• My kind opinion, let your husband stop picking your for a while. When they question you tell them the car broke down or something.
    Pick public... transport for the time being. Thank you more

    1
  • Start charging them. If they need to pay…they will not be so eager to ask for a ride. Gas is expensive, now! By the way, how do they get to work, in... the first place? more

    1

7 Best Cybersecurity Tools for Remote Recruitment Teams: Guard Candidate PII


A promising résumé can hide malware. In 2025 a mis-configured cloud server leaked 26 million CVs, exposing names, emails, and work histories to anyone online.

Breach fallout is costly: average incidents cost $4.88 million, and HR databases are prime targets.

Scammers even impersonate candidates; Proofpoint saw "just checking in" emails with malware links that recruiters clicked.

Security can't... wait. The next sections rank seven remote-ready tools so you can shield candidate data without wading through tech jargon.

Ready to close the back door before the next fake résumé arrives? Keep reading.

We cast a wide net, reviewing scores of security vendors, analyst reports, and user forums. Then we pushed every contender through a filter built for remote-recruiting realities, not generic IT wish lists.

First, we asked a blunt question: Does the tool shield candidate data in every scenario? If any edge case left PII exposed, we removed the product.

Next, we checked day-one usability. Recruiters ignore software that forces them to learn new workflows or babysit settings. Cloud delivery, single sign-on support, and a set-and-forget interface all scored high.

Integration came next. We inspected how easily each product plugs into the hiring stack: ATS, HRIS, email, and video-interview services. Smooth connections mean you safeguard the process without slowing it down.

Cost mattered, though not in a race-to-the-bottom sense. We balanced sticker price against breach-prevention impact and favored tools that give small and midsize teams meaningful protection. Pricey showpieces with features no recruiter needs did not survive.

We also wanted outside proof: analyst-leader badges, 4-plus-star user ratings, and a clean record in recent breach news. Marketing claims alone never made the cut.

Only products that met every test (data protection, remote fit, integration strength, compliance support, and real-world praise) earned a place in the final seven.

Technology blocks plenty, yet most breaches still start with an employee who trusts the wrong email. That pattern will not change until we train the people behind the screens.

KnowBe4 treats security education like a marketing campaign. Short, video lessons land in each recruiter's inbox, followed by realistic phishing tests that reveal who clicked and why. Over time you watch the "phish-prone" rate sink from double digits to low single digits, a shift HRStacks ties to sharp drops in real-world incidents.

KnowBe4 security awareness training dashboard screenshot for phishing simulations

Recruiters appreciate the relevance. Modules cover résumé malware, bogus CEO requests for W-2 data, and tips to spot deep-fake candidates. Lessons take minutes, not hours, so they fit between sourcing calls.

Administrators enjoy the automation. New hires enroll on day one, simulated attacks roll out on a schedule, and reminders chase anyone who falls behind. Reports satisfy auditors and give leadership proof that security is more than a checkbox.

Yes, a few employees will groan the first time they fail a test. That fades once everyone understands the stakes. A culture where people brag about catching the latest spoofed LinkedIn invite is a culture that keeps data safe.

Bottom line: tools guard the perimeter, but trained humans guard everything else. KnowBe4 turns that soft spot into a reliable last line of defense, paying for itself every time someone hovers over a shady link and clicks Delete instead of Open.

Recruiting lives on files. Portfolios, offer letters, passport scans, and interview recordings all bounce between laptops, inboxes, and chat threads. Each bounce risks leakage.

Box turns that chaos into a single encrypted cabinet in the cloud. Shield, its security layer, auto-labels sensitive content and enforces your rules. If a document holds 30 Social Security numbers, Shield can block external sharing outright. If a recruiter tries a mass download at 2 am, the platform flags the anomaly and, if you choose, kills the connection on the spot.

The experience stays friendly. Recruiters drag a file into Box Drive and share a link instead of an attachment. Hiring managers open the link, view the document, and Box logs every click for your audit trail. No one fiddles with VPN paths or remembers to password-protect a PDF; Box handles it behind the scenes.

Collaboration even speeds up. Multiple reviewers can add notes to a résumé in real time, confident that version history tracks every edit. When the requisition closes, automated retention rules purge old candidate data so you stay on the right side of GDPR or CCPA.

Yes, Box costs more than free cloud drives. Balance that against a single lawsuit from an exposed medical form and the math flips fast. Deploy Shield for recruiters and HR admins first, then expand to hiring managers once the workflow feels second nature.

Secure storage may not feel glamorous, but it quietly erases a huge attack surface. With Box Shield guarding the documents, you stop the "lost laptop" horror story before it can headline your next all-hands.

Email delivers every offer letter, interview link, and salary discussion. It also delivers 9 of 10 cyber-attacks. Proofpoint stands at the door, disinfecting messages so recruiters only see the genuine stuff.

The platform inspects each inbound message in milliseconds. Attachments open in a sandbox; malicious macros never reach the inbox. Links are rewritten on the fly, and if a previously safe URL turns hostile later, Proofpoint blocks the click in real time.

Impersonation scams are its specialty. The system studies writing style, header quirks, and reply-to tricks to spot a fake CEO or a "candidate" pushing a poisoned résumé. When it senses spoofing, it stamps a bold warning banner across the message or moves it to quarantine.

Outbound mail gets equal scrutiny. If a recruiter tries emailing a spreadsheet of Social Security numbers, Data Loss Prevention rules can force encryption or stop the send entirely. Candidates stay safe from leaks they would never see coming.

Deployment is straightforward. Point your MX records to Proofpoint, tune a few policies, and you are live. From day one you watch junk and attack attempts drop, giving recruiters back the time they once spent sorting inbox debris.

Proofpoint is not the cheapest filter, yet its catch rate saves far more than it costs. By removing weaponized emails before humans have a chance to trust them, you close the single most common breach path in HR.

A single recruiter laptop now holds thousands of résumés, offer letters, and background reports. Lose that endpoint to ransomware and the whole hiring engine stalls.

CrowdStrike Falcon plants an impossibly light agent on Windows or macOS, then watches every process in real time. No old-school signature files; the cloud brain hunts for behavior that screams intrusion. A macro-laden résumé spawns PowerShell in the temp folder? Falcon stops the process, quarantines the file, and alerts you before the user even notices.

Remote control is where it shines. From a web console you can isolate a compromised device with one click, cutting attacker command channels while the recruiter keeps working offline on local docs. When the machine reconnects under VPN, policies reapply automatically.

Falcon also spots insider trouble. If someone tries a midnight mass-copy of candidate PDFs to a USB stick, the agent logs it and, if you wish, blocks the transfer. Every action writes to a tamper-proof timeline, a lifesaver when auditors ask, "Who touched that data?"

Deployment takes minutes. Email installers, drop them in an RMM, or bake them into your MDM images. The agent updates itself silently, so there is no "please leave laptops overnight for patching" ritual that recruiters like to ignore.

Yes, Falcon costs more than the antivirus bundled with your operating system. It also removes the dread of waking up to encrypted laptops and a hacker's ransom note. That trade is an easy sell in any budget meeting focused on uptime and candidate trust.

Every new SaaS the talent team adopts adds another username, another password, and another off-boarding step someone might forget. That sprawl is a gift to attackers.

Okta collapses the maze into a single front door. Recruiters sign in once, then launch Greenhouse, Slack, Zoom, or your background-check portal from the same dashboard. Adaptive multi-factor checks location, device health, and time of day before opening the latch, so a stolen password alone goes nowhere.

Okta Workforce Identity SSO dashboard screenshot for talent teams

The admin view is pure control. Create a contractor account, tick the apps they need, and Okta pushes credentials out in seconds. When the contract ends, one disable switch yanks access from every system -- no frantic hunt for lingering logins.

Risk signals run constantly in the background. A sign-in from a new country prompts a second factor. Five rapid failures on an ATS API token lock the account and, if you choose, block that IP range. An immutable audit log shows who touched which app and when, delighting auditors.

Setup sounds daunting, yet most HR tools already sit in Okta's integration catalog. Paste two SAML values, test, and move on. Start with email and the ATS, then phase in niche sourcing apps once the team is comfortable.

Yes, there is a price per user, but the math is simple. Count the hours recruiters waste on password resets, the fines for an ex-employee still lurking in payroll, and the brand damage from one hacked mailbox. Okta's subscription looks modest next to those bills.

Identity is the new perimeter. With Okta guarding the gateway, every other control in your stack gains a reliable foundation, and recruiters enjoy the luxury of logging in once and getting straight back to hiring.

