• One of the things I discuss with my clients is to define what FORWARD actually means.

  • By being constructively conscious of the level you are in, regularly building on your knowledge base trough research and extensive reading

  • Perfectly said! My friend I trust that if you simply take the necessary steps above, your actions will yield fruits with faith in God who blesses work... of our hands.
     more

  • Tech is challenging. I work at a university. If you don’t have AI under your belt I highly recommend you take the free classes by Anthropic. It will... get you started and you can leverage your book knowledge to create a solution. As an engineer, don’t think about working for anyone. You have the ability to solve problems. Start small business solutions, do some volunteer work to build your experience. Work on getting your first two to three clients and you will expand from there. more

    1
1   
  • So unfortunate that most jobs nowadays can be done by robots but let's focus on handy skills that can't be done by AI

  • hoping to have interviews soon, i pray it doesn't go that way

    1

Jobberman equips Ondo youths with labour skills


Jobberman, in partnership with the Mastercard Foundation, has equipped young people in Ondo State with employability and career development skills aimed at preparing them for the changing demands of the labour market.

According to a statement, the initiative formed part of the Ondo edition of Jobberman's Career Clinic, held in Akure under the theme "Blueprint for Success: Building Skills for the... Future of Work".

The event brought together students, graduates, job seekers and career development experts to discuss career opportunities, workplace trends and strategies for professional growth.

Speaking at the event, the Country Head of Programmes at Jobberman Nigeria, Olamide Adeyeye, urged young people to approach their career development with purpose and clear planning.

According to him, the future success of Nigeria depends largely on the preparedness and contributions of its youth.

"The time has come for deliberate policy reforms that will strengthen Nigeria's reputation in the global workforce ecosystem. We must create an enabling environment that gives young Nigerians equitable access to opportunities, empowers them with the skills required for the future of work, and positions them to compete confidently and successfully on the international stage," Adeyeye said.

He also called on the federal and state governments to implement policies that would create more opportunities for young people and eliminate barriers that hinder their participation in the labour market.

Delivering the keynote address, a Senior Human Resources Professional at Johnvents Industries, Pamela Elekwachi, urged participants to be intentional in designing their career paths and personal development plans.

"Financial instability does not affect only the individual; its impact often extends to family, friends, communities and the wider society. This is why young people must intentionally position themselves for growth and sustainability," Elekwachi said.

She identified continuous learning, upskilling, networking, mentorship, relationship-building and volunteering as critical factors for career success.

Elekwachi added that employers increasingly seek candidates with practical skills, adaptability and relevant experience in addition to academic qualifications.

"Success becomes easier when you learn from those who have successfully navigated the path before you. Jobberman has demonstrated expertise in career development and can provide the guidance young professionals need to build and execute a strong personal blueprint for the future," Elekwachi said.

Participants at the event described the programme as impactful and beneficial, with ThankGod Friday declaring that the training had changed his perception of career development and employability.

"This programme has changed my perspective on career development and employability. I have learnt practical skills that will help me position myself better in the labour market. I appreciate Jobberman for creating this opportunity for young people like me," he said.

Another participant, Rebecca Akinadewo, said the session on writing a professional curriculum vitae was particularly useful: "The session on writing a professional CV was my favourite because it exposed me to mistakes I had been making and showed me how to present myself better to employers. I am leaving this programme more confident and prepared for future opportunities."

Highlights of the career clinic included fireside chats on personal branding, job search strategies, artificial intelligence and digital tools for career growth. Participants also took part in career counselling sessions, networking activities and interactive discussions with industry professionals.

The event attracted representatives of the Ondo State Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development, the Ondo State Ministry of Youth and Sports Development, professional bodies and other stakeholders in youth empowerment and workforce development.
 
more
3   
  • Tell then you don't work for free. You must be paid for your time.

  • i can offer u your request reach out to me

What looks like stability in today's workforce may actually be caution | Federal News Network


Terry Gerton Matt, I'd like to start with you. This new research out for the Economist Group talks about the quit rate. We talk about the unemployment rate, we talk about a lot of labor metrics. What is the quit-rate, and why should we be paying attention?

Matt Terry Yeah, so the quit rate is the rate of people quitting their jobs basically. And that rate has actually fallen to a low that it's... been the lowest in probably the last decade. So workers are not leaving their jobs as frequently. They're kind of job hugging is what we've called it in the research at unprecedented levels. And it's not always because they love their jobs. We see economic turbulence going on right now, hiring freezes, increased redundancies with the rise of AI. There's just a lot of uncertainty going on and people are increasingly opting for predictability in their employment, stable incomes and stable benefits. So, people are opting increasingly for predictability, stable income and stable benefits over potentially promising prospects at a new job. So they're less likely to jump from job to job and more likely to just hold on to what they've got. We found in our survey that 62% of respondents said in that sort of trade-off, they would choose long-term job security over higher pay. So we really see kind of a trend setting in that we've labeled the 'Great Stay' where people are just sticking in their jobs.

Terry Gerton In a healthy labor market, what would you expect that quit rate number to be?

Matt Terry It's traditionally been a little bit higher than it has been. I don't have the exact figure with me right now, but I think it's around 2% right now. So quite low. And one thing we find is that in the last five years, our respondents have stopped job searching, specifically due to the fear of losing that security. So we found 30% have reported stopping their job searches and half say they have done that within the last 12 months. So rising insecurity is really kind of on the increase and happening across the board.

Terry Gerton Brendan, what thoughts do you have about the quit rate?

Brendan McCarthy We definitely see it here, you know, as a hiring manager and a competitive industry, I'm always trying to recruit top talent. And sometimes I'm successful. And a lot of times lately people do not want to leave their their job security. And I think some of that has to do with, if you think of the environment that we came out of -- so we're, I don't know what we are, five or six years now out of the pandemic. And that was a major shift and a lot of people took career risks during the pandemic and some of it, you know, they might've gotten used to what was a virtual environment for a short time being that came back to normal. And I think we all probably know of people that took a major career change back then. A lot of those might not have paid off in the long term, you know, so I think a lot us know people that might've been displaced and then try to re-enter a thriving economy, but also in an inflationary period with increasing costs of living and may have ended up in a difficult position financially, and I think a lot of people, you know, are trying to avoid that now. So, I think that that plays in a little bit to the psyche of employees that they really do value job security. They will pass up on a greater opportunity to go into a new firm, just if they feel secure and comfortable in their job and they know their paycheck is dependable. They are a lot of times passing on opportunities and just staying where they feel comfortable and secure.

