1   
  • The pedals…what good is the bike without a source of energy for mobility.

  • my answer is Chain I will work together with other people as a chain to develop the institution

6   
  • Let’s put aside the emotional aspect of this. Being sure that you can do this job is not “I am the perfect candidate for this job”. Since you already... manage people at the Jr level, especially in your capacity, I have not heard any mention of what you used as a sales pitch. You know what you do to your customer list when pushing a new plan. If you are laughed at, then there is definately something wrong. Are you a top earner? Has your team broken goals or records? Are you the team member who asks questions or has the answers? Did you question the laughter? I have worked in a pit environment where ties & suit jackets fly when two brokers are fighting over a high commission close. There is no job that requires age. The fact that others may be in a position you desire who are a few years your senior would not hold water in my book. What have you accomplished in the pit, that justifies you climbing out. What’s your sell. What’s your close. Facts not feelings is what raises eyebrows.  more

  • Congratulations on becoming a junior manager at a young age. It was probably not a routine progression. Chances are that they had an open position and... from your non managerial performance, they saw a spark and decided to take a chance on you. You have been doing that job for 4 years and are disappointed that you were not considered for the new position.
    It all depends on how you are doing in the current position, whether there were many fumbles after you were promoted. Also how your employees, coworkers and superiors rate you and how much bigger and critical the new position is.
    It is unfortunate that you were given a quick answer in a joking way. Such matters are serious and I would have made an appointment with HR to discuss it. In any case, I would try to establish a reputation for getting the job done well. You can also approach HR for their advice on what areas you need to focus on, to be ready for next opportunity.
    Good Luck.
     more

I'm 47 and quit my job without having anything else lined up. I didn't want to live a life with regrets.


Even though people close to me advised me against quitting, I am excited to pursue meaningful work.

For years, I had wanted to resign from my job as a business school professor at a small private university. Yet I didn't have the courage. My salary was decent, my hours were flexible, and I had friendly coworkers.

From the outside, it made no sense for me to leave my job. I was unhappy, but most... people seem dissatisfied with their work.

With recent news stories about quiet quitting, job-hugging, and significant organizational layoffs, coupled with increased daily living expenses, I knew I should be grateful for employment. As someone who teaches Organizational Learning, Performance, and Change, I knew it was not advisable to leave a job without filling a gap in my résumé by securing another position.

Yet I was unhappy and unfulfilled in my role. When a large round of layoffs occurred over a year ago, many of my peers and friends left the organization, leaving me with an unreasonable workload for one person. In addition, my family had unexpected health issues, and I needed to be more at home.

I got burned out. My work was out of alignment, and my personal values did not align with those of the organization.

I dreamed of flying to another universe on the magical, luck-bringing dragon-like creature from the 1980s movie The NeverEnding Story, or purchasing a ticket to Europe or a beach destination and going on an extended vacation.

Life is short, and many of us are living on autopilot. We dream of retirement, but for most of us, that is many years away. I did not want to look back on my life and have regrets.

So, I quit. When I sent off my resignation letter, I felt a weight lift from my shoulders, and it felt so good.

My husband and I figured out our new budget and made some lifestyle adjustments to allow me to re-energize, spend quality time with my family, and figure out my next professional steps.

I have seen many stories of people who quit their jobs and travel the world. While this sounds dreamy, being a mom of three active kids, having a husband with a non-remote job, and older parents I want to support, the Eat, Pray, Love lifestyle was not in the cards for me.

Since I quit, I have been leaning into work and experiences I enjoy. I am writing my next book, have been teaching as an adjunct, earned a new executive coaching certification, and have done some corporate speaking and consulting. I am relaunching my business and am having fun.

My kids and I have also been doing some budget-friendly traveling. I have a 4th grader, and we have been using the Every Kid Outdoors program, sponsored by the National Parks, which gives 4th graders and their families free entry to national parks.

We visited family in California, drove to Yellowstone National Park, and did some amazing hikes. We also took a road trip to Yellowstone National Park, where we saw Old Faithful and learned about the geothermal activity.

I helped my son publish his first children's book, "Tommy the Tap-Dancing T-Rex," which then inspired my older son to finish his book, too.

While I am not yet earning the same amount of money I earned in my salaried job, I am following the energy of what lights me up.

My new office is at the kitchen table. While my workspace may not be glamorous, I appreciate the flexibility to pick up my kids from school and have my dog by my side.

Change can be scary, but sometimes it's the push we need for growth.

I still struggle with career and identity, juggling both professional and personal identities and supporting my family doing work I enjoy, and being in the role of a parent, daughter, and spouse.

I hope quitting was the right move and am trusting that the right opportunities will reveal themselves as long as I keep showing up and putting in consistent action.

We get this one life, so it's up to us to make the most of it. I am redefining my definition of success to include a life well lived, both professionally and personally.
 
more
6   
  • Sometimes we need to cool off to reenergize and get some sense of what would be the most satisfying in ones life.

    Great courage that you took to... make this move. All the best. more

  • I am having the most unsatisfying job right now, I am unhappy and not liking it at all. But the fact is I have no any other job and quitting right now... is risk because I have two kids that need a life out of it. But I am burning from inside. I will continue looking for opportunities out there. more

2   
  • Lying in a job interview is never a good idea

  • Good you told the truth, lying and depending on what job sets you up for future failures. Employers keep track of that and you never know who knows... who. Apply for a job with your skill sets. If they require or don't require a cover letter, write one unless you have a CV. Otherwise good job, always tell the truth, you did not say what type of job so I would stick with honesty. They may have other opportunities in which you may qualify down the line. They may reach out or you can apply and they will remember that you told the truth.
    Have a Wonderful Weekend! Remember honesty goes a long way. I see the comments, the skills that they need may not be taught or you cannot learn. Not all positions have a learning curve 🤗
    And I can name quite a few😉
     more

Unsuccessful job interview


Your question can be read by others - so please don't post your contact details or any other information that could personally identify you. Please read our Terms and Conditions and Community Guidelines for more details.

