• Is there anyway you could transfer to another department? Maybe that's an option.

  • vumilia tu.. mazuri yako mbele.. sorry though

Maintenance Engineer


The Maintenance Engineer vacancy is working with a market leading manufacturing firm based in the Knottingley area. You will be joining a well established engineering team working both reactively responding to break downs and on PPMs. The position offers excellent opportunities for both training and career development.

What's in it for your as a Maintenance Engineer:

Monday - Friday 40-48 hours... per week - based on a rotational 3 shift pattern of 8-hour days, afternoons and nights.

Salary - up to £55,000 per annum for 48 hours.

Overtime at x1.5

Service Bonus

KPI Bonus

Excellent pension company contribution, plus employee benefits package

Training and career development opportunities

30 days holiday (Increasing by 1 each year up to finishing at 36 days holiday) Inclusive of Bank Holidays

Main Duties & Responsibilities of Maintenance Engineer include:

Providing plant-wide maintenance service, departmental support and repairs ensuring that all production targets are maintained - maintaining factory manufacturing machinery

Monitor & supply Engineering support of machine set-up & changeovers to ensure that the product conforms to any quality assurance standards and ensuring changeovers are as efficient as possible.

Experience and Qualifications Required for Maintenance Engineer:

Recognised Engineering Apprenticeship & Qualification or equivalent, e.g. NVQ, City and Guilds, ONC, BTEC or above - Mechanical or Electrical

High degree of Health & Safety awareness

Ability to fault find, repair and provide solutions to problems

Maintenance Engineer experience or qualifications of a Maintenance Engineer.This position would suit a Multi Skilled Maintenance Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Mechanical Engineer
 
more

'You dodged a bullet': Job seeker praised online for walking out after 'one' interview question


A job interview took an unexpected turn after a candidate walked out upon being asked how she would handle unpaid overtime, sparking a viral debate on workplace boundaries. The Reddit post has drawn widespread support online, with many calling the question a major interview red flag and praising the job seeker for setting clear limits on work culture expectations.

A routine job interview took an... unexpected turn when a single question, which was also the first one from the hiring manager, exposed a workplace dealbreaker and invited praise from social media. The candidate, posting on Reddit, said the interview began normally, with firm handshakes, positive vibes, and a role they were genuinely excited about. Then came the first question: "How do you handle working unpaid overtime?"

At first, they laughed, assuming it was a joke. It wasn't. When they asked whether overtime was mandatory and paid, the interviewer replied, "We expect employees to stay as long as needed to get the job done. Everyone here is passionate about the work, and we don't track extra hours."

Also Read: Rejected for not matching belt and shoes: HR reveals 5 absurd reasons managers reject great candidates nowadays

The response didn't sit well. The candidate stood up, thanked the interviewer, and left. Later, doubt crept in. Should I have stayed and heard more? Or was walking out the right move? they asked the community.

Commenters overwhelmingly backed the decision. One user wrote, "You made the right move... some people are incredibly cheap. They view others as tools to be used and abused." Another added, "I'd say you dodged a bullet."

Others acknowledged nuance, suggesting the candidate could have probed further, but still emphasized intuition. "Your gut is wise," one commenter noted. "If something doesn't feel right your intuition is on to something."

The thread also surfaced cautionary tales about passion in private workplaces. One commenter shared a detailed account of being pulled into excessive unpaid work under the promise of "passion" and future rewards before quitting. "You will never see me do a single bit of work without being paid," they concluded. As this Reddit post shows, for some, trusting your instincts may be the most professional move of all.
 
more

Beyond Policies, Projections: How Leadership Is Redefining Nigeria's Revenue System - Adedeji


Institutional reform is often discussed in the language of policy, systems, and technology. But at the 2026 Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) Leadership Retreat, Executive Chairman Zacch Adedeji shifted the conversation decisively. His opening address was not about structures or strategy documents.

It was about leadership mindset, and why Nigeria's revenue transformation will succeed or fail based on... the beliefs leaders carry into this new era. Adedeji began with an unusual challenge to senior management: to suspend the comfort of familiarity.

Titles, tenure, and inherited ways of working, he argued, could no longer be relied upon as anchors in a rapidly changing institutional landscape.

The creation of the NRS, he stressed, represents a clean break from the past, a new era that demands new leadership postures. This transition, he warned, will not be secured by résumés, hierarchies, or institutional memory.

It will be secured by the capacity of leaders to adapt, to stretch, and to lead at a level of excellence that Nigeria's economic realities now require. What worked in the past, no matter how successful, will not be sufficient for the future being built.

Drawing insight from leadership research, including ideas popularised in Harvard Business Review, Adedeji pointed to a truth often ignored in public-sector reform: leaders rarely fail because they lack intelligence, experience, or strategy.

More often, they are constrained by invisible beliefs, deeply embedded assumptions about control, authority, perfection, and responsibility that quietly shape how institutions function.

In large public organisations like the NRS, these beliefs rarely appear as outright resistance to reform. Instead, they present subtly, often cloaked as good intentions.

They surface when leadership is equated with always having the answers, resulting in directive management rather than empowerment. They emerge when tight control is mistaken for accountability, creating decision bottlenecks and slowing institutional responsiveness.

They take root when excellence is narrowly defined as uniformity, leaving little room for alternative paths to strong outcomes.

Adedeji was particularly candid in acknowledging how such beliefs can undermine even well-designed reform agendas. Leaders, he noted, may unconsciously expect others to work at their speed, in their style, and according to their personal definitions of quality.

When outcomes differ from expectations, the instinctive response is often to tighten control rather than ask better questions. Over time, this approach erodes trust, stifles initiative, and limits organisational learning.

In a rare moment of public-sector leadership vulnerability, Adedeji reflected on his own evolution. He spoke about how a background shaped by high achievement and perfectionism influenced how he delegated, reviewed performance, and managed accountability. What initially appeared as a commitment to excellence, he explained, often masked a deeper fear of being held responsible for failure. That fear quietly drove rigidity, pressure, and unnecessary mistrust.

His turning point came with the realisation that efficiency does not require uniformity, that excellence does not require replication of one individual's style, and that leadership is fundamentally about enabling others to rise.

Trust, he argued, is not the absence of oversight; it is the deliberate choice to focus on outcomes rather than policing every step of the journey.

This message carries significance beyond the walls of the retreat venue. Nigeria's fiscal future depends not only on sound revenue policies but on leadership cultures capable of sustaining reform. Systems and technologies can be acquired, but culture is shaped daily by how leaders behave, delegate, and respond under pressure.

For the NRS, the stakes are especially high. The credibility of Nigeria's revenue architecture, and by extension, confidence in the Nigerian economy, rests on the institution's ability to function with integrity, agility, and public trust. These qualities cannot be legislated into existence. They must be led into being.

Adedeji's central argument was clear: before strategies are rolled out and structures redesigned, leaders must engage in deliberate self-examination. Without confronting internal barriers, leaders cannot credibly guide thousands of staff through institutional change. Reform, he insisted, is not first a technical exercise; it is a human one.

As Nigeria stands at the edge of one of its most significant institutional transformations, the lesson from the NRS Leadership Retreat is timely and instructive.

If leaders cling to rigid beliefs and legacy habits, they will unintentionally recreate the very constraints reform seeks to dismantle. But if they lead with humility, courage, and openness, they can build an institution worthy of national trust.

In centring leadership mindset as the foundation of reform, Zacch Adedeji offered more than an opening address. He issued a challenge to rethink leadership itself, and to recognise that the future of Nigeria's revenue system will be shaped not only by what leaders design, but by who they choose to become.

Arabinrin Aderonke Atoyebi is the Technical Assistant on Broadcast Media to the Executive Chairman of the Nigeria Revenue Service.
 
more
4   
  • Take a drink to loosen up and join the fun after all you are there to make sure that they have a great time.