Terry Gerton Well, Matt, let me come back to you, speaking about uncertainty and job security. Let's talk about the subset of your respondents that are from the federal government. Those folks have gone through a lot of uncertainty over the past 18 months or so. What does the data tell you about how they're perceiving job security, mobility, and their quit rate?

Matt Terry Yeah, so we don't have a quit rate statistic, I don't think, for government employees specifically, but our survey was conducted late 2025, so, you know, right at the tail end of a lot of federal layoffs and a lot of uncertainty going on there. And we did see strong trends among government workers for prioritizing job security. We asked a question of them: what keeps them working in government? What are the biggest factors for why they stay? And job security was the number one on that list. I think 60% of respondents marked that among their top choices. So it is top of mind, although at the same time, government employees do express some of the least fear of losing job security. Perhaps that's just the nature of their work and the jobs that they're in. But yeah, some interesting trends there definitely in the data.

Terry Gerton I'm speaking with Brendan McCarthy, he's the head of retirement investing for Nuveen, and Matt Terry is research manager for the Economist Enterprise. Brendan, let me come back to you because there's some data in this survey about retirement planning. So, we're talking about job security, but in this turbulent kind of environment, you mentioned inflation, some other things, are people delaying retirement? And if so, what are they thinking about when they're thinking about retirement planning?

Brendan McCarthy Yeah. And unfortunately, people are delaying retirement. We're seeing delays in retirement, even in the government sector that we just talked about. People are delaying retirement up to three years. It's four years or longer in the private sector. So they're delaying in retirement because they are seeing this as a couple of major contributing factors. One is this increased cost of living. So they're seeing the increased cost of living. But to add to that, they're living longer. So if you take a 65-year-old today, which is the number you should be looking at, you shouldn't be looking at general U.S. Life expectancy, you should looking at 65-year-olds. A 65-year-old today has a 25% chance of living to age 95 or longer. So in fact, a 65- year-old couple, there's a 46% chance that one of the two of them will live to age 90 or longer, so now people are living 30 years or longer in retirement and unfortunately what's happened is guaranteed income has all but gone away in the private sector. So, a generation ago, go back 30, 40 years ago, 70% of American workers who had access to a workplace retirement plan in the private sector were in a DB or pension plan. Those have gone away, that number's down to 11% today. So most are in a 401k plan and we have this new generation of workers retiring predominantly without any form of guaranteed income other than their social security, which we know is not enough. And so they're feeling very insecure approaching retirement. And as such, you're dealing with this new, It's a common term out there, the reluctant retiree. That, you know, for corporations in particular, that can have a heavy toll on the bottom line because you are increasing, it's a dramatic, you can talk to any CFO, it's a very dramatic effect on workforce costs when people delay their retirement one, two, three, three years and longer. So it's not great for the company, it is not great for the individual either. You want them to be able to retire on time and not feel like they should be able to work up and through their expected retirement date. That all comes down to retirement security. You know, I'll go on for this just a quick, you know, what do they do? There is fortunately, this is heavily recognized down in Washington. So there's a lot of work going on in Washington to bring guaranteed income back to retirement plans. And there's been a number of bills passed already. And in fact, there's a number of them floating around that will propose actually requiring retirement plans to have a guaranteed income option for employees so that the American worker can now work up to their retirement and then feel that they have a secure retirement. You can actually get that pension, you can get that guaranteed income that is associated with a pension, which has gone away for most Americans. You can now actually get through your 401k plan. So there's products that have come to market and there's legislation that's been passed that enable your workplace to find contribution plan, whether it's a 401k, 457 or 403b, it can now have an option of guaranteed income. So what was historically a savings, just a retirement savings plan, can now also be a retirement income plan for the American worker.

Terry Gerton Matt, let me come back to you. You mentioned a term up at the beginning of this conversation, job hugging. It used to be sort of an article of faith that if you wanted to progress in your career, you were eventually gonna need to move somewhere, take a different job, maybe change companies. If people are hugging their current job and they're not making those kinds of moves, what's the long-term implication for that in terms of career advancement, increased salaries, job progression?

Matt Terry Right, no, it's definitely a big concern. Obviously with people less likely to jump from job to job, pursue those traditional career development pathways, there is a risk for them that they kind of remain locked into certain situations. And so it's a trend that we're keeping a close eye on in the research. I mentioned a stat earlier that 60% of government employees are prioritizing job security at the moment as one of the reasons why they stay where they are. Along with that, just 22% said that opportunities for professional development or training are keeping them in their jobs. So it's much lower on the priority list and maybe an area that should be looked into a little bit more as something that can be implemented to help these workers who need those career opportunities.

Terry Gerton Brendan, let me come back to you. Let's think about policy lessons that you take from this data. You talked about one, which is recreating the opportunity for more fixed income structure in retirement. Are there other policy lessons you'd want folks to take from the data in terms of workforce management or workforce incentives or the benefit compensation structure?

Brendan McCarthy You know, I think the key thing is benefits matter, you know, and they're mattering. The pricing on benefits has changed. They matter more now to employees than they did a generation ago. We are seeing all sorts of signs of workers choosing jobs for lower pay because of a better benefit package. And I think, you know, primarily amongst the benefit package is the retirement plan. If you think of government sector, we talked about that being one of the most insulated sectors, historically. we talked about job security, which was key. You know, people feel secure in government jobs, or historically have, I should say. They also knew their retirement. So they knew they worked a certain amount of years because government jobs historically have had pensions. They knew what was coming to them in terms of retirement and that provided them with security. And that, unfortunately for the private sector, that has gone away. So I think in terms policy reform, there has been an unprecedented amount of retirement policy reform already. There was the Secure Act of 2019 and then there was the Secure 2.0 Act a couple of years ago. There is already work on a version of Secure 3.0 going on down in Congress. So you're going to continue to see that retirement policy reform, but a lot of it is geared towards. In particular, that fact that pensions have gone away in America for the majority of American workers, guaranteed income is no longer something they can count on in retirement. And Washington wants to see that come back. I've seen estimates of upwards of three or four trillion that would fall back onto social services if, you know, we have this volume of people, which EBRI -- I'll give you one statistic. The Employee Benefit Research Institute is now estimating that upwards of 40 percent of American households are at risk of running out of income in retirement. So it's a real risk and Washington's aware of it and it is one of those issues that does fortunately have bipartisan support and they have been moving on it and I think you'll continue to see that retirement reform so that for the American worker in the future and a lot of it is starting now. A lot your companies can get these products now but Washington will help mandate. You know, we feel that Washington's heading towards a where they will require your workplace retirement plan to provide you with that option of guarantee, easily converting that hard-earned retirement savings into guaranteed income.