I was unsuccessful after my 2nd interview 2 team leaders and the manager.

I have recorded this myself and the team leader Mark was pleased and stated I had "pushed other... competitors down' so I did my best.

Even though the interview lasts 1 hour, I finished in 15 minutes. I ensured I highlighted key points and used the STAR technique. I even asked on a follow up email after my interview with Mark if I would be marked down for this, he stated no as they state "1 hour for the interview" so they do not go over. I revised for this for at least 2 weeks and was super confident.

My experience, knowledge and qualifications go hand in hand with the job role as Cancer Information and Support Advisor. I am unsure as to why this was unsuccessful and find it unfair. To having got through the 2nd stage after they were pleased with the 1st stage interview seems off.

I have the necessary skills, and experience, just by cutting my interview short does not mean I should be unsuccessful as many candidates out there can get nervous but I ensured I followed all steps and covered everything to answer the questions, with notes they said we could bring. (Of course I did not continuously look over my notes, just briefly).

Yes, I have asked for feedback but I am sure they will mention the time it took to complete the interview and either my answers weren't structured when they were. What more would they like us to mention. 10 mins per question seems a lot, and i followed the "being concise and structured" during my answers.

It may not be suitable for them, but does not mean my answers are wrong.

I am disappointed and want another chance at this interview.
 
more

North Korea remote worker scheme: U.S. firms impacted


[authors: Carrie Aiken, Gretchen Lindlau, and Briana O'Rourke]*

CEP Magazine (December 2025)

For human resources and technology teams, the talent and recruitment landscape is already a challenging and competitive environment. Extensive steps are taken to ensure the right candidate is sourced to meet the needs of your team and the organization. For those actively recruiting for remote IT... opportunities, there is a new compliance wrinkle that has presented itself that requires a critical layer of awareness to avoid organizational risk and necessitates expansion of considerations for background checks during onboarding and within the context of your compliance program requirements.

Offshore applicants using stolen U.S. work credentials  --  including individuals from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea)  --  are infiltrating U.S. corporations for the purpose of raising funds for various military and weapons programs and data extortion. Both the Federal Bureau of Investigation and U.S. Department of Justice continue to issue alerts on the various schemes, which include identity theft and impersonation. There is also the potential for these individuals to engage in ransom of healthcare, confidential, or proprietary data, which results in access and reputational exploitation.

Not only is North Korea sanctioned by the U.S. for business activity  --  which can result in Office of Foreign Assets Control conflicts and prohibited financial exchange  --  but this also raises complications involving regulations or contractual obligations pertaining to offshore data access limitations, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, and other regulatory frameworks (both domestic and abroad).

Preventing these individuals from infiltrating your organization is key. There are steps that can be taken to identify these individuals and reduce organizational risks. Through partnership between security, IT provisioning, compliance, and human resources teams, there may be opportunities within your organization to evaluate this risk and take prevention steps.

Monitor the timeline of job postings and applications

These individuals, posing as qualified applicants, are often targeting aged job postings that offer the chance to work fully remote. For an application with extended posting visibility, resumes are often generated to align exactly with the requirements of the posted position. This is to give the appearance that the candidate has all the necessary experience to "save the day" and fill a long-vacant role. This gives the impostor an immediate advantage in the interview process. If your organization takes steps to refresh job postings, applicants will struggle to determine which positions have strong candidate pools versus those with stale ones, making it tougher to target hard-to-fill roles.

Résumé analysis

Résumés and experience from these candidates are presented in a way that appears "too good to be true," with qualifications that align exactly with the position description. These individuals often utilize various tools and technologies to align the content of their listed experience to mirror the exact expectations of an open role. Not only may the contents of these résumés be falsified, but these applicants have also been found to be utilizing recycled résumés that can be found online and are in use by several individuals, containing the same experience, skill set, and work history, but under a different candidate name. Comparison across résumés and/or online searches can be helpful in uncovering this falsification.

Although experience is a key area of focus for those reviewing résumés, further questions arise in other resume details. These individuals often include false contact information, such as Voice over Internet Protocol phone numbers, nonexistent addresses, or educational degrees from institutions that do not offer the listed degree on the résumé. Candidates may also submit multiple résumés, with varying experience and work history, under a different email address with the same candidate's name. By implementing controls or conducting a swift search in the organization's applicant tracking system for the candidate's name or variations, falsified applications may be more easily identified.

Visual confirmation

For additional verification, all candidates for these risk-prone positions are screened live via video. Evaluation is undertaken with scrutiny to asses background, disposition, and demographic alignment with the application. Although many of these applicants are prepared to be on camera, there are ways to remain vigilant during the screening itself. Often, there are details in the background of the video that may raise suspicions. Does the time of day correspond to the amount of sunshine coming through windows in the candidate's background? Are you able to hear others present with the candidate guiding the interviewee? Are you able to hear others in the background conducting interviews while you are interviewing the candidate (often in a call-center-like environment)?

Not only can the applicant's environment be a key source of warning signs, but visual facial expressions and body language can assist in determining if a candidate is being authentic during their interview. Candidates expect to be asked questions about their experience, education, and skill set during an interview. By finding a way to personalize questions, these individuals may struggle with a genuine reply. For example, if a candidate shares their attendance at a certain university or technical school, ask about their favorite restaurant near campus. If a candidate expresses that they live in a specific state, ask them how they enjoy the weather. These individuals are trained and prepared to answer questions specific to the applied role. Nontraditional questions may result in an unnatural delay or difficulty in forming a basic response because a response requires actual life experience in that environment.

Identity validation

Unfortunately, many of the identities that these applicants use are stolen and recycled. Traditionally, I-9 documentation is not collected until an offer has been extended and accepted. However, there are additional ways to remain vigilant prior to this compliance step.