Passwords still unlock every system we use. When they are weak, reused, or parked in spreadsheets, attackers do not need zero days; they just sign in.

1Password replaces that chaos with an encrypted vault the whole hiring team can share. Each recruiter keeps a single master key (ideally backed by biometrics) and 1Password fills every login with a random 30-character string no one could guess or remember.

Shared vaults solve the "Can you DM me the Indeed password?" routine. Drop an account into the Recruiting vault, grant junior sourcers read-only access, and watch Slack credential requests vanish overnight. When a contractor finishes the project, removing them from the vault instantly locks them out everywhere.

Security runs quietly in the background. Watchtower scans the dark web and alerts you if an email-password pair tied to the team shows up for sale. Two-factor codes live beside each login, so no one is hunting for an authenticator app on interview day.

Adoption is simple. Install the browser extension, import existing passwords, then flip the switch that blocks plain-text storage elsewhere. Most recruiters never open the desktop app again; autofill just works.

Price comes in at about the cost of one fancy coffee per user each month. Stack that against the $4.88 million average breach bill and the return is obvious. Strong, unique passwords everywhere, zero friction, zero excuses -- that is why 1Password earns silver on this list.

Recruiters travel. Coffee-shop Wi-Fi, airport hotspots, the spare bedroom. Each jump exposes logins and résumés to anyone listening on the same network.

TorGuard encrypts every packet the moment it leaves the device, so snoopers see gibberish instead of candidate data. The dedicated IP option is the game changer: your team appears to every SaaS from the exact same address, no matter where they work.

TorGuard dedicated IP VPN product page screenshot for recruiter network security

That single feature lets IT lock critical tools such as ATS, HRIS, and payroll to one whitelisted IP. Even if a password leaks on the dark web, an attacker's unknown address hits a brick wall.

A fixed IP also ends the daily annoyance of CAPTCHA storms and geo-blocked logins that plague shared VPNs; see the details on how TorGuard's anti-blocking architecture makes banking sites and streaming services treat the connection like a regular home network.

Recruiters connect once, then cruise through Gmail, LinkedIn, or banking portals as if they were at HQ.

Setup is two steps: install the app and choose your dedicated location. TorGuard allows unlimited devices per account, so laptops and phones stay protected without juggling licenses. Speeds remain snappy thanks to a network built for torrent-level traffic.

Budget? Roughly 10 dollars a month plus a small annual fee for the static IP, less than a coffee run on that risky café network. In return you get encrypted traffic, stable reputation IPs, and the peace of mind that comes from shrinking your attack surface to a single, known doorway.

Network security is the foundation of every control above it. Start with a solid tunnel, and the rest of your stack stands stronger.

We covered a lot of ground. Before you sketch a rollout plan, use the cheat sheet below to see where each tool shines, what unique perk it gives recruiters, and one trade-off to keep in mind.

*Public list pricing. Bundles and volume discounts often apply.

Scan the table, spot the gaps in your current stack, and address them in priority order. Most teams start with the network, password, and identity layers, then add email and endpoint defences, secure storage, and finally ongoing training to cement culture.

Security projects stall when they feel impossible. Break deployment into clear, bite-sized waves and momentum follows.

Start with TorGuard, 1Password, and Okta. These three lock down networks, passwords, and identity, the entry points attackers hit first. Rollout is fast: a VPN install link, a vault invite, and SSO connections to your top two apps. Within a week you remove the biggest risks without altering daily flow.

Next add CrowdStrike and Proofpoint. Protect the endpoints recruiters carry and the email they trust most. Push the Falcon agent on Monday, update MX records on Friday, and watch dashboards the following week. Users barely notice except for a cleaner inbox.

Finish with Box Shield for file governance and KnowBe4 for ongoing awareness. Migrate active requisition folders first, then older archives. While that transfer runs, launch the first phishing-simulation campaign. Celebrate every "I caught it!" message in Slack; positive reinforcement turns training into habit.

By handling one wave each quarter, you spread costs, avoid change fatigue, and keep leadership cheering quick wins instead of worrying about an all-or-nothing overhaul.

Attackers automate scans. They do not check company size before dumping leaked résumés for sale. The 26-million-CV breach came from a mid-tier vendor, not a tech giant. Small teams with thin defenses are easier, faster wins.

The opposite usually happens. Single sign-on cuts daily logins, password resets vanish, and email noise drops. Recruiters spend more time courting candidates and less time fighting IT friction.

Our ATS vendor says they're SOC 2 compliant. Isn't that enough?

Vendor compliance secures their servers. It does nothing for the café Wi-Fi your sourcer uses, the phishing email in her inbox, or the USB someone finds at a job fair. Shared responsibility means we must lock down access, devices, and people on our side of the fence.

So are breach fines. The first layer -- VPN, password manager, and SSO -- costs about the price of lunch per user each month and removes the easiest attack paths. Spread the rest over three waves and you protect revenue instead of gambling with it.
 
more
1   
  • Treat yourself as if you are "a business" when employed by someone or a company, and that will guide you. Businesses do not view employees as being... singular, as an entity who owns their own "business."  more

    1
  • Starting a career is a high-energy phase, but it’s also when the "lifestyle creep" trap is easiest to set. Maintaining independence requires a dual... strategy: building a financial moat and treated your career as an asset you own, rather than a place where you belong.
     more

    1

You Did Everything Right -- So Why Aren't You Getting Hired?


You did everything right: You got the degree, tailored your résumé, applied to 30, 40 or maybe even 50 jobs. You followed every rule the system told you to follow -- and you still ended up hitting a wall.

This experience is more common than anyone wants to admit. A recent New York Times focus group of 12 Gen Z job seekers revealed a generation that has largely stopped trusting in the idea that... effort gets rewarded. The rules they followed aren't delivering on the promise of security, and now young people are adjusting. They're pulling back socially while unemployed, choosing safety over growth, or coming into the workforce already disengaged.

The system genuinely appears to be broken. AI screening tools filter out qualified candidates before a human ever sees their résumés. Employers reward connections over credentials. But knowing all of this doesn't solve the immediate problem: You still need a job.

So what can you do? Build real-world experience to show employers. One of my students spent two years calling alumni donors for his university's fundraising office and arrived at graduation with cold-call experience, rejection tolerance and professional contacts. Another student worked a few afternoons a week at a consulting firm while still taking classes. The degree got her in the door, while everything she built along the way got her the job.

Don't be afraid to reach out to professionals for informational conversations. This is less uncomfortable than you think. Find mentors who can give you honest guidance, and find peers who are navigating this well and study what they're doing.

None of this fixes a broken system. But it can be the difference between graduating with options and graduating with a degree and a pile of unanswered emails.

This is a published version of Forbes' Careers newsletter. Click here to subscribe and get it in your inbox every Tuesday.

WORK SMARTER

Practical insights and advice from Forbes staff and contributors to help you succeed in your job, accelerate your career and lead smarter.

Learn five smart ways to use AI, including how to experiment with new skills to build a backup career and how to solve problems at your current job, according to business expert Diane Hamilton.

Feeling worried about your career? Sometimes digging into a new book can help you face uncertain times, executive coach Caroline Ceniza-Levine says. Here are five books to expand your thinking.

Working for a former employer may be the best way forward in your career, says psychologist Bryan Robinson, who shares why a "boomerang" move can be a great strategy in a tight job market.

Not interested in management? You're not alone. Over 40% of job seekers don't want to be managers, according to a new survey. Discover why from career expert Caroline Castrillon.

Careers Q&A: What To Do When Your Career Hits A Wall

I recently wrote about why mid-career malaise is more common than anyone admits, and what workers can do about it. I discussed the insights with Forbes careers editor Anjelica Tan.

Anjelica Tan: A lot of accomplished professionals hitting their late 30s and 40s are suddenly feeling flat about their careers. Why?

Andy Molinsky: They've outgrown the ambition that got them there. The goals that drove them for 15 years have been met, or quietly abandoned, and nothing has replaced them. Meanwhile, they have a mortgage, a lifestyle calibrated to their salary, and deep expertise in something they aren't sure they want to keep doing. At 25, that uncertainty feels normal. But at 45, it feels like a whole new problem they need to solve.

What is the biggest mistake people make when they hit this wall?

They assume they need to blow up their career. The burned-out banker who walks away from it all to make artisanal cheese in Vermont makes for a great story. But that's rarely the right move. The answer is usually more targeted than people expect.

So what can professionals in this position do to move forward?