Terry Gerton And Matt, last question to you, does this data change what's maybe been the conventional wisdom about the federal worker willing to settle for lower pay because of a better benefits package and a dedication to the mission? Does this tell us they're getting more salary sensitive?

Matt Terry It's possible. There are some signs in our data that show government workers are maybe more likely to prioritize pay in certain cases. So times are changing. The stability that was once, you know, very common in government jobs may not be as common anymore. But yeah, it just goes to show that workers have very changing priorities.

Terry Gerton I'm most interested, this administration seems to think that hiring government workers is a very elastic labor market. And I think that's kind of counter to conventional wisdom, like, oh, well, if we lose 300,000, whenever we want more, we can just hire more.

Matt Terry Yeah, I don't wanna speculate too much on what the administration's doing, but there are obviously a lot of risks in making big workforce decisions like that that affect a lot people. People feel a tie to their jobs and they need some baseline level of security. And if they don't get that, we definitely see their willingness to prioritize benefits, prioritize different things that they need to fit their changing situations.
 
more
3   
  • Sounds more like a family than a workplace. Although, I was in the newspaper business, and the atmosphere, actions, attitudes were open, unrestricted,... and emotional, as you described. more

  • very strange. Are they union employees?

Why English Communication Skills Are Becoming Essential in Modern Recruitment


Preparing for a job interview is stressful in any language. When the interview is in English, the pressure can feel even higher. You may worry about grammar, pronunciation, vocabulary, listening, confidence, or whether you will understand the interviewer's questions. The good news is that you do not need perfect English to have a successful interview. You need clear communication, strong... preparation, and the ability to explain your skills with confidence.

Learning English for job interviews is different from studying general English. In daily conversation, you may talk about hobbies, the weather, travel, or family. In an interview, you need to describe your experience, explain your strengths, answer behavioral questions, ask professional questions, and show that you are a good fit for the role. That requires a more focused type of preparation.

A strong interview performance comes from knowing what to say, how to say it, and how to handle unexpected questions. With the right practice, you can sound more professional, organized, and confident even if English is not your first language.

Understand the Job and the Company

Before practicing your English answers, make sure you understand the job. Many candidates focus only on language, but interview success also depends on preparation. Read the job description carefully and identify the most important skills, responsibilities, and qualifications.

Look for keywords related to:

➔ Technical skills

➔ Communication skills

➔ Leadership

➔ Problem solving

➔ Customer service

➔ Teamwork

➔ Project management

➔ Industry knowledge

Then, research the company. Visit its website, read the "About" page, look at its products or services, and review recent news or updates if available. Try to understand what the company does, who its customers are, and what problems it solves.

This helps you answer questions more effectively. Instead of giving general answers, you can connect your experience to the company's needs. For example, instead of saying, "I am good at communication," you might say, "In my previous role, I communicated with customers every day, which would help me support your client service team."

Learn Common Interview Questions in English

Most job interviews include a few common questions. You should prepare answers before the interview, but do not memorize them word for word. Memorized answers can sound unnatural. Instead, prepare key points and practice saying them in different ways.

Common English interview questions include:

➔ Tell me about yourself.

➔ Why are you interested in this position?

➔ What are your strengths?

➔ What is one weakness you are working on?

➔ Why should we hire you?

➔ Tell me about a time you solved a problem.

➔ Describe a challenge you faced at work.

➔ How do you handle pressure?

➔ Where do you see yourself in five years?

➔ Do you have any questions for us?

When studying English for job interviews, focus on questions that are likely for your role. A software developer may need to explain technical projects. A salesperson may need to describe results and customer relationships. A manager may need to discuss leadership, conflict resolution, and team performance.

Prepare a Strong "Tell Me About Yourself" Answer

"Tell me about yourself" is often the first interview question. It is not an invitation to share your full life story. It is a professional summary of who you are, what you do, and why you are a good fit for the job.

A simple structure is:

➔ Your current role or background

➔ Your most relevant experience

➔ One or two key strengths

➔ Why you are interested in this opportunity

For example: "I have three years of experience in customer support, mostly helping small business clients solve account and billing issues. In my current role, I handle customer questions by phone, email, and live chat. I am known for staying calm under pressure and explaining solutions clearly. I am interested in this position because I want to use my customer service experience in a company that focuses on long-term client relationships."

This answer is clear, professional, and focused. It also gives the interviewer a reason to continue asking about your experience.

Use the STAR Method for Behavioral Questions

Many interviews include behavioral questions. These questions ask about real examples from your past. They often begin with phrases like "Tell me about a time..." or "Give me an example of..."

The STAR method can help you organize your answer:

➔ Situation: What was happening?

➔ Task: What was your responsibility?

➔ Action: What did you do?

➔ Result: What happened because of your action?

For example, if asked, "Tell me about a time you solved a problem," you could say: "In my previous job, our team received many customer complaints about delayed responses. I was responsible for helping improve our reply time. I created a shared tracking sheet so we could see urgent messages more easily. I also suggested short response templates for common questions. As a result, our average response time improved, and customers received answers faster."

The STAR method helps you avoid long, confusing answers. It also makes your English sound more organized and professional.

Build Interview Vocabulary

A job interview requires specific vocabulary. You should be comfortable using words that describe experience, achievements, teamwork, and goals.

Useful interview words and phrases include:

➔ Responsible for

➔ Experienced in

➔ Skilled at

➔ Strong background in

➔ Worked closely with

➔ Improved

➔ Managed

➔ Developed

➔ Supported

➔ Resolved

➔ Increased

➔ Reduced

➔ Collaborated

➔ Led a team

VMet deadlines

➔ Learned quickly

➔ Adapted to change

It is also useful to practice phrases that show confidence without sounding arrogant:

➔ "One of my strengths is..."

➔ "I am especially proud of..."

➔ "I learned a lot from that experience."

➔ "I would describe myself as..."

➔ "I believe I would be a strong fit because..."

➔ "In my previous role, I had the opportunity to..."

Try to use vocabulary that matches the job description. If the posting mentions "client communication," use that phrase in your answers. If it mentions "data analysis," prepare examples that include those words.

