39% vs 16%). Mixed-effects models confirmed that both groups improved over time, but FST I to III demonstrated significantly greater TBSA reduction at multiple time points.

The authors conclude that NB-UVB benefits patients across all Fitzpatrick skin types but yields earlier and more complete clearance in FST I to III. They say that the findings warrant prospective studies to guide individualized treatment strategies.

From "J Am Acad Dermatol"

Researchers characterized the clinical spectrum of facial melanosis, and delineated dermoscopic patterns, including atypical features. They evaluated health-related quality of life using Skindex-16 in a skin of colour population in Northeast India.

For the hospital-based study, investigators recruited 150 untreated adults with facial melanosis. Participants underwent detailed clinical evaluation, dermoscopic assessment with a polarized video dermoscope, and quality-of-life assessment with the Skindex-16. Diagnoses were classified as standalone or overlapping entities.

The authors identified 22 clinical conditions, with melasma being the most prevalent diagnosis (n=102, 68.0%), showing a marked female preponderance. Overlapping presentations, particularly melasma with a topical steroid-damaged face, were common. Dermoscopy revealed predominant pigmentary patterns, including brown, structureless areas and globules, alongside vascular and appendageal changes. The investigators also documented infrequent atypical dermoscopic features, rarely reported in facial melanosis. A quality-of-life analysis demonstrated a disproportionate emotional burden despite relatively low symptom scores.

The authors conclude that facial melanosis in skin of colour is clinically complex, frequently overlapping, and psychosocially impactful.

From "Cureus"

To explore the experiences of eczema, acne, and psoriasis among adults with skin of colour in the U.K., researchers conducted a qualitative study of 20 individuals with these conditions, recruited online. Participants took part in online, one-to-one, semi-structured interviews.

Investigators used NVivo qualitative data analysis software to code and organize the data, and reflexive thematic analysis to generate themes.

The participants were mostly female (65%), Asian/Asian British ethnicity (45%) and had eczema (55%). From the responses, the researchers identified eight themes: (i) delayed or missed diagnosis; (ii) preferences regarding healthcare professionals; (iii) lack of online information and social media use; (iv) misunderstanding in cultural communities; (v) concerns about treatment and lack of research in skin of colour; (vi) complementary and alternative medicine use; (vii) experiences and impact of dyspigmentation; and (viii) challenges with structural racism.

The themes generated highlight the unique experiences and challenges faced by U.K. adults with eczema, acne, and psoriasis, the authors write. "The findings can help guide diagnostic approaches, culturally sensitive communication and treatment discussions for patients with skin of colour. Further research is needed in this under-represented group."

From "Br J Gen Pract"

McMaster University PhD student Albert Ashong [pictured below] was awarded the Canadian Black Scientists Network (CBSN) Excellence in Research and Innovation Award during the National STEM Summit in Toronto in February, according to a press release from the university. The Award recognizes exceptional innovation and leadership within Canada's Black STEM community.

Ashong conducts advanced biosensing research in the Niko Hildebrandt Lab, developing technologies for detecting cardiac and renal biomarkers with greater speed and sensitivity. His work combines FRET-based immunoassays with microfluidic systems to help clinicians detect kidney and cardiac injury much earlier than current diagnostic tools allow -- potentially within the first week of onset.

In his acceptance speech, Ashong said the honour reflects far more than scientific achievement. It acknowledges a journey shaped by cross-continental study, formative mentorship and a commitment to fostering research spaces where everyone feels they belong.

Receiving the Award, he said, "affirms the resilience, discipline, and persistence that have shaped my journey as a Black scientist navigating spaces where representation is still limited."

Ashong said he believes the most meaningful progress in STEM depends on shifting from simply increasing representation to ensuring meaningful inclusion.

That philosophy carries into his own research practice: "Innovation must be inclusive. When we build inclusive systems, we build better science," he said.

"Ultimately, this is about improving patient outcomes," he says. "Giving clinicians the ability to act early, not years later."

Now an active part of McMaster's interdisciplinary research community, Ashong said he sees the CBSN award not as a finish line, but as motivation to keep moving forward with purpose.

"This is a reminder to keep going, to keep building, and to help open doors for others," he said. "It's about the work and the people it serves."

March 24 is Diabetes Alert Day in the U.S.

March 24 is International Day for the Right to the Truth Concerning Gross Human Rights Violations and for the Dignity of Victims

March 25 is International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Slavery and the Transatlantic Slave Trade

Researchers compared the UV protection habits and preferences of patients with cutaneous immune-mediated inflammatory dermatoses in patients with a range of skin phototypes.

Established in 1995, The Chronicle of Skin & Allergy is a scientific newspaper providing news and information on practical therapeutics and clinical progress in dermatologic medicine. The latest issue features:

You can read a recent digital edition of The Chronicle of Skin & Allergy here. To apply for a complimentary subscription or to request a sample copy, please email health@chronicle.org with your contact information.

The Women in Dermatology e-newsletter updates readers with new findings concerning dermatologic issues affecting women and the female dermatologists who care for them. Read the current issue here.

