• Whether we like it or not the workforce has always been getting younger. There was a point where we were the young new person in the office with the... "little experience" in a position that may have been bigger than us. We persevered and so will this person...and so will you. Use your experience to complete the tasks set for you. Understand that change, demography and workplace structure are ever changing. Generational gapping is not new, it's just new to you at this stage. Why they got the position is none of your concern. You are there to do a job, so do it. Fretting about the why someone else's path is what it is is none of your concern. Focus on what you need to do to maintain your home and lifestyle and the day to day will get easier. Hope this helps. more

    1
  • Sorry to say that, you had assumed that job belonged to you just coz of your experience and perhaps age and you feel let down but thats not how things... work. Appreciate and respect your boss even if she were your daughter. Use your experience to guide her to do the right thing. Don't let your ego drag you down. I have for onve mentored a small boy who later became my boss' boss and do you how fulfilling it felt to me? more

2   
5   
  • Before jumping to replacement, it’s worth having a direct but calm conversation. Not accusatory but just factual and focused. For example, you can... point out specific instances where he snapped at clients and explain clearly that this affects business and cannot continue.
    Then listen. His response will tell you a lot:
     more

  • Sit him down. Time to give feedback. Is he on probation? How is he contributing to the direction of the business!!!

2   
  • Job description. Feedback. Meetings to strategize.

  • take them to training, team building, and conference to give them time to be enlighted on new things in career and to relax away from work

1   
  • Sit with both and get feedback. Enough wondering. Thank them for sitting with you. Ask about your work and how it contributes to the direction of... company? Either you are a value or not!! more

  • Just comply with their requests. You may feel overwhelmed, but do so without complaint. This is a training opportunity that will yield results in the... near future, making it a valuable personal experience. more

    1

Man Spent Months Applying For Jobs And Preparing For Interviews, But He Felt Burned Out And Questioned If Low Wages And Stress Were Ever Worth It


Job hunting shouldn't feel like full-time work.

The following story involves a man who has spent months applying to jobs and preparing for interviews.

But he faced confusing questions and constant rejection.

Even when he gets offered a job, he's often met with unpromising benefits.

Read the story below to find out more...

The number of times I have been lied to, gaslit, and asked the... stupidest goddamn questions during the job application process is uncountable.

It is so stupid.

Anyone with the slightest bit of intelligence or humanity can clearly see that there is something wrong with this entire thing.

This man spent months trying to ace job interviews.

This is not the way to vet job seekers. You get to the interview.

They continue to ask you incredibly stupid and specific questions.

If you make even the slightest misstep, you feel like a goddamn idiot.

I have spent months studying for some interviews.

I do not do that anymore.

Then, when one gets hired, they are welcomed with a low salary and stress.

Ninety-nine percent of the time, you just will not get it.

Then, when they say you get the job, there are low wages, overwork, stress, and little personal time.

Is any of this nonsense worth it?

With how much inflation we have had, the last three years of job applications I have been doing have actually cost me money.

Let's find out what others have to say about this.

A UX designer shares their personal thoughts.

This person gives their honest assumption.

This one chimes in.

Finally, here's another valid point.

Sometimes, applying for jobs feels like a job itself.

If you liked this post, check out this story about an employee who got revenge on a co-worker who kept grading their work suspiciously low.
 
more

Why More Professionals Who Can't Land A Job Are Pivoting To Sales Consulting


Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google.

For months, many professionals have followed the standard playbook: apply to roles, tap their networks, revise their résumés and wait for traction. Increasingly, that effort is yielding little return. The disconnect isn't just anecdotal. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average duration of unemployment rose... to over 21 weeks in early 2026, reflecting a labor market where hiring cycles are longer and opportunities are less accessible than they were just a year ago.

That stagnation is forcing a shift in behavior. Instead of continuing to chase traditional employment, more workers -- particularly millennials -- are rethinking how they generate income altogether. One path gaining traction is sales consulting: packaging existing skills into services that businesses will pay for directly.

"People are looking at their job titles instead of their skill sets," says entrepreneur and business strategist Erika Vassell. "But what they do every day -- the small things -- that's what people will pay for."

From Job Titles to Revenue Streams

She explained that corporate roles tend to bundle multiple functions under a single title. A manager might oversee hiring, scheduling, operations, and team performance, yet only identify with the title itself when searching for their next opportunity. In a tighter market, that framing becomes a limitation.

Vassell encourages young professionals to break those roles apart and evaluate the individual components. A former tech manager, for example, may struggle to land another leadership role immediately, but their ability to build workflows, organize teams, and manage processes is independently valuable. Those capabilities can be repositioned as services that companies -- especially smaller or scaling ones -- need immediately.

"You might think you're just managing a department," she says. "But setting up a system for a team, organizing operations -- those are services businesses need right now."

This reframing aligns with broader workforce trends. The number of independent workers in the U.S. has steadily increased, with McKinsey estimating that up to 36% of the workforce now participates in some form of independent or freelance work. What's changing is not just the volume, but the type of work being done -- more professionals are leveraging specialized expertise rather than general gig labor.

Why This Shift Is Accelerating

Several factors are converging to accelerate this pivot. Return-to-office mandates have reduced flexibility, hiring freezes have narrowed openings, and compensation growth has slowed across sectors. At the same time, companies are increasingly open to fractional or contract-based roles as a way to control costs while maintaining access to expertise.

That shift creates an opening for professionals who are willing to reposition themselves.

"If you've been trying for months and nothing is changing, you have to ask yourself if it's time to try something different," Vassell says.

For many, the decision is less about ambition and more about necessity. A prolonged job search often comes with financial pressure, which makes the idea of generating income independently more compelling -- even if it feels unfamiliar.

Rethinking Sales as a Skill

One of the biggest obstacles to this transition is perception. Sales is often associated with pressure tactics or aggressive persuasion, which discourages professionals who don't identify with that approach.

Vassell reframes the concept entirely. She describes sales as an extension of problem-solving, rooted in understanding what someone needs and offering a clear solution.

"Selling is serving," she says. "If you focus on how you can help someone, instead of worrying about yourself, it changes everything."