Applicants using stolen identities may copy a qualified individual's history and experience directly from their LinkedIn page. These résumés may mirror the work history and education of the targeted profile. If a headshot or photo is present on LinkedIn, you can verify the candidate's identity during the video screening. If a photo is not present, further analysis of the profile can still be done. Evaluate factors such as the number of LinkedIn connections, posting activity, and follower interactions to assess the legitimacy of a candidate's profile and identity.

If a candidate moves forward with onboarding, additional steps may be taken during the collection of I-9 documentation, including state licenses, work authorizations, and passports. These should be scrutinized for aberrancies such as format and alignment with the résumé and application. All documentation should match the person who attended the interview.

Furthermore, as onboarding progresses, it is still critical to remain vigilant and monitor the mailing of candidate equipment. Individuals falsifying information may list an address on their résumé or state of residency that is confirmed during the interview process. However, when equipment is due to be shipped and delivered, the candidate may request that the delivery be redirected to a new domestic location without further context. This is an additional chance to confirm that the candidate resides in the state listed on their application and is actually the person who applied.

Final thoughts

If this risk is not already contemplated in your compliance program, there is ample opportunity to learn more from these law enforcement agencies and their advisories. Take the time to educate applicable staff on their roles, potential controls, and options for intervention. Use due diligence in working through your candidate pool for potential individuals who may fit this profile and determine your strategy to best protect your organization.
 
more

Harassment During Job Interviews Under Cyprus Law


By Giorgos Kazoleas, LL.M., Lawyer, Managing Partner at Legal Experts Cyprus

Harassment or bullying during a job interview can now legally be considered workplace harassment. This is explicitly provided for in recent Cypriot legislation regarding workplace harassment, which widens the scope of application to include candidates for employment.

Law 42(I)/2025 (The Prevention and Combating of... Violence and Harassment at Work Law), which came into force on April 11, 2025, explicitly extends protection against harassment and violence to the recruitment process and employment negotiations before a contract is signed.

According to the interpretation of terms in Article 2 of the Law, the definition of an "employee" includes, among others, a person:

"Whose employment relationship has not yet begun, in cases where the violation of the provisions of this Law has been committed during the recruitment process or at another stage of negotiation in which they participated as a candidate for employment prior to the conclusion of a contract or the commencement of employment."

Behaviors Constituting Harassment

Under Law 42(I)/2025, the range of behaviors that could be considered workplace harassment and bullying during a job interview is now much broader.

Any unwanted conduct intended to or resulting in violating the dignity of the candidate and creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, or aggressive environment may fall into this category.

Bullying or psychological violence can take the form of humiliating or derogatory comments, such as:

Discrimination manifests through questions regarding protected characteristics, which are not directly related to the requirements of the position. These include marital status or intention to have children, sexuality, religion, or national origin and disability or age.

This category also covers clear bias, negative attitudes, or offensive behavior due to the above characteristics, as well as the refusal of an interview or unfair exclusion from the recruitment process based on them.

4. Physical Violence or Threat of Physical Violence

Though rarer, this refers to any physical contact that is not welcome or legitimate, or threats of physical harm.

Important Legal Distinction: The "Single Act" Rule

It is crucial to emphasize that Law 42(I)/2025 recognizes that even a single act -- whether verbal, physical, psychological, sexual, or economic -- is sufficient to cause serious harm and be considered harassment. Repetitive behavior is not required to substantiate a claim of harassment.

Steps for Candidates

If a job applicant has been subjected to even one of the above behaviors at any time during the recruitment process, it is recommended to keep detailed records of the incident(s) and document specific details: Dates, times, exactly what was said or done, the identity of the person involved, and any witnesses.

This evidence can then be utilized by legal counsel or the competent authorities who may investigate the matter.
 
more

Job-hunting trends for 2026 that you can't afford to ignore


South Africans searching for work are entering a tougher recruitment landscape, shaped by cautious employers, slower hiring cycles, and rising competition across nearly every sector. According to business strategist Yassin Aberaa, CEO and Founder of Social Market Way, the job market is shifting in ways that demand a different approach from candidates.

Aberaa says the job market in 2026 will... reward adaptability, practical skills and a proactive mindset, and she believes job seekers who evolve with these changes will place themselves far ahead of those relying on outdated job-hunting tactics. Drawing from data and labour patterns observed across industries, she outlines the six key trends that will define the job search in 2026 and explains what each one means for anyone looking to secure meaningful work in the year ahead.

Companies across sectors are approaching recruitment with far more caution, often delaying hiring plans or reducing the number of new positions they open. With fewer vacancies available, competition for each role is set to tighten significantly. Aberaa explains that fewer new openings mean job seekers will have to make a stronger case for themselves and that meeting the basic requirements is no longer enough. She says candidates who demonstrate adaptability, problem-solving ability and clear value from the outset will stand out in an environment where employers can afford to be selective.

Economic uncertainty continues to drive organisations to choose short-term, contract and project-based roles over permanent appointments. This shift means job seekers must become more flexible in how they build their careers. Aberaa notes that the traditional permanent role is becoming less common and that those who are willing to embrace temporary or freelance work will find more opportunities than those who only apply for long-term posts. She adds that short-term work can be a stepping stone to more stable opportunities, as it allows candidates to gain experience, build a portfolio and make industry connections.

Certain industries continue to show stronger hiring activity than others, especially those tied to long-term growth such as healthcare, renewable energy, technology, digital services and specialised trades. Aberaa says these future-fit sectors will dominate hiring in the coming years and that job seekers may benefit from upskilling into these fields or strengthening transferable skills that apply across them. She explains that candidates who invest in digital competencies, sustainable-industry skills, or sector-specific certifications will remain far more competitive than those relying solely on experience or academic qualifications.

While youth unemployment remains a major concern, competition is also intensifying across mid-career and senior levels. More South Africans are applying for fewer roles, and this means candidates must find ways to set themselves apart beyond their CVs. Aberaa says differentiators such as internships, real project experience, volunteer work, soft skills and strong digital visibility can make the difference between securing an interview and being overlooked. She emphasises that employers want proof of capability, not only potential, and that job seekers should showcase tangible achievements wherever possible.