Start with the job you have. Research on job crafting shows that employees who proactively reshape their tasks and relationships report significantly higher engagement, often without changing their title or employer. Before you conclude the job is the problem, ask honestly whether you've tried changing it from the inside.

Say they give that a real try and they still feel stuck. What then?

Run experiments on the side while you're still employed. Try doing something adjacent to what interests you and see what it reveals. The clarity comes from doing, not deliberating. Then pick a direction and start moving. That's usually enough to get unstuck.

TOUCH BASE

News from the world of work.

Will middle management soon be a thing of the past? Billionaire Jack Dorsey thinks so. In a recent blog post, the Block chairman argued that AI can handle much of what managers do today: gathering updates from executives, passing along instructions to teams and coordinating projects. If he's right, the impact on the job market could be significant -- about 21 million Americans currently work in management roles, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

March marked the strongest job growth in over a year, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data released last week. The U.S. added 178,000 nonfarm jobs, well above expectations of 60,000, with health care driving more than half the gains. The unemployment rate edged down to 4.3%, beating forecasts of 4.4%. Still, the labor force participation rate -- the share of Americans working or seeking work -- fell to its lowest level since 2021.

Health care's job boom is partly due to its status as a reliable path to the American middle class, according to the Wall Street Journal. The median annual salary for nurses is $93,600, compared to $49,500 for all occupations, Labor Department data shows. And while automation and AI have reduced factory and office jobs, health care has grown steadily since the 1980s.

Thanks for reading! This edition of the Careers newsletter was edited by Anjelica Tan and Chris Dobstaff.
 
more
1   
  • A reciprocal gifting culture doesnt exist in the way you want. Youre coping with that reality.
    It's hard when we engage in a behavior that makes us... feel not-valued. You could set that desire aside and think about what benefits you recieve from giving without expectations. Do you enjoy seeing recipients happy with your gift? If thats not enough - Are there other less -grand ways to appreciate them that would set THEM up for success ? Less cost to you, less (unknown?) pressure on them?
    If you want to give AND recieve gifts think about why that is. It seems this is taking space in your mind and something unpleasant is surfacing -agitation? confusion? When that happens I try to step back and hold those emotions tenderly. When we give gracefully to appreciate the recipient it's a beautiful gesture. When we recieve gracefully we shouldnt feel pressure . Your gifts are a kindness you put out there. We dont always get gifts exchanged tit for tat.
     more

  • My attitude on gifts is simple. I give gifts because it makes me happy and, since I do not expect anything, any gift to me is a pleasant surprise.... Since it is no longer making you happy, you can taper them off and replace with having cookies or candy on your desk. Anybody can come and get it from your desk and will also talk to you. more

New Research: Workers Pause Plans Amid Economic Uncertainty - HRTech Cube


* Economic uncertainty reshaping workforce benefits landscape: New research from Economist Enterprise on the evolving employee benefits landscape reveals how economic uncertainty is freezing career mobility, deepening retirement insecurity, and widening the benefits divide across America's workforce.

* Retirement and other milestones delayed: Financial pressures are forcing workers to delay... retirement by nearly four years, postpone major purchases like homes, and lead 35% to have taken hardship withdrawals.

* Job-hugging: 62% prioritize long-term security over higher pay and better benefits, and 30% have stopped job searching in the past five years.

New research from Economist Enterprise focused on employee benefits entitled, "Benefits 2.0", exposes three forces business leaders can't afford to ignore: economic uncertainty is freezing career mobility, pushing retirement out of reach, and forcing employees to raid savings and delay life decisions just to stay afloat -- at a real cost to both employees and employers.

The research -- supported by Nuveen, a TIAA company -- surveyed 2,063 full-time employed Americans aged 18-62, providing insights across industries including energy and utilities, manufacturing, sports, media and entertainment, financial services and insurance, and government. The findings reveal three forces reshaping how Americans work, save, and plan for the future -- and why business leaders can't afford to look away.

The great stay: job security over career mobility

America's workers are holding onto their jobs at a decade-low quit rate of 2%, and it's not always because they love their work, but instead are staying put out of fear of losing job security.

Caution, not confidence, characterizes how most American workers are approaching their careers, with 62% choosing long-term job security over seeking out new opportunities. The research paints a picture of a risk-averse workforce navigating economic uncertainty.

Job-search hesitation has become increasingly widespread, with 30% of workers reporting that they have stopped looking for new opportunities over the past five years due to concerns about job security. This trend is even more pronounced in certain sectors, rising to 35% among those in financial services and insurance and 34% in manufacturing. In contrast, government employees appear less affected, with 23% saying they have paused their job search for the same reason.

"America's workers are prioritizing job stability and a strong benefits package, signaling a shift in how workers weigh risk versus reward in today's competitive labor market," said Matt Terry, who led the research at Economist Enterprise. "This cautious approach reflects a broader trend: workers are increasingly valuing predictability over advancement, which could have lasting implications for career growth and economic mobility."

For most Americans, retirement is a moving target

Holding onto a stable job may feel like the safe choice, but for many workers true financial security remains out of reach. With respondents now expecting to retire nearly four years later than planned, the gap between expectations and reality is stark, nowhere more so than in retirement:

* Working longer out of necessity, not enjoyment: Of those who expect to work past their ideal retirement age, only 20% cite job satisfaction as the primary reason. Instead, rising living costs (47%) and healthcare expenses (41% -- rising to 50% among low-income workers) are the primary drivers of expected delays.

* Income shapes retirement expectations: Lower-income workers expect the largest gap, anticipating retiring roughly six years later than their ideal age.

* Retirement anxiety starts early: Even Gen Z -- many of whom just entered the workforce full-time -- expect retirement to be delayed by an average of five years.

* Retirement delays hit finance and manufacturing hardest: Workers in financial services & insurance expect the longest delay (5.1 years), followed by manufacturing (4.5 years). Government workers anticipate the shortest gap between ideal and expected retirement (2.9 years).

Raiding savings and delaying life decisions

To cope with financial pressures, workers aren't just adjusting their expectations. They're pulling from retirement savings and deferring major life milestones to stay afloat today:

* Borrowing from the future: About one-third of workers (35%) have, at some point, taken hardship withdrawals or loans from retirement accounts. Rates are highest in financial services & insurance (44%) and manufacturing (41%), and lowest among government workers (23%).

* Reduced retirement contributions: Thirty percent of workers say they have cut back retirement savings, rising to 36% among high-income workers.

* Major life purchases delayed: Three-quarters of workers (73%) have postponed buying a home or car, with millennials most affected (82%). Delayed purchases are highest in manufacturing (79%) and lowest among government workers (69%).

* Healthcare and family decisions deferred: Forty-three percent of workers say they have delayed or skipped medical care to avoid costs -- rising to 51% in manufacturing and financial services -- while one in four (25%) have postponed having children.

"The data in this report should give every employer pause. When workers feel financially insecure, they delay retirement, and that has real costs - both administrative and financial - for organizations carrying expensive, experienced employees who are ready to move on but don't believe they can afford to," said Brendan McCarthy, head of Nuveen Retirement Investing. "Employers have more power to change that than they might realise. At a time when employees are craving stability and certainty, employers can stand out as an employer of choice by delivering a more modern approach to benefits that can help employees navigate key life milestones with more confidence."
 
more
1   
  • Barbara, take a look at your social media accounts, like Facebook. Make sure your posts are "business like" or "family oriented." No low-top pictures,... no silly poses, etc. People WILL look before hiring, so your posts need to be in line with the image the company wants to project.  more

  • Do not put all your eggs in one basket. Apply for 10 jobs at a time, you'll probably get 4-5 interviews invitations. When attending interviews, do not... sound desperate. Just say you are very keen as you like the copany (and if you don't, do not accept the offer as you'll be jumping out of the frying pan into another fire). BUT make sure you tell them you have other interviews lined up and make it sound like you are in demand. I always had 5 interviews in hand and I was never desperate. Usually when I walk into an office, they won't let me out. Instead, they tell me to sit down and start work - immediately. BTW, NEVER mention you had or have any personal problems. Employers will select the one who is happy, smiley and has no problems. GOOD LUCK. more

Empower Your Future: Transformative Lessons from Career Development Conferences - Oconall Street


In the contemporary professional landscape, career development conferences play a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of individuals' careers. These events are not just about networking; they are a cradle of innovation, learning, and personal growth. Attendees leave with a wealth of knowledge, actionable insights, and a renewed sense of purpose. The transformative power of these conferences... lies in their ability to provide both strategic and tactical guidance, tailored to a myriad of industries and roles. As the future of work continues to evolve, understanding and leveraging these opportunities becomes increasingly crucial.