  • Jimmie, first things first, if you are not enjoying it don't stay. If it's a part job, sometimes you have to deal with the crowd and if the money is... good that will make it tough to leave. Find a place you enjoy to save you. more

    1

Mastering Job Application Emails for Career Success


Communicating effectively can make all the difference in advancing your career, and crafting a professional email for job application is a skill worth mastering. An email for job application not only serves as a first impression but is also your opportunity to highlight your suitability for the role. In a competitive job market, understanding the intricacies of a well-crafted application email is... crucial. This article will guide you on how to compose an email that catches potential employers' attention and increases your chances of getting noticed.

Understanding the Email for Job Application

An email for job application serves to outline your interest in a position, introduce yourself to potential employers, and provide a concise summary of your qualifications. This is the initial step in your application process and oftentimes an employer's first interaction with you. The email should be professionally structured and free from typos or grammatical errors.

Subject Line: Capturing Attention

Your subject line is critical as it determines whether your email will be opened. Be clear and concise, mentioning your name and the job title. For instance, "Application for Marketing Specialist Position - John Doe." Keep it professional to ensure it doesn't get lost or ignored in an employer's inbox.

Email Body: Structuring Your Message

The body of your email should begin with a formal greeting. Address the recipient by name if possible to personalize the note. A good starting point can be: "Dear [Hiring Manager's Name]." In the opening paragraph, state your purpose: mention the job title you're applying for and how you learned about the position.

Next, provide a brief overview of your professional background, crucial skills, and relevant experience. Tailor this section to highlight how your qualifications align with the job requirements. It is important to engage the reader without overwhelming them with unnecessary details. Emphasize any achievements or unique skills that set you apart from other candidates.

In the closing paragraph, thank the employer for considering your application and express enthusiasm about the opportunity to discuss your application further. Conclude with a strong closing statement, such as "I look forward to the possibility of discussing this exciting opportunity with you. Thank you for your time and consideration." End with a professional sign-off, like "Sincerely," followed by your full name and contact information.

Attachments: Presenting Your Résumé and Cover Letter

Always attach your résumé and cover letter in PDF format unless specified otherwise. Ensure that your documents are named appropriately, for example, "John_Doe_Resume.pdf" or "John_Doe_Cover_Letter.pdf." This not only looks professional but also makes it easy for the employer to locate specific files.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Even with a strong email for job applications, certain oversights can negatively impact your chances. Here are a few mistakes to avoid:

Using Informal Language

An informal tone can make you appear unprofessional. Stick to formal language and avoid using slang or emojis. Your email should reflect the seriousness of the job application process.

Forgetting to Proofread

Errors in your application email can be a deal-breaker. Take the time to proofread for grammatical errors, typos, and proper formatting. Reading your email aloud can often help catch mistakes.

Failing to Customize the Email

A generic email that isn't customized to the specific job or company shows a lack of effort. Tailor your message to the role and demonstrate your knowledge about the company's mission or recent achievements. This shows that you've done your homework and are genuinely interested in the employer.

Not Following Up

Following up can be crucial in standing out from other candidates. If you haven't heard back after a week or two, a polite follow-up email can reaffirm your interest in the position and let the employer know you are proactive in your approach.

Enhancing Your Application with Additional Resources

For those who may have employment gaps or unique circumstances, composing an explanatory note alongside your application can be beneficial. Check out our other resources on writing an employment gap explanation letter for more guidance.

Furthermore, enhancing your job application email with added information about continuous learning can bolster your credentials. Learning about different career paths through resources like Wikipedia's comprehensive guide on education can provide valuable context to showcase your commitment to professional development.

Conclusion

Crafting a compelling email for job application can significantly impact your job search outcomes. By fine-tuning your subject lines, customizing your email body, and avoiding common mistakes, you leverage your chances of making a favorable first impression. By utilizing these strategies, you can create polished emails that make your applications stand out in the eyes of potential employers.

* Start with a clear, professional subject line.

* Personalize your greeting and tailor the content to each job.

* Highlight the key skills and experiences that align with the job requirements.

* Ensure that your attachments are properly named and formatted.

* Proofread your email to maintain a professional appearance.

What should I include in an email for job application?

Include a professional greeting, a reference to the job you are applying for, a brief summary of your qualifications, and a thank you note, accompanied by your attachments.

How important is the subject line in an application email?

The subject line is crucial as it encourages the recipient to open your email. A clear and professional subject line should include your name and the job title.

Can I use a template for my application email?

While templates can be helpful, it is important to customize each email according to the specific job and company you are applying to, to show genuine interest and effort.

Should I follow up after sending a job application email?

Yes, if you have not heard back within a couple of weeks, a polite follow-up email can reiterate your interest and remind the employer of your application.

Why is proofreading significant in my job application?

Proofreading is essential to maintain professionalism by avoiding grammar mistakes and typos, which could otherwise distract from your qualifications and suitability for the role.
 
more
2   
  • Not understanding why you just simply change your seat?? Tell the decision maker responsible for seating that your not able to see the screen/board.... C'mon, this isn't junior high. more

  • This is too bad, but u have to be careful abt her

2   
  • As a 30 year licensed MD Realtor, I can attest that nationally we have surprisingly high standards for integrity and ethics. The lawsuits are caused... by those that ignore them. So I can see this being a question to test integrity.  more

  • And some HRs sometimes they ask funny questions for u to fail,

Read This Before You Waste Another Month Chasing the Wrong Goals -- 3 Signs You Need a Hard Reset


Investment in the process and personal well-being is crucial for maintaining momentum and ensuring the sustainability of your professional aspirations.

It happens to all entrepreneurs at some point. You've put in the work, you've hit the right milestones and your résumé has professional success written all over it. Yet one question keeps popping up: Is this what I want?

At the height of my... success as a realtor in Washington, there was a moment when I was being offered incredibly high-valued listings. People were calling me and offering me opportunities that I had worked so hard to get, and in that moment where one might expect me to feel victorious or excited, I felt nothing. I received a call and was offered an amazing listing, in one of the best locations in Washington and my first thought was, no. Pointblank. I do not want to do this. And I ended up outsourcing that opportunity.

I had put in so much effort to build a portfolio of listings exactly like what I was being offered and I had never felt such a strong negative reaction. I was a listing agent, and this was how I made my living -- but at that moment, all I felt was burnout and stress. A moment that could've been seen as the completion of one of my all-time career goals wasn't.

If that tension feels familiar, it may be a sign that you need to reassess what it is you are pursuing.

Sign up for How Success Happens and learn from well-known business leaders and celebrities, uncovering the shifts, strategies and lessons that powered their rise. Get it in your inbox.

It's not an easy task, admitting when you need to drop a goal from your list. But if you keep putting effort into projects you're ready to move on from, or keep a goal somewhere on the back burner indefinitely, that energy either goes to waste or perpetuates a problem.

During a time when I was auditing my goals, I was working with a coach who called me out on a long-term goal by asking me a powerful question. Are you willing to do what it takes to achieve this goal? I had to decide if I wanted to pretend I didn't know the answer, or if I was ready to tell the truth. And my answer was no. I wasn't ready to put in the effort. I had to admit, that goal wasn't on my action list and I wouldn't be putting effort in there.

Sometimes, in order to get what we need to get done, we have to be honest about what we can't do. Audit your goals and be blunt.

On paper, the shiny "yes" looks like progress on the road to achieving your goals, and it often is the path to new opportunities. Yes to new titles, yes to reaching new milestones, yes to recognition from the right people.

For entrepreneurs in hustle mode, it feels counterproductive to say no. That "yes" makes so much more sense and, in theory, brings you further down the path you're on. When my son was young, I wanted to be involved in his school life. I loved being a classroom mom and being involved in his field trips and helping make those decisions. So, I said yes to becoming co-president of the PTA.

It looked great on paper and made sense in many different ways, but what actually started to happen was that I spent my evenings mediating politics and my days stressed about situations I didn't have control over. Eventually, it became something that stole energy from me.