With more applicants per role, companies are extending and intensifying their hiring processes. Multi-stage interviews, assessments, skills tests and longer waiting periods between rounds are becoming increasingly common as employers take their time to find the exact fit. Aberaa advises job seekers to expect more rigorous screening and to prepare thoroughly for each stage. She says patience and persistence are essential in this environment and that candidates should maintain momentum by continuing to apply for other opportunities instead of waiting for a single outcome.

Across South African industries, there is a clear move away from strict degree requirements and a stronger focus on demonstrable skills, practical experience and portfolio-based evidence. This is especially true for roles in technology, digital marketing, renewable energy, and the broader green and AI-aligned sectors. Aberaa explains that what matters most now is concrete ability, supported by certifications, project work and practical results. She believes this shift levels the playing field for candidates who may not have formal academic credentials but possess strong technical or creative capabilities.

Aberaa says job seekers must adopt a more intentional and adaptable strategy in order to navigate these changes successfully. She encourages candidates to identify sectors that align with their skills or interests and to invest in targeted upskilling through short courses and certifications. She adds that building a strong online presence is essential and that platforms like LinkedIn or portfolio websites allow candidates to showcase their work in ways that employers can easily verify. Networking remains critical, both online and in person, as many roles are filled through relationships long before they appear on public job boards.

She also advises job seekers to remain flexible about the types of roles they consider. Temporary or freelance opportunities can provide valuable experience and often serve as pathways into permanent positions. Finally, she stresses the importance of preparation. Keeping a CV updated, practising interview techniques and applying consistently will help job seekers maintain momentum through longer hiring cycles.
 
more

Why Most Founder Bios Don't Build Trust (And the Fix Takes 10 Minutes)


Most founder bios don't build trust.

They read like LinkedIn résumés wearing a blazer.

But the people reading them?

They're not looking for polished accomplishments.

They're looking for you.. the reason you're building what you're building, the context that makes your work make sense.

And most bios hide that part completely.

This is the gap we're closing today.

What you'll walk away with

A... simple, 10-minute structure to rewrite your founder bio so it builds trust, not boredom.

Who this is for

Creators, solopreneurs, indie founders, service pros. Anyone whose "About" section currently feels like a beige wall.

The moment I realized founder bios were broken

A few years ago during the pandemic a founder DM'ed me. Her message frantically asked me to review her homepage.

Everything looked sharp. Clean layout, strong offer, clear CTA.

Then I clicked "About."

Three dense paragraphs.

A timeline of roles and responsibilities.

A few logos sprinkled in for good measure.

But nothing in it explained why she built the product. Nothing spoke to what she cared about, or the worldview that shaped her decisions.

I closed the tab, shook my head and thought:

I still have no idea who this person is.

And then it hit me. That's how most readers feel.

Because a founder bio isn't a résumé.

It's part of the trust-building process.

And most people skip that entirely.

Where most founders get stuck

Here's the pattern I see over and over:

They assume "credibility" means:

- listing achievements

- stacking credentials

- showing career progression

- proving they've "earned" the right to build

But your reader doesn't think like that.

They're searching for:

- context

- intention

- relatability

- the story behind the product

- a signal that you understand them

When a bio misses those pieces, it becomes a timeline instead of a trust layer.

And timelines don't convert.

They inform.

They don't connect.

The real problem, your bio has no "why"

Most founder bios answer the question:

"What have I done?"

But readers are silently asking:

"Why did you build this?

Do you understand my world?

Can I trust you to lead me somewhere better?"

When the bio doesn't address these questions, a sort of emotional static forms.

The reader doesn't know you.

Doesn't feel you.

Doesn't see the mission under the work.

And trust never forms.

The good news?

It takes less than 10 minutes to fix.

The 10-Minute Fix: Build a Trust Layer, Not a Timeline

A founder bio has one job:

Make people believe you're the right person to guide them through the problem they're living with.

Not because of your titles.

But because of your story. The small moment that made your work inevitable.

Think of your bio as a Trust Layer:

- Who you are

- Who you serve

- The problem you couldn't ignore

- Why you're credible (in context, not bragging)

- Where you're going, the mission

This shift alone turns a flat bio into a magnetic one.

A quick proof story

One of my clients had a typical founder bio:

Years of experience, impressive roles, all the right signals.

But no heartbeat.

We rewrote it using the Trust Layer:

- Opened with the moment she realized the industry was broken.

- Described the type of people she serves and why she cares.

- Added a short story about a customer interaction that changed her approach.

- Framed her expertise as lived experience, not a trophy case.

Within weeks she reached out excited:

- More profile views

- More replies to outreach

- More "I feel like you get me" messages

- And higher conversion from homepage traffic

Same founder.

Same skills.

Just a different narrative architecture.

The 10-Minute Founder Bio Upgrade Framework

Set a timer.

Grab your current bio.

Rewrite it using these five pieces:

1. Start with the spark

What moment, frustration, or realization pushed you into building this?

One or two sentences is enough.

(Example: "I kept meeting founders who were brilliant but invisible online. Not because their ideas were small, because their story wasn't clear.")

2. Define who you serve

This is where your reader feels seen.

(Example: "I work with early-stage founders who want consistent visibility without turning into full-time content creators.")

3. Explain the problem you couldn't ignore

Use everyday language.

Keep it human.

(Example: "I noticed most marketing advice demanded more time than founders actually had. So they gave up. Not because they lacked effort, but because the system wasn't designed for them.")

4. Show your credibility through context, not flexing

Instead of listing achievements, link them to the work you do now.

(Example: "After a decade in digital marketing strategy, I realized the real bottleneck wasn't tools. It was clarity.")

This lands better because it feels earned, not performed.

5. Close with the mission you're building toward

Readers trust founders who stand for something.

One clean line:

(Example: "My work is about giving founders a story strong enough to carry their business.")

Takeaway: Your bio shouldn't sound like you're trying to impress anyone

It should sound like you're talking to the person you built this for.