Key Takeaways from Career Development Conferences

Career development conferences offer a multitude of lessons that can significantly impact one's professional journey. These include:

* Networking Opportunities: Engaging with industry leaders and peers can open doors to new opportunities and collaborations. Developing a robust professional network is essential for career advancement.

* Industry Insights: Conferences provide a platform to gain insight into industry trends and future directions. This knowledge can inform career decisions and strategic planning.

* Skill Enhancement: Workshops and sessions often focus on skill development, helping attendees to refine existing skills and acquire new ones. Explore advanced guides and tips.

Strategic Career Planning

Strategic career planning is a key theme in many conferences, emphasizing the importance of setting clear career goals and developing a roadmap to achieve them. This involves:

Understanding Market Needs

Aligning personal skills and aspirations with market needs is crucial. Conferences often highlight emerging job roles and industries, providing a blueprint for future-ready career paths. Find out more about this approach.

Personal Brand Development

Establishing a personal brand is increasingly important in the digital age. Conferences offer insights into building a compelling personal narrative that resonates with potential employers and clients. Discover expert strategies here.

Innovative Learning Methods

The evolution of learning methods is a focal point at career development conferences. Participants are exposed to:

* Interactive Workshops: Hands-on sessions that allow practitioners to apply concepts in real-time, enhancing retention and understanding.

* Panel Discussions: Diverse perspectives on industry challenges and opportunities, fostering a deeper understanding of complex topics.

* Case Studies: Real-world examples that illustrate successful strategies and solutions. Learn about our tailored solutions.

Conclusion

Attending career development conferences is an investment in one's professional future. These events offer invaluable insights, skills, and connections that can catalyze personal and organizational growth. As the workforce continues to navigate rapid changes, staying informed and adaptable is imperative. Embrace the transformative power of career development conferences to unlock new possibilities and empower your career trajectory. For more comprehensive resources and guidance, explore advanced guides and tips.

Share this post: on Twitter on Facebook
 
more
3   
  • The problem originated from ypur advert and shortlisting. If properly done theres no way the two would have appeared to be interviewed. It means you... didnt know what you wanted more

  • There are advantages and disadvantages to both. The experienced person is going to take a shorter time to onboard and get up to speed (pro) BUT may... not have the experience on newer technology or may bring baggage(e.g. unwillingness to share work or teach others), which could potentially impact delivery (con). The younger person will bring a fresh eagerness (pro) but will take a minimum of 3 months to get up to speed(con). This means someone will need to spend that time handholding and ensuring errors are spotted, which could be expensive if human resources are thin. Ultimately, it is the boss's choice, and you may need to wrap your head around that reality. Your views on the matter become irrelevant when the directors are the decision makers. Additionally, if they do bring on the more experienced person, you could very well earn a thing or two from him. Never underestimate the value of experience over eagerness. more

    1

Out: Résumés: In: Weeklong in-office trials.


Business Insider tells the global tech, finance, stock market, media, economy, lifestyle, real estate, AI and innovative stories you want to know.

When Ellis Neder interviewed for a job as head of design at Foxglove three years ago, a platform for robotics developers, he was asked to come in for a few days to work. He was hesitant to invest the time, but took some days off and... flew to Foxglove's San Francisco offices to work over a long weekend.

Neder tells me he loved it. The work trial, which involved fixing a user experience issue within Foxglove's app, let him see up close the pace at which the team moved, how the startup's leadership team functioned, and the bigger problems he would tackle upon joining.Now he oversees work trials for other prospective employees at Foxglove, as the company uses them for every role. People ask him, "Can I use AI during my work trial?" Neder answers, "We expect you to use AI, and we will give you whatever AI tools you want." It's not just about evaluating a candidate's competency. "We want them to see what it's like to really work with us."Last month, I wrote that the age of AI, the résumé has lost its cachet. Online job portals are launching them into the void. Instead of relying on your past experience, recruiters are more actively sourcing candidates on LinkedIn, relying on referrals, and putting job seekers through work trials, job simulations, or picking people based on personality traits.Welcome to the show your work era of job hunting. It's not enough to ace an interview and list your GPA and previous employers -- job seekers need to demonstrate those skills and aptitudes live. AI lets everyone talk; your next boss wants to be sure you can walk. Just as college professors have pivoted back to in-person Blue Book exams and middle school math teachers require equations written out step-by-step, hiring managers are looking for workers who can back up what they say they know. The job interview has always been a sort of audition; now companies are increasingly looking for people who can get on the proverbial stage and perform -- not just to prove that they're real in a world of generative AI fakes and frauds, but also to show that they can use AI.AI is "changing not just how we get the job, but what we do in the job and what's expected of us in the job as well," says Patrick McCue, senior vice president at talent management firm Right Management. Companies want workers who combine hard and soft skills, like vibe coding marketing managers. People who can add AI skills to their portfolio and show how they would use them are increasingly valuable. "The future job market is going to definitely benefit the bold -- people who are willing to put themselves out there with just a little bit of knowledge and understanding, knowing that they will be able to fulfill whatever it is they're asked to do."During the 2000s, employers added degree requirements to jobs that had previously been open to those without college degrees, like managers, administrative assistants, sales representatives, and IT workers. But between 2017 and 2019, when companies struggled to fill managerial and IT roles in particular, companies dropped degree requirements by 46% for middle-skill positions, and by nearly a third for high-skill ones, according to research published by Harvard Business Review in 2022. Companies like Google and IBM hopped on the trend. Some positions in healthcare followed suit in 2020, as the pressure to hire workers during the Covid-19 pandemic hit. Skills-based hiring, which emphasizes assessments over credentials, started to rise.Now, as the job market tightened and companies have shed the employees they overhired during the 2010s tech boom, employers are even hungrier for skills. The hype around generative AI and Silicon Valley's promises of a new era of productivity have amplified the drive to hire the most effective people. The number of job postings requiring AI skills has quadrupled, from about 50,000 in March 2024 to nearly 200,000 last month, according to an analysis from the Brookings Institution. A 2025 survey from the National Association of Colleges and Employers found that the proportion of employers who say they're using skills-based hiring increased from 65% to 70% from 2024 to 2025. More than 60% of 3,500 business leaders surveyed in late 2025 by payment intelligence firm Payscale said they had updated the expectations of existing roles to include AI usage -- at both tech and non-tech jobs.And just as candidates need to show more of their work to get hired, they need to show more skills to stay employed. Revenue per employee metrics are back -- Meta's revenue per employee has jumped as the company implemented layoffs and adopted AI over the past three years, now averaging more than $2.5 million per worker. Big Tech companies are tracking how workers use AI and adding AI competency to performance reviews, trying to crystalize the murky relationship between the technology and productivity gains. The shift towards skills "opens the door for a lot of people that may not have opportunities," says Rick Smith, a professor at Johns Hopkins University who also directs the Human Capital Development Lab. "It then creates a challenge for employers with, OK, how do you measure these skills and competencies?"Startups are racing to build the new interview standard. There's Rounds, a work simulator that gives candidates tests ranging from 30 to 90 minutes for roles like software engineering, design, social media marketing, in content, and for product and technical leaders. The company uses an AI agent named Sophia, who takes job candidates through an interview process that includes technical simulations and questions. AI use is not just allowed, but part of the evaluation. "Every enterprise wants to build AI native teams, and consequently, they have to change their hiring process to test for how well people work with AI," says Fardeen Khimani, CEO of Rounds.Live tests and work trials are appealing because they take away the questions of whether someone cheated by overrelying on AI. Foxglove tells me they have extended offers to eight of the 13 people who completed them in the last 90 days. This isn't just for jobs like software engineering, which saw its industry standard technical interviews upended by AI early on. Michelle Volberg, founder and CEO of recruiting software company Twill, tells me that she has seen processes where candidates for finance jobs are asked to decipher spreadsheets during interviews. "Every single function you can think of, there is some sort of live component to it," she says.But even work trials and simulations might fail to capture the highly sought after trait bosses are seeking: adaptability. "Work is changing so quickly, because of AI, that job descriptions will be varying," McCue says. Some employers are looking not just at skills-mapping, but capability-mapping, he says, or seeking soft skills that correlate to success on the job. Davide Grieco, head of growth at software company Clay, tells me that his new team doesn't come from Big Tech companies or with years of marketing experience. Instead, he selected for personality traits he thought would equip workers for success: obsession, creativity, and the ability to multitask, putting those traits above more traditional qualifications. He hired a top NCAA artistic swimmer; someone who had juggled gigs across a nonprofit and a floral business; and an applicant who joined a livestream Grieco hosted and started participating. Work experience didn't matter, adaptability did. "The problem is everything changes so fast," Grieco says. "Knowing how to do something today doesn't mean that you know how to do something in six months."Volberg has seen the uptick in demand for former athletes, too. "The majority of people that we work with would much rather hire somebody with no experience or like one to two years of experience that played on a sports team or did something competitively in a field that they have some level of interest in." She says AI and vibe coding are fueling the trend that values personality traits over white-collar experience. The question is no longer: "How am I going to make this person more efficient?" she says. Instead, they think: "I'm going to hire this person to make the team more efficient."At small companies, the work trial is critical to assess dollars spent on a small batch of hires. Peter Grafe, cofounder of AI marketing platform BlueAlpha, says he has used work trials to find about half of his 12-person team. The company will bring candidates in for several days, and pay them $2,000 or cover their travel expenses to San Francisco. "Everyone can code something within 48 hours," Grafe says. "But what we want to understand is how do you think, how critically do you assess things, and then are you using AI tools to make yourself 10X faster?"Results are outweighing credentials and prestige. Jake Ward, cofounder of internet search agency Contact, posted a link to an application portal on LinkedIn. "I don't care about your CV or what degree you have. Just what you've created, written, launched, or the results you've driven," his post read. Days later, Ward told me the firm had received more than 1,000 applicants for six open roles -- a large pool for the small company. The portal asks just for name, email, role they're interested in, years of experience, and then an open-ended response about two or three projects the applicant is proud of. "All we really care about is results -- results for our clients, results for our users, results for our product, and a CV doesn't tell you that, their past experience does," Ward says. "I would love to see the thing that broke and how you thought about that thing and how you got it back to where it needs to be."For larger companies, sorting droves of applicants by degrees is much easier than skills-based hiring, Moe Hutt, director of strategic consulting services at recruitment advertising agency HireClix, tells me. When inundated with applications, they're still putting candidates to a test, but that's often because they're trying to evaluate whether a person and their qualifications are real in an age of AI, rather than put their aptitude above their past experience. "The knee-jerk reaction is to put something in front of them: a test," Hutt says. "Companies are able to do this right now because it is an employer market." If the market shifts, employers may change their demands on candidates. But it's likely that the change in showing, not just telling, that you're the best fit for a job sticks.Amanda Hoover is a senior correspondent at Business Insider covering the tech industry. She writes about the biggest tech companies and trends.