Season three of the Vender on Psoriasis podcast, featuring Dr. Ron Vender, has begun. Listen to the new season here. In episode five, Dr. Vender discusses whether vitamin D influences the severity of psoriasis, sex differences in psoriatic inflammation and itch, and the risk of psychiatric disorders associated with acitretin.
 
more

'Was he hired?': Man goes for job interview, accidentally appears on live TV as expert. Internet reacts- Moneycontrol.com


The video remains popular, sparking memes and nostalgia online

A 2006 video of a man going viral on social media shows him accidentally appearing on BBC News 24.

Guy Goma, who went to the BBC for a job interview in 2006 and ended up on air when he was mistaken for IT expert Guy Kewney.

Business presenter Karen Bowerman thought she was speaking to Kewney for analysis, which led to confusion... between her and Goma.

In 2023, he revealed that he was not paid for his infamous appearance on BBC News 24, and he plans to sue the broadcaster for a share of the royalties, according to a report by The Guardian.

When asked if the BBC had reached out after the incident, he said, "I contacted them. They didn't respond."

"I am going to go because of the money they made from it. They didn't give me a single penny," he said.

The clip has been screened repeatedly over the last 17 years, and Goma and people even call me an "accidental celebrity."

Today, 20 years on, the video of Goma's accidental BBC appearance remains popular. Recently, an X user @TheFigen_ reshared the clip, where online users reacted with memes, jokes and nostalgic comments.

One user wrote, "That looks on his face, the moment he realises he's on live TV. Then he really leaned into 'fake it till you make it. The best part is he actually made some decent points about the future of music downloads!"

Another X user said, "Not fair at all, at least give the man a heads up."

Guy Goma became an unexpected viral sensation after accidentally appearing on BBC News 24 in 2006. He had gone to the BBC for a job interview for an IT position but was mistaken for IT expert Guy Kewney. Initially, some thought he was Kewney's taxi driver, but the truth soon emerged.
 
more
1   

  • Just bring your own soap. The owner is already being inconvenienced by an employed kleptomaniac.
    Sharing soap dispensers is also a contaminated hub... when used by multiple end users. Even hand sanitisers have been proven to have the opposite effect on body parts washed. Many carcinogens in their formulations​.

    Your boss is not responsible for your hygiene nor is he/she not aware of property being stolen. the price of doing business. Perp will be fired for integrity issues once caught in the act.
     more

    1
  • I think you should buy a personal small pocket size bottle of sanitizer. Save yourself and perhaps others also.

    1

I Built 26 AI Career Tools for Claude Code -- Here's What I Learned


Job hunting is a second full-time job. And if you're a developer, it's a particularly strange one -- because you spend your days building tools that make other people's work easier, and then you go home and manually tailor your resume for the fifteenth time this month.

I got tired of it. So I built something.

placed-skills is a collection of 26 AI career tools that live inside Claude Code and... Cursor. Resume builder, ATS checker, interview coach, salary negotiation, job tracker -- all in your terminal, all accessible through natural language.

The existing tools aren't bad. But they all have the same problem: they live in the browser. When you're in the middle of a job search, you're constantly context-switching. Five context switches for one task. Multiply that by every resume tweak, every interview prep session, every application you want to track.

I wanted something that lived where I already was.

Claude Code has a skills system. You put a SKILL.md file in , and Claude activates it automatically when you describe relevant tasks. No slash commands. No configuration. It just works.

The MCP angle came later. By packaging the same tools as an MCP server, I could reach Cursor users, Cline users, Continue.dev users, Zed users, Windsurf users -- anyone with an MCP-compatible client.

26 tools across 5 categories:

Resume Builder (12 tools): Create and edit resumes with AI, 37 professional templates with ATS scores, export as PDF/DOCX/Markdown

ATS Optimizer (7 tools): Real ATS compatibility scoring (not generic tips), keyword gap analysis vs. specific job descriptions, match score with apply/don't-apply recommendation

Interview Coach (8 tools): Company-specific mock interviews, 13 system design cases, behavioral question banks with STAR format guidance, answer bank

Career Tools (12 tools): Cover letter generation, salary data by role + location, LinkedIn profile generation, salary negotiation scripts, offer analysis

Job Tracker (5 tools): Full pipeline (WISHLIST → APPLIED → INTERVIEWING → OFFER → REJECTED), conversion analytics

The skills format is powerful but the ecosystem is small. ClawHub is early. MCP is winning in terms of adoption. I'd probably lead with MCP next time and treat skills as a bonus.

The job tracker was the most requested feature. People want to track applications without opening Notion or a spreadsheet.

System design cases are the most used interview prep feature. 13 cases isn't enough -- I'm adding more.

MIT licensed. PRs welcome. Happy to answer questions in the comments.
 
more

Woman refused job at Midland estate agents because car 'too old'


An 18 year old woman was left furious after being denied a job interview at an estate agency - because her CAR was too old.