The moment your bio shifts from résumé to Trust Layer, everything else gets easier:

People understand you.

They remember you.

And they trust you faster.

If you want to start somewhere simple?

Start with the spark.

The rest unfolds naturally.
 
more
10   
  • 1) Try not to slurp
    2) Try not to spill the coffee down your shirt (especially if you are wearing white)

  • Yes, I know the coffee test. I think it’s a clever way to observe someone’s attitude toward small responsibilities. I believe small actions show a lot... about someone’s work ethic, so I’d naturally return the cup or ask where to place it.” more

    1

Interview Rubric: How To Build On + FREE Template


An interview rubric is one of the most effective tools HR can use to make consistent, fair, data-driven hiring decisions. A well-developed interview rubric, which helps standardize candidate evaluations, can reduce an organization's risk of costly hiring mistakes.

Regardless of the role you're hiring for, a structured system for rating candidates helps ensure your interview team is aligned,... objective, and efficient. This article explores what an interview rubric is, why you should use one, and how to build and apply it effectively.

Contents

What is an interview rubric?

Interview rubric examples

Why should you use an interview rubric?

6 elements to include in an interview rubric

Free interview rubric template

9 steps to build an interview rubric

Practical ways to apply a job interview rubric

An interview rubric is a structured scoring guide you can use to rate candidates on the same criteria during job interviews. It's not meant to replace human judgment but to standardize how hiring managers apply that judgment.

By providing predefined competencies, clear behavioral anchors, asnd a consistent rating scale, an interview rubric makes sure each candidate is evaluated on metrics that are both objective and relevant to the job.

Typically, an interview rubric includes:

This tool fits naturally into structured interviews and competency-based assessments, which helps "connect the dots" between hiring decisions and actual job performance expectations.

As different roles require different competencies, it's essential to tailor your rubric to suit each role for which you are interviewing. There are different types of scales you can use for your rubric, such as a graphic rating scale or behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS). Here are a few examples:

Other competencies: Conflict resolution, activity discipline, and coachability.

Other competencies: Code quality, system design basics, and collaboration.

Other competencies: Product knowledge, communication skills, and conflict resolution ability.

A structured interview scoring rubric improves both decision-making and business outcomes. Here are the main benefits of using an interview rubric:

Many elements can be included in a rubric, but the principle of "garbage in is garbage out" applies. With that said, an effective rubric should include the following relevant components:

Start by listing five to eight core competencies that truly define success in the role, such as problem-solving, stakeholder management, or technical expertise. Each competency should link directly to key outcomes for the job, so you avoid scoring candidates on vague traits or "nice-to-haves" that don't impact performance.

Include a definition of each competency to give hiring managers a clear picture of what answers and behaviors to look for when assessing each candidate for required competencies. For instance, you could define strategic thinking as the "ability to see the bigger picture, set priorities, and make decisions that support long-term goals".

Use a consistent rating scale (e.g., 0-5) and define what each score means. For instance, 0 can mean "shows no evidence of this skill," and 5 can mean "exceptional, expert use". Describe what performance at each level looks like in practice, so interviewers can score based on observable behaviors, not gut feel.

Assign more weight to the competencies that matter most for success in the role, such as problem-solving or safety in critical positions. Use a 1-5 scale and explain what each means (e.g., 1 is "nice to have) and 5 is "must-have"), so hiring managers understand why certain areas carry more influence on the final score and hiring decision.

Reserve space next to each competency for interviewers to record specific examples and quotes from the candidate. Encourage short, factual notes (e.g., "led a team of 6 through a system migration") rather than opinions ("seems confident"), so you build a record that supports decisions, enables fair comparisons, and strengthens compliance.

Include a section for overall candidate scores based on how they fared on individual skills and competencies, and define what each scoring range means. For instance, a candidate who scores 0 to 15 "shows no or very limited evidence of this skill, while one who scores 29 or more "shows exceptional, expert-level capability".

AIHR offers a free, customizable interview rubric template in Excel that you can adapt for any role. It provides structured scoring, informative definitions, and evidence documentation, simplifying panel interviews and candidate evaluations.

Here are nine steps to take to build your own interview rubric:

Start by identifying the top five to seven outcomes the candidate should achieve in their first year. This makes sure the rubric focuses on what really matters for the role.

Practical tip: Engage the hiring manager and team to brainstorm measurable outcomes.

Example: A Product Manager should deliver a first-quarter roadmap, improve product adoption by 10%, and lead cross-functional team meetings effectively.

Translate these outcomes into measurable competencies. These are the skill areas or behaviors your rubric will assess.

Practical tip: Ensure each outcome links directly to a competency to avoid evaluating irrelevant traits.

Example: The outcome "deliver a first-quarter roadmap" should link to the competency of project planning and execution.

Select a rating scale, usually 0-5, and define what each point represents. A key purpose of this scale is to maintain consistency across interviewers.

Practical tip: Include clear labels (e.g., 0 = "shows no evidence of this skill/competency" and 5 = "exceptional, expert use; can lead or coach others in this area."). Discuss this with the panel to align expectations prior to the interviews.

Example: A Customer Service Specialist who shows little to no ability to calm upset customers would get a score of 0, while one who expertly turns escalated cases into positive experiences would get a score of 5.

Not all competencies are equal. As such, it's important to assign greater weightage to must-have skills and smaller weightage to nice-to-haves.

Practical tip: Use percentages that sum to 100%, or a 0-5 scale. Consider using equal weights for small roles or weighted scales for strategic positions.

Example: Problem-solving = 3, technical knowledge = 3, communication = 2, teamwork = 2.

Develop at least two structured questions for every relevant competency. This helps maintain consistent data for easier, more accurate scoring.

Practical tip: Ask open-ended, behavioral, and situational questions. Avoid questions that favor one interviewer's perspective.

Example: A relevant question regarding the competency of collaboration might be: "Tell me about a time you resolved a conflict in a team project."

Test the rubric with two to three recent hires or a few mock candidate personas. Then, compare scores to see if your anchors and weights are realistic.