Hiring Generative AI

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Eagle River business prepares Easter-themed charcuterie boardsAlaska Berry and Board features chocolate-covered strawberries, bunny skewers for spring season

Read more "

Texans business: Mike Tomon on Toro District, 'productive conversations' on NRG Stadium, potential international gameTexans team president Mike Tomon discusses Toro District, NRG Stadium lease negotiations, potential international game this year

Read more "

Inside the Multibillion-Dollar Business of Child InfluencersIn her book 'Like, Follow, Subscribe: Influencer Kids and the Cost of a Childhood Online' journalist Fortesa Latifi gets deep into the booming industry.

Read more "

Michael Saylor hints at next Strategy Bitcoin buy after weeklong pauseThe most recent news about crypto industry at Cointelegraph. Latest news about bitcoin, ethereum, blockchain, mining, cryptocurrency prices and more

Read more "

Street sweeping resumes across Philadelphia as seasonal cleanup program beginsStreet sweeping machines returned to neighborhoods across Philadelphia on Monday as the city launched its seasonal mechanical street cleaning program.

Read more "

Trump administration resumes ferry funding program critical for Alaska Marine Highway SystemThe Alaska transportation department is relying on nearly $78 million in federal funding from the program for state ferries.

Read more "
 
more

Salvador and the Human Side of More Than 100 Job Openings in Nazaré


salvador is preparing for a day when a school corridor in Nazaré will carry more than class schedules and foot traffic. On Wednesday, a fair of employability and entrepreneurship will bring more than 100 job and internship opportunities to the neighborhood, alongside free services that reach beyond work and into daily life.

What will happen in Nazaré on Wednesday ?

The event will run from 8: 30... a. m. to 3 p. m. at Grau Educacional, Fonte Nova unit, in Nazaré. It is part of another edition of the Feira de Empregabilidade e Empreendedorismo organized by Grau Educacional. The openings span sectors such as telemarketing, administration, logistics, construction, and information technology, giving the day a practical focus for people looking for work or a first step into the labor market.

Participation is open to interested people aged 16 and older. To join the selection processes, they should arrive with personal documents and a résumé, either printed or in digital form. The organization will distribute service tickets throughout the day to help keep the selection flow orderly.

Why does this fair matter beyond the vacancies?

The event reflects a wider need in salvador: access to entry points that are close to everyday life and not limited to a single type of worker. A fair with more than 100 opportunities can matter differently to someone seeking a first internship, a person changing fields, or a resident trying to reconnect with formal employment after time away from it. In a city where job seeking can be shaped by timing, transport, and access to information, a local event lowers some of those barriers for one day.

It also places job searching beside services that support the rest of a person's routine. The fair will offer massotherapy, nutrition guidance, oral hygiene advice, eye care, financial orientation, beauty consulting, professional training, and other activities tied to well-being and personal development. That mix turns the event into more than a hiring line; it becomes a place where work, health, and confidence are treated as connected needs.

Which services will be offered for free?

Free services will be available throughout the day for the public. These include massotherapy, consultation with a nutritionist, guidance on good oral hygiene practices, eye care, financial orientation, beauty consulting, and professional training. The structure suggests an effort to welcome people who may come for a vacancy but leave with something else useful for their daily lives.

For many visitors, the practical value may be immediate. A person who comes in search of an interview may also receive advice that helps with job readiness, health concerns, or budget decisions. In that way, the fair is built around the full experience of trying to move forward, not just the final step of handing in a résumé.

Who is taking part in the selection process?

Several partner institutions will be present, including SIMM, CIEE, IEL, and Isbet, along with recruitment agencies such as Grow RH and Habilita RH. Their presence broadens the range of opportunities available on site and gives the fair a multi-institution shape rather than a single-employer format.

The organizers have set the event up to handle movement across the day, which matters when a public selection process brings together candidates, service stations, and health support. For families, students, and adults seeking alternatives, the fair offers a concentrated window of access in one neighborhood, on one day, with one clear purpose: open doors.

For salvador, the scene in Nazaré may feel ordinary by the end of the day, with people leaving carrying papers, advice, or an appointment made for later. But that ordinary movement is the point. A line at the door, a résumé in hand, and a free consultation next to the interview desk can turn a Wednesday into a first attempt at something larger.
 
more

The End of Resumes: Why Work Trials Are the New Hiring Standard - Newsy Today


When Ellis Neder interviewed for the role of head of design at Foxglove, a platform for robotics developers, he wasn't asked to provide a polished portfolio or a list of accolades. Instead, he was asked to show up and actually do the job. He flew to San Francisco for a long weekend, spent several days in the office, and worked through a real-world user experience issue within the company's app. It... was a trial by fire -- and Neder loved it.

Today, Neder oversees these work trials for every single role at Foxglove. When candidates ask if they can use AI during the process, his answer is a definitive yes: "We expect you to use AI, and we will give you whatever AI tools you seek." For Foxglove, the trial isn't just a competency test; it is a window into the company's actual pace and a way to ensure a candidate can "walk" in an era where generative AI allows almost anyone to "talk."

The death of the paper trail

The traditional résumé is losing its cachet. In a landscape flooded with AI-generated "slop," hiring managers are increasingly viewing online portals as voids. The result is a pivot toward a "show your work" era of job hunting. It is no longer enough to list a GPA or a former employer; candidates are being asked to perform live, much like a musician's audition or a student's in-person exam.

This shift is driven by a fundamental distrust of static credentials. AI has made it possible to fabricate expertise or polish a CV to perfection, but it cannot simulate the ability to solve a problem in real-time under the gaze of a team. This is why companies are turning to work simulators -- such as Rounds, which uses an AI agent named Sophia to lead candidates through technical simulations -- or asking finance applicants to decipher complex spreadsheets on the spot.

The data suggests this is more than a startup trend. According to an analysis from the Brookings Institution, job postings requiring AI skills quadrupled from roughly 50,000 in March 2024 to nearly 200,000 recently. A 2025 survey from the National Association of Colleges and Employers found that the proportion of employers using skills-based hiring rose to 70%.