Alanah Thompson French applied for the position of trainee lettings negotiator but was rejected because she drove a 2014 Citroen C1.

The industrious teenager spent over a year juggling two cafe positions to fund the £2,800 vehicle which she believed would boost her... employment prospects.

However, when she put herself forward for a £20,000 position at haart Estate and Lettings Agents in Nottingham, her aspirations quickly stalled.

She was astonished upon receiving an email from the firm stating she would not be invited for interview.

Alanah was informed: "We regret to inform you that you have not been shortlisted for interview on this occasion as it is a requirement to have access to a vehicle under 10 years old."

The peculiar requirement meant Alanah's cherished Citroen exceeded the age limit by two years despite having clocked merely 33,000 miles, alongside a complete service history and MoT.

Alanah, from Burton Joyce, Notts., said: "I was really shocked when I received the rejection letter saying it was down to my car.

"I worked really hard whilst doing my A-Levels to pay for the car myself and pay the £700 insurance.

"My reason for getting a car was because I wanted to be able to drive for work but now it seems it was the reason I didn't get the job."

Alanah, who resides at home with her mum and dad, submitted her application for the trainee role last December. Despite nailing the application form, it seems she hit a snag when asked "is your car under 10 years old" and she marked "no".

Alanah commented: "If I hadn't got onto the shortlist because I didn't have the skills then fine but to be told it's because of the car I drive is a kick in the teeth.

"It's hardly an old banger and I keep it really clean inside and out.

"I'm only young so an older car was all I could afford. Obviously if I got the job I could save for a newer model but I need the job first.

"I finished my A-Levels and just didn't want to go to university and saddle myself with tens of thousands of pounds of debt.

"I wanted to get out into the world and really want to have a career in property but I've literally crashed at the first turning.

"It's really frustrating."

Danielle Parsons, employment partner at law firm Irwin Mitchell, stated that the car policy highlighted the obstacles young people encounter in the job market.

She expressed: "I'm concerned that this policy may disproportionately exclude younger less affluent applicants from applying for this job, particularly as this is an entry level position and job vacancies are currently few and far between.

"The response from haart doesn't point to any alternatives to this sort of blanket ban."

A spokesperson for haart responded: "It's extremely important that people who work for us use reliable vehicles for their own personal safety particularly where they travel many miles each day and often work alone.

"Evidence from motoring organisations shows that the likelihood of mechanical problems increases as vehicles get older.

"For that reason, and in line with many organisations that require staff to use their own cars for work purposes, our policy is that vehicles should normally be under 10 years old."
 
more

Guy Goma Reflects on His Iconic 'Funniest Interview' Blooper at the BBC - Internewscast Journal


In the annals of television blunders, few can rival the unforgettable moment when an unsuspecting job seeker, Guy Goma, was thrust into the limelight at the BBC. Mistaken for a renowned technology expert, Goma found himself unexpectedly ushered into the newsroom for a live interview.

As the cameras rolled, Goma's bewildered demeanor was evident, yet he gamely navigated a two-minute segment... discussing Apple and a multimillion-dollar lawsuit. This unexpected moment of TV gold spawned a flood of memes and became one of the most viral clips, capturing the imaginations of viewers worldwide.

Marking the 20th anniversary of this remarkable mix-up, the Daily Mail revisited the incident, speaking with both Goma and the producer responsible for the mix-up, to uncover the full story behind that unforgettable incident.

Reflecting on his accidental fame, Goma shared with the Daily Mail, "It's unbelievable. To this day, people still recognize me on the street. They call me a legend and often ask for my autograph."

He added, "I never could have imagined that this one mishap would make me so well-known around the globe."

The intended segment was supposed to focus on a court case involving Apple, scheduled at the High Court in May 2006. Instead, it became a legendary TV moment, forever etched in the collective memory of viewers.

Mr Goma, a soft-spoken Congolese-born job seeker, had just arrived at the BBC's then HQ in White City, west London, and was waiting to be interviewed for a data role.

Meanwhile upstairs at Television Centre, producer Elliott Gotkine was rushing around organising the live output of that night's BBC News 24 channel.

The correct guest who had been arranged, tech expert Guy Kewney (who incidentally, unlike Mr Goma, was a white skinned man of slight build), had just arrived downstairs waiting in reception to be taken to the studio.

But when frantic Mr Gotkine burst into reception before he saw Mr Kewney sitting nearby he saw Mr Goma first, who looked up expectantly.

A legend was born.

Now both men have spoken exclusively to the Daily Mail ahead of the 20th anniversary of their bizarre first meeting, that night at the BBC.

Mr Gotkine, who has never spoken publicly about the episode before, recalled: 'It was all a bit of a mad rush that day.

'I had booked Guy Kewney and with a few minutes to go [before he was meant to be on air] there was still no word from him.

'So I ran down to the reception and asked if they had someone called Guy Kewney there - and the receptionist pointed to Guy Goma.

'I was a little taken aback and I asked if she was sure and she said yes.