Practical tip: Discuss discrepancies openly to refine wording and reduce subjectivity. Track which anchors lead to consistent scoring.

Example: Have three interviewers independently score two recent successful hires and one unsuccessful hire using the new rubric. Then, compare their scores and discuss where they disagreed to refine the anchors and adjust weights that don't reflect real performance.

Once calibrated, save the rubric in a central location (e.g., ATS, HRIS, or HR folder) and allow the interview panel access to it.

Practical tip: Maintain strict and consistent version control, so everyone using the rubric can be certain they're using the latest updated version.

Example: Naming a rubric along the lines of "Product Manager Interview Rubric v1.0 - Nov 20 2025" makes it clear which version it is and when it was updated.

Conduct training sessions that review anchors, scoring, and effective note-taking techniques. Provide a sample scoring exercise.

Practical tip: Include examples of common pitfalls (e.g., rating based on gut feel). Reinforce the "note facts, not feelings" principle.

Example: Run a workshop where interviewers review the rubric together, score a recorded mock interview individually, then compare scores while highlighting where someone relied on "good vibes" or "liked them" instead of writing short, factual notes tied to specific behaviors.

Analyze scoring patterns against performance data to ensure predictive validity, and adjust anchors or weights as necessary to maintain their relevance and accuracy.

Practical tip: Review key trends, such as average candidate scores, pass-through rates, and hiring manager satisfaction. Then, refine the rubric for continuous improvement.

Example: Every quarter, compare interview rubric scores with three- and six-month performance ratings for recent hires. If high-scoring candidates underperform (or vice versa), adjust the anchors and weights so the rubric better reflects what success in the role actually looks like.

After building an interview rubric, you need to apply it effectively to make the most of it. Here's how you can do it:

An interview rubric is more than a scoring tool. It's a structured, strategic framework that brings consistency and fairness to your hiring process. By defining competencies, anchoring ratings, and documenting evidence, HR teams can make data-driven decisions that benefit both candidates and the business.

Implementing a well-designed rubric leads to better hires, reduced turnover, and stronger teams. By following the steps outlined here and leveraging AIHR's free interview rubric template, HR professionals can elevate the interview process and deliver measurable business impact.
 
more

The New American Reality: Working Past 80 Just to Survive | WATCH | EURweb | Black News, Culture, Entertainment & More


'Still Working at 80': Four Americans Explain Why Clocking In Isn't Optional

*In a country that loves to preach "work hard and retire happy," the reality for many older Americans looks a lot more like work hard, keep working, and pray the transmission doesn't go out.

For four Americans in their 80s, "retirement" isn't just delayed -- it's not even on the menu. Between rising costs, nonexistent... safety nets, and retirement accounts that evaporated faster than a politician's promise, these seniors are still punching the clock. And not because they "just love staying active."

From Uber shifts to substitute teaching gigs, their stories offer a brutally honest look at what aging in the U.S. really means when the math ain't mathin'.

The Early Days: First Jobs, Pivot Careers, and Lessons That Didn't Pay the Bills

Before they were octogenarians navigating a gig economy built for 22-year-olds with ring lights, these older workers lived entire chapters of American labor history.

Cocktail waitressing, computer programming, driving jobs, healing arts -- their résumés read like a timeline of industries that thrived, collapsed, and reinvented themselves. Some switched careers as often as others switched hairstyles; others stayed loyal to one job only to see industries shrink, move overseas, or fade out.

One theme runs through all their paths: having a degree -- even multiple degrees -- doesn't guarantee financial literacy. One woman with a college background said she knew how to analyze literature, not compound interest. And by the time she figured out what she should've done with her money, well, the rent was already due.

Peak Earning Years: When the Money Was Good... Until It Wasn't

For a few, the so-called "peak years" actually paid off -- salaries reaching $100,000 and up. But high earnings didn't automatically translate into cushy retirements. Raise a family alone? That income disappears fast. Work two or three jobs to keep food on the table? Savings fall to the bottom of the priority list.

One self-described night owl said she spent decades working night shifts -- perfect for her body clock, terrible for her long-term health. Another worked days, nights, and weekends because "children don't raise themselves and bills don't care."

Their biggest regret: mistaking steady income for long-term security.

Why They Couldn't Retire: Crashes, Layoffs, and the Sound of 401(k)s Crying

Retirement wasn't just postponed -- it was derailed. Several of these seniors were forced to tap into their 401(k)s after sudden layoffs or medical expenses. Others watched market downturns wipe out years of savings.

The stock market crash? They felt it.

Unexpected debt? It followed them.

Financial setbacks in their 60s and 70s? Absolutely devastating.

As one senior put it: "It's hard to rebuild a retirement at 72. Companies don't exactly line up to hire you."

The Rising Cost of Living: When Even the Basics Become Luxury Items

Ask anyone over 80 still working today, and you'll hear the same tired sigh: "Everything costs too much."

Groceries. Insurance. Car repairs. The basics have skyrocketed. Even those living frugally -- cooking at home, clipping coupons, doing the "stretch-the-leftovers" shuffle -- admit it's not enough.

One woman said that even after a raise, she still wasn't hitting a living wage: "I celebrated for 10 minutes, then paid my bills and cried."

Still Working: Uber, Subbing, Admin Work -- Whatever Pays

Most of these seniors are still grinding through part-time or full-time gigs to keep their independence.

* Uber driving: One 80-plus driver says the app doesn't know her age -- and that's the only reason she still gets rides.

* Substitute teaching: Another says the kids keep her sharp, and the check keeps her housed.

* Admin jobs: Perfect for those who still type faster than today's interns.

Their Social Security checks? A helpful supplement -- but nowhere near enough to live on.

Age Discrimination: When Experience Makes You "Invisible"

Finding work after 70 is hard. Finding work after 80? Borderline Olympic.

Most of them say employers treat older workers like museum exhibits: admired from afar, never hired. Age discrimination is real, rampant, and rarely subtle.