"No" has the same power that "yes" does in keeping you on the path to success, and under-utilizing it as a tool often leads to loss of energy or frustration.

A sure sign that you may need to pause and reflect on your current goals is when every day starts to feel strained. From the outside, everything reads like momentum, but on the inside, the tells stack up. Calendar dread before the day begins, shallow wins, rework, missed workouts and a shorter fuse than you want to admit.

When you're trying to build professional status, your resources are limited. You might not have anyone to delegate to, and you might be pulled in 12 different directions in a time where it feels impossible to say no. This is a sign it's time to change that.

When I was trying to build my reputation as the go-to realtor in my area, my resources were limited and I was struggling to balance it all. I started saying "no" and in doing so realized my goals had changed.

Once you audit your goals, reinvest in what is working and where you are committed.

All of these signs might feel like an attack at first, but what's happening is that these signs point to you being ready for more. If you're being prompted to cut goals that aren't moving forward, it means you're preparing for other goals to move to the next level. You're ready to start saying "no" to what holds you back and "yes" to what matters. Your goals are evolving not because you've failed in some way, but because you are ready for more.
 
more

Your next favorite show to binge may be just 60 seconds long


The premise of "Bound by Honor" makes it sound like a typical soap opera.

On her 18th birthday, Aria's Chicago mobster father tells her that she's expected to marry Luca, the vicious heir to a rival New York City gang. She agrees only so she can spare her younger sister from the same fate. Crime, chaos and romance ensue.

But unlike made-for-television series, "Bound by Honor" isn't on air or on... streaming services. The actors aren't household names, nor do they have traditional Hollywood résumés. Each episode is one to three minutes long. And over 334 million people and counting have tuned in to the show -- from their phones.

The series is among the hundreds within a growing genre known as microdramas. The format, which originated in China and has spawned a multibillion-dollar industry overseas, is now booming in the U.S., as everyone from tech brands like TikTok to footwear companies like Crocs rushes to cash in on their popularity.

Microdramas are "sort of the 'Triple Crown' of the modern entertainment industry," said Tomm Polos, director of creator arts at the University of Southern California. "Because they're social-friendly, they're cost-effective and they're data-driven. That is what everyone wants."

The rush to get in on the microdrama boom comes when some traditional film and TV productions are scaling back, or leaving Los Angeles altogether, because of rising costs. Consumers also continue to shift their viewing habits, opting for phone-first experiences and bite-size content on social media platforms.

Some companies have tried -- and failed -- to find the same massive audiences with similar formulas. Notably, Jeffrey Katzenberg's short-form video streaming service, Quibi, launched and quickly shuttered in 2020 after it was unable to draw in a large subscriber base. Twitter shut down Vine, the hugely popular social video app, in 2017.

Now, platforms like ReelShort and DramaBox are testing out a similar strategy but leaning into low-budget, soapy series, instead. Some, like the U.K. microdrama app Tattle TV, have even repurposed Hollywood classics, like Alfred Hitchcock's 1927 feature "The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog," in microdrama format.

Thus far, their efforts appear to be working: Short dramas made $1.4 billion in revenue in the U.S. last year, according to data from Owl & Co., a consulting firm that focuses on media and technology.

Last month, the Los Angeles City Council voted to explore creating a $5 million subsidy for microdramas to help support their continued growth.

"The microdrama space is an incredible opportunity for ... not just those who are new and trying to get their foot in the door, but established people who know how to work with format and structure," Polos said. "There are a lot of empty sound stages in Hollywood. There are a lot of empty studio spaces in Hollywood. It should not surprise anyone if, in the coming quarters or years, those studio spaces get converted to be laboratories for microdramas, and that's going to really help the economy of Los Angeles."

For actors, the appeal of microdramas is the visibility they offer.

"At the beginning of last year, I finally took a chance, and I think I completed about seven or eight [microdramas] last year ... which is insane," said Savannah Coffee, one of the stars of "Bound by Honor."

She likened microdramas to soap operas but said there's one key difference: accessibility.

"Everyone can open an app and there it is," she said.

Coffee's co-star Rhett Wellington, who has worked in Hollywood for nearly 20 years, said he hasn't seen anything "with as much reach" as the microdramas he has been in. He attributed their success to the up-close and personal nature of the way audiences consume the content.

"They're seeing our faces constantly," he said. "Because of how many verticals we're able to do in a year, we start to build this very engaged, very intense fan base that wants to see more from us."

Some who work in film and production say the genre, which is staffed mostly with non-union workers, gives people in the industry more opportunities to do what they love.

"This is sort of a different beast, because you're just moving so fast," said Chris Baker, a North Carolina-based assistant director who has worked on several microdramas. "You're essentially shooting a movie in seven days, so you don't have time to do more than, like, two takes with your actors before you have to move on and set up the next shot."

The scripts often resemble feature-length projects in page count, but everything gets squeezed.

"We're going to film 12 pages a day, and a regular movie or TV show might do, like, four pages a day, but because the budget is smaller and tighter," Baker said. "And these projects are more nimble than movies, everything gets compressed, and so you just move much faster."

Whether the genre will continue to surge in popularity is unclear. Baker thinks it could go "in one or two ways."

"It's either this is a flash in the pan ... or this will be a new form of media that's here to stay," he said, adding that maybe "movies can be, like, the steak dinners, and these [microdramas] are, like, the snacks you have on the plane."
 
more

Bikes, beds and bookings: Classified Moto revs up new garage-venue-hotel hybrid - Richmond BizSense


Facebook 0 X (Twitter) LinkedIn

(Slideshow photos by Adam Ewing)

In a career path that's taken him from writing ads to building motorbikes, John Ryland can now add another title to his resumé: hotelier.

The owner of local custom bike shop Classified Moto has relocated the company's garage from its previously secret spot in Manchester to a renovated building a few blocks away that moonlights as... a boutique hotel and events space.

The move was prompted by the construction of The Navigator Apartments, a 5-story building at 103 E. Second St. that replaced the 1800s-era mule barn that Ryland had used as Classified Moto's underground HQ.

At the same time, after 15 years in business, the move prompted Ryland to make the shop less secret and bring Classified Moto out in the open, while also opening up new business opportunities with the bigger building at 1000 E. Fourth St.

Having previously hosted karaoke parties and other gatherings at the old garage, Ryland said he'd been considering adding a retail or social component to the new shop. With the 10,000-square-foot Fourth Street building providing more room to work with, Ryland had the idea of renting out the excess space for lodging and events.

John Ryland in the lobby of Classified Moto's new digs. (Jonathan Spiers photo)

"I'd always thought maybe I'd have a coffee shop or retail thing one day, but I don't drink coffee, so it didn't really enthuse me," Ryland said.

"We've got 130,000 followers on Instagram, so I'm like, a lot of people will come to see (the shop). But maybe 2% of the people that come actually know anything about the bikes," he said. "That's kind of good and bad. I wished I was getting more from the people who know us, but the people who don't really like it."

Originally an office for the neighboring industrial complex now used by Kinsley and Hanover Iron Works, the 57-year-old Fourth Street building was previously owned by Estes Express Lines, which bought it in 1996, renovated it and later rented it to a local drug enforcement task force, Ryland said.

Working with Fultz & Singh Architects and UrbanCore Construction, Ryland set out to renovate the building with a mid-century modern aesthetic and motorcycle accents and references throughout. Motorbike pictures and props fill the five guest rooms, one of which is named The Minibike Room. The hotel rooms also feature lamps that Ryland made from motorcycle parts.

He manages the property with his wife, Alex Scheer, whom he met during his time as a copywriter and art director at The Martin Agency. Ryland launched Classified Moto in 2009 and, after getting laid off from Martin the following year, made it his primary gig.

Ryland is leasing the building through a rent-to-own arrangement with Boris Besler, a Classified Moto customer in Germany whom Ryland befriended and became a financial backer when the shop was forced to move.

"I told him we're getting kicked out of our space so we're looking for a new space. He said, 'Why don't we just buy one?' 'Because I don't have money,'" Ryland recalled, laughing.