'I then went over to Guy - who I now know was the wrong Guy - and asked if he was Guy Kewney and he said yes, I thought maybe I had seen the wrong picture [of Mr Kewney], and I grabbed him and then rushed up to the studio.

'We were due on air in less than five minutes, so I just grabbed him and we sprinted up the stairs.'

Mr Goma, then a business studies graduate from Brazzaville living in west London and seeking work as a data cleanser, picked up the story at this point, recalling: 'I first thought something strange was happening when I was sat down in a chair and someone tried to put makeup on me.

'I said to her, "I don't need makeup, I'm here for a job interview," but she didn't seem to hear me.

'Then we moved into the studio and the TV cameras were on me and I started to think, "Something isn't right here - this isn't how a job interview is supposed to go." Because that's what I was there for.'

Seconds later, Mr Goma found himself sitting opposite presenter Karen Bowerman, with beads of nervous sweat beginning to break out on his forehead as he shifted in his seat wondering what was going on.

The now famous footage shows Westminster College business graduate Mr Goma, dressed smartly in an open necked blue shirt and brown jacket, glancing nervously up at the lights and around at the cameras.

Breathing heavily, a terrified grimace crosses his face, before licking his lips and composing himself for the unsuspecting onslaught about to hit him.

Goma recalled: 'I saw my image on a monitor, and I think that's when I realised something was going horribly wrong.

'But I didn't want to make a scene or cause a fuss so I went along with it when the presenter started asking me questions.'

As Ms Bowerman wrongly introduced him as 'Guy Kewney', Mr Goma could be seen gulping.

He then opened his eyes wide in shock as she asked him for his 'reaction to the court verdict' and whether he was 'surprised'.

The footage shows Mr Goma reply: 'I'm very surprised to see this verdict come because I was not expecting that... When I came they told me something else, they said it was an interview so it was a big surprise...'

As the car crash exchange continued it began to dawn on Ms Bowerman and fellow TV executives that a huge cock-up was unfolding in front of their eyes - and they eventually managed to cut to another reporter who was standing outside the High Court.

Mr Goma's live ordeal was over - but his fame was just beginning.

He recalls now: 'Once it finished, I left and walked out of the building into the Underground station opposite.

'I called the job agency and told them that something terrible had happened, I had been interviewed live on TV about something I didn't know about.

'I asked if I had got the job.

'But they said, "No - go back, they are waiting for you."

'So I went back and had the interview, which was about Microsoft Excel which I do know about - but unfortunately I didn't get the job.'

Mr Goma may well not have got that data job, but the clip of his interview was already going viral.

Furious BBC bosses launched an investigation into the cock-up and Mr Gotkine eventually left the BBC. He still works elsewhere within the TV industry.

Mr Goma briefly became a celebrity, invited onto TV shows around the world, even hiring.

'There was even talk of a prominent appearance on that December's BBC Sports Personality of the Year award show - but it never materialised.

A week after the incident, Goma was interviewed by the BBC and other TV networks telling them: 'I never really wanted to be famous. I just wanted to be an accountant - I hope I get a job at the BBC.'

Almost immediately an online petition was started by viewers demanding that the BBC give him a job. Although this never happened, Goma was touched by the reaction: 'It was so very kind of everybody, people were so kind and thoughtful.'

Mr Goma says: 'I later got a call from the BBC asking me what programme I would like to work on, but I was in a hurry to catch a plane to Germany for a TV interview, so I asked them to call me back.

'They never did but like I say to everyone it is the will of God, everything happens for a reason, I never really wanted to be famous but if the clip makes people laugh and makes them happy then I'm happy.'

Mr Gotkine recalls how minutes after Goma had been erroneously interviewed, he received a call to say the real Guy Kewney was in reception - and still waiting to be interviewed.

The producer said: 'Once I realised the mistake had been made, I apologised profusely and we recorded an interview with Guy Kewney but it was never broadcast.'

Mr Kewney died in 2010, although the two did meet up after the infamous interview with the IT specialist posting about it on his blog, adding a photograph of the pair and describing Goma as his 'twin brother'.

Goma - who fled to the UK after civil war ravaged Congo - now works with various charities in east London and also as a car park marshal at his beloved Queens Park Rangers football club.

He reflects now: 'It was just a mix up, I was in the wrong place, I had no idea about the subject, so I just tried to give the right answer in the interview.

'When she started talking, I thought "Oh dear Guy, you are in the wrong place" and you can see [in the footage] my body language expressed everything I was feeling.

'But so many people have seen the video, and I still get messages from people about it.'

Mr Goma - who was not paid for his BBC interview - did initially contemplate legal action against the BBC for a share of the royalties his blooper earned.

But he later changed his mind, explaining: 'I am a very spiritual person and I think God helped me get through it that day - and that everything happens for a reason.

'If the reason was to make people happy and take some stress from them, then I'm happy for what happened.'

Mr Gotkine added: 'Guy Goma really is the loveliest man you could ever meet

'They talk about everyone having 15 minutes of fame but Guy has had twenty years of it and it couldn't have happened to a nicer man.'