That perspective expands the pool of people who can realistically pivot into consulting. Many professionals already perform sales-adjacent functions -- pitching ideas internally, managing client relationships, or improving processes -- without labeling it as such. Recognizing those activities as transferable skills is often the first step.

Where Career Pivots Break Down

Not every transition to consulting gains traction, and the reasons are consistent. One of the most common missteps is positioning. Professionals frequently lead with their past employers rather than articulating what they can solve.

"They keep saying, 'I used to work for this company,'" Vassell says. "But they're not telling people how they can help them now."

That gap makes it difficult for potential clients to understand the value being offered. Clear positioning -- defining a specific outcome you can deliver -- matters more than credentials alone.

Another issue is overcomplication. Vassell explains that many people assume they need a fully built brand, a large audience, or a detailed business plan before they begin. In practice, early traction often comes from identifying one specific service and offering it to a targeted group.

"It could be something as simple as organizing systems for a small business," Vassell says. "That alone is something people will pay for."

The Psychological Barrier to Starting

If the mechanics are relatively straightforward, the hesitation is often psychological. Fear -- of failure, rejection, or judgment -- can delay action indefinitely.

"What will people think if I don't have a traditional job?" is a concern Vassell hears frequently from clients.

That fear can manifest in subtle ways: excessive planning, underpricing services, or avoiding outreach altogether. According to a 2025 LinkedIn Workforce Confidence survey, nearly 60% of professionals reported hesitation about pursuing independent work due to income uncertainty and social perception, even when they had marketable skills.

Overcoming that barrier requires a shift in focus. Rather than centering on personal risk, Vassell encourages clients to think about the value they can create for others. That reframing helps move the conversation from self-doubt to service.

Income Stability Without a Salary

Concerns about inconsistent income remain one of the biggest deterrents. Without a predictable paycheck, many professionals hesitate to fully commit to consulting.

Vassell challenges the assumption that traditional employment offers more security. Layoffs and restructuring have made it clear that stability in corporate environments is often conditional.

"A job isn't the safety net people think it is," she says.

Building income independently requires strategy, but it can also create more control. Instead of relying on a single employer, consultants can diversify their client base and scale their earnings over time. Research from Upwork indicates that skilled independent professionals often surpass their previous salaries within two years of consistent consulting work, particularly in specialized fields.

A Shift in How Work Gets Done

The growing interest in sales consulting reflects a broader change in how work is structured. Skills are becoming more valuable than titles, and adaptability is becoming more valuable than tenure.

For millennials in particular, this shift aligns with evolving priorities. Flexibility, autonomy, and sustainable workloads are increasingly non-negotiable. The traditional model -- where stability is tied to a single employer -- is being replaced by a more fluid approach to income and career growth.

For professionals navigating a stalled job search, the takeaway is practical. The first step isn't necessarily building a brand or launching a business; but it could look like first identifying what you already know how to do and translating that into a clear outcome for someone else.

"Write down what you're good at -- what you actually enjoy doing," Vassell says.

From there, the path forward becomes less about waiting for an opportunity and more about creating one.

This article was originally published on Forbes.com
 
more

Retention Over Recruitment: The Rise of Talent Management Platforms | Knowledge Hub Media


HR leaders, talent development teams, business decision-makers, and managers looking to improve employee retention, engagement, and performance.

Hiring is no longer the hardest part of building a strong workforce. Keeping employees engaged, productive, and growing within your organization has become the real challenge. As turnover costs rise and employee expectations shift, companies are... investing more heavily in talent management platforms that prioritize development, performance, and long-term retention over constant recruitment cycles.

This shift is changing how organizations think about Human Capital Management. Instead of focusing primarily on acquiring talent, businesses are building ecosystems designed to nurture, measure, and evolve their workforce over time. Platforms like Cornerstone OnDemand, Lattice, 15Five, and SAP are leading this transformation by focusing on performance management, learning, engagement, and employee growth.

The modern workforce is no longer satisfied with static roles and annual performance reviews. Employees expect continuous feedback, personalized development paths, and opportunities to grow within their organization. Companies that fail to provide this experience are seeing higher attrition rates and lower engagement across teams.

Talent management platforms address this by creating structured systems for performance tracking, learning, and career development. These tools allow HR teams and managers to move beyond reactive processes and instead build proactive strategies that keep employees aligned, motivated, and invested in their roles. The result is not just better retention, but stronger overall business performance.

While all four platforms operate within the same category, each takes a slightly different approach to solving the talent management challenge.

Cornerstone OnDemand

Cornerstone is heavily focused on learning and development, making it a strong choice for organizations prioritizing upskilling and reskilling. Their platform combines learning management with performance tracking, allowing companies to tie employee growth directly to business outcomes. What sets Cornerstone apart is its deep content ecosystem and AI-driven learning recommendations, which help personalize development at scale.

Lattice

Lattice centers its platform around performance management and employee engagement. It offers continuous feedback tools, goal tracking, and structured performance reviews that help managers maintain alignment across teams. One of Lattice's standout features is its emphasis on connecting performance data with engagement insights, giving organizations a clearer picture of employee sentiment alongside productivity.

15Five

15Five focuses on employee engagement and manager effectiveness. Its platform is built around frequent check-ins, lightweight performance tracking, and coaching tools designed to improve communication between managers and employees. What makes 15Five unique is its strong emphasis on human-centered management, helping leaders build stronger relationships rather than just tracking metrics.

SAP (SAP SuccessFactors)

SAP brings talent management into a broader enterprise context through its SuccessFactors suite. It integrates performance management, learning, and workforce analytics into a single ecosystem that connects with core HR and business systems. SAP stands out for its scalability and data depth, making it ideal for large organizations that need to align talent strategy with broader business operations.

Despite their differences, all four platforms share a common foundation. They provide tools for performance reviews, employee development, and engagement tracking, all of which are essential to managing the full talent lifecycle. Each platform also supports continuous feedback models, replacing outdated annual review processes with more dynamic and ongoing performance conversations.