Practice Speaking Out Loud

Thinking about answers is not enough. You need to practice speaking them out loud. Speaking activates different skills than reading or writing. You need to pronounce words clearly, organize ideas quickly, and sound natural.

Practice in these ways:

➔ Record yourself answering common questions.

➔ Listen for unclear pronunciation or long pauses.

➔ Time your answers so they are not too long.

➔ Practice with a friend, teacher, tutor, or language partner.

➔ Repeat answers using different words so you do not sound memorized.

➔ Practice smiling and speaking with calm energy.

Most interview answers should be between 45 seconds and two minutes. Very short answers may sound weak. Very long answers may lose the interviewer's attention. Aim for clear, complete, and focused responses.

Improve Pronunciation and Clarity

You do not need a perfect accent for a job interview in English. You do need to speak clearly enough that the interviewer can understand your message. Pronunciation practice can help you sound more confident and professional.

Focus on:

➔ Important words in your industry

➔ Your job title and previous company names

➔ Numbers, dates, and achievements

➔ Common interview phrases

➔ Words that are difficult for you to pronounce

➔ Sentence stress and pacing

Slow down slightly if you are nervous. Many English learners speak too fast during interviews because they want to sound fluent. Speaking too quickly can make pronunciation harder to understand. A steady pace is better.

You can also use short pauses to organize your thoughts. It is acceptable to say, "That is a great question. Let me think for a moment." This sounds professional and gives you time to answer.

Prepare Questions to Ask the Interviewer

At the end of the interview, you will usually be asked, "Do you have any questions for us?" Always prepare questions. Asking thoughtful questions shows interest, confidence, and professionalism.

Good questions include:

➔ "What does success look like in this role?"

➔ "What are the main priorities for this position in the first few months?"

➔ "How would you describe the team culture?"

➔ "What are the biggest challenges the team is currently facing?"

➔ "What opportunities are there for learning and growth?"

➔ "What are the next steps in the interview process?"

Avoid asking only about salary, vacation, or benefits in the first interview unless the interviewer brings them up. Those topics are important, but your first questions should show interest in the role and company.

FAQ About English for Job Interviews

Do I need perfect English for a job interview?

No. You need clear, professional communication. Employers usually care more about your skills, experience, attitude, and ability to explain your ideas.

What should I do if I do not understand a question?

Politely ask for clarification. You can say, "Could you please repeat the question?" or "Do you mean that you would like an example from my previous job?"

Is it okay to pause before answering?

Yes. A short pause is natural and professional. You can say, "Let me think about that for a moment," before giving your answer.

Should I memorize interview answers?

No. Prepare key points, but do not memorize full answers. Natural answers sound more confident and authentic.

How can I sound more professional in English?

Use clear structure, polite phrases, strong action verbs, and specific examples. Avoid slang and overly casual language.

What if I make a grammatical mistake?

Keep going. One grammar mistake will not ruin the interview. Focus on communicating your idea clearly.

How long should my answers be?

Most answers should be about 45 seconds to two minutes. Use enough detail to answer the question, but stay focused.

Final Interview Preparation Tips

The day before your interview, review your notes, but do not overload yourself. Practice your most important answers, check the interview time, prepare your clothes, and test your technology if the interview is online.

Before the interview, review:

➔ The job description

➔ Your resume

➔ Your strongest achievements

➔ Your STAR examples

➔ Your questions for the interviewer

➔ Key vocabulary for the role

If the interview is virtual, test your camera, microphone, internet connection, and background. Keep a copy of your resume nearby and have a glass of water ready. If the interview is in person, plan your route and arrive early.

Most importantly, remember that an interview is a conversation. You are not only being tested. You are also learning whether the company and role are right for you.

Final Thoughts

Preparing for a job interview in English takes more than studying grammar. You need to understand the job, prepare strong examples, practice common questions, improve your speaking clarity, and learn professional vocabulary. The more you practice, the more confident you will feel.

English for job interviews is a practical skill. You can improve it with focused preparation and real speaking practice. You do not need to sound perfect. You need to sound prepared, clear, and professional. When you know your message and can explain your value, you give yourself a much better chance of making a strong impression.
 
more
2   
  • People are human. Sounds like a personable company where people have a sense of care for one another. With that said, they must respect your choice to... keep your private life private. If they are insistent upon asking then set a boundary and choose not to go to the outings. more

  • Simply tell them you have other plans. (Work-out, shopping, meeting OTHER friends, family obligations, etc.)

4   
  • You mentioned the word never twice. But you don't mention how long you've been with this company. 10 years without ever getting a raise is a big... difference from one year without giving a raise. If you have been with the company more than two years and you have not gotten a raise you can set up a time to meet your employer and ask for a raise yourself. List the reasons you think you deserve one, including the cost of living, projects you've worked on, and things you have done to generate the company more money. If it's 3 years, no raise, and the boss is not willing to negotiate with you, then look for a new job. more

  • Truth is you shouldn't get rewarded for performing the job they pay you to do. Monetary awards should come from going above and beyond. Ex., saving... the company a large amount of money or bringing in new clients.  more

    -1

Benevolve Helps Organizations Move from Fragmented HR Systems to Predictive Talent Development


Integrating performance, career development and workforce intelligence to help organizations anticipate talent needs and unlock employee growth

Benevolve today announced its integrated approach to talent management, helping organizations move beyond fragmented HR systems toward predictive talent development.

By connecting performance insights with employee aspirations and development,... organizations gain a clearer understanding of workforce capabilities, identify readiness for future roles, strengthen internal mobility, and build stronger succession pipelines. This connected view enables leaders to move beyond reactive talent decisions toward predictive talent development.

At the core of this approach are Benevolve's REFLECT and STRIVE frameworks, which bring together talent strategy and technology in a single, integrated experience. While REFLECT helps organizations align goals, performance, feedback, compensation, and analytics, STRIVE enables employees to navigate their growth journey through career planning, skills development, mentorship, and personalized learning pathways.

Together, these frameworks create a connected talent ecosystem that aligns individual growth with organizational objectives. In doing so, they address a critical challenge facing enterprises today: workforce data, performance management, career development, and talent planning often operate in silos, limiting visibility into future skill needs, internal talent readiness, and long-term workforce planning.