The adaptability premium

Beyond hard technical skills, there is a growing obsession with "capability-mapping" -- the search for traits that correlate with success in a volatile environment. Some leaders are now prioritizing personality over prestige. Davide Grieco, head of growth at Clay, has built a team not from Huge Tech veterans, but from people demonstrating "obsession, creativity, and the ability to multitask." His hires include a top NCAA artistic swimmer and an applicant who simply joined his livestream and started participating.

This trend toward "vibe coding" and adaptability is echoed by recruiting experts like Michelle Volberg of Twill, who notes a surge in demand for former athletes. The logic is simple: in a world where AI changes the nature of a job every six months, knowing how to do a specific task today is less valuable than the innate ability to learn and pivot tomorrow.

For minor firms, this approach is a risk-mitigation strategy. Peter Grafe, cofounder of BlueAlpha, pays candidates $2,000 or covers their travel to San Francisco for multi-day trials. "Everyone can code something within 48 hours," Grafe says. The goal is to see how a candidate thinks and whether they can use AI to become "10X faster."

Efficiency as the new benchmark

The pressure to prove value doesn't end at the hiring stage; it has moved into performance reviews. Big Tech companies are now tracking exactly how employees use AI to justify productivity gains. Meta provides a stark example: after implementing layoffs and adopting AI over the last three years, the company's revenue per employee has jumped to an average of more than $2.5 million per worker.

However, a tension remains between the agility of startups and the inertia of large corporations. For massive firms, sorting thousands of applicants by degree is simply easier than conducting individual skills assessments. Moe Hutt of HireClix notes that while large companies are adding tests to their process, it is often a "knee-jerk reaction" to verify that a candidate is real, rather than a genuine attempt to prioritize aptitude over experience.

Despite this, the trajectory is clear. Whether it is through an application portal that ignores CVs entirely -- like the one used by Jake Ward of Contact -- or a week-long in-office trial, the burden of proof has shifted. The modern candidate is no longer asked to tell the employer what they can do; they are expected to do it.

How is AI actually changing the interview process?

AI is acting as both the disruptor and the tool. Because it can automate the creation of resumes and cover letters, employers are moving toward live simulations and "work trials" to verify authenticity. Simultaneously, AI is being integrated into the evaluation itself; companies now expect candidates to use AI tools to solve problems faster, treating AI competency as a core requirement rather than a bonus.

Why are companies hiring former athletes or people from non-traditional backgrounds?

Employers are increasingly valuing "adaptability" over specific white-collar experience. Because AI evolves so rapidly, specific technical knowledge can become obsolete quickly. Traits associated with competitive athletics -- such as discipline, obsession, and the ability to perform under pressure -- are seen as better indicators of a candidate's ability to thrive in a rapidly changing workplace.

What does "revenue per employee" have to do with AI hiring?

It serves as a metric for AI's impact on productivity. Companies like Meta are using this figure to demonstrate that a smaller, AI-empowered workforce can generate more value than a larger, traditional one. This creates a higher bar for new hires, who must now prove they can integrate AI into their workflow to maintain or increase these efficiency levels.

Will the traditional resume disappear entirely?

While unlikely to vanish completely -- especially in large corporations where it remains a convenient sorting tool -- the resume is losing its status as a primary validator of talent. The market is shifting toward a model where results, launched projects, and live demonstrations of skill carry more weight than a list of previous employers or degrees.

As the barrier between "talking" and "doing" continues to shrink, are you prepared to audition for your next job?
 
more
1   
  • Someone once said charity begins at home
    Treat all members the way u want them to treat you and remember this world is round the person you treat... badly today may be your boss at one point more

  • They can't push you to be rude, that is a choice you make. Perhaps you should criticize them for their behavior.

    2

AI job hunters show why compute needs to be on-chain


An open-source AI job hunter built on Claude Code just auto-applied to hundreds of roles and actually landed a job, exposing why the real bottleneck is on-chain compute, not résumés.

A viral clip shared by 0xMarioNawfal claims that "SOMEONE BUILT AN AI JOB SEARCH SYSTEM FOR CLAUDE CODE THAT SENT 700+ APPLICATIONS AND ACTUALLY GOT HIM HIRED," and that "THE JOB HUNT JUST GOT AUTOMATED."

The system... in question, an open-source project called Career-Ops, is billed on GitHub as an "AI-powered job search system built on Claude Code" with 14 skill modes, a Go dashboard, PDF generation and batch processing, effectively turning the job hunt into an automated pipeline. A LinkedIn post summarizing the tool says it "scans multiple company career pages, rewrites your CV per job, and even fills application forms," targeting firms like Anthropic, OpenAI and Stripe across 45-plus pre-configured employers.

Reaction on X underscores how fast AI agents are colonizing hiring. One user, Ofek Shaked, calls it "the future of job hunting," adding that a simpler version "landed me 3 interviews" in a month. Another, Eugene Smarts, notes "that's wild, imagine how much time that saves, job hunting is the worst," while EchoWireDai warns that "If everyone automates applications... recruiters will just automate rejections." Others highlight the quality constraint: investor Balvinder Kalon writes that "the real flex is getting the context right per company," arguing that agents that "tailor each application to the job description, not just spray and pray" will be the ones that matter. Tools like Plushly, promoted in the same thread as a way to "auto apply to internships & jobs while you sleep," show how quickly similar services are proliferating.

As systems like Career-Ops scale, their bottleneck is not résumés; it is compute. The GitHub repo describes an architecture that continuously scans job portals, runs multi-step Claude Code prompts, generates ATS-optimized PDFs via Playwright, and monitors everything from a terminal dashboard, turning each job search into thousands of model calls and browser automations. According to Bloomberg, AI has already become "unavoidable on both sides of hiring," with most résumés never reaching a human and interviews increasingly led by bots, a shift workforce experts say forces applicants to "learn how to navigate a job market reshaped by it." In another explainer on the "new rules of finding a job in 2026," Bloomberg warns that mass-applying with generic AI hurts candidates, but using AI well can help them strategically target roles and refine materials, exactly the niche Career-Ops tries to occupy.

That compute demand is already visible in crypto markets. An MEXC research note on AI tokens highlights how Bittensor (TAO), Render (RENDER) and the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance's FET token have led recent rallies, with TAO up nearly 35% in a week and Render and FET gaining roughly 25-32%, as traders bet on "agentic AI systems, autonomous software capable of performing tasks without human input." These networks explicitly sell tokenized access to GPU and machine-learning resources: Render routes GPU rendering jobs across a decentralized network of providers, while Bittensor's design, as CCN explains, aims to reward participants who supply and route high-quality machine-learning models, with price forecasts suggesting TAO could trade between $748 and $2,750 in long-term scenarios. As job-hunting agents evolve from scraping and form-filling to full-stack career copilots, routing their ever-growing computational load through tokenized compute layers becomes a rational way to meter, price and trade that performance rather than leaving it buried inside closed platforms.

The cultural flip is not lost on users. Commenter Gagan Arora notes that "We went from 'AI will take your job' to 'AI will find your next job' in about 6 months," calling it "the irony" that the tool workers feared is now "the best tool for getting hired." Bloomberg's coverage of AI-led interviews points in the same direction: a study summarized by the outlet found that AI interviewers, randomly assigned to 67,000 job seekers, could outperform human recruiters in surfacing strong candidates, raising questions about where humans still add value in the funnel. For now, Wall Street expects AI adoption to increase hiring rather than crush it, with a Bloomberg Intelligence survey cited by Bloomberg News indicating that roughly two-thirds of financial firms foresee staff numbers rising initially as they roll out AI.

For crypto, the signal is simple: if agents are going to swarm both sides of the labor market, the underlying compute will become an asset in its own right. In a previous crypto.news story on AI tokens, analysts argued that projects like Bittensor and Render sit "at the center of the AI infrastructure narrative," capturing value as demand for model inference and GPU cycles grows. Another crypto.news story on agentic AI in DeFi predicted that autonomous agents would eventually need on-chain reputations, budgets and compute allowances, paid in liquid tokens that track underlying GPU or model performance rather than abstract governance rights. The Claude-powered job hunter that just landed its creator a new role is a glimpse of that future: an early, messy, very human example of why the next phase of job hunting may run not just on prompts and PDFs, but on tokenized computational performance that turns raw AI horsepower into a tradable, programmable resource.
 
more

The Truth About Today's Job Market


This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at UCF chapter and does not reflect the views of Her Campus.