Another shared strength is their ability to centralize employee data related to growth and performance. This gives HR leaders better visibility into skill gaps, high performers, and areas where intervention is needed. By consolidating this information, organizations can make more informed decisions about promotions, training investments, and succession planning.

The biggest differences between these platforms come down to focus and scale. Cornerstone leans heavily into learning and development, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing training and certification programs. Lattice and 15Five are more focused on engagement and performance, offering tools that are easier to implement and often better suited for mid-sized companies or teams looking for quick adoption.

SAP, on the other hand, operates at an enterprise level, offering deep integrations and advanced analytics that support complex organizational structures. While it may require a larger investment and longer implementation timeline, it provides a level of insight and scalability that smaller platforms may not match.

The growing importance of talent management platforms reflects a broader shift in workforce strategy. Recruiting will always be important, but it is no longer enough to sustain long-term growth. Companies are realizing that developing and retaining existing employees is more cost-effective and strategically valuable than constantly replacing them.

This shift is also being driven by data. Organizations now have access to detailed insights into employee performance, engagement, and development, allowing them to identify risks before they lead to turnover. Talent management platforms are turning this data into actionable strategies, helping businesses build stronger, more resilient teams.

Talent management is no longer a secondary function within HR. It is becoming a core driver of business success, influencing everything from employee satisfaction to overall productivity. Platforms like Cornerstone, Lattice, 15Five, and SAP are helping organizations move beyond traditional HR practices and build systems that support continuous growth and engagement.

As the workforce continues to evolve, the companies that invest in their people will be the ones that stand out. Talent management platforms are not just tools for HR teams, they are strategic assets that shape the future of work.
 
more

'We're almost done, but are you planning to get married?' Candidate walks out of job interview after HR asks about 'family planning situation'


'We're almost done, but are you planning to get married?' Candidate walks out of job interview after HR asks about 'family planning situation' The conversation begins like a typical hiring conversation. The HR representative appears satisfied with the candidate's performance and says, "Everything looks great. Your technical assessment was strong, the team loved you, and I think we're almost done... here."

An online job interview has sparked a debate about workplace boundaries after a candidate declined a job offer over personal questions about marriage and family. The conversation, posted by a career advisor, shows the chat turning from positive to uncomfortable, and ends with the candidate calmly walking away.

The conversation begins like a typical hiring conversation. The HR representative appears satisfied with the candidate's performance and says, "Everything looks great. Your technical assessment was strong, the team loved you, and I think we're almost done here."

The candidate responds positively, saying they enjoyed the process and seemed ready for the next step.

But just before closing, the HR introduces what they call a "final question", "Just one last question before we wrap up... Are you married?"

When the candidate questions the relevance, the HR continues probing: "And if not, are you planning to get married soon?" The explanation offered is that it is "for planning purposes," suggesting that life events like marriage or children "can affect work."

The candidate then directly asks whether the question is about plans to have children. The HR responds by saying they need to understand the "family planning situation for team planning purposes" and describes it as a "standard question for all our hires."

They further justify it by referring to "long-term stability" and "important clients and projects that demand long-term stability."

The tone shifts as the candidate pushes back. They respond, "I'm not comfortable answering this question as it's not legally appropriate for hiring decisions."

The candidate adds that hiring should be based on professional ability, not personal life choices. The moment becomes decisive when they say the question has changed how they see the company's culture and decline to continue with the process.

HR : Everything looks great. Your technical assessment was strong, the team loved you, and I think we're almost done here.

Candidate: Glad to hear that. I've enjoyed the process.

HR : Just one last question before we wrap up.

Candidate: Sure.

HR : Are you married?

Candidate: Sorry?

HR : And if not, are you planning to get married soon?

Candidate: I'm not sure I understand why that's relevant to the role.

HR : We just like to understand these things for planning purposes.

Candidate: Planning for what exactly?

HR : Well, marriage, children, family changes... those things can affect work.

Candidate: So this is really about whether I'm planning to have children?

HR : We just want to know your family planning situation for team planning purposes.

Candidate: I'm not comfortable answering this question as it's not legally appropriate for hiring decisions

HR : This is a standard question for all our hires

Candidate: This still doesn't change the fact that it crosses a line.

HR : We're just trying to understand long-term stability.

Candidate: My ability to do the job should be measured by my skills and experience, not my marriage plans or whether I want children.

HR: We've important clients and projects that demand long-term stability

Candidate: Honestly, that question changes how I view this company completely.

HR : Let me know if we moving forward .

Candidate: No, Thank you. I have concerns about a company culture where such questions were considered acceptable.

The post presents the exchange as a scenario, but its impact lies in how familiar the situation feels to many job seekers. Questions around marriage and family, though often unofficial, continue to surface in hiring conversations. It puts a spotlight on where professional evaluation ends and personal intrusion begins.

The conversation has drawn strong reactions online, with many users siding with the candidate's response.

One commenter wrote, "There are questions that are not necessary, and this is one. If I were him, that's the way I'd answer."

Another said, "Any company asking about marriage and kids in 2024 is basically admitting they have zero respect for boundaries or basic labor laws."

A third added, "Well in this kind of situation every candidate should leave quietly... and in actual they are already married mostly ."

Another bluntly remarked, "HR is always selfish."

As the clip continues to circulate, it has sparked a broader discussion about what employers can and cannot ask during interviews. Many users pointed out that such questions, even if framed as planning needs, risk crossing into personal territory that should remain off-limits.

At the same time, others highlighted the candidate's calm and composed response as an example of how to handle uncomfortable situations without confrontation.

The reactions suggest it reflects a real and ongoing issue in hiring practices. For many professionals, the chat has become less about one interview and more about a larger question, how much of one's personal life should matter at the workplace door.

For now, the clip continues to travel across timelines and places, serving as a reminder that sometimes, saying no can be as important as landing the job.
 
more
1   
  • Sometimes it depends to the organisations interests, so high level of maturity and thinking is needed to answer such a question.

  • i find no problem in positively respond to the question if i were the candidate,because so contracts come with benefits ,for instance medical... insurance,housing,transport etc .So the company would be in a better position to catch biodata of the employee right from the start. I submit. more

Making a university people strategy real


The success of any plan to improve the working culture of a university depends far less on how it is written and far more on how it is interpreted and applied by teams and departments. Change is felt in how a manager runs a team meeting, how a colleague experiences workload, how opportunities are shared and how inclusive a space feels day-to-day.