"Most organizations have data about their people, but very few have connected intelligence about their future workforce," said Aditya Singh, Founder & CEO, Benevolve. "The challenge isn't collecting talent data, it's connecting it. When performance, skills, career aspirations, development, and engagement are viewed in isolation, organizations miss opportunities to grow talent from within. By bringing these elements together, Benevolve helps organizations shift from reactive talent management to predictive talent development, while empowering employees to take greater ownership of their career growth."

With over 100 years of combined global HR leadership experience behind its founding team, Benevolve is focused on helping organizations build stronger talent pipelines, improve employee growth outcomes, and create future-ready workforces through AI-supported, data-driven talent strategies.

As workforce planning becomes increasingly strategic, Benevolve is helping organizations transform talent development from a periodic HR process into a connected, data-driven engine for long-term business growth.
 
more

Retaining talent requires the industry to address 'experience ...


Insurance Times' latest talent report reveals nearly half of the industry believes talent exits stem from a lack of career development and advancement

The insurance industry has "an experience shortage" that is contributing to pressures in the talent pipeline, according to Karen Weir, owner and founder at Weir Insurance Brokers.

While "career progression, workload and pay are clearly factors"... behind the sector's retention challenge, which needs to be addressed, Weir told Insurance Times that there is not a "talent shortage" - but a lack of opportunities for experience.

The view was in response to Insurance Times' 2026 Talent Development Report, published in association with Intact Insurance on 9 June, which revealed that 45% of respondents feel some people leave the industry due to a lack of career development and advancement.

From a survey of 304 respondents across insurance, it also showed that 42% of respondents believe people leave the industry because they are overworked, 33% believe it is because people are underpaid and 32% believe it is due to salary scales.

Savan Shah, head of research at Insurance Times, said: "What comes through clearly from Insurance Times' report is that the main drivers of attrition are progression, pressure and pay.

"The challenge for the industry is not a lack of opportunity in principle, but making progression visible, workloads sustainable and the overall career proposition competitive enough to retain talent."

For Weir, the findings point to a broader issue that the industry is not "creating enough opportunities for people to gain meaningful industry experience".

The UK produces hundreds of thousands of graduates every year, she explained, but "too few are finding routes into general insurance".

She continued: "I encountered this firsthand when trying to secure a summer internship for a Newcastle University undergraduate.

"Despite widespread discussion about talent shortages, finding a placement opportunity proved difficult. If we want to attract the next generation, we need to do more than promote insurance as a career. We need to invest in internships, work experience and entry-level opportunities that give people a genuine insight into the industry."

Broadening horizons

Echoing this perspective, Chris Welch, operations director at Hedron Network, said that "more needs to be done to attract talent into insurance from the outset".

He explained that, in this part of the sector, it is "rare" to see many people exit the industry "except at retirement" and that "movement tends to happen between different areas of the industry, often driven by a clearer pathway to career progression or by higher offers of remuneration".

Once people enter the sector, he feels that "many find strong opportunities to build long-term, rewarding careers".

And, Insurance Times' report revealed that 70% of respondents said that their organisation emphasises learning and upskilling opportunities as the most engaging value proposition for young talent, while 62% said career progression and leadership development and 42% said competitive salary and benefits.

Speaking to Insurance Times, Welch said he believes that the talent development initiatives and technical training offered to brokers via Hedron People have played a part in helping to "improve retention by broadening staff horizons and making people feel valued in their careers".

As a result, he said that the network is "seeing a new generation of leaders emerging in broking".

"As with any industry, it is vital that insurance remains competitive on salary for prospective talent," he continued.

"However, it must also provide clear and appealing pathways for development and progression. Apprenticeships are increasingly being used across a wide range of levels, but beyond training, culture plays a crucial role and that is often shaped by leadership."
 
more

Common interview questions and how to answer them


Knowing what to expect in a job interview is half the battle. Here is how to answer 10 of the most common interview questions with confidence.

Job interviews can be both exciting and nerve-wracking. Most of the time, you walk in not knowing what to expect. While every interviewer has their own style, most draw from the same pool of questions.

We looked through leading job boards and career... platforms to bring you the ten most common interview questions, plus a bonus, and how to answer each of them well.

One piece of advice came up consistently across every source: use the STAR method. It stands for Situation, Task, Action, and Result, and is a simple but effective framework for structuring answers to behavioural questions. Here is your study guide.

"Tell me about yourself"

The undisputed number one question. Interviewers are not looking for your life story, and they do not want you to recite your entire resume either. The purpose of this question is to understand, quickly, why you are the right person for the role.

Tailor your answer to this position, highlight relevant experience and skills, and touch on personality traits that suggest you would fit well into their culture.

A useful formula for answering this question is to follow the "present, past, and future" order. Start by talking about your current role, what you do and one notable achievement, then give some background on how you got there and any other relevant experience. Finally, talk about what you are looking for and why this specific role interests you.

"What are your greatest strengths?"

An employer wants to hire someone who knows what they bring to the table, so this is your chance to show you are capable of self-reflection. Narrow it down to at most three strengths. Pick one or two skills that will help you excel at the job and one or two personal traits that speak to who you are as a team member.

Every strength should be backed by a specific situation or story that shows how you have applied it at work.

It is not enough to just say you are great at problem-solving without any evidence. Talk about a time you faced a real challenge, how you stayed composed, the steps you took, and how you still delivered what was needed.

"What is your greatest weakness?"

Similar to the previous question, but this one requires a little more careful thought. Your weakness should be truthful, but it should not be something that would affect your performance in this role or be a poor reflection of your character.

Like your strengths, every weakness should be backed by a specific, self-aware narrative, followed immediately by what you are doing to address it. If you have a tendency to overcommit, explain how you have improved by prioritising tasks and delegating when needed.

If public speaking makes you nervous, acknowledge that it is an important skill in most careers and share that you have been building confidence by volunteering to lead internal team updates. Showing active growth is what matters most.

"Why do you want to work here?"

This question reveals whether you have done your homework. Interviewers want to know if you understand the specifics of the position, have genuinely considered whether your skills and experience are a good fit, and that their company is truly somewhere you want to be.

Saying you admire the brand is not enough. Name something specific about the company's mission, values, or product that genuinely resonates with you, and connect it to your own experience and expertise.

A strong candidate does not just explain why the company is a good fit for them. They use this question as an opportunity to show what they can bring to the organisation.

"Why should we hire you?"

This is your pitch moment. Describe your personal value proposition, how you can contribute to the company and why you are well-equipped to do so. Tie your answer to the company's needs rather than your own career goals, and tailor it to the specific role you are applying for.