After four long years of classes, extracurriculars, internships, volunteer opportunities, jobs, and professional publications, I'm finally graduating with my bachelor's degree this May. Yay! However, as I prepare for postgrad life, a seemingly unconquerable feat lingers in... my mind: navigating the job market.

While I haven't turned the tassel just yet, I began applying to job postings a month ago. I've submitted upwards of 30 applications, and while that number isn't staggering, it's a steep figure for someone who's still taking classes full-time and engrossing herself in career-building opportunities. I've only received responses from a handful of companies, all of them rejections (and some of them were unnecessarily pointed).

It's hard to admit that my job search is impacting my mental health as much as it is. I believe myself to be a driven and qualified worker, so getting turned down for entry-level work as a postgrad with relevant experience definitely stings. However, I'm not the only one struggling with job hunting.

The New York Times reports that, at the end of 2025, the unemployment rate for college graduates between 22 and 27 rose to 5.6%. 40% of college graduates with jobs could have gotten their positions without a college degree, which is the highest percentage in six years. While college graduates still have better luck finding jobs than non-college graduates, Gen-Z applicants are facing one of the roughest job markets in years. Why is the job market so difficult to maneuver? What makes this market worse than those from years' past?

A phrase that's been circling the world of economics is "low-hire, low-fire" hiring, which, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, means that "firms have substantially reduced the number of workers they are actively hiring while also reducing the number of workers they are firing."

In keeping teams contained, employers publish fewer job postings, perform fewer interviews, and attend fewer job fairs, which postgrads rely on for networking opportunities. The chances of a recent graduate getting hired at a low-hire, low-fire company are slim, as each job posting brings monumental competition and a lack of inclusivity for entry-level applicants. For companies with such restricted workforces, hiring teams gravitate towards people with several years of experience and success, instead of those looking to achieve such.

There's also the impact of AI on job hunting. In industries like customer service and software engineering, applicants between 22 and 25 are facing close to a 20% decline in finding jobs due to AI capabilities. Employers are also implementing AI in determining candidates for interviews; by putting resumes into an AI scanner, employers can filter through applications based on specific keywords or skills. While this can streamline the hiring process, it strips the personalization from applicants and can potentially lead to important contributions or experiences being dismissed.

And then, there are the AI interviewers, who interview potential candidates in the place of recruiters or company representatives. For job hunters, interviewing for a program instead of living, breathing people can be downright frustrating, especially considering the difficulty of getting an interview in the first place.

Recent years of job hunting have also brought an increase in ghosting from employers, something unfortunately relevant to my own job search. The Atlantic states that almost two out of three candidates have been ghosted for an interview at some point in their job search, and there's no sign of stopping. Josh Millet, CEO of the hiring website Criteria, tells Yahoo! Finance that recruiters are "seeing a surge in application volume, largely fueled by AI tools" and "hiring teams are spending more time reviewing applications, but getting less meaningful signals from each one." Under Millet's reasoning, ghosting serves as a reciprocation of lacking energy or passion that applicants first display, which leads to a never-ending cycle of applications and absences of responses.

So what hope can be salvaged from the job market right now? For me, the most foundational motivation is that everything will work out in time. Most days, it's hard to open LinkedIn and apply for jobs that I will most likely not hear back from, but something will work out. Considering how many people are also struggling with the same issue, it's soothing to know that my lack of fruitfulness in job searching is not a personal attack. The job market is rough right now, but that doesn't mean it will always be.
 
more

Calculating your career ROI: When education pays


Professional advancement is increasingly shaped by decisions around education. Qualifications signal capability, open doors and promise career progression, yet their value is often assessed...

Professional advancement is increasingly shaped by decisions around education. Qualifications signal capability, open doors and promise career progression, yet their value is often assessed too narrowly.... Beyond remuneration, education carries costs and returns that unfold over time, influencing professional mobility, access to leadership, and long-term relevance. This article by Regent Business School Academic, Ravin Baburam examines career return on investment through a broader, more considered lens, exploring how study choices can either accelerate professional momentum or constrain it.

In recent years, the business world has developed a noticeable tendency towards the accumulation of academic qualifications. Employees increasingly seek additional certifications and credentials to strengthen their résumés and broaden their skill sets. The result is a more competitive marketplace, shaped by the growing volume of qualifications pursued in the hope of career advancement and skills development, encompassing both technical and soft skills.

This raises an important question about the real return on investment (ROI) that graduates derive from their studies. While salary progression is often regarded as the primary indicator of ROI, it represents only one dimension of value. ROI can also be understood through non-monetary considerations, including time investment, opportunity cost, professional mobility, access to leadership pathways and long-term relevance within an evolving labour market.

When time becomes the hidden cost of education

As industries evolve at speed, the duration required to complete a qualification may become a barrier for new entrants seeking to establish themselves and secure a foothold in the marketplace. This challenge applies equally to experienced professionals aiming to reposition or redirect their careers.

Programmers, for example, may choose to explore new terrain by completing short courses in a new programming language rather than committing to a three-year bachelor's degree. This approach allows them to enter the field sooner, gain practical experience and study in manageable segments. Conversely, others may favour a full bachelor's degree, viewing it as a more comprehensive pathway that develops broader competencies.

This route is often regarded as better preparation for functioning effectively in complex organisational environments, particularly within large, global corporations where a three-year degree remains a prerequisite for employment.

Different qualifications, different career leverage

The cost of pursuing any qualification extends beyond financial considerations. Time and cognitive capacity are finite, and most individuals can realistically focus on only one programme at a time if it is to be completed successfully. Selecting one qualification therefore involves forgoing others.

For this reason, prospective students must carefully evaluate their study options and make informed decisions aligned to their personal circumstances, professional goals and future priorities. Another influential factor lies in access to leadership competencies, which are often embedded within graduate attributes developed by institutions such as business schools through carefully designed teaching and learning outcomes.

There are many considerations when selecting a qualification, but one of the most significant is the individual's current position relative to where they aspire to be. A recent matriculant may consider a bachelor's degree, diploma or higher certificate as an entry point. Those who have already completed undergraduate study may opt for postgraduate education to deepen expertise or enhance strategic capability.

Each qualification offers distinct benefits, and these must be weighed against constraints such as time, cost and effort. While it is well established that graduates in South Africa earn, on average, significantly more than non-graduates, it remains important to examine the different qualification pathways and the varied forms of career progression they enable.

From credentials to leadership capital

A more prestigious qualification, such as a Master of Business Administration (MBA), can open access to senior leadership opportunities. Many MBA graduates report advancing into management or executive roles within a relatively short period after completing their studies. One contributing factor may be the MBA's integrated curriculum, which emphasises the application and synthesis of business and commercial knowledge, strengthening advanced leadership, problem-solving and critical thinking capabilities.

The Doctor of Business Administration (DBA), by contrast, is designed to cultivate deep research expertise and advanced strategic thinking. Holding a doctoral qualification can confer credibility and influence within both corporate and academic environments, alongside the professional standing associated with the doctoral title.

International mobility also warrants consideration when assessing educational ROI. Certain qualifications, particularly the MBA, enjoy strong global recognition. This recognition can enable graduates to pursue international career opportunities and relocate in search of broader professional exposure and financial reward.

Longevity remains one of the most critical ROI considerations. Prospective students should reflect on how relevant their chosen qualification, and the associated knowledge and skills, are likely to remain within their industry. Ideally, a qualification should provide a robust foundation that supports ongoing development and sustained competitiveness.

The questions every strategic student should ask

Before applying, students would benefit from reflecting on several key questions. Foremost among these is how the qualification will challenge and develop them, both personally and professionally.

They should also consider what problems the qualification is intended to solve. Will it support career advancement, enhance professional credibility, fulfil compliance requirements, or enable reinvention?

Equally important is the broader cost of study in terms of time, stress, energy and potential impacts on work performance. Personal and family sacrifices during the period of study must also be taken into account. Timing therefore plays a critical role, particularly when considered alongside life stage, professional responsibilities and personal commitments.

Students should also determine how they will define success upon completion. For some, success may be passing all modules at the first attempt. For others, it may involve graduating with distinction or completing the programme within a specific timeframe.

Choosing education that sustains career momentum

While tertiary education can significantly accelerate career progression, prospective students must assess their current circumstances alongside their long-term aspirations when selecting a qualification. The right qualification, chosen at the right time, can act as a powerful lever for advancement. Conversely, a poorly aligned choice may quietly undermine momentum and motivation.