"We just liked each other and never had any idea that something like this would come from it. That's why I'm so interested in the community part of it now, because that's when cool stuff starts to happen."

A balcony was added to the building, which is across the railroad tracks from the Kinsley steel plant. (Adam Ewing photo)

Besler purchased the 2-story building in 2022 for $850,000, and Ryland is paying that down monthly over 10 years, after which he said he could either buy Besler out or they could sell the building and split the profit.

"I'm 56 now, so I feel like by the time I'm 66, I'll be ready to hopefully make some money," Ryland said. Noting spillover expected from the development boom in Manchester, he added, "Everything's moving this way, so it's kind of like a real estate deal."

The building's hotel rooms are rented through Airbnb, though Ryland noted that he and his wife have a hotel license and the rooms are classified as tourist dwelling units. Nightly rates range from $180 to $250.

The upstairs events space features a stage for karaoke and bands, a bar and commercial kitchen, and a 40-foot balcony with views of the city skyline. Ryland said the space is ideal for weddings - he and Scheer had their wedding there - as well as family reunions, retreats and other events.

Rates for the events space start at $225 per hour with a four-hour minimum. The building's lobby and other common areas are also available to rent.

Parking around the building is enclosed by a security fence that Ryland added after the building was tagged with graffiti. Guests access the site with codes that open the gate and the front door.

Ryland said the renovation took two and a half years to complete and cost over $3 million.

"Which is way more than what we thought it was going to be," he said. "The original estimate to do what we wanted to do was $750,000. Everybody was like, 'Yeah, I think we can do this,' and then everything just snowballed."

He said the project required installing a new fire hydrant on the property and extending water lines out to the street. Other higher dollar costs included the balcony, sprinkler systems, and an elevator-like vertical platform lift that was needed to bring the building to code.

Ryland and Scheer opened the hotel and events space quietly about a year ago and said bookings have been pretty steady since then.

"The weekends have been really good pretty much ever since we opened, but we've got more people staying on weekdays, which is what I was hoping for," Ryland said. "If I can get the weekdays full all the time, then I can hire a manager."

The new garage in the building where Ryland makes his creations. (Jonathan Spiers photo)

The building marks a new chapter for Classified Moto, which upped its profile a decade ago when one of its bikes was featured on "The Walking Dead" TV show. Its client roster has included actor Norman Reedus, actress Katee Sackhoff and others. Last year, its bikes were featured in a five-week exhibition at Richmond's Branch Museum of Design.

While his bike-building was largely put on hold during the renovation, Ryland said he was able to fit in a few builds, including one for a customer in Dubai.

"I had a couple builds that were in the middle of happening when we got kicked out of our spot, so I just had to try to put my customers' minds at ease, and they were luckily really patient," he said. "I haven't been taking on builds until recently. This has just been all-consuming for three years now."

With the building open, Ryland said he's been focusing on getting the word out and has received enthusiastic responses from folks once they see it.

"Everybody I've shown so far is like, 'I had no idea this was over there.' Which is embarrassing," he said, "because I was in advertising so long."

Print Article Facebook 0 X (Twitter) LinkedIn
 
more

Why "Critical Thinking" Became a Buzzword Instead of a Skill


"Strong critical thinker."

You've seen the phrase everywhere.

On résumés.

In job descriptions.

In school mission statements.

In policy documents.

In performance reviews.

It's one of those terms that signals seriousness. Maturity. Intelligence.

To say you value critical thinking is to place yourself on the "reasonable" side of things.

And yet.

The more often the phrase appears, the less... clear it becomes what anyone actually means by it.

That's not an accident.

And it's not because people stopped caring about thinking well.

Something more subtle happened.

We didn't lose the skill. We changed how we talked about it.

Most conversations about critical thinking start in the wrong place.

They assume the problem is educational.

Or generational.

Or personal.

That people aren't trained enough.

Or aren't trying hard enough.

Or are too distracted.

That framing feels intuitive. It's also misleading.

Critical thinking didn't disappear.

It didn't suddenly become rare.

It got outsourced to language.

When a skill becomes a slogan, institutions stop cultivating it and start assuming it.

That's the shift worth paying attention to.

Familiarity can hide decay

The phrase "critical thinking" feels stable because it's familiar.

It's been around for decades.

It sounds academic.

It feels neutral and virtuous.

But familiarity has a strange side effect: it lowers curiosity.

When something is mentioned often enough, we stop asking what it actually refers to. We nod. We move on. We assume alignment.

In workplaces, "critical thinking" often means:

- You can question things -- as long as the conclusion aligns with leadership.

- You can analyze data -- as long as it supports the existing direction.

- You can raise concerns -- as long as they don't slow momentum.

In education, it often becomes:

- A line in a syllabus.

- A checkbox in an outcomes list.

- A word that floats above assignments without shaping how they're evaluated.

The term survives.

The practice thins.

And because everyone agrees the skill is important, no one notices the gap forming.

A pattern that shows up in interviews

This gap becomes especially visible in hiring.

Over the years, working as a Solutions Architect in the IT industry, I've interviewed candidates for multiple companies. Different roles. Different seniority levels. Different tech stacks.

One pattern repeats almost every time.

"Critical thinking" appears on a large number of résumés.

Sometimes prominently.

Sometimes grouped with communication and problem-solving.

Sometimes framed as a defining strength.

After technical discussions, I would often ask a simple, open-ended question about it. Not to test or trap -- just to understand how the candidate thought about the skill they had claimed.

What came back was rarely clarity.

Not because the candidates lacked intelligence.

Not because they were unprepared.

And not because they didn't care about thinking well.

But because the term itself had become detached from practice.

It was a signal they had learned to use, not a process they had been asked to describe.

That moment isn't a failure of individuals.

It's a symptom of how the language now functions.

The quiet shift: from practice to trait

There was a time when critical thinking was treated as something you developed.

It showed up in:

- How arguments were challenged.

- How assumptions were surfaced.

- How tradeoffs were discussed.

- How uncertainty was handled.

It was visible in behavior.

Then something changed.

Critical thinking slowly became a trait instead of a practice.

You either "had it" or you didn't.

You claimed it, or you were assumed to lack it.

It moved from verbs to labels.

Once that happens, environments stop doing the hard work.

Why design systems that reward careful dissent if everyone is already a critical thinker?

Why slow decisions down if rigor is assumed by default?

Why create space for doubt if confidence is easier to measure?

Language became cheaper than structure.

And cheaper things tend to win.

What breaks when everyone claims the skill

When a skill is widely claimed but rarely reinforced, predictable things start to happen.

Decision-making becomes performative.

People learn how to sound analytical without actually challenging underlying assumptions.

Disagreement becomes shallow.

Surface-level objections replace deeper questioning, because deeper questioning carries social risk.

Overconfidence rises.

If you're surrounded by people who all identify as critical thinkers, it becomes harder to admit uncertainty without feeling incompetent.

Conformity gets disguised as independent thought.

Shared conclusions feel earned, even when the process that led to them was narrow.

None of this requires bad intentions.

It emerges naturally when environments reward speed, alignment, and confidence more than depth, friction, and reflection.

The tragedy is that the word "critical thinking" remains present the entire time -- giving everyone plausible deniability.

This isn't about intelligence or effort

At this point, it's tempting to turn the critique inward.

To say people are lazy.

Or incurious.

Or insufficiently trained.

That move feels satisfying. It's also incomplete.

Thinking quality is not just an individual property.

It's an environmental outcome.

People think better when:

- Disagreement isn't punished.

- Slowing down doesn't signal incompetence.

- Admitting uncertainty doesn't reduce status.

- Changing your mind doesn't look like weakness.

Remove those conditions, and even very capable people will default to safer, shallower forms of reasoning.

Not because they don't know how to think critically -- but because the environment quietly teaches them not to.

If this framing resonates with you, following the thread here may be worth your time.