What Mr Goma was particularly keen to clear up in our interview was the suggestion, widely repeated at the time, that he was a taxi driver.

Chuckling he said: 'That was all wrong, I was never a cabbie. People said I was but I wasn't.

'In fact I had recently graduated from college and was a student.

'But back in Congo I had had a taxi firm so maybe that's where the confusion came from.'

When asked why he just didn't come clean before he was put on air, Mr Goma says today: 'I just didn't want to cause a scene and I didn't want to create a fuss.

'If I had just got up and walked off that would have been worse, I tried to answer the question as best I could but it wasn't necessarily the right answer.'

Mr Gotkine added: 'I think what got to people was just how extraordinarily lovely he came across as - Guy is such a lovely, lovely man and you can see that in just the few seconds he is on TV...

'Although granted yes, it was a complete cock-up.

'The way he tried to bluff his way through it though was TV gold and it's brought so many laughs to people and goodness knows we need a few laughs, especially at this time with what's going on in the world.'

A new book called The Wrong Guy - The Inside Story Of TV's Greatest Cock-Up - is to be published this spring for the anniversary, telling in fine detail the buildup and the aftermath of what became television history.

Written by Mr Gotkine, the hilarious account also details how the two men have kept in touch ever since and have even visited Mr Goma's hometown of Brazzaville in the Democratic Republic of the Congo together.
 
more

Star of 'TV's funniest interview' Guy Goma relives viral BBC blooper


It was one of the most extraordinary TV mishaps of all time - when an African job seeker waiting in BBC reception was mistaken for a global tech expert and invited into the newsroom to be interviewed live on air.

And his evident bemusement as he bluffed his way through a two minute interview about Apple and a multimillion dollar lawsuit gave rise to a legion of memes and became one of the most... viewed viral clips of all time.

Now, on the 20th anniversary of the incredible BBC blooper, the Daily Mail has tracked down both that hapless interviewee, Guy Goma, and the producer who mistakenly put him on air, to find out what really happened that strange night.

Mr Goma told the Daily Mail: 'It's crazy - even now people recognise me in the street. They say I am a legend. I'm still being asked for my autograph.

'I never imagined that night that this one cock-up would go around the world like it did and I would become so famous.'

The TV segment was meant to be a two-way interview discussing an ongoing court case involving Apple at the High Court in May 2006.

Mr Goma, a soft-spoken Congolese-born job seeker, had just arrived at the BBC's then HQ in White City, west London, and was waiting to be interviewed for a data role.

When Guy Goma, a softly spoken Congolese man, arrived at BBC headquarters in White City one afternoon in 2006, he was expecting to have an interview for a job as a data analyst

Instead, Mr Goma got a rather different interview as a flustered TV producer ushered him through the door and into a studio in front of millions of people. Baffled and wide-eyed, Mr Goma was introduced as a 'tech expert' there to opine on a High Court case involving Apple

Meanwhile upstairs at Television Centre, producer Elliott Gotkine was rushing around organising the live output of that night's BBC News 24 channel.

The correct guest who had been arranged, tech expert Guy Kewney (who incidentally, unlike Mr Goma, was a white skinned man of slight build), had just arrived downstairs waiting in reception to be taken to the studio.

But when frantic Mr Gotkine burst into reception before he saw Mr Kewney sitting nearby he saw Mr Goma first, who looked up expectantly.

A legend was born.

Now both men have spoken exclusively to the Daily Mail ahead of the 20th anniversary of their bizarre first meeting, that night at the BBC.

Mr Gotkine, who has never spoken publicly about the episode before, recalled: 'It was all a bit of a mad rush that day.

'I had booked Guy Kewney and with a few minutes to go [before he was meant to be on air] there was still no word from him.

'So I ran down to the reception and asked if they had someone called Guy Kewney there - and the receptionist pointed to Guy Goma.

'I was a little taken aback and I asked if she was sure and she said yes.

'I then went over to Guy - who I now know was the wrong Guy - and asked if he was Guy Kewney and he said yes, I thought maybe I had seen the wrong picture [of Mr Kewney], and I grabbed him and then rushed up to the studio.

'We were due on air in less than five minutes, so I just grabbed him and we sprinted up the stairs.'

Mr Goma, then a business studies graduate from Brazzaville living in west London and seeking work as a data cleanser, picked up the story at this point, recalling: 'I first thought something strange was happening when I was sat down in a chair and someone tried to put makeup on me.

'I said to her, "I don't need makeup, I'm here for a job interview," but she didn't seem to hear me.

'Then we moved into the studio and the TV cameras were on me and I started to think, "Something isn't right here - this isn't how a job interview is supposed to go." Because that's what I was there for.'

Seconds later, Mr Goma found himself sitting opposite presenter Karen Bowerman, with beads of nervous sweat beginning to break out on his forehead as he shifted in his seat wondering what was going on.

The now famous footage shows Westminster College business graduate Mr Goma, dressed smartly in an open necked blue shirt and brown jacket, glancing nervously up at the lights and around at the cameras.