Change is felt "locally". Although the... institutional view - documents, themes, commitments - is important, because it signals intent and sets direction, it is not where change is felt.

When we launched our People Plan 2025/26-2027/28 with the aim of improving staff experience, supporting career development and creating the conditions for everyone to do their best work, we were clear that it would and could not just be owned by one team. Instead, it would be something leaders actively work with to shape decisions, prompt conversations and help all our teams focus on what matters most for colleagues in their daily lives.

The shift from strategy to lived experience is where the real work begins.

It can be tempting to move quickly to drafting documents or defining actions - but the most effective local plans begin with conversation.

Leaders need space to ask, and genuinely explore, a number of questions:

One of the most common pitfalls is trying to do too much. Faced with a new institutional strategy, teams often feel pressure to respond with a long list of new initiatives. The result is predictable - unwieldy plans, unclear ownership and lost momentum.

A more effective approach is to be deliberate about focus. At our university, our guidance to local teams is a simple balance - continue what is working, refine where needed and introduce a small number of new actions. In practice, this often means that the majority of effort stays with existing activity, with targeted improvements and only a handful of genuinely new initiatives.

This approach is not about lowering ambition. It is about increasing the likelihood of meaningful delivery.

The next step is to translate broad themes into something tangible. Institutional plans often speak in terms of inclusion, development, community or systems. These are the right priorities but they can feel abstract unless they are made specific.

At a local level, this means asking: what would this look like here? If the priority is to create a more inclusive and supportive environment, the answer might not be a change project. It might be as simple as changing how we run meetings, give feedback and model behaviours in our departments or faculties. If the focus is career development, it might be about making existing opportunities more visible, such as mentoring schemes, leadership programmes or secondments. It might be about actively encouraging "stretch" experiences that help colleagues build confidence and visibility, such as leading a cross-department project, chairing a working group or representing their team in senior discussions.

What matters is that staff can see and feel the difference. If all our colleagues do not recognise our People Plan in their everyday experience, it is unlikely to succeed.

Of course we, as leaders, should not do this work in isolation. We built the plan on insights gathered from meetings, conversations and our annual staff survey, and that's helped hugely; involving people early has improved the quality of our plan as well as credibility. We're noticing that people engage with change they have helped shape.

Equally important is keeping the plan alive. This is not a document to be written and set aside. In some areas it can be helpful to identify a dedicated lead or champion to maintain momentum and ensure actions continue to move forward. Leaders should revisit progress regularly, whether through leadership discussions, team meetings or internal communications. For example, we created a central hub for content and a series of case studies.

Over time, this consistency builds trust. Staff begin to see that commitments are followed through, that feedback leads to change and that the plan is not simply a statement of intent.

When this happens, the impact is tangible. People understand priorities more clearly. Experiences become more consistent across teams. And, importantly, individuals feel more supported in their work and development.

None of this is driven by the document itself. It comes from the accumulation of small, deliberate actions taken locally.

Perhaps that is the most important point. A plan to improve the working culture of a university does not need to be complex to be effective. In fact, the opposite is often true. The most successful approaches are those that are focused, realistic and rooted in everyday practice.

For leaders, the challenge is not to interpret every element of a strategy, but to identify where they can make the biggest difference and to act on it.

Because ultimately, a plan only matters if people can feel it.

Donna Dalrymple is chief people officer at UCL.
 
more
1   
  • What is your method? Sometimes it's in the approach. Also remember that you are included in the sale. How you approach the meeting, present yourself... and the product and show the benefit to them will help you close deals. You gained the meeting because they identified a need and wanted to learn more about it. Your job is to listen and learn more about the pain points and present your products in a manner in which you address those pain points without causing more pain. Add value in your presentations, don't just sell. Sometimes when you've gone without the yes for so long it shows to the customer. Claim it at the door and it will be yours when you leave. Hope this helps more

  • Read books, put in more effort,for your life insurance job talk to more persons, never give, evaluate honestly how you're doing the jobs, are you... doing it the right way  more

The long way around


Each spring, the College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) at Oakland University recognizes a graduating student for the Meritorious Achievement Award.

According to the university, the award honors "extraordinary academic achievement beyond that required for good grades ... the following criteria will be used to evaluate the nominations: originality, extent of effort, scholarly significance, artistic... merit/significance."

I'm still a little surprised I received it

I didn't have a flawless résumé or a carefully mapped out plan. I switched majors, took on jobs that pulled me in completely different directions and said yes to opportunities that didn't make sense on paper but sounded cool at the time.

I don't think I received this award for doing everything right. If anything, I think I earned it by having a really good time along the way.

In my freshman year, I started as an international relations student in the political science department. I even worked in the city hall for two years, which means I have great stories - and not much fazes me anymore.

I saw how policy actually happens: looming deadlines, overlapping calendars, different personalities and an overwhelming number of Excel spreadsheets. Through that experience, I learned that policy isn't an abstract idea in a textbook - it directly affects people's daily lives.

But by the end of my sophomore year, I pivoted.

I added public relations and strategic communications as a second major after realizing I didn't want to stay inside these systems - I wanted to explain them. Around the same time, I also joined The Oakland Post and started writing for the politics section. Journalism made me more accountable, more precise and more aware that if I got something wrong, people would notice. It taught me how to ask better questions and how to listen closely.

And then, as any confused college student would do, I dropped everything and went to Prague.

I spent the summer learning Czech, a language I had never spoken before arriving. There was no master plan here. It sounded fun at the time, and that was apparently enough justification for me. Some days, I felt impressive ordering coffee or food in full sentences. Most days, I stood in grocery stores translating labels word by word. Somewhere between catching sunsets on the Charles Bridge and missing metro stops, it turned out to be one of the most formative experiences I didn't know I needed.

My third major, French language and literature, was not part of any grand strategy. In all honesty, I chose it because I thought it was sexy. I still do.