A useful structure is to combine a creative skill, an analytical skill, and a proven result. Together, these three things can make a strong case for why you are the right person for this team.

"Where do you see yourself in five years?"

Your answer here has to be anchored to the role you are interviewing for. Avoid talking about moving into a completely different field, starting your own business, or anything too personal, as it signals low commitment.

Interviewers want to see a willingness to learn, grow within the company culture, and develop relevant skills over time.

A good formula is to describe a short-term goal tied to excelling in this role, followed by a longer-term vision, such as a leadership or more senior position in the field. Weave the company you are interviewing for into that vision, so it feels like a natural next step rather than just another job.

"Why are you leaving your current job?"/"Why did you leave your last role?"

This is a favourite question amongst interviewers as it reveals a candidate's true motivations and provides genuine insight into what drives them. Be honest if you left due to company restructuring or had to take time off, but keep it brief and move quickly into why you are excited about this next step.

The most important rule is to never speak negatively about a former employer, manager, or team, no matter the circumstances.

It reflects more negatively on you than them. Frame your departure as an opportunity to seek growth and new challenges, and focus on what you are moving towards rather than what you are leaving behind.

"Tell me about a challenge or conflict you've faced at work, and how you handled it"

The STAR method is key here, as it keeps your answer focused and results-oriented. Set the scene and explain the problem quickly, but spend more time on how you resolved it.

Include a concrete result if relevant, and mention what you would do differently next time, as it shows an openness to learning.

Interviewers are mostly looking for evidence that you are willing to face difficult issues head-on, that you have a clear train of thought when it comes to problem-solving, and that you make an attempt at resolution rather than avoiding conflict altogether.

"Describe a time you were successful on a team"

The STAR method is useful here again. Interviewers are looking for structured answers that demonstrate your ability to communicate, delegate, and collaborate effectively. Come prepared with a specific example that does all three.

A good answer should name the team and the shared goal, then explain your specific role and contribution. Describe how you maintained clear communication across the group, and close with a concrete result that the team achieved together.
 
more

I physically can't submit hundreds of applications a week, my new job duped me, and more


It's five answers to five questions. Here we go...

1. I physically can't submit hundreds of applications a week

I'm in the hellscape of the 2026 American job market and have been here for a while. I keep getting told that getting hired is a numbers game, and that to increase the chance I will get a callback I must simply apply to everything and send hundreds of applications a week.

This is... literally impossible. Even if I minimize the effort I put in customizing my resume and cover letters, I can get at the most five applications a day, if I push myself. Heck, even if I didn't do that, I wouldn't be able to find that many jobs per week, let alone apply. Plus, I can't shake the feeling that if competition is this thick, 100 low-quality applications are more likely to get thrown out than 10 high-quality ones (on the other hand, I have been incredibly unsuccessful, so it's likely that I'm wrong).

From a hiring manager's point of view, what's the better way to approach this? Play the odds or actually try?

P.S. Fun fact I learned in my master's program this semester: if you look for job hunting advice on online forums, you are more likely to encounter people who have been searching for a long time. This is because of the Inspection Paradox aka Renewal Theory. The job market is not as bleak as Reddit forums might lead you to think.

Yeah, be cautious about job hunting advice from Reddit. A ton of it comes from people who aren't having success in their own careers and thus aren't well-positioned to provide it.

The answer to quality vs. quantity is what your instincts are telling you: when competition is strong, low-quality applications have even lower chances of succeeding than they normally do.

That's not to say that quantity doesn't matter; it does. When competition is strong, by definition it will take most people more applications to find a job. But you're shooting yourself in the foot if you send out hundreds of low-quality applications; that's just wasted effort. You're better off looking for ways to streamline your process without making major quality sacrifices -- like having a few cover letter templates that you can quickly customize for different types of jobs (like by just changing the opening paragraph) and a long master resume that you can quickly edit down to the most relevant experience for any given job you're applying to. Don't spend hours agonizing over a single application -- but don't resume-bomb employers either.

2. Can I offer to help my boss with her personal life in a crisis?

One of the owners of the small company I work for recently had a medical emergency in her family. It sounds like it's going to be a long, hard recovery, and she is struggling with basically everything. I can't help her with her work for profession-related reasons, but would it be out of line for me to offer to help with personal stuff? She was there for me when my dog died (literally, she drove through a snowstorm in the dark to get to us and was the one to do the deed, and then took care of the body for me because I wasn't able to do so), and I want to help if I can.

For what it's worth, both she and my manager might as well have gone to the Alison Green School of Management, and the risk of me being taken advantage of in a way that is point-blank clearly inappropriate is basically zero.

The general answer to this is no; the best way to help your boss while she's going through a tough time is with work-related things because the power dynamic makes help with non-work things too fraught (i.e., if we start considering that appropriate, there's too much risk of people or their coworkers feeling pressured to offer, or pressured into more than they intended to offer, or worrying that if they don't it will harm them professionally or someone else will gain professionally, and so forth).

Those things are all still in play for your situation, but the facts that (a) she did such a lovely personal favor for you, (b) you're confident you won't be taken advantage of, and (c) you actively want to help do change the calculus a little and I could see offering if there's a one very specific task you want to suggest (because if you make an open-ended offer to help in general, a graduate of the AGSoM is just going to thank you but not take up on it). At the same time, though, stay sensitive to the potential dynamic it could cause with other employees if it's more than one very specific, time-limited activity.

And if you can, think about work-related things you might be able to take off her plate instead.

3. My new job deliberately hid the workload from me

After two years of unemployment, I just started a new job two months ago. Considering the job market and that I had been looking for about one year, I was grateful for the offer (even though I took about a $50K pay cut). Based on the job description and my interviews, I understood the scope of the role to be one thing, but more work outside of that scope is being added to my plate. Additionally, in a meeting with coworkers, I found out that they intended to add additional responsibilities but they all deliberately agreed not to tell me in my first 90 days so I wouldn't be "overwhelmed."

I feel like I've been duped to a certain extent. This is a director-level role so I do expect a significant amount of work on my plate, but I don't like that I feel I was lied to or that additional responsibilities keep being added when I don't have a team to help execute everything that needs to be done. It was discussed in my interview that within six months, hiring a team member would be up for discussion, but until then I'm solely responsible for it all.

How would you go about navigating this? I do feel like it's a bit early to push back and cause friction with my new coworkers. If the job market wasn't so terrible, I'd look for new employment since this has left a bad taste in my month, but that doesn't seem feasible right now.