"I felt invisible," one woman said. "Like the moment they saw my birth year, the interview was over."

They've learned to highlight skills, not ages, and apply strategically -- because too many rejections sting even when you've lived long enough to expect them.

Purpose, Pride, and the Real Reason They Keep Going

Here's the twist: many of these seniors actually enjoy the work. Not the bills, not the scraping by, but the purpose.

Work keeps them social. It keeps them thinking. It keeps them -- in their words -- alive.

Some love the flexibility of choosing their own hours. Others feel younger when they're contributing. One woman said, "Retirement is overrated unless you can afford it. I can't, so I'm still useful."

Lessons Learned: Regrets, Wisdom, and What They Want Younger People to Know

Aging is tough, they say -- not because of wrinkles or slowing down, but because the financial hits feel heavier when you're older.

Their advice?

* Save early. Earlier than you think.

* Budget like your life depends on it -- because one day it might.

* Choose a job that brings you joy sooner, not later.

* Understand your money before it understands you.

Despite everything, these seniors have found joy in resilience. They may still be clocking in, but they're also still laughing, still learning, and still living -- on their terms, in a country that makes it far too hard.

Check out the Business Insider video below on life lessons from older Americans who still work to pay the bills.

(If You Like/Appreciate This EURweb Story, Please SHARE it!)

MORE NEWS ON EURWEB.COM: Morgan Freeman on Aging: 'Keep Moving' and No Retirement at 88
 
more

Lord Over LinkedIn - Christianity Today


God may clothe the birds and the lilies, but he doesn't seem that interested in our careers.

At least, that's how I've felt at times. Perhaps you've felt this way too. Maybe unemployment found you through no fault of your own, the outcome of a medical issue, family circumstances, a new administration, or a company layoff. (In October of this year, over 150,000 men and women lost their jobs from... layoffs alone.)

Even if you're still employed, you may be miserable in your current job, doing some "vocational scrambling" and looking for new work. In either case, the longer the search drags on, the more isolated and bitter you feel, and the harder it is to believe God is paying attention.

This nagging suspicion can get us stuck in one of two places. Either we lack urgency -- lackadaisically applying to new roles here and there, trying to be content in all things, praying that the Lord will provide "in his time" -- or else we find ourselves wracked with anxiety, spending hours submitting applications online.

Even the mature Christian (who might not fall into either of these traps) has to ask, "How do I navigate a job search effectively?" Professional career coaches and social media influencers can give tips on résumés, LinkedIn profiles, and interview strategies, but they don't often address our inner motivations or underlying unease.

Meanwhile, well-meaning faith-and-work literature can feel tone-deaf and out-of-touch for the desperate applicant. Yes, all work is sacred, and our vocations are a means of participating in God's redemptive purposes, as best articulated by Tim Keller in Every Good Endeavor. But it's hard to engage with that larger framework if you just need to pay the bills.

What I think Christian (and secular) job seekers need first and foremost is a practical recommendation -- an encouragement to the means by which over half of job seekers report finding work. I'm talking about networking.

Networking sounds like a buzzword, a recommendation those career coaches and social media types would make. It evokes a "You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" mentality. It conjures an image of another perfunctory meeting over coffee and an awkward request for any "available opportunities." It smacks of using subtle sales tactics to pressure a stranger to make a referral or a connection on your behalf.

Certainly, networking can be schmoozy and cynical. But we can approach it differently -- not as a practice of fake flattery and underhanded manipulation but simply as a habit of intentional conversation with friends, family, and strangers. Yes, you're still hoping for a job offer to arrive as soon as possible. But in the meantime, you receive opportunities to listen to others' stories and advice and, as a happy side effect, to form lasting relationships.

If networking is the process by which most jobs are found, I'd like to suggest that all applicants should start there rather than wiling time away or frantically submitting cover letters to online portals. And for the Christian, networking can look different: more relational than transactional, more intentional than haphazard.

If this is unfamiliar territory, here are a few guiding principles.

Be clear and forthright in your initial outreach. The more straightforward the ask, the easier it will be for the recipient to say yes. Avoid the ambiguous "Could I have 15 minutes to pick your brain?" Introduce yourself and describe precisely why you're interested in a conversation. If you received the same email, would you say yes? As a test run, send your message to a friend or two first and get their reactions.

Approach conversations as relational, not transactional, with humility rather than selfish ambition or vain conceit (Phil. 2:3). Fight the urge to focus on "What can I get out of this?" or "Do you have a job for me?" That's the kind of networking we're trying to avoid. Is there an element of self-interest in your initial outreach? Almost inevitably. Don't let that discourage you.

Come prepared with thoughtful questions. One proverb goes, "The heart of the discerning acquires knowledge, for the ears of the wise seek it out"(Prov. 18:15). You initiated the conversation, so you should be prepared to lead. What could you learn that might help you discern whether a role or company is a fit? Which aspect of this person's vocational trajectory might apply to your own?

Be a good listener; be genuinely curious (James 1:19). Don't get sidetracked by your preconceptions of what a conversation should look like. Pay attention to what's actually being said.

Recalibrate your definition of a successful conversation. What if this person can't help you find a job tomorrow? It's no problem. Remember, that's not the only reason you reached out in the first place.

Stay in touch. This is easy to say but hard to do. As a first step, send a thank-you email or handwritten note. Follow the LinkedIn pages of your contact and her company. She gets a promotion, publishes an article, or speaks at a conference -- send a congratulatory note! You stumble across an article or podcast that relates to her work -- forward it. Real relationship consists of periodic touchpoints like these.

Become a connector. Seek the good of your job-searching neighbor (1 Cor. 10:24). In a conversation with a recruiter, you may realize that a position isn't right for you but might be a good fit for a friend. Send an email to link the two of them. Schedule a Zoom call with someone who's earlier in a career. The more you do this, the more it becomes part of your professional DNA even after the job search is over.