Breathing heavily, a terrified grimace crosses his face, before licking his lips and composing himself for the unsuspecting onslaught about to hit him.

Goma recalled: 'I saw my image on a monitor, and I think that's when I realised something was going horribly wrong.

'But I didn't want to make a scene or cause a fuss so I went along with it when the presenter started asking me questions.'

As Ms Bowerman wrongly introduced him as 'Guy Kewney', Mr Goma could be seen gulping.

He then opened his eyes wide in shock as she asked him for his 'reaction to the court verdict' and whether he was 'surprised'.

The footage shows Mr Goma reply: 'I'm very surprised to see this verdict come because I was not expecting that... When I came they told me something else, they said it was an interview so it was a big surprise...'

As the car crash exchange continued it began to dawn on Ms Bowerman and fellow TV executives that a huge cock-up was unfolding in front of their eyes - and they eventually managed to cut to another reporter who was standing outside the High Court.

Mr Goma's live ordeal was over - but his fame was just beginning.

He recalls now: 'Once it finished, I left and walked out of the building into the Underground station opposite.

'I called the job agency and told them that something terrible had happened, I had been interviewed live on TV about something I didn't know about.

'I asked if I had got the job.

'But they said, "No - go back, they are waiting for you."

'So I went back and had the interview, which was about Microsoft Excel which I do know about - but unfortunately I didn't get the job.'

Mr Goma may well not have got that data job, but the clip of his interview was already going viral.

Furious BBC bosses launched an investigation into the cock-up and Mr Gotkine eventually left the BBC. He still works elsewhere within the TV industry.

Rather than come clean and explain who he really was and the real reason he was there that day, Mr Goma styled it out and bluffed his way through the next few minutes of TV

Mr Goma even spluttered at one point that he was 'surprised by the decision' because, he said, he 'hadn't been expecting it', in the clip that went viral to millions of people all over the world

Mr Goma briefly became a celebrity, invited onto TV shows around the world, even hiring.

'There was even talk of a prominent appearance on that December's BBC Sports Personality of the Year award show - but it never materialised.

A week after the incident, Goma was interviewed by the BBC and other TV networks telling them: 'I never really wanted to be famous. I just wanted to be an accountant - I hope I get a job at the BBC.'

Almost immediately an online petition was started by viewers demanding that the BBC give him a job. Although this never happened, Goma was touched by the reaction: 'It was so very kind of everybody, people were so kind and thoughtful.'

Mr Goma says: 'I later got a call from the BBC asking me what programme I would like to work on, but I was in a hurry to catch a plane to Germany for a TV interview, so I asked them to call me back.

'They never did but like I say to everyone it is the will of God, everything happens for a reason, I never really wanted to be famous but if the clip makes people laugh and makes them happy then I'm happy.'

Mr Gotkine recalls how minutes after Goma had been erroneously interviewed, he received a call to say the real Guy Kewney was in reception - and still waiting to be interviewed.

The producer said: 'Once I realised the mistake had been made, I apologised profusely and we recorded an interview with Guy Kewney but it was never broadcast.'

Mr Kewney died in 2010, although the two did meet up after the infamous interview with the IT specialist posting about it on his blog, adding a photograph of the pair and describing Goma as his 'twin brother'.

Goma - who fled to the UK after civil war ravaged Congo - now works with various charities in east London and also as a car park marshal at his beloved Queens Park Rangers football club.

He reflects now: 'It was just a mix up, I was in the wrong place, I had no idea about the subject, so I just tried to give the right answer in the interview.

'When she started talking, I thought "Oh dear Guy, you are in the wrong place" and you can see [in the footage] my body language expressed everything I was feeling.

'But so many people have seen the video, and I still get messages from people about it.'

Mr Goma - who was not paid for his BBC interview - did initially contemplate legal action against the BBC for a share of the royalties his blooper earned.

But he later changed his mind, explaining: 'I am a very spiritual person and I think God helped me get through it that day - and that everything happens for a reason.

'If the reason was to make people happy and take some stress from them, then I'm happy for what happened.'

Mr Gotkine added: 'Guy Goma really is the loveliest man you could ever meet

'They talk about everyone having 15 minutes of fame but Guy has had twenty years of it and it couldn't have happened to a nicer man.'

What Mr Goma was particularly keen to clear up in our interview was the suggestion, widely repeated at the time, that he was a taxi driver.

Chuckling he said: 'That was all wrong, I was never a cabbie. People said I was but I wasn't.

'In fact I had recently graduated from college and was a student.

'But back in Congo I had had a taxi firm so maybe that's where the confusion came from.'

When asked why he just didn't come clean before he was put on air, Mr Goma says today: 'I just didn't want to cause a scene and I didn't want to create a fuss.

'If I had just got up and walked off that would have been worse, I tried to answer the question as best I could but it wasn't necessarily the right answer.'

Mr Gotkine added: 'I think what got to people was just how extraordinarily lovely he came across as - Guy is such a lovely, lovely man and you can see that in just the few seconds he is on TV...