Are you sure that your coworkers really meant that they deliberately set out to deceive you because they didn't think you'd take the job if you knew the real scope of the work, or could they just mean they agreed they should let you get settled with ABC responsibilities before adding XYZ to your plate? The first one is awful, but the second one is a pretty normal way for jobs to go.

Unless it was very clear it was the first one (and maybe even then), the best thing to do is to handle this like any workload issue: talk to your boss about what can and can't realistically get done and how to prioritize (and maybe point out that if it all needs to get done now, it would make sense to move up the timeline for hiring more help).

4. Interviewing when my job title sounds like I have more experience than I actually have

I work for a Fortune 500 company. Let's say my job title is teapot sculptor, but the actual bulk of what I do is overseeing our suppliers' teapot sculptors. I review their work and point out problems based on our rules and standards, but I don't do any sculpting myself. I test out some techniques or fixes when I have time, but largely I leave it to the suppliers. I really want to learn sculpting and actually work in it, which is part of why I'm job searching. (There are no opportunities for me to move into a sculpting role here since they outsourced all those roles to suppliers years ago.)

So my resume says I've got two years as a teapot sculptor, but in reality I've probably got 1-2 months of real experience. I put the tasks from that 1-2 months at the top of my resume without stating how infrequent it is, since I figured it would give me the best chance of getting a response, but I did not realize that a ton of people are trying to hire in this field right now and I'm getting swamped. I'm getting a ton of messages from recruiters who think I'm a knowledgeable sculptor, one of which got me all the way through the phone interview with the hiring manager without me being completely honest about what my experience is. He wants to have an in-person technical interview soon and I'm terrified and ashamed.

How should I be clear in my resume and messages to recruiters that I don't actually have much experience without completely turning off anyone from hiring me? It seems disingenuous to change my job title. Should I state in a bullet below it what describes me better, like "Reviewer with 1-2 months sculpting experience"?

And what should I do about the one hiring manager who wants to do a technical interview? Say I got another opportunity and cancel? Call to confess my real experience and ask if they still want me? Go to the interview knowing I'm likely going to bomb the questions and explain there? I know I screwed up by not being honest when the recruiter contacted me. I wanted to hide it because I'm ashamed that I've worked here for two years but have almost no sculpting skills to show for it, especially while I'm reviewing the work of actual sculptors.

I absolutely realize I was wrong to not be honest about my real experience from the start and I don't want to make this mistake again.

Yes -- make it clearer on your resume what you're actually doing, and that you're overseeing your suppliers' sculptors, not doing sculpting work yourself. People doing a quick skim of your resume might still assume that you wouldn't be reviewing that work if you didn't have sculpting experience, so you should also clarify it to recruiters when they first reach out to you by saying something like, "I want to make sure you realize, although I oversee our suppliers' sculptors work and identify problems, I don't have significant sculpting experience myself. I'm looking for a role where I can learn it, which is why I applied."

With the upcoming interview, can you contact the recruiter who got you that interview, explain the situation using language like the above, and ask if it still makes sense to move forward?

5. Recruiter wants me to send LinkedIn requests to everyone I'm interviewing with

I'm at the very beginning of a job search and just started working with a recruiter whose company reached out to me. She sent my resume to a few companies and I have an "introductory interview" with one this Friday. I'm excited about this firm and want to make a good impression. The recruiter sent me an email with a list of things to prepare for the interview. One of them was to send LinkedIn requests to each of the people that I'll be interviewing with and, if they accept my request, to send a short message saying that I look forward to meeting with them.

Is this a normal thing to do? I would never think to do that on my own as these are the partners of the (small) firm and I'm sure they have better things to do than respond to every LinkedIn request. Will it make me look bad or out of touch? Or desperate in some way? I don't want to screw this up and am leaning towards not doing this. What do you think?

It's a pretty normal thing to do. It's not a necessary thing to do, but it's not a weird or desperate-seeming thing to do; loads of candidates do it.

The partners may or may not respond to the LinkedIn request, and that's fine.
 
more

How do I know if a job candidate is overstating abilities? Ask Johnny


Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google.

Johnny C. Taylor Jr. tackles your workplace questions each week for USA TODAY. Taylor is president and CEO of SHRM, the world's largest trade association of human resources professionals, and author of "Reset: A Leader's Guide to Work in an Age of Upheaval."

Have a question? Submit it here.

Question: I'm a hiring manager, and... I keep encountering candidates whose résumés look excellent, but their actual skills don't match what they claim in interviews. How can employers effectively verify real-world abilities without creating an overly rigid or discouraging hiring process? - Nia

Answer: At SHRM, we have a term for what you're describing: "skillfishing," or presenting credentials, skills, or experience that don't fully translate into real-world execution. The truth is, this isn't new. Candidates have been overstating their abilities for as long as employers have been hiring. What has changed is how easy it has become to use artificial intelligence to build a polished professional narrative that may or may not reflect genuine depth.

So how do you separate real capability from strong self-promotion? Start before the interview even begins. When reviewing applications, look for indicators that a candidate has invested in developing and validating their expertise. Relevant certifications, licenses, portfolios, or demonstrated project work can provide a useful baseline. They're not foolproof, but they can help employers distinguish between someone who has studied a subject and someone who has actually practiced it.

Better teamwork: How do I build trust and unify dysfunctional work teams? Ask Johnny

From there, the interview itself becomes your most valuable tool. Don't let candidates get away with generalities. Ask them to walk you through specific examples of how they applied the skills they claim to have. What was the situation? What decisions did they make? What obstacles did they encounter? What was the outcome? People with genuine experience tend to speak with specificity and clarity because they've lived it.

And here's the key: Don't stop at the first answer. Ask follow-up questions. What would they do differently today? What trade-offs did they consider? What went wrong along the way? Real experience has texture. It includes setbacks, adjustments, and lessons learned. Someone relying on surface-level familiarity often struggles once the conversation moves beyond rehearsed talking points.

You can also incorporate practical assessments where appropriate. That doesn't mean turning your hiring process into an obstacle course. But asking a candidate to review a case study, solve a realistic problem, or demonstrate part of the work can tell you far more than another round of conversational interviewing. The best assessments mirror the actual demands of the role rather than trying to "catch" someone making a mistake.

And let me be clear: A rigorous hiring process doesn't have to feel adversarial. Strong candidates generally appreciate thoughtful questions and clear expectations. High performers want to know the organization values substance, not just presentation.