It's the major I default to when a guy at the bar asks what I study because it sounds elusive. I also tutored French at the Academic Success Center on campus, where helping freshmen with pronunciation quickly became the most wholesome part of my week.

At the same time, it was easily my most challenging major. I got my butt kicked in a 4000-level 19th-century French literature class. If you think "Les Misérables" is hard to get through in English, try reading it in French, slowly, with a dictionary open, fighting back tears of frustration as you reread the same paragraph five times. I still get tripped up on verb conjugations, but somewhere along the way, French stopped being an aesthetic choice and became the hardest thing I've done - and also the major I'm the most proud of.

Before my senior year, I went to Paris to study architecture, which made absolutely no sense on paper because I had never studied architecture before.

Within a few weeks, I had ink stains on my hands, a sketchbook in my bag and a routine of sprinting from the metro because I was always late to class. I spent my days gawking at cathedrals, people watching from metal café chairs and trying to understand how history and culture could be built into a physical space.

One of my favorite jobs was working for the Southeast Michigan World Affairs Council, doing communications work and event planning. Occasionally, this also meant I got to sit in on lunches with guest speakers - including ambassadors.

I remember sitting with the former ambassador to Venezuela, trying to act normal, while poking at my plate of chicken piccata. I could not believe this was my Tuesday afternoon.

In January, I started a job at Local 4, the news station in downtown Detroit.

Working at WDIV taught me the chaos of a newsroom in real time. I spent hours listening to police scanners. At any moment, something could happen, and when it did, the newsroom shifted.

It taught me how fast news actually breaks, and how fast you have to move when it does. There were a few hallway sprints. There was a lot of controlled panic. But more importantly, there was this strange feeling about hearing about a breaking story from a police scanner before the public would know it minutes later.

During my first week at WDIV, I got a call from the Japanese Embassy offering me a spot on a two-week diplomatic trip.

So, on my first day at work, I had to awkwardly tell my boss - who had just hired me - that I would actually be leaving for two weeks and needed to adjust my contract. It was not ideal timing, but it was also an opportunity I couldn't say no to.

Japan was incredible. It's hard to summarize the experience without sounding overly dramatic and soppy, but it changed how I see a lot of the world. I sang karaoke, ate the best food and visited shrines.

I also cried on my flight back home, which I guess says enough about my experience there.

I did a lot of odd jobs in college. I worked in retail to pay for Paris - folding jeans and tagging clothes. I worked in newsrooms, nonprofits, medical institutions and everything in between. I researched for the U.S. Department of State for a semester, which still feels like it shouldn't be on my résumé. I was even Miss New Hampshire for a brief week in Washington, D.C., where I shook hands with senators and a Supreme Court Justice. It wasn't all glamorous, but it was meaningful.

If there's anything that made me a strong candidate for this award, I don't think it was having the clearest, most impressive path. I wasn't efficient or linear. Three majors, four countries and multiple jobs later, I changed my mind often, said yes more than I said no and trusted things would eventually fall in place.

My favorite moments were not spent in the classroom (although I did learn a lot there, too). They were spent seeing the Charles Bridge at sunset, eating a late-night crêpe on a Paris sidewalk with friends, running through newsroom hallways on deadline and getting lost in Tokyo while jet-lagged.

This award feels less like a big finish line and more like a nod to the long way around. OU wasn't a straight path, but it was a meaningful one - and more importantly, a fun one.

I'm deeply thankful for my professors and faculty advisors who took my work seriously even while I was still figuring things out. They scribbled thoughtful notes in the margins of my essays, stayed after class to talk through ideas and supported me throughout it all. Their mentorship and faith in my skills changed everything for me.

So here's my unofficial advice, which I'm fairly confident OU would not endorse: Do the fun thing. Take the class that sounds cool, study the language you think is sexy and say yes more often than you think you should.
 
more

She Went On A Few Dates With A Guy Who No Longer Wanted To See Her After She Said She Wasn't Sure About Kids


Falling in love can absolutely feel more like a job interview than a love story. We're often reminded to prioritize a meaningful life partner over a fling and to never settle.

It is all sound advice, in theory. But is there such a thing as deciding too soon that someone isn't your forever person, and is it possible to get too stuck on a checklist before you've even given someone a real... chance?

This 27-year-old woman went out on a couple of dates with a 38-year-old guy. Everything was wonderful, and he said he liked her before she talked about her feelings.

He pursued her and confessed to having a huge crush on her. She truly believed that they had a genuine connection, even though they were still becoming acquainted.

"Out of nowhere, he ended things. His reason was that he's 'dating intentionally' and wants someone whose future aligns with his, specifically around kids," she explained.

"I told him I'm not against having kids. I'm just not 100% certain yet. I said I'm still figuring it out, which I feel is normal. He basically said he's trying to trust his gut and doesn't want to invest in something that might not align long-term."

"I get the idea of dating intentionally, but at the same time...it feels really premature to make that call after only a few dates. Like, we barely know each other. It honestly came across to me like an excuse or an easy way out."

She's left feeling completely upset and puzzled, and she thinks there's more to the story than what this man told her.

Well, I don't see anything wrong with what he did, although I can understand why she's feeling disappointed. The thing is, they have an 11-year age gap, which means something when it comes down to starting a family.

Sign up for Chip Chick's newsletter and get stories like this delivered to your inbox.

She still has plenty of time to decide if she wants to be a mom, but I'll bet anything this man doesn't feel the same way, and his biological clock is ticking.

Dating isn't just about the chemistry or the sparks; it's also about making sure you align on your life plans, and they simply aren't if he's all in on kids and she's not positive about them.

There's nothing problematic about this man realizing that he doesn't want to spend any more of his time waiting for her to see if they ultimately will want the same things.

At the end of the day, kids are clearly a dealbreaker for him, and she can't fault him for that. He is out there dating with intention; he made that crystal-clear, and she's not the best fit for him since she has not yet made up her mind about kids.
 
more

How to Use Gemini for Job Search


Gemini for job search is becoming a practical option for candidates who want help with writing, interview preparation, networking, and other parts of the hiring process. What makes Gemini for job search useful is not just speed, but the ability to turn rough ideas into clearer and more structured communication.