Why the buzzword persists anyway

If the term causes so much confusion, why does it stick around?

Because it's useful.

It allows institutions to signal values without changing incentives.

It allows leaders to demand rigor without tolerating friction.

It allows individuals to claim intellectual seriousness without risking social cost.

Buzzwords thrive when they create agreement without accountability.

"Critical thinking" is especially good at this because everyone wants to be associated with it -- and no one wants to be the person accused of lacking it.

So the word stays.

The practice becomes optional.

A different way to see the problem

The issue isn't that we need better definitions of critical thinking.

Definitions don't change behavior.

Environments do.

The more useful question isn't "How do we teach people to think critically?"

It's "What kinds of systems make critical thinking unavoidable?"

Systems where:

- Questioning alters outcomes.

- Dissent has consequences -- but not penalties.

- Depth is visible and valued.

- Silence isn't mistaken for agreement.

When those conditions exist, the skill shows up naturally.

When they don't, no amount of language can compensate.

Ending with clarity, not advice

It's worth noticing how often we reach for "critical thinking" as a comforting phrase.

We use it to reassure ourselves that rigor exists.

That someone, somewhere, is thinking carefully.

That complexity is being handled.

But words can only carry so much weight.

When a skill becomes a slogan, it stops doing the work we assign to it.

And the longer we rely on the label, the harder it becomes to notice what's missing underneath.

Seeing that shift clearly doesn't fix the problem.

But it does change how you hear the phrase the next time it appears.

And sometimes, that quiet reframing is where real thinking begins.

If this helped you see a familiar phrase differently, you'll likely enjoy what comes next.
 
more

Men's Bubble Watch: Virginia Tech gets biggest victory yet with Clemson upset


Neil Paine writes about sports using data and analytics. Previously, he was Sports Editor at FiveThirtyEight.

The 2026 men's NCAA tournament is rapidly approaching, which means the question top of mind for many fans is: Will your team be in or out? They have roughly five weeks until Selection Sunday to strengthen their case. Until then, we're here to track how each team on the "bubble" of the... bracket is trending.

We'll use a variety of metrics as guides, classifying teams based on how likely they are to make the field of 68 as one of the 37 at-large selections -- conditional on not winning their respective conference tournaments for one of the 31 automatic qualifying bids (AQs). To that end, we'll use Joe Lunardi's Bracketology projections and a combination of data sources -- including my forecast-model consensus and NCAA résumé metrics such as NET rankings that the selection committee will evaluate -- to judge a team's underlying potential. (For a full glossary of terms and sources, click here or scroll to the bottom of this story.)

We'll sort teams in at-large contention into the following categories:

* Locks: Teams that would need a significant change in momentum to miss the cut (which some inevitably still will). 29 current teams

* Should be in: Teams tracking safely above the cutline, if not immune to trouble. Most likely, these teams should hear their names called March 15, though their fates are not yet assured. 12 current teams

* Work to do: Teams whose upcoming results will meaningfully change their fate (for good or bad). These are the truest "on the bubble" teams, because their chances are closest to a coin flip. 16 current teams

* Long shots: Teams that would need to outperform expectations or benefit from chaos. There is little -- though not zero -- chance these ones will make the Big Dance without winning their conference tournament.

Let's go conference by conference -- in order of which project to have the most NCAA tournament bids -- to rank the teams in each category based on their chances to secure an at-large bid.

Note: All times Eastern. Only expected at-large bids are listed; each conference will receive one additional berth with an AQ.

Jump to a conference:

Big Ten | SEC | ACC

Big 12 | Big East

Mid-majors

BIG TEN

9.8 expected bids; 8.8 at-large

Locks (5)

Michigan Wolverines

Illinois Fighting Illini

Purdue Boilermakers

Nebraska Cornhuskers

Michigan State Spartans

Should be in (4)

Iowa Hawkeyes

Updated: Feb. 11, 8:24 p.m.

With a chance to run its win streak to seven games, Iowa instead fell short against Maryland on Wednesday. The Hawkeyes still own a conditional at-large probability in the mid-90% range, and a résumé inside the top 30 nationally, so the road loss only stalls their momentum for now. Helping coach Ben McCollum's team is the fact that it's borderline top 25 in our average of predictive ratings, which in turn raises its potential going forward. Iowa's schedule does get more difficult, though, jumping from 64th so far to ninth from here on nationally (fourth hardest in the Big Ten), according to the BPI.

Next game: vs. Purdue (Saturday)

Wisconsin Badgers

Updated: Feb. 10, 10:24 p.m.

After trailing by double digits with seven minutes left in regulation, Wisconsin rallied to force overtime at Illinois on Tuesday, eventually scoring an impressive win behind 49 combined points from John Blackwell and Nick Boyd. The victory was the Badgers' second Quadrant 1A win of the season, which improves a résumé that otherwise sits around 40th in the national consensus ranking (ninth in a Big Ten currently tracking for 10 bids). Their schedule doesn't let up after the trip to Champaign, with three more Quadrant 1 contests still coming up. More wins over that stretch could further solidify their at-large case.

Next game: vs. Michigan State (Friday)

Indiana Hoosiers

Updated: Feb. 10, 7:20 a.m.

Darling of the forecast models -- which now average out to a conditional at-large probability in the mid-80% range despite the team's borderline top-40 résumé ranking -- Indiana bolstered its chances with a thrilling overtime win over Wisconsin on Saturday, then rolled all over Oregon on Monday. The latter was the Hoosiers' fifth victory in six games, a stretch that includes three wins over opponents in Quadrants 1 and 2. With only the eighth-hardest remaining schedule in the Big Ten and a top-30 ranking in the predictive metrics, the Hoosiers have a good path to the tourney in front of them.

Next game: at Illinois (Sunday)

UCLA Bruins

Updated: Feb. 8, 8:02 a.m.

The Bruins recently saw their 14-game home win streak snapped in double overtime against Indiana, but they've gotten right back to winning with consecutive victories over Rutgers and, on Saturday, Washington. In the big picture, their résumé ranks in the mid-40s nationally and 10th in the Big Ten, though that might be underselling their chances. The forecast model composite thinks they're more likely to get a bid than not (76%) on the basis of two Quadrant 1 wins -- a better predictive rating than their résumé gives them credit for -- and a future projection that calls for them to end up above 20 wins on the season. That said, many high-leverage games remain for UCLA, and it faces the Big Ten's third-toughest remaining schedule.

Next game: at Michigan (Saturday)

Work to do (3)

Ohio State Buckeyes

Updated: Feb. 12, 7:14 a.m.

Bouncing back from Sunday's lopsided home loss to Michigan, the Buckeyes won Wednesday's clash with USC to help raise their at-large chances above 60% again. They still sit right on the bubble, ranking mid-40s in the national résumé rankings, and 11th in what is looking like a 10-bid Big Ten. They are also 0-7 against Quadrant 1 opponents, making them less sure of a tournament-bound team than they seemed to be earlier in the season. But they're also better than their current résumé indicates, ranking borderline top 40 in the predictive ratings. The victory over USC is a step in a better direction, and now the Buckeyes will try to compile what has been too rare of a sight this season: a winning streak.

Next game: vs. Virginia (Saturday)

USC Trojans

Updated: Feb. 12, 7:14 a.m.

Behind the play of freshman star Alijah Arenas, USC's recent win streak helped pad its bubble case. But in a crucial visit to Ohio State on Wednesday, the Trojans were unable to hang on to a second-half lead, which sliced their at-large chances below 60%. If the season ended today, they would still likely secure one of the Big Ten's last entries with the eighth-best résumé ranking in what's tracking to be a 10-bid conference. Of course, their main problem remains future results. which is why the models are less bullish. USC is a high-40s team in the predictive ratings, with the nation's 23rd most difficult remaining schedule. The next three weeks will be a wild ride for Eric Musselman's team.