'Although granted yes, it was a complete cock-up.

Afterwards Mr Goma became, albeit briefly, one of the most recognisable men on television and his newfound fame even earned him a place of the satirical show Have I Got News For You

'The way he tried to bluff his way through it though was TV gold and it's brought so many laughs to people and goodness knows we need a few laughs, especially at this time with what's going on in the world.'

A new book called The Wrong Guy - The Inside Story Of TV's Greatest Cock-Up - is to be published this spring for the anniversary, telling in fine detail the buildup and the aftermath of what became television history.

Written by Mr Gotkine, the hilarious account also details how the two men have kept in touch ever since and have even visited Mr Goma's hometown of Brazzaville in the Democratic Republic of the Congo together.
 
more

A Woman Was Called 'Inconsiderate' For Trying To Shake A Job Interviewer's Hand


A woman had a strange experience when she tried to shake a job interviewer's hand, but was told she did not have consent to do so. Now, she is trying to make sense of the bizarre experience and if, in fact, shaking hands is an act that requires consent.

Interviewing for a job is incredibly stressful. There's a lot on the line, and you want to put your best foot forward. One woman believed she... was doing just that until the interviewer let her know that her completely normal behavior was apparently unacceptable.

The woman named Lauren, known as @scratchqueenlauren on TikTok, shared her bizarre job interview experience."I just had the craziest thing happen to me in a job interview that's, like, ever happened to me," she said in a video.

She described the job as a "pretty simple full-time office job." She stated that she had already completed one interview over the phone and was asked to come into the office for a second, but things felt off from the beginning.

"It's a lady. When I go to meet her, she's very, like, standoffish," she said. The two then had an awkward conversation in which the interviewer asked Lauren questions about how she handles workplace drama.

At the end of the interview, Lauren prepared to do the customary thing and shake the other woman's hand, but it didn't go well."I go to, like, put my hand out to shake her hand, like, 'Thank you for meeting me,' and she goes, 'Don't touch me' ... She's like, 'I don't give consent for you to touch me,'" Lauren said.

She tried to explain that she didn't actually touch the woman and just wanted to extend a kind gesture. "'I didn't touch you,'" she said. "'I'm just trying to shake your hand to thank you for meeting with me.'" The woman's response shocked Lauren. "She was like, 'That's very inconsiderate of you.'"

Lauren was so upset by the interview that she decided she no longer wanted the job, although she doubted the woman would call her about it anyway.

Lauren made a second video to update viewers and answer some questions she had received. "The position I was applying for was actually for a construction company," she explained.

Lauren stated that many people commented on her first video and recommended that she report what happened to her to the company's human resources department. However, that might have led to an even stickier situation.

"When I researched the company on who I needed to reach out to regarding what happened, the HR director has the same last name as the woman I interviewed with yesterday," Lauren said.

At first, she ignored the strange coincidence and sent the email anyway. Then, she decided to do a bit of sleuthing and discovered the HR director was the daughter of the woman she had interviewed with. "My email is probably going to be laughed at and disregarded completely," she lamented.

Handshakes are a regular part of job interviews, even used by recruiters to gauge candidates. According to Indeed, "When you first meet a professional employer, you often greet them with a handshake ... Your handshake can actually leave a significant impression on a hiring manager."

If handshakes are such a typical part of the interviewing process, it seems exceptionally strange that this woman would not want to shake hands. And, even if she did not wish to, there was probably a kinder way she could have informed Lauren of that.

This interaction was undoubtedly a red flag, and she's probably better off looking for a job elsewhere.
 
more

Turning Online Internship Into Job Offer: Step-by-Step Guide


How to Turn Your Internship Into a Full-Time Job Offer: The Essential Step-by-Step Guide

The future of career development is being shaped by a revolution in online internships and digital workplace experiences. Gone are the days when internships were simply a way to pass the summer or pad a résumé. Today, internships are often the golden ticket -- your direct pathway to a full-time job offer and... permanent position within the company. It's not just about learning the ins and outs of the business; it's about demonstrating your value to influence hiring decisions and turning an internship into a full-time role in a competitive job market.

Internship programs have become a transformative bridge between education and employment. In many industries, digital internships and remote work experiences are as valuable as traditional programs -- sometimes even more so, thanks to artificial intelligence and advanced educational technology tools. Whether you're a student, a recent graduate, or an early-career job seeker, your internship experience can help you achieve meaningful career goals, develop a strong skill set, and significantly boost your chances of landing a full-time job. In this actionable guide, you'll learn the academic evidence, insider strategies, and step-by-step process to turn your internship into a job offer -- before, during, and after your assignment ends.

Let's explore how you can go above and beyond to turn the internship into your next big opportunity.

A proactive attitude and planning are critical if you want to turn your internship into a full-time job. Many employers use internship programs not just as on-the-job training, but as an "extended interview" to identify candidates for full-time positions. By starting strong and treating your internship like the first chapter of your career path -- not just a temporary job -- you stand out to your supervisor and the whole team.