Still, good results do not happen automatically. Most users know what they want help... with, but they are not always sure how to phrase their request in a way that leads to something genuinely useful. That is why Gemini for job search works best when prompts are clear, specific, and structured.

This is where the LoopCV AI Assistant adds value. Instead of starting from a blank page, users can rely on templates, guided inputs, and a smoother workflow. This makes Gemini for job search easier to use in a real, everyday process.

Download our Chrome Extension to get access to the LoopCV AI Assistant → Apply Tool

There is a reason more candidates are turning to AI tools. For many users, Gemini for job search is not just about saving time. It is about getting help with clarity, tone, and direction when those are hardest to define alone.

The challenge is that broad prompts lead to broad answers. Gemini for job search becomes much more effective when the input includes the right context. A structured prompt helps guide the output toward something more relevant and usable.

The LoopCV AI Assistant is designed to support Gemini for job search by giving users a stronger starting point and reducing the guesswork involved in writing prompts.

The assistant is simple to use, which is one of the reasons Gemini for job search becomes easier to manage.

Start by opening the LoopCV AI Assistant while using Gemini. This allows you to create and use prompts without switching between tabs.

For many users, this makes Gemini for job search feel more integrated into their workflow rather than a separate task.

Select a template that matches your goal. Templates are available for cover letters, outreach messages, interview preparation, and more.

This is especially useful for Gemini for job application tasks, since many candidates repeat the same types of writing. It also improves Gemini for job interview preparation by guiding more realistic and role-specific prompts.

Fill in the key fields such as job title, company name, and experience level.

This step is essential for Gemini for job search, because more context leads to more tailored outputs. It is equally important for Gemini for job application prompts and Gemini for job interview preparation, where specificity directly improves quality.

Once your prompt is ready, use it directly in Gemini. This removes unnecessary steps and makes the process more efficient.

For users relying on Gemini for job hunting regularly, this streamlined workflow helps maintain consistency and saves time.

Users can also create their own templates for repeated use.

This is particularly useful for Gemini for job seekers who need structured prompts for follow-ups, networking messages, or role-specific applications. Over time, this makes Gemini for job search more efficient and easier to repeat.

The assistant allows you to choose the output language, which is useful for international applications.

This makes Gemini for job search more flexible for candidates applying across different regions and markets.

Gemini for job search can support multiple stages of the hiring process.

It is commonly used for Gemini for job application tasks such as writing cover letters and refining summaries. It also supports Gemini for job hunting by helping with outreach, follow-ups, and communication. Additionally, Gemini for job interview preparation becomes more effective when prompts are structured and tailored to the role.

For many candidates, Gemini for job seekers becomes a practical tool when it is used consistently and with the right structure.

The biggest challenge for most users is not the tool itself, but knowing how to use it effectively.

Without guidance, Gemini for job search can feel inconsistent. Structured prompts improve Gemini for job application results, make Gemini for job interview preparation more focused, and help maintain a more reliable Gemini for job hunting workflow.

This is why adding structure is essential. It turns Gemini for job search from a helpful tool into a repeatable process.

Gemini for job search can save time, improve communication, and help candidates feel more prepared throughout the hiring process. The key difference comes from how it is used.

With the right structure, Gemini for job search becomes more consistent, more relevant, and easier to integrate into a daily workflow. Over time, this leads to better results and a more efficient job search process.
 
more

Woman Waited Two Weeks To Thank The Coworker Who Got Her A Job Interview, So He Guilt Tripped Her Over It And Started Ignoring Her Attempts To Make It Right


Saying thank you is important, and waiting two weeks to do it after someone personally called in favors to get you hired is cutting it pretty close.

When a woman finally texted her ex coworker to thank him for landing her a job interview, he made it clear he'd been stewing over the silence since day one.

The worst part is -- he kind of had a point.

Keep reading for the full story.

I (22F) went... to see my ex coworker David (28M) at the coffee shop we used to work at together, and he called some people to get me a job interview.

We were talking about how I'm looking for a job in another cafe and didn't know where to start.

David turned out to be the perfect person to turn to.

So he helped.

He scheduled me a job interview. I thanked him then for even calling those people for me, even if nothing came of it.

She planned to show him her gratitude, but life got in the way.

I ended up getting the job and wanted to go to the cafe David works at to thank him in person and buy him a drink.

However my schedule was a bit crazy for the first 2 weeks and I couldn't make it, so I ended up texting him near the end of week 2 to thank him.

David definitely took notice.

He sent a voice message replying "I know, I've known since the day you started. I remember thinking wow you couldn't even say thank you after I got you the job, but yeah. I've known the whole time."

It rubbed her the wrong way, but still she tried to save face.

It was kind of dramatic, but I understood so I texted back and explained I wanted to come in person to say thank you and discuss earlier but just couldn't make it.

I said thank you again and asked when he was working so I can come and buy him the drink anyway, and if not this week then the following one.

But to that he just replied "Yeah yeah come next week. Just make sure it's all good for you." Which also came off kinda ironic on his part, but I just said I will try to make it this week.

But when she tried to stop by and see him, things didn't go as planned.

Since he never told me when he actually works I came by that week anyway but he wasn't there, so I told his coworkers to tell him I was looking for him.

A few days later (today) I texted again asking when he is working, but he is ignoring me for about 6 hours now.

So my question is, AITA for not texting immediately the day I started or is he blowing this out of proportion?

Definitely seems like David's response is on the dramatic side.

What did Reddit have to say?

This commenter thinks there's more than enough blame to go around.

Saying "thank you" really is an important skill.

This commenter doesn't find this the appropriate way to show gratitude.

Referrals are kind of a big deal.

A quick text on day one would have solved all of this.

Consider this a lesson learned the awkward way.

If you enjoyed this story, check out this post about a daughter who invited herself to her parents' 40th anniversary vacation for all the wrong reasons.
 
more

Recency Is King: Why the First 50 Job Applicants Play a Different Game


Two people can have the same résumé, same skills, and same experience -- but if one applies when the job is posted and the other applies after 900 people, they are not playing the same game.