Next game: vs. Illinois (Wednesday)

Long shots

Washington Huskies

SEC

9.5 expected bids (8.5 at-large)

Locks (6)

Florida Gators

Vanderbilt Commodores

Alabama Crimson Tide

Arkansas Razorbacks

Tennessee Volunteers

Kentucky Wildcats

Should be in (3)

Auburn Tigers

Updated: Feb. 10, 9:17 p.m.

A couple of weeks ago, Auburn was multiple games above .500 in the SEC and was nearing "lock" territory in the model consensus. But three straight losses -- albeit to a trio of tough opponents in Tennessee, Alabama and Vanderbilt -- have complicated the pace of that trajectory. If we zoom out, the Tigers do have four Quadrant 1 wins (including one 1A) against the nation's fourth-most-difficult schedule per the BPI, and they remain mid-30s in the national résumé ranking average. That means there's still cushion to work with, though the BPI is projecting them to barely clear 18 wins. They will be a fascinating litmus test for how much the committee values schedule strength.

Next game: at Arkansas (Saturday)

Georgia Bulldogs

Updated: Feb. 11, 9:15 p.m.

Georgia picked up a much-needed win in Saturday's visit to LSU, but Florida made quick work of the Dawgs on Wednesday to hand them their fourth loss in five games. Still in the mid-to-high 30s of the overall résumé rankings -- with a quartet of wins against the BPI top 50 -- they are still eighth in résumé average amid what is looking like a nine- or 10-bid SEC, so their at-large chances remain solid despite the recent losses. But a jump from 67th-hardest strength of schedule nationally to 21st moving forward could portend even more losses from here.

Next game: at Oklahoma (Saturday)

Texas A&M Aggies

Updated: Feb. 12, 7:24 a.m.

Trying to stop their first losing streak of the season since November, Texas A&M fell again at home to conference bubble rival Missouri on Wednesday night. The skid has sent A&M's consensus at-large odds tumbling from 90% to 74% in the past week, though most of the models in the forecast average still consider the Aggies to be in OK shape (70% or higher) for an at-large bid. They are projected by the BPI to finish the regular season with around 21 wins, which should be enough to make the tournament. They're still living on the edge, however, ranked ninth in the résumé ranking average out of what could be as few as nine tournament-bound teams from the SEC -- and the gap between them and 10th-ranked Texas has shrunk.

Next game: at Vanderbilt (Saturday)

Work to do (2)

Texas Longhorns

Updated: Feb. 7, 5:34 p.m.

Despite ranking in the mid-30s of the predictive metrics nationally, Sean Miller's team is in a tough numbers game after a handful of early defeats in SEC play. The Longhorns seem to be moving in the right direction, though, with three straight wins (and four in five). That includes Saturday's victory over Ole Miss, courtesy of a game-ending 14-0 run that turned a three-point deficit into an 11-point win over the final 3½ minutes. They are still 10th in the conference in the résumé rankings (around 50th nationally), and their schedule strength jumps from 64th hardest looking back to 19th hardest going forward. Three Quadrant 1 wins, including two for Quadrant 1A, are helpful, but the Horns need to either keep the winning streak going against a tough set of opponents, or hope the SEC gets 10 bids.

Next game: at Missouri (Saturday)

Missouri Tigers

Updated: Feb. 12, 7:32 a.m.

After a recent cold stretch, the Tigers won their third straight game (and fourth in five) with a comeback win over Texas A&M in College Station on Wednesday, courtesy of Shawn Phillips Jr.'s go-ahead dunk and game-saving block in the final 20 seconds. They still rank just 11th among SEC teams in the résumé average -- a tough spot to be in with the conference projected for 10 tournament entries at most. Mizzou does have a pair of Quadrant 1A wins (Florida and Kentucky) and five against the BPI top 50. But even if its résumé is on par with that of Texas, Missouri is much lower in the predictive metrics. Saturday's game against the Longhorns in Columbia looms large.

Next game: vs. Texas (Saturday)

Long shots

LSU Tigers

Ole Miss Rebels

Oklahoma Sooners

ACC

8.1 expected bids; 7.1 at-large

Locks (6)

Duke Blue Devils

Louisville Cardinals

Virginia Cavaliers

North Carolina Tar Heels

Clemson Tigers

NC State Wolfpack

Should be in (2)

SMU Mustangs

Updated: Feb. 10, 9:09 p.m.

The Mustangs bounced back from consecutive losses, including an especially tough one hosting NC State, with a pair of wins over Pittsburgh and Notre Dame to help stabilize their trajectory. Even after the recent losses, SMU still ranked seventh best in what should be an eight-bid ACC on résumé. And although they are seventh in the ACC (34th nationally) in the predictive ranking, they have the nation's 74th-hardest remaining schedule. That's good for managing a status quo that likely resides above the bubble if the bracket was set today -- especially if they can add another résumé win or two, which they'll have a handful more chances to do before the regular season ends.

Next game: at Syracuse (Saturday)

Miami Hurricanes

Updated: Feb. 11, 7:58 a.m.

The Hurricanes' chances had dipped with recent losses at Clemson (excusable) and to FSU and Cal at home (less so), but a return to the win column against Boston College followed by a huge, résumé-boosting victory over North Carolina has their tournament chances back on the rise. Miami is hardly a lock -- it has a low-40s résumé quality nationally (eighth in the ACC) -- but its consensus model at-large odds are now into the 70s. Which makes it more of a "should be in" team than a "work to do" team, for now. The BPI has the Canes facing the 59th-hardest remaining schedule in the nation, with four more chances to score Quadrant 1 wins.

Next game: at NC State (Saturday)

Work to do (2)

Virginia Tech Hokies

Updated: Feb. 11, 9:21 p.m.

Unlike on Saturday, when the Hokies could not overcome NC State on the road, they scored a huge road win over another Quadrant 1A foe with an upset at Clemson on Wednesday. It was their third Quadrant 1 win of the season -- and first Quadrant 1A victory -- helping to boost a résumé rating that threatened to drop out of the top 50. Conditional at-large chances below 40% still suggest they are tracking to miss the field without additional résumé boosters, in part because they only rank mid-50s in the predictive metrics. But a win in the highest-leverage game of Wednesday's slate, per BartTorvik, absolutely helped their case.

Next game: vs. Florida State (Saturday)

California Golden Bears

Updated: Feb. 11, 9:47 p.m.

Recent wins over North Carolina, Stanford, Miami and Georgia Tech vaulted Cal into bubble territory, but back-to-back losses to Clemson, then Syracuse in double overtime -- the latter of which happened amid a city-wide power outage -- splashed cold water on the Golden Bears' hopes. They still sit in the borderline top 50 on the résumé ranking, have four Quadrant 1 wins (including one Quadrant 1A) and face the ACC's second-easiest remaining schedule. But with a consensus at-large probability tumbling toward the single digits, the Bears truly do have "work to do" (and not much time to do it).

Next game: at Boston College (Saturday)

Long shots

Stanford Cardinal

Wake Forest Demon Deacons

BIG 12

7.4 expected bids (6.4 at-large)

Locks (6)

Arizona Wildcats

Houston Cougars

Kansas Jayhawks

Iowa State Cyclones

Texas Tech Red Raiders

BYU Cougars

Should be in (1)

UCF Knights

Updated: Feb. 8, 4:15 p.m.

With so many of the conference's expected bids being effective locks -- the six teams listed above each have 100% conditional at-large odds in the model consensus -- the Big 12 bubble picture really comes down to which team could be the seventh in. The Knights remain in the driver's seat for that slot despite back-to-back losses at Houston and Cincinnati over the past week. They rank around 30th in the résumé average, while only one other non-lock Big 12 team (Oklahoma State) is even in the top 50. Despite the recent defeats, the Knights are still tracking for more than 20 wins and will get the chance to regroup and bolster their tournament chances against a more winnable sequence of upcoming games against West Virginia, TCU and Utah.

Next game: vs. West Virginia (Saturday)

Work to do (3)

TCU Horned Frogs

Updated: Feb. 11, 7:58 a.m.