Ultimately, students must conduct thorough research into the wide range of tertiary qualifications available and make considered, well-informed decisions about their educational pathways.

by Ravin Baburam (Academic at Regent Business School)
 
more

Inside Apex Standard: The Quiet Push to Build a Universal Credentialing Framework for AI Professionals


A new organization called Apex Standard has emerged with an ambitious goal: to define what it actually means to be qualified in artificial intelligence. Not qualified in the informal, LinkedIn-badge sense. Qualified in the way a CPA is qualified to audit books or a PE is qualified to stamp engineering drawings. The kind of qualification that carries weight in boardrooms, courtrooms, and regulatory... proceedings.

The effort, still in its early stages, arrives at a moment when the AI industry is grappling with a credibility problem it didn't anticipate. Companies are hiring AI talent at breakneck speed, but there's no standardized way to verify whether a candidate -- or a consultant, or an entire vendor team -- actually possesses the competencies they claim. Résumés list frameworks and tools. Certifications from cloud providers test product-specific knowledge. But nothing approximates the kind of profession-wide credentialing that exists in medicine, law, accounting, or engineering.

That's the gap Apex Standard is trying to fill.

According to its website, the organization positions itself as a professional credentialing body focused on establishing recognized standards for AI practitioners. The language is careful, institutional, and deliberately modeled after legacy professional bodies. It speaks of competency frameworks, ethical guidelines, continuing education requirements, and tiered certification levels -- the architectural bones of any serious credentialing system.

The timing is not accidental. Governments worldwide are accelerating AI regulation. The European Union's AI Act, which entered into force in August 2024, imposes obligations on providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems that implicitly demand demonstrable competence. In the United States, the Biden administration's October 2023 executive order on AI safety called for workforce development standards, and multiple federal agencies have since begun exploring what qualified AI oversight looks like in practice. The question of who is competent to build, deploy, audit, and govern AI systems is no longer theoretical.

And yet the AI profession -- if it can even be called that in a formal sense -- has no answer.

Consider the contrast with software engineering more broadly. While software engineers don't face universal licensing requirements, the field has well-established credentialing pathways through organizations like IEEE and ACM, along with certifications such as the Certified Software Development Professional designation. AI, despite its higher stakes and greater public scrutiny, has nothing comparable. The closest equivalents are vendor certifications from Google, AWS, Microsoft, and others, which test knowledge of specific platforms rather than foundational competence in AI design, safety, fairness, or governance.

This is where Apex Standard appears to be making its bet. The organization's framework, as described on its site, encompasses technical proficiency, ethical reasoning, regulatory awareness, and practical application -- a multidimensional model that goes well beyond what any single vendor certification covers. It's structured to be platform-agnostic and principle-driven, which would make it more analogous to a CFA charter or a board certification in medicine than to an AWS Solutions Architect badge.

Whether the market actually wants this is a different question entirely.

The AI industry has historically resisted formalization. Its culture is rooted in open-source collaboration, rapid iteration, and a meritocratic ethos where shipping code matters more than holding credentials. Many of the field's most influential figures -- from research scientists at DeepMind to startup founders in San Francisco -- would bristle at the suggestion that a credentialing body should gatekeep who gets to work in AI. The tension between professionalization and the hacker ethos is real, and it's not going away.

But the pressure is mounting from the other direction. Enterprise buyers are increasingly demanding proof of competence from AI vendors and consultants. Insurance companies are beginning to ask about the qualifications of teams building AI systems that make consequential decisions. And regulators, particularly in the EU, are writing rules that will effectively require organizations to demonstrate that their AI personnel meet certain competency thresholds. The market dynamics are shifting, even if the culture hasn't fully caught up.

Recent reporting underscores the urgency. A May 2025 analysis from Reuters noted that demand for AI governance professionals has surged more than 40% year-over-year, with employers struggling to evaluate candidates because no common standard exists for the role. Separately, the Financial Times has reported on growing frustration among corporate boards that they lack the tools to assess whether their AI teams are genuinely competent or simply well-credentialed in adjacent fields.

This is the environment Apex Standard is entering. Skeptics will note that the organization is new and unproven. Building a credentialing body that achieves real market recognition is extraordinarily difficult. It requires buy-in from employers, educational institutions, regulators, and practitioners simultaneously. The history of professional certification is littered with well-intentioned organizations that never achieved critical mass.

The successful ones share common traits. They establish rigorous, transparent standards developed with input from diverse stakeholders. They create examinations that genuinely test competence rather than rote memorization. They require continuing education to ensure credentials don't become stale. And critically, they achieve a tipping point where employers begin to prefer or require the credential, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of adoption.

Apex Standard's published framework touches on all of these elements, at least in outline form. The organization describes a tiered certification structure with escalating requirements, mandatory ethics components, and ongoing professional development obligations. It's a blueprint that mirrors the architecture of established credentialing bodies. The question is execution.

There's also the matter of legitimacy. In the credentialing world, legitimacy comes from accreditation -- typically from bodies like the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) or the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Without third-party accreditation, a credential is essentially a private-sector product, no matter how rigorous its standards. Whether Apex Standard intends to pursue formal accreditation isn't clear from its current public materials, but it would be a critical differentiator if the organization is serious about becoming the profession's standard-bearer.

The competitive field is not empty. Organizations like the International Association for Artificial Intelligence (IAAI), various university-backed certificate programs, and consulting firms offering proprietary AI maturity assessments all occupy adjacent territory. None has emerged as a definitive professional standard. The opportunity exists precisely because the space is fragmented.

So what would it take for something like Apex Standard to succeed? Three things, primarily.

First, employer adoption. If major enterprises -- the banks, insurers, healthcare systems, and government agencies deploying AI at scale -- begin to require or prefer Apex Standard credentials in hiring and procurement decisions, the credential gains gravity. Without employer demand, it remains a nice-to-have line item on a résumé.

Second, regulatory alignment. If the credential maps cleanly to emerging regulatory requirements -- particularly those in the EU AI Act and anticipated U.S. federal guidelines -- it becomes not just a signal of competence but a compliance tool. That's powerful. The CPA credential derives much of its market power from the fact that regulatory frameworks require CPAs for certain functions. An AI credential that serves a similar regulatory purpose would have a built-in demand floor.

Third, practitioner respect. The credential must be difficult enough to earn that holding it means something. If it's perceived as a rubber stamp or a cash grab -- and the credentialing industry has no shortage of those -- practitioners will ignore it, and employers will follow. The rigor of the assessment process is everything.

The broader context here is a profession in the midst of defining itself. AI practitioners today come from computer science, statistics, mathematics, engineering, linguistics, neuroscience, philosophy, and a dozen other disciplines. There is no common educational pathway, no shared body of knowledge that everyone in the field is expected to master, and no ethical code that carries professional consequences for violations. This is unusual for a field with as much societal impact as AI now has.

Medicine went through a similar professionalization process in the early twentieth century, catalyzed by the Flexner Report of 1910, which established standards for medical education and effectively created the modern medical profession. Accounting professionalized through the establishment of CPA requirements in the mid-twentieth century. Engineering licensing evolved over decades in response to public safety concerns. Each of these transitions was messy, contested, and ultimately driven by a combination of public demand, regulatory pressure, and professional self-interest.

AI may be approaching its own inflection point. The technology is now embedded in hiring decisions, medical diagnoses, criminal sentencing, financial underwriting, and national security operations. The people building and deploying these systems wield enormous influence over individual lives and societal outcomes. The argument that they should meet some demonstrable standard of competence and ethical awareness is becoming harder to dismiss.

Apex Standard is one early attempt to provide that standard. It may succeed. It may be overtaken by competitors or rendered irrelevant by regulatory developments that impose their own competency requirements directly. But the underlying need it's responding to -- the need for a credible, recognized, profession-wide credentialing framework for AI -- is real and growing.

For industry insiders watching this space, the key indicators to track are straightforward: Does the organization secure endorsements from major employers or industry associations? Does it pursue and obtain formal accreditation? Do regulatory bodies reference its framework in guidance documents or rulemaking? And do practitioners who hold the credential demonstrate measurably better outcomes than those who don't?

Those are the tests that matter. Everything else is marketing.

The AI profession is being built in real time, by thousands of decisions made by companies, governments, universities, and individual practitioners every day. Whether a single credentialing body can impose coherence on that process is an open question. But the attempt itself tells us something important about where the industry is headed: toward accountability, toward formalization, and -- slowly, unevenly, but unmistakably -- toward becoming a real profession.
 
more