Don't struggle alone (Gal. 6:2). Your search may last weeks, months, or longer. Each passing day may lead to increasing loneliness and resentment. Even those closest to you likely won't understand what you're going through unless you tell them explicitly. For men, sharing your insecurities with a spouse or friend can be particularly vulnerable. Know that it's okay to admit you're struggling.

Don't count out the local church. Here are two examples.

After I graduated from law school, I was deferring student loan payments, was engaged to be married, and was unemployed. I frantically applied to job after job with not much to show for it. To say I was discouraged would be an understatement. My pastor at the time heard about my struggle and asked a simple, life-altering question: "Have you met the church's attorney?"

With a brief email, he introduced the two of us. That attorney just happened to need some part-time help. After dozens and dozens of applications and six-plus months of searching, my pastor's three-sentence email was the final piece of the puzzle. Unknowingly, my pastor had been part of my networking journey.

In a different context, at my parents' church in rural Appalachian Ohio, men and women walk through the sanctuary doors looking for answers to life's hardest questions and for help finding a job -- many of them with criminal records or struggles with addiction. For as long as I can remember, my parents (and many of their church friends) have written letters to judges, given rides to and from work, and made connections with local business owners. Networking looks different in a rural setting -- in part because everyone knows everyone and cold emails typically aren't necessary. But an introduction by a church member with an exemplary reputation goes a long way for someone trying to get back on his feet.

If you're reading this article as someone who's comfortably retired or stably employed, what does this networking conversation have to do with you? You are in a fortunate position. Like my pastor many years ago, you might go out of your way to facilitate connections for people struggling with career transitions. You undoubtedly have more influence than you realize. An introduction from you could be the difference between an application floating into the digital abyss and getting pulled from the bottom of the pile. Let this be a gentle reminder that the only reason you're comfortably retired or stably employed is because of God's extravagant grace in your life. Now you have the opportunity to extend that grace to your neighbor.

Proverbs 21:31 proclaims, "The horse is made ready for the day of battle, but victory rests with the Lord." The verse holds tension. Despite our skilled preparation, the Lord is responsible for each win. At the same time, God is interested in our effort, and his interest allows for both our labor (don't just sit on your hands and pray for a new role to fall into your lap) and his sovereign provision (take the pressure off, reach out to strangers for coffee, and submit applications knowing that God loves you and will care for you).

Let's be job seekers who skillfully prepare with the boldness and assurance that comes from knowing that the Lord provides for the birds and the lilies. "So won't you teach me how I mean more to you than them?" goes the lyric to a Jon Guerra song. "In times of trouble, be my help again."

Jacob Zerkle is a husband, father of three, and attorney in the Chicago area.
 
more

The college degree was a signal. Now it's just noise


For many parents, these statistics land like a betrayal. They followed the script they were handed, and they urged their children to do the same: work hard, pad the résumé, secure admission, earn the degree. They were assured the payoff would be waiting on the other side. Instead, the very credential that students were promised would open doors for them is now failing even to keep those doors from... closing in their faces.

The promise of the bachelor's degree is faltering, and the public knows it. A new Overton Insights poll shows only 14% of voters believe a four-year degree is always worth its nearly $150,000 average price tag. Degrees once signaled potential. Now, to many employers, they signal little to nothing at all.

For generations, college served as society's default credential, a shorthand for competence, diligence, and upward mobility. But when everyone is told to get a degree, when the government underwrites trillions in loans to guarantee they can, and when universities respond by inflating tuition far faster than wages or value -- all while inflating grades and decreasing educational attainment -- the signal loses clarity. A credential propped up by limitless lending isn't a marker of merit; it's a product with a distorted price. More inputs do not create more value. They dilute it.

Employers have noticed. A survey of 1,000 hiring managers released this spring found that 25% of employers will eliminate bachelor's degree requirements for some roles this year. Seven in 10 now rank relevant experience above degrees in hiring decisions. And among the companies that have already dropped degree requirements, 84% say the change made hiring more effective.

Young adults see it too. A recent study from Tallo found 62% aren't working in the career they intended to pursue. One in four now openly regret going to college at all.

And even when the pipeline "works," it works poorly. One study showed that the majority of recent graduates are underemployed a year after finishing school, working jobs that don't require the degree they spent four years (and often tens of thousands of borrowed dollars) to obtain.

Perhaps parents still cling to the college degree as an ideal societal benchmark because it once served as a map. But the terrain has shifted beyond recognition. The knowledge economy now rewards capability, not ceremony. Practical skill, not parchment. A portfolio, not a transcript.

Increasingly, young adults who bypass the degree are finding more traction than those who collect one. Efforts such as the mikeroweWORKS Foundation promote the trades, a response to high demand. Ford's CEO, for example, indicated that his company has 5,000 open mechanic jobs with six-figure salaries that it is trying to fill. For those not interested in manual labor, programs such as Praxis offer knowledge workers a bootcamp experience to develop practical skills useful to employers while guaranteeing participants a job upon graduation.

Simply put, parents who still assume that "college equals security" are operating on a lagging indicator from another era. The labor market has moved on. The uncomfortable truth is this: Insisting that your children follow the old script does not protect them. It exposes them. It directs them into the very bottleneck where millions of other hopeful graduates now wait, degrees in hand, wondering why no one is acknowledging them.

The degree is no longer the differentiator. It is the default, and defaults do not confer advantage. Parents must stop treating higher education as a moral duty or a rite of passage. It is a purchase, and like any purchase, it deserves scrutiny. Its value must be proven, not presumed. If the numbers tell us anything, it's that the era of automatic returns is over.

TRUMP VS. THE DEMOCRATS ON THE AFFORDABILITY CRISIS

The world has changed. The question is whether parents will allow their children to change with it -- or whether they'll push them, lovingly and mistakenly, into a system that promises opportunity while delivering diminishing odds.

The degree once opened doors. Today, it risks locking the next generation out.

Connor Boyack is president of Libertas Network and author of 53 books, including Skip College: Launch Your Career Without Debt, Distractions, or a Degree.
 
more