After a recent losing skid in Big 12 play, the Horned Frogs responded with a win over K-State and, on Tuesday, a big résumé-boosting upset win over Iowa State at home. Their case is now getting interesting: Although they sit with just 31% at-large odds after beating the Cyclones, they have four Quadrant 1 wins (including a pair of Quadrant 1A wins over Florida and Iowa State), and a couple more Quadrant 1 games coming up against Oklahoma State and UCF, in the Big 12's third-easiest remaining schedule (51st hardest nationally). Winning those would add more to their portfolio.

Next game: at Oklahoma State (Saturday)

Oklahoma State Cowboys

Updated: Feb. 11, 8:05 a.m.

The Cowboys followed Saturday's lopsided loss at the nation's No. 1 team, Arizona, with another loss Tuesday to Arizona State -- where they fell behind early and never could close the gap. Their previous upset of BYU had them creeping toward the top 40 in the résumé ranking -- still eighth best in the conference in that regard -- and just on the edge of how many bids the Big 12 could have. That said, the models remain comparatively low on Oklahoma State because its predictive ranking (now outside the top 60) is so much worse than those of some of its bubble rivals. It also faces the conference's third-toughest remaining schedule.

Next game: vs. TCU (Saturday)

West Virginia Mountaineers

Updated: Feb. 8, 3:15 p.m.

WVU certainly faces an uphill climb to get back to the tournament for the first time since 2023, and Sunday's loss at home to Texas Tech gave back some of the gains from Thursday's win at Cincinnati. The model consensus gives the Mountaineers just around a 10% at-large shot on average, and they reside outside the top 60 in the résumé rankings. West Virginia does have two wins against Quadrant 1 foes -- including one against Quadrant 1A Kansas last month -- but they sit below Baylor and TCU in the predictive ranking. WVU will get four more chances to add Quadrant 1 wins and will need to win some of them to get closer to a tourney-bound track.

Next game: at UCF (Saturday)

Long shots

Baylor Bears

Cincinnati Bearcats

Arizona State Sun Devils

BIG EAST

3.2 expected bids (2.2 at-large)

Locks (3)

UConn Huskies

St. John's Red Storm

Villanova Wildcats

Should be in (0)

None

Work to do (1)

Seton Hall Pirates

Updated: Feb. 11, 9:27 p.m.

Just when the season seemed to be slipping away from Shaheen Holloway and his team with six losses in eight games, the Pirates outlasted Providence on Wednesday in a game with exactly one lead change -- midway through the second half. They still have a steep hill to climb, entering the day with only slightly above 10% at-large chances in the forecast composite, sitting outside the top 50 nationally in résumé average with only a single Quadrant 1 win (against NC State). An at-large bid will be hard to argue for if the Big East receives only three bids, which is the current Bracketology expectation, though the Pirates have a few more high-profile chances left to make their case.

Next game: at Butler (Sunday)

Long shots

Creighton Bluejays

OTHERS

Locks (3)

Gonzaga Bulldogs (West Coast Conference)

Saint Louis Billikens (Atlantic 10)

Utah State Aggies (Mountain West)

Should be in (2)

Saint Mary's Gaels (WCC)

Updated: Feb. 12, 7:54 a.m.

Saint Mary's hasn't missed the NCAA tournament in five seasons, so it's tough to imagine that streak coming to an end, with the Gaels sitting 33rd in the résumé rankings. Yet they're here because they carry only a consensus 80% at-large probability -- not a "lock" -- likely driven by the perennial question of how many WCC teams the NCAA can accommodate for the Dance after Gonzaga. One possible trouble spot: While their résumé is better than that of Santa Clara's, the Gaels lost the first of the teams' two head-to-head matchups. They also don't have any Quadrant 1 wins -- and likely won't, unless they get revenge for a recent loss at Gonzaga when the teams meet again on Feb. 28 at Saint Mary's. But consecutive wins over San Diego, San Francisco and now Pepperdine have them back on the victory bus.

Next game: at Pacific (Saturday)

Santa Clara Broncos (WCC)

Updated: Feb. 12, 7:54 a.m.

The Santa Clara and Saint Mary's comparisons will be constant down the stretch as we debate whether the WCC could get three bids -- which has happened only once in the past 13 seasons, but legitimately could (and arguably should) this year -- and how much the committee should value head-to-head wins versus overall résumé quality. The Broncos' chances continue to rise, however, with 74% consensus at-large odds and the 41st résumé ranking, which earns them "should be in" status for now. They cruised over Seattle on Wednesday night to claim their ninth consecutive win (and 13th in 14 games). And they will get additional cracks at both Saint Mary's and Gonzaga soon.

Next game: vs. Gonzaga (Saturday)

Work to do (5)

Miami (Ohio) RedHawks (MAC)

Updated: Feb. 10, 7:32 a.m.

The MAC hasn't received multiple bids since 1998-99 -- fittingly, the same season that Wally Szczerbiak led the RedHawks to the Sweet 16 after knocking off Washington and Utah in the first two rounds. Could history repeat itself? After Arizona's loss, Miami is the sole remaining unbeaten in Division I and ranks inside the top 40 on résumé as a result. The forecast models don't quite know how to handle the RedHawks, though the committee has never excluded an eligible team with fewer than four losses in a non-pandemic season. It is true that Miami is a borderline top-90 team in the predictive ratings (Akron ranks higher in the MAC) that has run up an undefeated record against the 347th-hardest schedule in the nation. But wins are wins, and Miami got another one Saturday against Marshall in a more comfortable fashion than its recent closer victory over Buffalo.

Next game: vs. Ohio (Friday)

San Diego State Aztecs (MW)

Updated: Feb. 8, 8:34 a.m.

Saturday was a good day for SDSU: The Aztecs beat Air Force, and conference bubble rival New Mexico fell to Boise State. That said, the Aztecs are still one of the bubbliest of bubble teams. They sit 46th nationally in résumé ranking, third in the conference standings and their consensus at-large chances are almost exactly 50-50. The Mountain West could feasibly send at least three teams to the tournament this year (the conference has sent at least four teams in each of the past four seasons). With a fairly large gap in at-large odds over the next-best MW team (New Mexico at 27%), the Aztecs would figure to be in decent enough shape if they keep winning.

Next game: vs. Nevada (Saturday)

New Mexico Lobos (MW)

Updated: Feb. 12, 7:54 a.m.

Seeking a third straight NCAA tournament trip for the first time in more than a decade, the Lobos might no longer have the inside track to being the Mountain West's second-most-likely entrant after Saturday's heartbreaker against Boise State at The Pit dropped their consensus at-large odds below 50%, where they still reside after surviving Grand Canyon on Wednesday night. New Mexico is still slightly behind San Diego State in the résumé ranking though they do face the slightly easier schedule from here on out. The primary blemish for the Lobos is their head-to-head loss at the Aztecs on Jan. 17, which they won't have a chance to avenge until they play host on Feb. 28.

Next game: vs. Air Force (Tuesday)

VCU Rams (A-10)

Updated: Feb. 11, 9:08 p.m.

VCU hasn't made back-to-back NCAA tournaments since the Will Wade era nearly a decade ago, and the forecast models (around 20% consensus at-large) remain less than bullish on that streak ending this season, in part because the Rams are 0-4 against Quadrant 1 opponents with only one remaining shot at changing that (at Saint Louis on Feb. 20). However, they are right in the middle of bubble territory in overall résumé (46th nationally), and their remaining schedule is set up for plenty more wins, so they can certainly add to their case. After crushing Dayton at home to conclude last week, they were back at it Wednesday with a comfortable win at La Salle.

Next game: at Richmond (Saturday)

Boise State Broncos (MW)

Updated: Feb. 8, 8:47 a.m.

The Broncos have come on strong recently, elevating themselves into the "work to do" category with wins in six of seven games, including Saturday's critical one-point victory at fellow bubble squad New Mexico. They've tripled their conditional at-large odds in the past week -- but before we get too excited, that still leaves them at 15% odds, with a résumé ranking outside the top 60. They belong here for now, and will get further chances to build their case to the committee in the next month.