At the same time, employers should remember that hiring is about potential as much as it is about polish. Not every great candidate interviews perfectly. The goal isn't to eliminate every risk. It's to create a process that gives people a fair opportunity to demonstrate whether they can truly do the work.

The views and opinions expressed in this column are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of USA TODAY.

A break from work: Is it a bad career move to take a sabbatical? Ask Johnny

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: How to tell if a job candidate is overstating abilities
 
more

Building a Portfolio for Instructional Coaching Job Interviews


Gearing up for a job interview can be daunting, especially in education. When principals and administrators want to hire instructional coaches, they're looking for candidates who are flexible about a school's complex academic needs. These candidates need to be prepared for questions about how they'll simultaneously support students and classroom teachers.

As an instructional coach myself, I've... been through my fair share of interviews and have engaged in illuminating conversations with school leaders about the qualities and experiences they believe are most important for the position. With a thoughtfully crafted portfolio, prospective instructional coaches can approach job interviews with clarity, purpose, and a strong sense of what they have to offer.

One bit of feedback I've received is that administrators expect -- and welcome -- applications from teachers who haven't served as instructional coaches before. After all, everyone has to start somewhere. The key for first-time applicants is to demonstrate their would-be coaching style: How does it look? How would you act? Capturing and then articulating these details takes time and reflection, but it's the most effective way to provide interviewers with a clear picture of how you would settle into the role.

The start of an instructional coaching interview often features this question: "How will you establish strong relationships with staff during your first year?"

Within your portfolio, I'd recommend including examples of how you'll connect with staff members, ensuring that they have meaningful opportunities to get to know you. You might suggest the following:

Many instructional coaching roles are specialized -- they include titles such as "literacy coach," "math coach," and "educational technology coach." The second section of your portfolio should highlight your knowledge of these topics. And if the open role is a more generalized "instructional coach" position, then the second section is a valuable chance to relay your own passions and areas of expertise.

This section of your portfolio is also where you can display your strengths as an educational leader. Include copies of the following:

If you don't have these leadership experiences, don't fret; consider including lesson materials that have been particularly successful in your classroom, which point to your knowledge/understanding of best educational practices.

Lastly, it's important to review the prospective school's website so you can take note of relevant district initiatives and programs that are already in your wheelhouse. Mark these down in your portfolio. In doing so, you'll be able to lay out how you can step in and collaborate with a school's instructional leadership team, as well as how your background aligns with district goals.

The final section of the portfolio should run through all of your potential contributions as an instructional coach and make it clear how you plan to encourage teacher growth. Many applicants present this section as a "menu" of sorts -- it functions as a choice board of services that you can provide to staff members. Focus on the coaching cycles that reflect your strengths and what you perceive as the needs of the school.

I also recommend offering a "new-teacher coaching cycle" as an extra layer of support for first-year teachers, so you can assist them with logistics and early-days questions while they acclimate to the job. And you may want to offer other outreach efforts about timely topics in the field of education, such as artificial intelligence and educational technology.

When you create your portfolio, I recommend using a binder with tabs that separate the three sections. If you're interested in going the extra mile, consider matching the aesthetics of the binder to the school district's colors and tailoring the cover of the binder so that it matches the specific role. I suggest including at least four or five artifacts in each section of the binder, so the interviewing team can see your full capabilities as a coach.

Once you complete your portfolio, try practicing responses to instructional coaching interview questions. If a question correlates with an item in your binder, make sure to refer to the artifact in real time, so the interviewing team can get a visual representation of your response. Here are a few go-to questions you should expect:

On the day of your interview, take a moment to reflect on your career to date. Remember: Instructional coaching is not defined by a title, but by the impact you have on students, staff, and school communities. Every educator brings a distinct perspective to this work, shaped by their own experiences, their values, and their commitment to students. That includes instructional coaches, the best of whom leave a lasting impact on their school community by affecting teaching and learning in entirely new, innovative ways.
 
more

Central Alabama schools host hiring fairs to fill teaching, support staff positions


Video above: A look at the forecastTwo school systems in the Birmingham metro area are hosting hiring events as they work to fill teaching, transportation, maintenance and support staff positions.Birmingham City Schools Operations Department is seeking skilled laborers, HVAC technicians, electricians and plumbers to support school operations.The district is offering a $1,000 sign-on bonus for... child nutrition workers, bus drivers and custodians who commit to three years of employment.Applicants should bring copies of their résumé, references and any relevant certifications or credentials. "Behind every successful school is a dedicated team working hard every day to support students," Superintendent Mark Sullivan said in announcing the event.The Birmingham hiring fair is scheduled from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. June 11 at the Lincoln Professional Development Center, 901 Ninth Ave. North.Birmingham applicants can find additional openings on the district's hiring webpage.>> YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD: Community coverage from WVTM 13Midfield City Schools is hiring for elementary teachers, secondary history and science teachers, special education teachers and physical education teachers.Applicants are encouraged to bring a résumé. School officials said interviews may be conducted during the event.The Midfield Schools job fair will be held from 9 a.m. to noon June 22 at Midfield High School, 1600 High School Road.Those unable to attend the Midfield event may apply through the ALSDE HireTrue Portal.

Video above: A look at the forecast

Two school systems in the Birmingham metro area are hosting hiring events as they work to fill teaching, transportation, maintenance and support staff positions.

Birmingham City Schools Operations Department is seeking skilled laborers, HVAC technicians, electricians and plumbers to support school operations.

The district is offering a $1,000 sign-on bonus for child nutrition workers, bus drivers and custodians who commit to three years of employment.

Applicants should bring copies of their résumé, references and any relevant certifications or credentials.

"Behind every successful school is a dedicated team working hard every day to support students," Superintendent Mark Sullivan said in announcing the event.

The Birmingham hiring fair is scheduled from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. June 11 at the Lincoln Professional Development Center, 901 Ninth Ave. North.

Birmingham applicants can find additional openings on the district's hiring webpage.

>> YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD: Community coverage from WVTM 13

Midfield City Schools is hiring for elementary teachers, secondary history and science teachers, special education teachers and physical education teachers.

Applicants are encouraged to bring a résumé. School officials said interviews may be conducted during the event.

The Midfield Schools job fair will be held from 9 a.m. to noon June 22 at Midfield High School, 1600 High School Road.

Those unable to attend the Midfield event may apply through the ALSDE HireTrue Portal.
 
more