Start by treating every day during your internship like it directly influences hiring decisions. Arrive punctual, dress appropriately for the company culture, and display a strong work ethic. Consistent professionalism signals to the hiring manager and colleagues that you would be easy to work with as a full-time employee -- someone who will fit seamlessly into permanent teams.

Interns who actively network within the company frequently land a job. Take the initiative to introduce yourself to coworkers from other departments, attend team meetings, and don't be afraid to ask thoughtful questions about available positions or the team's long-term goals. Networking within the company can lead to critical job referrals or insider information about openings you might not otherwise find. Interns who genuinely connect are remembered long after the internship ends.

Research shows interns who request and act on feedback during performance reviews are more likely to get hired. Use every opportunity, from a one-on-one meeting with your supervisor to group conversations in team meetings, to ask for actionable feedback on your skills and performance. Demonstrate your eagerness to contribute and willingness to learn -- the very qualities that increase your chances of turning the internship into a job offer.

You've proven you can do the work -- now, show that you can add long-term value to the company. Action is what transforms temporary positions into permanent ones. This stage is about more than just completing assignments; it's about becoming indispensable to your organization through proactive learning, visible contributions, and strategic communication.

Don't settle for simply meeting deadlines or checking boxes. Successful interns deliver work that exceeds expectations and positively impacts the team's results. For example, if you see an inefficient process, propose a new technology tool or method drawing on your educational technology knowledge. If you master a project, ask for more responsibility. Companies offer full-time opportunities to interns who demonstrate initiative and problem-solving skills that make them stand out.

Internship can help you build a résumé loaded with measurable accomplishments. Document your contributions, results, and learning outcomes. During performance reviews or in email updates, highlight how your work ethic, attention to detail, and professional experience improved team performance. Visibility, when done respectfully, helps hiring managers remember you when it's time to make hiring decisions.

Before the end of your internship, don't be afraid to ask for endorsements, references, or specific performance feedback for your LinkedIn profile or future résumé. These genuine testimonials increase your chances in the job market and keep you top-of-mind for job referrals or "alumni" hiring. Staying in touch via LinkedIn or occasional email signals your ongoing interest in a full-time position and keeps the relationship alive.

The data is clear: over 70% of companies offer full-time positions to their top interns. But companies can't read your mind -- if you want to turn your internship into a full-time job offer, you need to be clear about your intentions, even if it feels a little uncomfortable.

When the internship nears completion, request a meeting with your supervisor or the hiring manager. Express your enthusiasm for the team and communicate directly that you want to be considered for a full-time role within the company. Share why the company culture, projects, and ongoing mentorship align with your career development goals.

Don't be afraid to ask specific questions about available positions, expectations for full-time employees, and the next steps in the hiring process. Sometimes, the simple act of expressing interest and asking actionable questions at the end of your internship gives you a leg up. Clarify any uncertainties and show your willingness to continue learning in the role.

If offered a job interview, approach it like you already know the ins and outs of the business. Use portfolio examples, data from your internship, and feedback from your supervisor to explain your fit for the role. Your internship experience gives you a unique advantage in the hiring process, since you can demonstrate your value, cultural fit, and growth trajectory better than external job seekers.

Turning an internship into a full-time job doesn't always happen immediately. Sometimes, companies offer roles months after the original program ends, especially as new projects develop or budgets allow. Staying proactive, building relationships, and maintaining ongoing communication can significantly increase your chances of landing a full-time job offer -- even after the internship is over.

Use tools like email, LinkedIn, and company alumni networks to maintain relationships with supervisors and peers. Share occasional updates on your professional development or educational milestones. Interns who stay in touch are top candidates when new full-time roles appear.

If a full-time position isn't available right away, use volunteering, additional online learning, or professional certifications to show continued growth. Advanced digital skills, artificial intelligence knowledge, or project management certifications can significantly boost your chances when new opportunities arise. Leverage industry trends and learning platforms to stay competitive.

Many industries have fluctuating hiring cycles. A single internship can help you build the reputation, résumé, and professional network that give you a leg up well after the official program ends. Stay in the loop, remain willing to learn, and build strong relationships to increase your chances of getting that long-awaited job offer.

Transforming your internship into a full-time job offer is no longer just a hopeful possibility -- it's a proven career pathway in today's education and employment ecosystem. The academic evidence, industry data, and practical experience all agree: internships have become much more than a checkbox on your résumé. They're a springboard to professional achievement, a bridge to permanent positions, and a showcase for your work ethic and eagerness to contribute.

By being proactive, demonstrating value, building relationships, and leveraging every opportunity, you can significantly boost your chances of turning an internship into a job offer. The future of accessible, merit-based career advancement is being shaped by motivated interns like you. Treat your internship as more than a temporary assignment -- it's your launchpad for landing a full-time job and achieving your career goals.

Let's keep pushing the boundaries of what online education and internships can deliver. Stay inspired, keep learning, and explore more career development resources to give yourself every advantage in the evolving job market.
 
more