The job search has a timing problem.

People talk about qualifications, keywords, networking, résumés, referrals, and interviews.

A job posted ten minutes ago is not the same opportunity as a job posted ten... days ago.

The title may be the same. The company may be the same. The application form may be the same. But the human context around that job is completely different.

The hiring manager may still be paying attention.

And once the flood opens, individual attention becomes expensive.

On the surface, job applications look like a fair queue.

But anyone who has actually been inside a messy human system knows that is not how attention works.

Even when companies use applicant tracking systems, AI filters, automated rankings, templates, and screening tools, the overall process still runs through human bottlenecks.

The EEOC has held hearings on the increasing use of AI and automated systems in employment decisions, including recruitment and hiring. That means the system is already technical, already automated, and already complex.

Source: EEOC hearing on AI and automated systems in employment decisions

But automation does not remove human attention limits.

They help define what the recruiter thinks the job market looks like.

That is the part people miss.

When a role opens, the company may have an idea of what it wants. But that idea is often still flexible. The recruiter is calibrating. The hiring manager is clarifying. The team is figuring out what kind of candidates are actually available.

The first batch shapes the conversation.

If the first ten applicants are weak, the eleventh solid applicant may look amazing.

If the first fifty applicants all have one kind of background, a different profile may stand out.

If the recruiter sees your application while the role is still new, you are entering before the job becomes another overloaded queue.

The same résumé can feel different depending on when it appears.

Fresh fruit at the market gets handled differently than fruit buried at the bottom of the pile.

It is an acknowledgment that recruiters are human.

If a role gets hundreds or thousands of applicants, nobody is giving every résumé the same emotional energy, curiosity, and patience.

At some point, the system starts looking for reasons to say no faster.

At some point, attention collapses.

The first batch gets a different kind of recruiter than the thousandth applicant.

And if you ignore that, you are playing the game with one eye closed.

This is one of the reasons I started building around job automation.

By the time you finish carefully applying to five jobs, someone else using automation may have found fifty fresh postings, tailored their context, and entered the pipeline earlier.

In a gold rush, early movers do not need perfect tools.

They need enough tools to start digging before the crowd shows up.

Some people hear "AI job automation" and think the goal is to blast low-quality applications everywhere.

A lot of people have done more than they can remember on demand. They have touched tools, projects, systems, workflows, and responsibilities that never made it onto a one-page résumé.

So when a fresh job appears, the right system should help answer:

If you are a job seeker, there are parts of the process that should absolutely be automated.

There is no moral victory in manually typing your name into the 300th form.

That is refusing to waste human brainpower on clerical repetition.

There are parts of the process that should stay human-controlled.

Do not blindly let AI agree to legal terms under your name.

Do not let AI invent experience.

Do not let AI answer something deeply personal without review.

Do not let AI commit you to something you do not understand.

Do not let AI turn your job search into a spam cannon.

Automation should carry the bags.

It should not sign your name to a contract you did not read.

The future is not "remove the human."

The future is "put the human where judgment matters."

The hiring side is already changing.

AI is entering recruiting. Automated systems are shaping employment decisions. Workers themselves are starting to use AI more in their jobs. Pew Research Center reported in 2025 that 21% of U.S. workers say at least some of their work is done with AI, up from 16% roughly one year earlier.

The people who learn how to use these tools now will not just save time.

The people who wait will still be trying to make the old process feel fair while the system quietly routes around them.

If you are looking for work right now, stop treating the job search like a once-a-week emotional ritual.

Not spending three hours crafting one perfect application that gets buried under 800 others.

Applying early will not make an unqualified person qualified.

It gives your application a better shot at being seen while the role is fresh.

It helps you enter before the flood.

It lets you compete when the recruiter is still forming the mental picture of the candidate pool.

If the hiring side is automated, the applicant side cannot stay manual forever.

I'm building tools around this exact problem through Exempliphai and writing more about AI, job search, automation, and the future of work. You can follow more of my work at asaday.co, dev.to/keith_azodeh, and medium.com/@keithazodeh.
 
more

Prince George's County launches mobile 'library' for career help - Hyattsville


Prince George's County residents now have a free resource to aid them in a job search -- the Library2Go: Career Connector.

The initiative from the Prince George's County Memorial Library System (PGCMLS) comes in the form of a 38-foot coach bus staffed with a coordinator, library associates and a technology assistant who are available to help residents. The bus has laptops; a printer and scanner;... free Wi-Fi; a collection of books about résumé writing, finding jobs and earning certifications; and other job-related information.

"This is definitely one of a kind in terms of the combination of the focus on workforce development and job seeker resources," said Amanda Ashley, Library2Go's coordinator.

The mobile library is available to all county residents for free. Residents do not need a library card to use the mobile library's services, but they will need one to borrow books or materials. Conveniently, residents may also register for a library card at the mobile library.

The mobile library's mission is geared especially towards underserved residents, Ashley said. Its targeted destinations include municipalities with smaller library branches, those that do not have a library branch nearby, places with high unemployment rates and places with lower-than-average household income, including Hyattsville.

Ashley explained that the mobile library will be used in a variety of ways: Some events, like an April 8 career connector outreach at the Hyattsville Branch Library, are designed to provide tailored, one-on-one assistance. Other events are workshop-style, focused on a specific skill like résumé building, career readiness, using LinkedIn, writing cover letters or honing interview skills.

Some Hyattsville residents are already using the mobile library's services. Dowahking Bestman was at the April 8 event, where he said the staff was pleasant and patient, and "went slow with me so that I could keep up." Bestman also recommended the mobile library for people who have trouble using computers.

The Library2Go has not held its official launch celebration yet; Ashley said the county may hold such an event this summer. Regardless, the mobile library is already on the move, including 14 events in April, two in the first week of May -- and more to come.

LIbrary2Go's funding is courtesy of a $2.2 million grant for workforce development from the U.S. Department of Labor. "It was sought specifically to address issues of equity and accessibility across the county, especially in people's ability to access library programs and services related to job readiness and career development," said PGCMLS Communications Specialist Alexis Gunderson. The grant runs through 2027.