Next Game: vs. UNLV (Friday)

Long shots

Nevada Wolf Pack (MW)

Belmont Bruins (MVC)

Tulsa Golden Hurricane (American)

South Florida Bulls (American)

George Mason Patriots (A-10)

Liberty Flames (Conference USA)

Grand Canyon Lopes (MW)

McNeese Cowboys (Southland)

Dayton Flyers (A-10)

Yale Bulldogs (Ivy League)

Akron Zips (MAC)

Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks (Southland)
 
more

Happily Handicapped Nation: Almost 4 in 10 Stanford Students Claim "Disability"


"I'm disturbed, I'm depressed, I'm inadequate -- I got it all!" So exclaimed Seinfeld sitcom character George Costanza, trying to woo a woman he believed had a psychologically oriented Florence Nightingale syndrome. It was a funny scene in 1993, and entirely fictional. But today, a generation-plus later, life has sort of imitated art.

For unlike with George, whose appeal fell flat, having a... disability has now become a way to leverage advantage.

It's so bad that at Stanford University nearly four in 10 undergraduates are registered as disabled. What's more, this merely reflects a trend sweeping pseudo-elite universities in general. The issue?

While having a disability once brought stigma, it's now akin to a résumé enhancer. Moreover, a "keeping up with the handicapped Joneses" phenomenon is operative: If you don't game the system, you lose out to those who do.

The Daily Caller reported on the story last week, writing:

"One of the most prestigious universities in the US offers perks to those who say they have ADHD, night terrors, even gluten intolerance. You'd be stupid not to game the system," writes Elsa Johnson, an undergraduate at Stanford University, for The Times.

That system is Stanford's "disability accommodation" apparatus, which doles out privileges to the on-paper disabled: The "best housing on campus," extra time on tests, extra absences from class, tardiness allowances.

To put this in perspective, realize that it's akin to DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion). Only, it's being applied on a wider scale -- to anyone willing to claim "disabled" status. We're training people to not be competent but confidence-man-like.

Even the über-liberal Atlantic recently warned of this phenomenon. As the magazine wrote in December:

Professors now struggle to accommodate the many students with an official disability designation, which may entitle them to extra time, a distraction-free environment, or the use of otherwise-prohibited technology. The University of Michigan has two centers where students with disabilities can take exams, but they frequently fill to capacity, leaving professors scrambling to find more desks and proctors. Juan Collar, a physicist at the University of Chicago, told me that so many students now take their exams in the school's low-distraction testing outposts that they have become more distracting than the main classrooms.

Accommodations in higher education were supposed to help disabled Americans enjoy the same opportunities as everyone else. ... Over the past decade and a half, however, the share of students at selective universities who qualify for accommodations -- often, extra time on tests -- has grown at a breathtaking pace. At the University of Chicago, the number has more than tripled over the past eight years; at UC Berkeley, it has nearly quintupled over the past 15 years.

This just reflects a wider problem, too. When I was a child, being "handicapped" really meant something in virtually every case. People thus labeled were in wheelchairs, and needed them, or were blind and perhaps negotiated terrain with "white canes."

But then we "evolved," and this was reflected in language. The handicapped went from being "crippled" to "handicapped" to "disabled" to "physically/mentally challenged" to "differently abled," as the euphemisms metastasized. (And, yes, I'm missing a number. Where does "special needs" fits in, for example?)

Corresponding to this, handicaps transitioned from being liabilities to social-arena reputation enhancers (and those résumé enhancers). Claiming them has, too, become a good way to enforce your own ridiculous will on others. Just consider the service-animal phenomenon.

It used to be that almost every such case involved seeing-eye dogs, which are godsends for the blind. Now we've witnessed the following:

Daffy does describe, however, what the above tells us America is becoming. After all, can we really call ourselves a serious country if we're entertaining such lunacy?

As for this disability-metastasis phenomenon's deeper effects, they didn't escape the more astute MSN commenters on the Daily Caller article.

One noted that part of the problem is the extreme over-diagnosis of various purported psychological "conditions." And a handful warned that we were training people to "cheat." Consequently, a respondent lamented, "later in life you may think that anything is OK to get your target."

Another opined that this diminution of meritocracy "will lead to a USA that no longer innovates [and] no longer creates...."

Even more significantly, it will deliver a people so morally degraded that they will be, as philosopher Edmund Burke put it, those "men of intemperate minds [who] cannot be free."

So what is the remedy? First, a simple rule must be accepted:

Certain things disqualify you from doing certain things.

A corollary: This even applies to the most sympathetic of people, to those limited through no fault of their own.

(Of course, this includes us all since only God is without limitation.)

Let's illustrate this with a couple of examples.

A good accommodation: Virtually all of us would help a wheelchair-bound student attend intellect-oriented classes. A given immobile person, after all, may turn out to be a brilliant physicist (think Stephen Hawking).

A bad accommodation: If, however, someone can't complete a legitimate test in the allotted time, it reflects lack of merit. Perhaps his talents lie in a different field, and it's a service to him to channel him toward that.

Another bad one: If you can't take a plane without an emotional support pig, maybe you should drive cross country.

Sometimes, too, a handicap is an advantage in certain contexts. Consider wrestler Adonis Lattimore. He won a Virginia state championship some years ago -- despite having no legs.

When a realm's normal rules must be altered for a handicapped person, however, it's a red flag. An example is blind wrestlers in U.S. schools. Competitors normally begin a match separated. When the rare blind wrestler competes, though, his sighted opponent must maintain contact with him at all times. This changes the sport's dynamics notably.

Stating that this is an unjust accommodation may be unpopular. But that doesn't make it untrue -- just unemotional (as in objective). But today feelings trump all. This is why we're acting like turkeys, are graduating them, and have them on our airplanes.
 
more
8   
  • This might sound crazy but jobs train you once your hired. Fake it til you make it is a real strategy. There is no morality to job applications but 8f... you dont know how to answer the questions they can provide figure out youre not qualified, but maybe they dont and then you get training.  more

  • Proud of you

    -1

Penn State Mont Alto students 'Rock the Mock' and gain interview confidence


MONT ALTO, Pa. - Students at Penn State Mont Alto are now better prepared for internship and post-grad job interviews, thanks to the "Rock the Mock" career preparation event held on Feb. 5.

More than a dozen representatives from local employers met with students at the Allied Health Building on the Mont Alto campus. The employers engaged students in mock interviews, asking questions as they would... during an actual job interview. In addition to the skills students learned, both students and employers made valuable professional connections.

"Some of the employers walked away stating 'I think I got a solid internship contact' and 'this student will get an interview offer to be considered for a full time job,'" said Patty Gochenauer, senior manager for student life and career services at Penn State Mont Alto.

Acing the interview

The lessons students learned will go far beyond the event; the mock interviews helped participants gain confidence in acing a job interview with any company.

"I learned the importance of knowing not just you and your strengths, but researching and knowing the company to show that you're putting in the effort and would like that job. Things like that can really elevate you as a candidate," Miana Kaufman, a second-year student studying occupational therapy, reflected after going through multiple mock interviews.

Preparing for a job search

In addition to interview preparation, students learned how to set up and use a LinkedIn account, with a student photographer at the event to take a professional headshot that participants can use as a profile picture on the networking website.

Students also had the chance to perfect their elevator pitch, learning how to confidently and succinctly summarize their job experience and career goals.

"It's daunting to walk up to a perfect stranger, stick out your hand, and proceed to have a conversation about yourself. No one is organically comfortable doing that. The only way to prepare yourself for the awkward, but very necessary job interview, is to practice. And 'Rock the Mock' gives students that opportunity in a safe environment," Liz Denlea, program coordinator for the Information Technology program at Penn State Mont Alto and one of the main drivers behind "Rock the Mock," said.
 
more