The mobile library schedule and event locations can be found at pgcmls.info/library2go.

-- -- -- -- -- -
 
more

Laurie J. James Named One of IAOTP's Top 50 Fearless Leaders for 2026


Award-winning career coach and branding expert recognized for global leadership in career development.

LAFAYETTE, LA, UNITED STATES, April 28, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ -- Laurie J. James, an internationally recognized career coach, résumé writer, LinkedIn profile expert, and image consultant, has been named one of the Top 50 Fearless Leaders for 2026 by the International Association of Top... Professionals (IAOTP).

This prestigious distinction is awarded annually to only 50 professionals worldwide who demonstrate exceptional leadership, innovation, and lasting industry impact. Honorees are selected based on professional achievement, dedication, and influence. Recipients will be featured in Top 50 Fearless Leaders, Volume 5, to be released in Summer 2026, and honored at IAOTP's Annual Awards Gala in December 2026 at the Plaza Hotel in New York City.

With 40 years of experience in career development and professional branding, James is widely regarded as a leader and subject matter expert. She has worked with over 14,000 clients, guided individuals through career transitions, résumé development, LinkedIn optimization, and personal branding to achieve meaningful professional advancement.

In 2000, James co-founded the Professional Résumé Writing and Research Association (PRWRA), serving as its first president. Under her leadership, the organization expanded to 19 countries, establishing a global network of career professionals. She also launched key industry initiatives, including the TORI (Toast of the Résumé Industry) Awards and International Update Your Résumé Month, both of which continue to shape the profession.

Following the events of September 11, 2001, James spearheaded VolunteersForCareer.org, a global initiative that mobilized career professionals across 19 countries to provide complimentary services to affected individuals and families, demonstrating the power of service and collaboration during a time of crisis.

PRWRA later evolved into Career Directors International (CDI), where James holds the distinguished Master Career Director (MCD) designation, an honor awarded to a select group of professionals worldwide.

Her additional credentials include Job and Career Transition Coach (JCTC), Certified Résumé Writer (CRW), Certified Career Enlightenment LinkedIn Writer (CCELW), Certified DISC Practitioner (CDP), and Certified DISC™styles Communications Consultant (CDCC). She is also an 11-time national award-winning image coach and career strategist.

James specializes in résumé writing, LinkedIn profile development, career and interview coaching, and DISC™-based communication strategies. Her work supports clients at all career stages, from entry-level professionals to senior executives.

Her contributions have earned widespread recognition, including the CDI Lifetime Achievement Award (2022). She has been featured in Marquis Who's Who Women of Influence and was previously named IAOTP's Top Master Career Director of the Year and Empowered Woman of the Year. In 2026, she is under consideration for additional honors in Top Industry Professionals Magazine.

In 2024, James published her first book, About Faces, a nonfiction tribute to her late father that reflects her commitment to storytelling, legacy, and personal connection.

Beyond her professional work, James is known for her a cappella performances of the national anthem, reflecting her passion for expression and community engagement.

James credits her success to perseverance, a strong work ethic, and the guidance of mentors. She remains committed to helping individuals build confidence, strengthen their professional presence, and achieve long-term career success.

For more information, visit www.lauriejjames.com

About IAOTP

The International Association of Top Professionals (IAOTP) is an international boutique networking organization that selects the world's most distinguished and accomplished professionals across a wide range of industries. These elite professionals are provided opportunities to collaborate, share insights, serve as keynote speakers, and inspire others within their fields. Membership is not open to the general public. Candidates must be personally invited by the President or nominated by an esteemed honorary member following a brief interview.

IAOTP's experts have recognized and credentialed thousands of top-tier professionals worldwide, helping them strengthen their personal brands and expand their influence. The organization prides itself on being a one-of-a-kind boutique network that handpicks only the most exceptional individuals and brings them together on a premier platform designed to foster meaningful connections and professional growth. IAOTP remains one of the most elite and highly respected professional recognition organizations in the world.

For more information on IAOTP, please visit: www.iaotp.com

EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability

for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this

article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
 
more

Is career agency the next frontier in employee development?


This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

Traditional career development simply isn't keeping up with today's ever-evolving workforce needs, Julie Giulioni, who leads DesignArounds, a workplace training provider, told attendees April 21 during a SHRM Talent session.

At risk are higher levels of employee disengagement and turnover -- or not even getting workers in the... door in the first place, she said.

"The old rules simply don't apply as they did before," Giulioni said, emphasizing that HR professionals need to move on from encouraging workers to own their career development.

"To expect people to be able to own in this whole world of unknowns sets them up for something less than success," she said. "My proposal is that the new frontier is to move beyond this notion of ownership to the notion of agency, which may be more aligned with current conditions."

Career agency, she said, means urging workers to embrace uncertainty, to experiment and to make data-informed choices as they navigate a market characterized by increasing skills volatility, technological advances and changing job roles.

"With as fast as things are accelerating, imagine what's [in] the future that's not even on our radar screens yet," Giulioni said.

Career agency, however, is not "a solo job," she said, and requires help from organizations and leaders.

To create a culture that supports career agency, organizations need to focus on awareness, access and action, Giulioni explained.

Awareness means giving workers more information and insight about what is going on in the organization and what the strategy, priorities and emerging skill needs are, she said.

"Leaders need to be really candid with feedback about performance and skill gaps, and individuals need to be a lot more reflective in understanding their strengths, their opportunities," Giulioni said. "We need to dramatically elevate awareness if employees are going to be able to exercise agency."

As for access, employers need to not only make career development opportunities available but also remove roadblocks, she said.

Workers need "transparent systems for being able to access opportunities. They need to have less gatekeeping and more support for experimentation," Giulioni said.

To spur action, meanwhile, involves ensuring that employees understand that development now is about experimentation and iteration, she said.

"They've got to be able to experiment, learn, iterate and experiment again, and that's going to be the cadence of learning going forward," Giulioni said. "Leaders need to be prepared with a cadence of check-ins and support to be able to encourage and allow for that kind of adaptation and adjustment."
 
more

Why is Louisiana a poor state to work? WalletHub ranks it 2nd worst in US